The Donahue Syndrome
I know I should be pivoting, but it appears that the Bruin's lackluster performance against Rice this past Saturday inspired a bit of a debate.
There are those, including myself, who believe that UCLA has some serious issues that they need to deal with if they are going to have a truly great season. I'm not ready to "write off the season," as they say, but the sheen is certainly off the apple.
One of the most fun things about college football is the limitless possibilities. Everyone starts undefeated, and as the season opens, there's always that glimmer of hope that maybe, just maybe, all the commentators are wrong, and that we've got ourselves a championship caliber football team ready to do something special. It's a fun time, and I like the unflagging optimism.

"Dude, I'm telling you, she's totally into me."
But, after this past Saturday, I gotta say that, while I think UCLA is certainly still capable of meeting our minimum expectations, I also believe that the Bruin's aren't going to find themselves anywhere near a Pac-10 title or a BCS game this year.
If I'm wrong, great. I'll happily take my crow with some salt and a cold bottle of Franziskaner. But, in my humble opinion, barely beating an awful Rice team reasonably foreshadows a less than stellar season ahead of us. And it also has revealed some troubling shadows from past less than stellar seasons. I suppose we can all debate exactly how bad of a team the Owls are, but that's pointless. There's no disputing that they're bad. And, really, there's no disputing that even a 26-16 win against Rice wasn't what one should expect from a championship caliber team. A school like UCLA should never limp by a lower tier team from a nothing conference. The only real question is how bad it was.
Now that I've said this, I'm sure a fair number of fans will be in a right huff. For some, there's no place for any criticism of the team, or it's coaches, even by genuine fans who have the program's best interests at heart. And some people have no patience for anyone who is unwilling to express anything besides the party line.
The responses are varied, but common refrains include that people like myself: (a) are not a real Bruin fans; (b) just hate Karl Dorrell; (c) don't support the players, and/or (d) are just unreasonable fans with crazy expectations, among others.
After all, we are 2-0!!! And, whatever happens this year is just gravy, since next year is the really going to be where UCLA is going to make run at it. You know, we're still rebuilding, are starting a new QB, lost all those players, and.... blah blah blah.
Why does this happen? Why can't some UCLA fans tolerate a few reasonable, fact-based criticisms of their team without having a cow about it? Why do some fans so reflexively come to the defense of the team that they are willing to attack other fans who are just as passionate about Bruin football as they are?
Maybe it's just that evolution and society has engrained in us a remarkable ability to cope with bad situations, and circle the wagons in the face of adversity. Us silly humans also seem to have an inherent psychological predisposition to remember bad things as better than they were; to see the bright side. Call it selective perception, or some other psycho-jargon.
Or maybe it's something else. Maybe, its something about our experiences from the not-so-distant past have made us this way. Maybe it's the decades of mediocrity from a football team that enjoys almost every natural advantage, be it location, academics, talent pool, etc. Maybe it's a defense mechanism, born of almost inexplicable ineptitude relative to what one would expect from a university like UCLA that is on the brink of earning it's 100th NCAA championship. Maybe we have some inherent need to revel in a close victory to a shitty team so long as it gets us one step closer to that 8-4 season we have become all too willing to accept. I'll call it the Donahue Syndrome.

"A win is an f'ing win! Rice, Smice!"
Old habits die hard. But the days of accepting an ugly win against a bad team in route to an uninspiring season need to come to an end. Yes, winning by 10 to a team like Rice should be a cause for concern. As best as I can tell, the only reason it isn't for some is that they have bought into the concept of the gutty little Bruins and adorable losers. And, for me, Homie don't play that.
And, frankly, I think this kind of attitude is much more damaging than a little post game criticism after a disappointing showing.
GO BRUINS.
0 recs |
31 comments
Comments
Expectations are NOT lowered.
by bruinelder on Sep 12, 2006 3:59 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
A little
Maybe you need to lay of the BOOZE,dude.
Its good to know that you'll stand behind the team, "Through the good times and the great times"-Philly sportswriter commenting about T.O.
At least you can look past the positives and bring out "Unbias real look at the bruins"-Sarcasm
Blahblahblah is all I'm hearing from your post, do you have anything positive to say about this team....ever.
Making fun of/Bashing Bruin fans who like to look to the POSITVE side of the coin is unfair and wrong!!!!!
If the bruins get 9 wins and beat SC I'll be sure to hand you some WATER TO DRINK.
GO BRUINS!!!
by uclabruins05 on Sep 12, 2006 4:01 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Uh
Instead of whining about constantly in the comment thread why don't you lay out your case with some cogent arguments.
