Restore Pauley - Part II: Then & Now
This is Part II in a periodic series. Here is Part I.
You know the drill. It's time to get serious about restoring Pauley.
Before we delve into the subject more deeply, let's spend a few moments on the then and now.
First, the then -- the construction of Pauley Pavilion
As many of you many know, Pauley Pavilion was dedicated in June, 1965, and was named for University of California Regent Edwin W. Pauley, who donated almost one fifth of the more than $5,000,000 spent in building the arena. According to one source:
At the June 1965 commencement ceremonies Chancellor Murphy dedicated the building to UC Regent Edwin Pauley. Although Pauley was a Berkeley graduate, he was a southern California businessman and owned a petroleum company based in Century City. His generosity is manifested through buildings on both the UCLA and Berkeley campuses, and it was because of his one million dollar donation that the dream of a basketball pavilion was fully realized....
Then, as now, UCLA supporters rode the momentum of a great coach, John Wooden, to get the Pauley project rolling. One lesson here is that you have to act at the right time. Before Wooden started bringing banners to Westwood, the administration had been meandering along for over a decade, and were even contemplating playing in a freak'n surplus World War II blimp hanger. But, with that success, and the commitment of a group of administrators and alumni actually serious about moving the project forward, the project was realized. Of course, with Howland at the helm, I expect the iron to be hot for many years to come, but that doesn't mean that we should let this prime opportunity for a Pauley push slip by us.
And, as remains true today, the building didn't exactly hurt in recruiting. According to wiki:
Bruin teams, coached by John Wooden won the NCAA Men's Division I Basketball Championship in 1964 and 1965. Fans and Coach Wooden felt that a suitable arena needed to be constructed.... Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, then known as Lew Alcindor, was recruited to UCLA partly on the promise of playing in the new arena.
Today, more than 40 years later, Pauley remains essentially unchanged. Sure, in 1990, a new lighting system was installed, the interior of the building was given a modest face lift, and a new scoreboard was added. And, in 2003, the basketball floor at Pauley was renamed the "Nell and John Wooden Court" to honor Wooden and his late wife. But, besides that, Pauley stands essentially as it was in the 60's.
Second, the now -- Pauley Pavilion in 2007
A lot has happened since 1965.
With all due respect to the history of Pauley, the arena itself isn't all that great by today's standards. The seats are set back too far from the court, particularly on the east and west ends, the sightlines are poor from many places, the concession stands, restrooms and other amenities are just plain pathetic, and so on.
And the world around Pauley and UCLA has changed as well. Let's take a stroll around the facilities in just the Pac-10, and see what our conference foes offer their fans (and potential recruits). Here they are, listed in chronological order since each arena's last major renovation.
- USC - Galen Center. Yep, our cross town rivals in football, owners of exactly zero hoops tradition, and almost zero hoops success, have managed to build a brand new arena, with the Galen Center opening in the fall of 2006.
- Stanford - Maples Pavilion. Monty may be gone, but the building his teams played in still benefits from a $26-million renovation in 2004. Financed entirely through private donations, the new Maples Center was upgraded to include many of modern amenities now standard in today's arenas.
- Washington- Hec Edmundson Pavilion. Lorenzo Romar has done a lot to invigorate Washington's men's basketball program. And it sure didn't hurt to get an essentially new building just before he was named head coach in 2002. Originally completed in 1927, Hec Ed arena underwent a major, $40 million top-to-bottom renovation between March of 1999 and November of 2000.
- California- Hass Pavilion. Ben Braun is having a tough year. But, at least his team gets to do it in nice digs. In the fall of 1999, California opened the Walter A. Haas Jr. Pavilion, a state-of-the-art sports facility that was the centerpiece of a $57.5 million project, and replaced the 60-year old Harmon Gym, while still maintaining its history.
- Arizona State - Wells Fargo Arena. Even the hapless Sun Devils have a newer arena than UCLA. Constructed in the spring of 1974 at the cost of $8 million, the 14,198-seat facility was recently updated with a new scoreboard.
- Arizona - McKale Center. The Wildcats' coach may be older than dirt, but at least they have a newer building than the Bruins. The McKale Center was opened in 1973 and has a capacity of 14,545 spectators.
