Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Dog Football! Which Breeds Are Best Suited For The Gridiron?

H-O-R-S-E

So I have been away from the internets most of the day traveling back to the East Coast. For my in-flight reading I did pick up a hard copy of Fox 71's fishwrap and, sure enough, garbage columns from Plaschke and Simers were up there prominently in the first and second pages of the sports section. I am not going to link to that kind trash. DumpDorrell.com has the links here. I wouldn't bother commenting on those predictable columns focusing on Coach Neuheisel's NCAA recruiting violations that took place 5-10 years ago. But, after listening to a moron like Mark May, and checking out some other columns, I thought I put in my 2 cents with the help of friends in the Bruin blogosphere.

First, if you haven't done it yet, go over to Bruin Roar right now and read CPBruinFan's must read post on Coach Neuheisel and NCAA violations.

Apparently, he was written up for two sets of violations during his time at CU and UDub. He was written up for a set of `compensation violations,' which includes high crimes such as ... you ready for it?!!! ... going $3 over the limit for some recruiting weekends so kids could have access to things such as Nintendo games:

Use of a hotel game room at a cost of $3 over the limit for some recruiting week-ends.
$3 so a kid could play Nintendo? Golly Gosh! Wow. That sounds as serious as getting a star receiver $10,000.00 in free rent!

I mean really? Oh it gets better. The second set of violations fall under category of `recruiting violations' which includes such violent crimes as:
Engaged one UW recruit in a game of H-O-R-S-E, deemed an improper tryout by the NCAA.
No, I didn't make that up. That's what Coach Neuheisel got written up for.

And, yet, if one were to read the panting of Plaschke, Simers, and Dohns of the world he or she could get the impression that Coach Neuheisel was in charge of a program where athletes were involved in (alleged) incidents of rape, violent assault, steroid use, racist websites, taking academic shortcuts, or getting hundreds of thousands of dollars in cash, rents, and gifts.

But, hey, what do we know? We live in a world in which people like Plaschke can get away with writing with a straight face something like this:
Because Carroll has worked hard to build that rare dynasty that follows the rules.
So, yeah, to sum it up, it is totally cool to have a coach whose players somehow, someway systematically gets themselves on the police blotter or embroiled in blockbuster NCAA scandals involving hundreds of thousands of dollars of illegal benefits, yet it is not okay for UCLA to hire a coach who has been humbled, paid his dues for NCAA "infractions" involving $3 extra benefits or playing a game of H-O-R-S-E.

Let's get back to Coach Neuheisel. CPBruinFan articulates what so many of us have reflected on his past:
He was an aggressive recruiter, no doubt. There is a fine line between been aggressive and violating the rules. Rick stepped over that line a few times. He didn't cheat, he didn't steal signals, he didn't break the rules of the game. No, he just went a little too far in trying to get the best talent into his program. In NASCAR they have an expression, "if you ain't cheating you ain't trying". In the same way, recruiting is a dance that has coaches going as close to the line as possible and finding "creative" ways to interpret the rules.

He was young and obviously didn't realize that, while each violation was minor, that as a whole it could hurt the University. If anyone in the college ranks understands the repercussions of pushing the NCAA rules, it is Rick. I think now that he is older and wiser, he'll learn form these mistakes. He has recently expressed that he is sorry for the incidents that occurred and he takes ownership of them. There isn't anything he can do now to make up for those mistakes, except run a clean program and stay out of trouble.

I'm all for giving Rick a second chance. It has been almost 10 years since his last violation was committed. He is, after all, a Bruin and member of the UCLA family and that should be enough reason to give him our support. He is definitely one of Westwood's wayward sons and It's time for him to come back home and prove that his past is just that... in the past.
While the boys over at DumpDorrell.com unload on the hypocrites as they look to the future:
Were there similar reports when Eric Scott was kept on at UCLA after being nationally ridiculed for being arrested for felony robbery??  And having, as we later found out, 3 convictions for unregistered weapons and disturbing the peace??  No. Instead we got a beautiful redemption piece by Brian Dohn, and charges dropped pieces from the rest of the beat press.  Nary a word after.

Yet, Rick Neuheisel hasn't been afoul of the NCAA for over 5 years (as the PR said, some of his infractions were a decade ago) and even those infractions were all minor. Neu was young when he committed them and now he is older, wiser, repentant, and committed to doing things right - basically all the things we would want in a human being let a lone a coach - and the press still want to crucify him??  The beat press is swallowing their 2nd bitter pill this month, the first with the firing of their guy Karl Dorrell and the second with the non-hiring of their guy DeWayne Walker.  They are mad and want to take it out on us and Neu.

We will repeat again, Rick Neuheisel will not get the goodwill he deserves as new head coach.  Next season, we lose 17 starters and 25 seniors, practically every one on the field will be new to the position.  We have a much tougher schedule.  You all know this because we have been writing about this since early in the '06 season.  We said at the time and since that any coach will be lucky to get this team to .500.  Brian Dohn said the same thing, and we put it here on the record.  He was undoubtedly convinced at the time that his 2nd guy Walker (Dorrell was his first) would get the job so he was making sure Walker had support already for next season.  Neu won't get the benefit of such wisdom next year or ever, unless he starts winning titles and even then he will not get the benefit of fair treatment by some.