And BTW attacking/insulting the moderators will get you banned. And that is something not unique to BN. That happens in every online community.
Carry on.
by Nestor on Sep 12, 2006 4:05 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
A lot ridiculous
by Menelaus on Sep 12, 2006 4:53 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's "unfair" and "wrong"
by scittles on Sep 12, 2006 5:16 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nice post M
At least we are not getting embroiled in the 'crank' v. 'blue' nonsense, which often turns message boards into unreadable cesspool.
And yes it can't be said enough that days "days of accepting an ugly win against a bad team in route to an uninspiring season" are officially over.
It won't happen here on BN.
by Nestor on Sep 12, 2006 4:02 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Rice Game Was No/Account.
What you don't want to see is a team too emotionally high against a non-descript opponent, then coming out flat against the next-scheduled conference rival. This teame should now be primed and ready for a top effort in a meaningful game. No team can be "up" and sharp every week for 12 games. It is to their benefit the Bruins took the week off, including Saturday. Find a better story-line, next time.
by Snakedance on Sep 12, 2006 4:24 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Doesn't fly ..
Again it's an argument we saw during the Lavin era when we heard excuses how UCLA was having a little off day against non-descript OOC teams who were playing at a magic level.
That story line never worked and it won't this time.
by Nestor on Sep 12, 2006 4:29 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agree also
John Wooden did not want his teams emotionally sky high or conversely, too low. He wanted them prepared for the teams they were playing by demonstrating on the court what they learned in practice.
I think this is where KD fell off the horse at the Rice game and he needs to do something about it.
I think how we play against UW with two weeks to work out the kinks shown in the first two games will give a good indication of where this team is heading for the rest of the season.
by artybruin on Sep 12, 2006 4:54 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
RICE IS NOT USC, NOT EVEN "SOUTHERN CAL"
by Snakedance on Sep 13, 2006 8:46 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Happy talk
And I love the rationalization! It was a great thing that we didn't have a good game, otherwise we would have been on too much of an "emotional high."
Listen, if you don't like to hear this stuff, I understand. Some things in life are totally pleasant.
by Menelaus on Sep 12, 2006 4:33 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
SPEAK FOR YOURSELF (Not For Me)
If you want your team to go through the charage of treating every Saturday like it is life and death, and that potential victory over the anti-Christ is riding on the outcome/beating the point spread = FINE! Just don't put that fantasy-world delusion on me.
So how much money did you lose when the Bruins failed to cover? Can we be honest here as to the REAL reason underlying our little hyper-critical rants?
by Snakedance on Sep 13, 2006 8:26 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
You supported Lavin too, didn't ya?
It shouldn't and doesn't take a super human effort to beat a team like Rice by 10 points. It does take a mistake-riddled, uninspired performance to do that though.
by scittles on Sep 13, 2006 8:35 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
a dumb post ..
All we are looking for is efficient, well coached, performance every weekend. We didn't get that pass weekend, and are offering just observations.
That is all.
It's really you who is doing the silly ranting.
by Nestor on Sep 14, 2006 4:57 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh geez
And I love the faux indignation at my alleged "putting words in [your] mouth". You said:
Is that really so different from what I said (in jest):
Also, you just plain make up some jibberish about me thinking that every game is "life and death" and armagedon.
I don't know if you're trying to wow us with your bad manners, or lack of credibility.
The good news is that you've accomplished both.
by Menelaus on Sep 14, 2006 7:39 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nice job Menalaus...
During that third quarter, I couldn't help but to think of Lavin's final disgrace to the UCLA basketball program--the loss to CSUN.
Why is this still happening in year 4?
by Ajax on Sep 12, 2006 4:29 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Please Allow Me to Introduce Myself
While everything was positive during the Bruins' title run, the onset of the FB season has created a much different atmosphere on this board.
There is no dispute that the Rice game was a major disappointment. My biggest gripe is that KD's teams have been unable to build on well-played games to gain some momentum and instill a winning, dominating attitude among the players. It was hard to believe that post-game quotes from players indicated their attitude that they took Rice too lightly. KD must not allow this to happen simply because his team is not good enough to take any opponent too lightly. They can only become good enough by stringing together solid efforts on both sides of the ball -- something KD's teams have yet to accomplish.
That being said, I believe that some here are overreacting. They have only played two games. If they played like this in Game 5 or 6, that's another story. Let's give them a few more games before pronouncing a wasted season.