- Washington State- Friel Court. Yes, even the Cougars have a building constructed after the 1960's. Friel Court came online in 1973, and received a new parquet floor in 2000.
- Oregon State - Gill Coliseum. Hooray. A facility actually older than Pauley! The Beavers' old caverous building, home of Ralph Miller Court, was opened in 1949.
- Oregon- McArthur Court. The second oldest on-campus arena still in use, Mac Court saw its first game in 1927 and makes Pauley look like a spring chicken. Still, the intangibles of this historic building, and the intimidating home court advantage it provides (as we, unfortunately, saw Saturday morning), not to mention $5 million in recent renovations, keeps this building on many pundits top-10 lists.
If anyone can to explain to me what twisted version of reality makes this acceptable, I'd love to see it. Because, otherwise, I think we have to face the fact that UCLA's unmatched legacy has been taken for granted by too many university officials and, yes, alumni.
UCLA has shown before that it can build a facility that is worthy of our team. It's time to do it again.
Next up: Part III: The Road Behind Us.
GO BRUINS.
P.S.: I really appreciate all the thoughtful comments in response to Part I. I will try to circle back to follow up on many of the good subjects you addressed as this series continues.
0 recs |
23
comments
Comments
What I really can't stand
I'm not saying that we should necessarily waste exorbitant amounts of money (like on the perpetually half filled Galen center) just to compete with SUC to have the biggest best toy around, but we should at least have a facility worthy of our rightful place among the basketball elite. Galen will never even be half the arena Pauley is now, nor will 99% of the venue's nationwide, because the banners in the rafters are something money can't buy, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't continue to distance ourselves from the pack.
by Tydides on Jan 8, 2007 11:59 AM PST 0 recs
Good thoughts
And, as for Pauley, I hope everyone understands that I'm just talking about the building itself when I'm being critical. Of course, the history and banners are unmatched. I just think we need to have a better building, as UCLA basketball deserves.
by Menelaus on
Jan 8, 2007 12:23 PM PST
up
0 recs
I agree
On a seperate note, I know somebody very high up in the Athletic Department and he told me some of their ideas for Pauley... They obviously want to bring the seats on the west and east ends closer to the court and they plan on putting them within a step or two of the floor. To accomplish this, they will tear out the seating on the west side and place the court right by the east stands. They will then rebuild the stands on the west side also within feet of the court. They will add seats in the corners to fill out the area around the court. They will leave the band where they are and give the students the rest entire north bleacher and possibly the east bleacher (that will be decided later). This will put the student courtside seating to roughly 2,250. With the extra room in the building created by the west side seating being moved, they plan to build a Donor's club on the floor level and foodcourt/team store on the main level. The building now goes in, creating narrow concourses, but the renovation will make it so the building goes straight down and widens the concourse. Concessions and restrooms will be added and to aleviate the problems of too many people in the concourses, a floor level concourse will be built for those seated in the 100's. Also, luxury suites will be built at the top of the arena. They hope to put in between 10 and 15 of them that will be located only between the baselines on both sides of the court. These renovations will lower the capacity slighty, to somewhere around 11,500. New locker rooms will be built as well, as well as training rooms and a basketball team lounge. A media room is also planned. Again these are only what the Morgan Center HOPES to do. These are in no way final plans or anything that should be considered fact, solely ideas widely agreed upon within the Morgan Center.
by ryebreadraz on
Jan 8, 2007 12:53 PM PST
up
0 recs
Any chance...
by Menelaus on
Jan 8, 2007 3:08 PM PST
up
0 recs
Sorry
by ryebreadraz on
Jan 9, 2007 2:25 AM PST
up
0 recs
No worries
by Menelaus on
Jan 9, 2007 3:18 PM PST
up
0 recs
How much money are we talking here?
by doublebonus on Jan 8, 2007 1:12 PM PST 0 recs
We have plenty of wealthy alumni . . .
by charnaw on Jan 8, 2007 1:28 PM PST 0 recs
Easton Arena Works For Me
Truthfully, the entire building should be named Wooden Pavilion/Arena. But since that won't be happening anytime soon, we might as well find a sponsor who can absorb some of the costs of what will no doubt be a very expensive renovation.
by insomniacslounge on
Jan 9, 2007 1:42 AM PST
up
0 recs
a interesting article about recruiting from U$C
by abby8065 on Jan 8, 2007 1:28 PM PST 0 recs
Stadiums & Recruiting
Conversely, UCLA should get a lot more top players because of the Rose Bowl in Pasadena & the Westwood campus.
