Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Ten Worst Swings Of The 2011 Season

Start Osaar Rasshan this Saturday...

That's right, START OSAAR RASSHAN at QB this Saturday...!

Already, Dorrell is proving our point, that he simply is not a good coach and that he should be gone come Monday, 3 December.

He's about to play Ben Olson or Pat Cowan... two hobbled players at the moment if there ever were any. Ben isn't mobile because his knee is tender. He's supposed to stand in the pocket and deliver against a heavy $C pass rush how? By throwing to our healthy receiving corps ???(oh, that's right, they're also hurt... and/or underperforming) He didn't fare too well against `mighty' Notre Dame, arguably one of the worst teams in the COUNTRY and he's supposed to give us a better chance to win against one of the better (or hottest at the moment) defenses in the country on THEIR home turf? Again, HOW is this supposed to happen??

Don't get me wrong, I like Ben (SPJ), but he's clearly not healthy and Dorrell is risking his long-term health by possibly throwing him out there against a hungry SC defense at home. Sure, Ben did `ok' against Oregon at the Rose Bowl Saturday - against a demoralized Oregon D no less - his ability to generate something was clear, but even that was limited.

But completing 40% of your passes, for a mere 60 yards in one HALF with no TDs and one pick isn't gonna cut it against $Cum... Yes, kudos to Ben for showing up, for being ready to take the reins, but in reality, let's not kid ourselves, he probably shouldn't have played and definitely shouldn't this Saturday.

Next? Pat Cowan!  Nope. We can't let him play. Yes, he's one of the few catalysts we have, for that alone he should be allowed to play, but in reality SHOULD he play? No. He's also NOT HEALTHY. This kid has heart, he's beaten SC already, somehow he manages to bring life to this vaunted `West Coast' offense (utter the phrase `west coast offense' with as much seriousness as you can muster), but is it likely he'll be able to do so against the Spoiled Children Trojans? No. He's had not one, not two, but THREE injuries this season. All serious for a QB who is as mobile as he is. Cowan's first two injuries were serious, but he was able to come back because he was needed. He wasn't healthy either time he returned, but he did. His third injury? A collapsed lung.  This isn't a strained calf or tight back, this affects his breathing. This kid was in the ER three weeks ago! And Dorrell is considering throwing him in there against SC's defense?  Is he nuts? That alone should be grounds for firing KD.

Cowan, God bless him, is one hit away from being back in the ER. One vicious hit, a blindsided hit by an $C LB and he's done. Why jeopardize him for next year or even his own health?  Don't get me wrong, if Cowan is cleared by UCLA doctors, then I guess it's reasonable... but this kid doesn't deserve the beating he COULD get if he plays. For what? To save Dorrell's season?

My point? Yes, play Rasshan!

I've read a couple accounts already that Rasshan was held back on Saturday against the Ducks. Sure, he was 0 for seven with one pick. He was allowed to run once, I believe, gaining one of the two first downs the Bruins got in the first half... Why did KD and that 'lethal' Off. Coordinator of his unleash this kid and let him run?  He's a weapon now, primarily because he's a virtual unknown. Look at what he almost did against AZ? Look at what he did against ASU? Those were the first two games he's ever PLAYED at this level... he had never touched the ball prior to Nov. 2007 in two years in the program! Now he's being hung out to dry because he didn't complete a pass in one half on Saturday?  Not because he couldn't but because they likely didn't design plays for him... The kid is talented on SOME level AND, he's HEALTHY.  He's also a mystery to the opponent, SC in this case.

At this point, we don't have healthy or stellar receivers ready to catch passes anywhere and everywhere on the field.  Our two starters are hurt and IMMOBILE.  Our defense is a good one, but we can't count on them to shut down SC for a second year in a row, not the way this D has played (inconsistently) all year. They may show up, they may not. Or, they may simply be unmanned or outplayed. We have to come up with some type of `weapon' some type of `look' on offense. Our running game (also hobbled, surprise surprise) can probably hold its own for a bit, but it won't be able to dominate the game in any way.  The leadership, the victory can only come from the QB position, and the only ONE who MIGHT be able to do something is Osaar Rasshan.  Think a young Donovan McNabb, Kordell Stewart in his prime, or even a seasoned Dennis Dixon up at Oregon. Rasshan hasn't been given the real opportunity to let it fly... why not give it to him now? Who in their right mind thinks SPJ can deliver a win this Saturday? Not me. Cowan? Maybe, but why risk his health?

A couple years ago (2003), I remember seeing not Ben, but DREW Olson play against SC... he was getting CREAMED on every play, and he was about as mobile (even when healthy) as that Tommy Trojan statue on the SUC campus. It was sad to watch. Go on U-tube and re-live that horrible 2003 loss at the Coliseum, where the score was 40-2 by the third quarter, when young Drew couldn't get a damn thing done against a defense having fun with him, literally toying with him. That will be the current Ben Olson this Saturday.  Pat Cowan will be able to limp his way out of the pocket, but what happens when he gets drilled? Or can't go downfield because the coverage is tight?

Play Osaar this Saturday. We may be in for some type of surprise... if anything platoon him and bring him in for lots of gimmick plays just to keep Petey and his thugs somewhat confused.

At this point, KD has nothing to lose, he may as well let his most healthy but unproven (meaning there's LOTS to still prove) QB play. If he sucks that badly, yank him after the half and try something else. To NOT play OR just because Olson and Cowan are barely `healthy' is simply wrong... no, it's dumb and it's selfish of a coach, who is arguably on his way out to do so.