That's all for now for this "newbie." I hope to be a regular poster to this very informative and entertaining site.
by 78Bruin on Sep 12, 2006 4:37 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Nice start.
GO BRUINS!!!!
by bruinelder on Sep 12, 2006 4:43 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Welcome aboard
Of course, my larger point was about expectations, and my belief that some fans are too willing to rationalize this kind of performance, and then later accept a year that is less successful than what I think UCLA can reasonably obtain.
by Menelaus on Sep 12, 2006 4:51 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hear Hear...
GO BRUINS!
by norcalbruin95 on Sep 12, 2006 4:56 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
YOU FALL CORRECTED
by Snakedance on Sep 13, 2006 8:48 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is nuts
The Bruins played a horrible football game. They were critiqued rather harshly, by me and others. People began to complain about the criticism. Everything is fine. Okay, a disagreement.
If the Bruins play a very good football game, Karl and the team will be roundly praised, as they were against Utah. That's how it works.
That's it. That's what happened. Many people are concerned that Karl will be another perennial 8-4 football coach. Others are not.
Please, everybody. We're all Bruins here.
by HomeBruin on Sep 12, 2006 5:56 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
nice post Menelaus
Obviously the loss against Rice was bad news. It seems like we just let ourselves go and even gave a chance to a team which we should have completely blown out. There were no positives to take from this game.
But the one thing that we have to hope about this game is that it serves as a wake up call, much like the SC basketball game last year. We lost to an inferior team, but that just made our team play harder and we ended up with a great season.
We did make the 9 wins & beat SC expectation from Dorrell and that goal is still plenty alive. Hopefully our team wakes up to their potential and rallies together after this poor showing and shows us what they're made of. I'll be doing my best to help by being at every home game. GO BRUINS!!!
by sfatoo on Sep 12, 2006 5:59 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Just one nitpick
by scittles on Sep 12, 2006 6:20 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Positives and Negatives
First, you are really discounting the defensive effort. I think this is the lowest total yardage (maybe points)in 2 consecutive games in like 20 years for UCLA. That's good no matter how bad the opponents. Than you consider that much of the rice yardage came on 2 plays, and that we continually turned the ball over to get them good field position and putting the D back in in quick change situations, and the performance really does look amazing.
Next, on the offense. 3 factors are the new clock rules and the turnovers and the injuries along the OL. Rice game planned well by gambling everything on taking away the pass. Running eats up a lot of clock and relies on wearing down the opponent as the game goes on. When you continually turn the ball over you score even less and you don't wear the opponent down. So even though we dominated yardage wise the T.O.'s stripped the effectivness from the running game. And the new clock rules magnified the time lost.
Finally, the pass pro and to a lesser extent the run game was hampered by Sutherland and Lanis being out for portions of the game. you need a group of OL that has worked together to pickup the crazy blitzes.
Positives: the OL can run it, at least against rice. Given how well they opened holes, they can probably run decent against most of our opponents.
The D is good.
Even on bad days Ben maintains enough composure to throw some nice balls.
Negatives:
if we don't decrease the T.O.s, we will lose a lot.
The OL and Ben need to work more on blitzes and quick hitters. That's not surprising this early into an OL. OLs take time and luckily we have the schedule that will allow them to learn.
bad playcalling-if we were playcalling to score max points rather than work on some things. I think Svoboda was working on OL basics.
Special teams-this is the one unalloyed negative. Coverage and return units sucked.
bottomline: I think the clock rules make a grind it out running style more risky because you don't have time to make up for turnovers or early fizzling drives and the game is too short to wear teams down. So it will be a good strategy for undermanned teams to take away the pass and hope for a few breaks. I predict you will see a number of close shaves and upsets as teams understand this. I am worried about the special teams and OL breakdowns, but at least the OL breakdowns can reasonably be attributed to injuries and inexperience. From various people I do not think motivation was the problem, which was my first worry.
by OsoPuro on Sep 12, 2006 6:00 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
applause on the moderator's post and the comments
GO BRUINS!
by converso on Sep 12, 2006 6:43 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Nice to see you didn't leave
by HomeBruin on Sep 12, 2006 6:55 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
My two cents
Look, we all want the best for UCLA. I think the minimum expectations that we set back in spring are reasonable. How we get there, I don't really care, as long as we do. I'm just sick and tired of these Southern Cal bandwagon fans. I'll say it again, we just have to beat those fuckers!
by bruinbabe2000 on Sep 13, 2006 10:17 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Menelaus, I feel your pain
by TheStick on Sep 13, 2006 12:49 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 



