It is certainly a factor, but I think a small one. Coaching staffs, type of offense & defense, previous success and the initial availability of playing time lures recruits more than facilities.
by artybruin on Jan 8, 2007 2:24 PM PST 0 recs
Yes and no.
The coloseum is in better shape than the rose bowl and it's ON their campus (directly across the street)... don't underestimate the gameday tradition and facilities on recruiting.
Plus USC has the football tradition - same way we still get recruits in BB playing in Pauley - but lose some, too.
But what you're forgetting is MONEY. The amount of money spent at football games that take place on campus is huge. UCLA loses a fortune in sales and a ton of recruits on the way to Pasadena. And tons more having an old, often unfilled, no bathroom or food having facility for BB.
by greatgymnasticsschool on
Jan 8, 2007 9:03 PM PST
up
0 recs
I do agree
Even though I can't stand Duke, I love their fans!
by abby8065 on Jan 8, 2007 2:53 PM PST 0 recs
Arena
Puke fans suck.
by artybruin on Jan 8, 2007 3:14 PM PST 0 recs
Let me rephrase
by abby8065 on Jan 8, 2007 3:28 PM PST 0 recs
Safety First - Time for a NEW ARENA
I too have heard about the same plans as detailed in the reply by Ryebreadraz and have also heard that there is a substantial fund already in place (close to $50M) to begin and nearly complete the renovation ideas currently contemplated. What my source also tells me that one of the major sticking points is that, Wooden himself opposes any plan that does not allow Pauley to continue as a multi-use facility. While he can't hold up plans, he certainly can make moving forward more difficult if the folks at the Morgan Center don't have the Wizard's "ok".
So, some believe that no meaningful progress on renovating PP, sadly, will come until the dreaded day that we lose the beloved Coach.
Go Bruins this weekend vs. the SUCS.
by Bald Eagle on Jan 8, 2007 4:45 PM PST 0 recs
Haas Pavilion vs. Pauley Pavilion
It also used to have baskets that hung down from the roof.
But now it's Pauley that seems so antiquated.
Is there an elevator that takes people down to the court level? Does Coach Wooden walk down all the steps?
by Wes Covington on Jan 8, 2007 7:00 PM PST 0 recs
Yes there is an elevator at door 2...
by isodore on
Jan 8, 2007 11:17 PM PST
up
0 recs
this is good to hear.
During the renovation, do you know if they'll adress this?
by True Blue and Gold on
Jan 9, 2007 4:07 PM PST
up
0 recs
If I had to choose-
In other words, use the $$ to hire a coach, and he will generate more revenue which can be used to renovate Pauley.
by Fox 71 on Jan 9, 2007 2:47 PM PST 0 recs
Not that scarce
And, I don't think that a $60-80 million dollar Pauley renovation effort is going to be effected much either way by a few million here or there for coaches (which will be quickly offset by a wave of new revenue if they hire the right guy and he turns around the program).
Lastly, the two pools of money may not be the same. While the small to mid-sized individual donor money probably is the same, the big corporate money they are likely looking for to do the Pauley renovation probably isn't going to be available for the coaching situation.
Though, it would be funny if we could get a corporate sponsorship to oust Dorrell. Just imagine: "DorrellDischarged, courtesy of your friends at Nabisco" and we could deck out the new coach in "Brought to you my Pfizer."
by Menelaus on
Jan 9, 2007 3:16 PM PST
up
0 recs
You're probably right
(I just don't understand DG. He did it so right with Howland. Why is he still so mesmerized by KD?)
by Fox 71 on
Jan 9, 2007 5:39 PM PST
up
0 recs