BEAT $C!!! Go Bruins!.

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of BruinsNation's (BN) editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of BN's editors.

Comment 11 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I would normally say to start OR...
... if I could count on KDJN (Karl Dorrell Jay Norvell) Radio to get out of its own freaking way (playing the same 5 bits every Saturday, and humming the same tune every Monday).

If, if, if, IF!!!! our braindump -- I mean -- brain trust would do some basic things like, i don't know --

(1)  Call play action more than once a quarter;
(2)  Run 2-3 option plays every quarter;
(3)  Have OR throw both short hitches AND long passes in a less predictable fashion;
(4)  Have him play out of the shotgun on plays other than 3rd and Old Town Pasadena to go; and
(5)  Have receivers go in motion on plays that are NOT runs to the side wherever the receiver ends up running to...

... then I'd say start the healthy guy who might be able to run for his life a la PC.

M

"Because I'm tired of it. Year after year after year after year having to choose between the lesser of 'Who cares?'"

by Meriones on Nov 27, 2007 1:03 PM PST reply actions  

let's put something funny in the coaching staffs'
drinks the day of the game... w/o a coaching staff, we can play some backyard ball and probably win

by bruinbunz on Nov 27, 2007 3:44 PM PST up reply actions  

start OR
let him go out of the pocket, make some plays with his legs. I think that is what you need to do to beat SC. Look at Oregon when they had Dixon, and us last year with Cowan the only plays we did make was him running.

by uclaov1 on Nov 27, 2007 1:28 PM PST reply actions  

One thing...Cowan should not play
I absolutely think that under no circumstances should Cowan play. I don't know what the official prognosis on him is but its clearly evident that there very little to be gained from risking his long term health (again) for anyone but KD.

The most disgusting thing of all is to see these players re-injure themselves or worsen their condition after being thrown back into the game (i.e. Bell, Dixon).

by kidro2001 on Nov 27, 2007 1:47 PM PST reply actions  

I agree
I also think Dorrell should throw the playbook away and let the players draw up plays in the dirt.
A coach is someone who can give correction without causing resentment. John Wooden

by MexiBruin on Nov 27, 2007 1:56 PM PST reply actions  

KD's playbook is like
Easter bunny
Unicorn
Tooth fairy

You hear about it, but no one has ever seen it.

by bluegold on Nov 27, 2007 2:13 PM PST up reply actions  

That's because
Karl Dorrell doesn't have a playbook, he has playpants.

by jaffa on Nov 27, 2007 2:36 PM PST up reply actions  

Here's the "Package"
Olson must start, but should be platooned with OR.  When OR is not under center, he should be at times lined up at WR.  At WR, he should sometimes be motioned into the backfield for the snap.  When OR is at QB, he needs to be given plays to utilize his athleticism and quickness.  No BS drop back crap.

You almost had it perfect Wes.  We do indeed need to create confusion and mayhem on the offensive side of the ball.  The playbook goes out the window Saturday.

When Olson is at QB, the plays need to be quick developing or he will be done early.  Lots of misdirection, inculding draws and screens to offset SC's defensive quickness and pursuit.  It can be done.  However one thing has to happen -

Olson has to have his best game ever wearing the Blue and Gold jersey.

by Forearm Shiver on Nov 27, 2007 2:53 PM PST reply actions  

The moral of the story?
5 touchdowns against Stanford just means you're inconsistent.

5 touchdowns against $C just means you're a god.

M

"Because I'm tired of it. Year after year after year after year having to choose between the lesser of 'Who cares?'"

by Meriones on Nov 27, 2007 3:13 PM PST up reply actions  

that's asking a lot of Olson
If you really think about it, Ben Olson truly has yet to play a GREAT game for us as a Bruin.

He either has a great season next year, or he's the biggest BUST since Brett Johnson.

I'm not questioning his abilities at all, but thus far, he has so little to show for. I was really excited about the Bruins landing him... here we thought he'd be the next Steve Young, or Cade McNown, a bit more mature, a southpaw no less (a la Young and McNown), the # one QB coming out of college... and all that for what? for a couple meager pre-conference wins and then more than a few losses...

I'm pulling for him next year... clearly he's done with this year.

Hence, he has to have the game of his LIFE Saturday if he's to play. Given that he's still hurt -- unlikely.

W.S. Montano Class of 1994

by wsmontano1994 on Nov 27, 2007 8:00 PM PST up reply actions  

I think OR will actually play
This is KD's idea of being sneaky, trying to surprise Cheatie Petie. There will be trick plays, I guarantee it. This is the one time where KD knows his ass is on the line. The problem is, the timing of the trick plays will be simply dumb, as witnessed by Dan Fouts last Saturday...

by tasser10 on Nov 28, 2007 10:50 AM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bruins Nation, an unofficial daily online scrap book covering the greatest collegiate athletic program in the nation. Established June 16, 2005. GO BRUINS.

Managers

Uclabear1_small Nestor

Arron_afflalo1_small Tydides

Brad_pitt_as_achilles_small Achilles

377011_2642084725867_1068030137_32302525_1166539782_n_small Ryan Rosenblatt

Telemachus_small Telemachus

Licenseplate_small gbruin

2761_small tasser10

Blue_bellerophon_small Bellerophon

Img_0052_2_small Patroclus

Small DCBruins

Of Counsels

094_small Ajax

Menelaus2_small Menelaus

Small Meriones

Small Odysseus

Associates

Eee_small freesia39

Uclabruins_small AHMB