Rick Neuheisel has a big challenge ahead of him that Karl Dorrell did not have and DeWayne Walker would not have had.  He has to fight the press from Day 1.  We think Neu will overcome this challenge but it is not fair to him, to UCLA football or to UCLA.  The press is ready to pounce on him and turn his tenure into a Neuclear era.  Hacks like Simers, Plaschke and Dohn are renegades who will search long and hard for that uranium ... it will sell papers and keep their paychecks coming.  One spec is all they need to torch Neu and blow up his tenure.  With the myriad of rules and compliance procedures there is not a coach or program in America that is not absolutely clean.  It's impossible.  That is why programs have compliance officers whose full time job is to check the rules and procedures on everything every staff member and player does.  That is why the Washington compliance officer got the NCAA tournament pool rule wrong after Neu ASKED the officer for the ruling on it.  That is why Neu WON a $4.5 million settlement against both Washington AND the NCAA.
Well if today is any indication, we are going to have Coach Neuheisel's back. Thanks to many of you including 66 and uclahy have already pushed back on the predictable attacks against Coach Neuheisel.

We are going to do what we can to enjoy just the game and forget most of the shenanigans around UCLA football just like we are now doing when it comes to UCLA hoops. However, we should let the world know that we are not just going to sit back and take this nonsense in the coming days, weeks and years if these idiots keep coming with their same predictable, lazy BS attacking on our head coach. Every time they attack Coach Neuheisel with their H-O-R-S-E-&^%#, we are going to call them out as hypocrites for looking the other way, when a far more disturbing (and in some cases disgusting) record was being compiled on the other side of the town.

In many ways, Coach Neuheisel is the perfect General because we know he is not going to sit back and take this H-O-R-S-E-&^%#, and we are going to do what we can to back him up. Anyway, let's get back to more important stuff. Coach Neuheisel has a program to rebuild.  And we are going to enjoy that process just like we did when Coach Howland arrived in town five years ago.

GO BRUINS.

Comment 46 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Good post, Nestor.
Thanks for the bump.  Enjoy the snow!

by uclahy on Dec 30, 2007 8:40 PM PST reply actions  

I AM SOOOOO EXCITED!!!!
I was just PUMPED UP when I first saw the news yesterday.  Without question, DG made an excellent choice.  And while I can honestly admit that RN was not necessarily at the top of my list when the coaching search began, he steadily climbed toward the top as things began to play out.  I just have no doubt that RN is going to put UCLA football where it needs to be (and should be) - toe to toe with the other elite programs in the country; including the one on the other side of town as well.  

Also, while I'm at it, I want to offer a HUGE THANK YOU to BN and my fellow UCLA alums, students, and fans for this site.  Through BN, I was able to keep up on the latest on what was happening with the search and get a good feel of what the local reaction to breaking rumors/stories is/was.  As you can imagine, the MSM here in Minnesota and the upper Midwest wasn't really saying anything about it.  Of course, I rely on BN so much anyway for both UCLA football and basketball anyway but this situation was really neat.  

All I can say is that it's GREAT to be a Bruin!!!  

by Minnesota Bruinfan on Dec 30, 2007 8:52 PM PST reply actions  

Be interested to find out
Just how dilligent the NCAA has been in leveling penalties since having to pay out to Rick?

Seems to me since the time of that payout, I have seen very few cases of the NCAA actually dropping the hammer, and those few cases have been schools like Oklahoma, where they self reported their violations.

In a wierd way, maybe the Neuheisel situation at UW has helped SC because it has created a timid mindset at the NCAA.

by Free the 16 on Dec 30, 2007 9:38 PM PST reply actions  

RN is no saint....
but you definitely got it right that he's not even CLOSE to as bad as the guy across town.

by jjreicher on Dec 30, 2007 10:41 PM PST reply actions  

...but you can't just focus on Petey...
...$UC has a tradition of superfunding its athletes.  Everyone knew OJ was getting big bucks for NOT watering lawns or washing cars.  Everyone knows there are boosters of $UC who make Sam Gilbert look like a piker.  Pete Carroll just happens to be the current coach of a program and university that has worked to bend (or break, when possible) every rule relating to the recruitment or maintenance of high-profile athletes.  The level of PC's involvement is what is moot...

Far be it from me to suggest that Bill Plaschke is accepting 'gifts' from the $cumbags across town, but it does make you wonder why there is no apparent effort being made by the LAT's beat writers to dig into the allegations surrounding Bush and $UC. (Despite the superficial articles that have, to date, appeared.)  Certainly, if a writer was being given privileges or gifts they might willingly look the other way while recruiting or maintenance trangressions were/are being committed.  I'd hate to think that there is some level of collusion existing between LA beat writers and the University of South Central, but the writers in question certainly haven't worked to dispel that concern.

No, based on personal agendae, writers like Dohn, Plaschke and Simers will continue to aim their invective toward RN - and the only way to diminish those attacks is to play it straight and WIN.  

UCLA - the finest public university in the world

by SecondGenBruin on Dec 31, 2007 9:54 AM PST up reply actions  

You Must Be Kidding
Not sure how you can call that a great article about RN.  The article that I read from the link you posted completely blasted Neuheisel and the UCLA program and administration.  

I can only assume that you, seattle, are not a Bruins fan, but probably some disgruntled Husky fan still angry at Rick.  

by BruinSteve on Dec 31, 2007 12:14 AM PST up reply actions  

Not even close
That article was not even close to cutting edge commentary on the situation. It just served up some warmed-over complaints and charges about Neuheisel and ranted about UCLA being cheap chicken for paying him $1.25 million per year.

O.k., which is it? They don't like the hire because of his (long) past NCAA transgressions or they are mad at UCLA because it didn't pay the transgressor enough to cover his living expenses in L.A.?

Essentially both points have been addressed here so a rehash would be redundant except to say, it's $1.25 million with another half mil for bonuses.

Hello!

Dorrell was making a base salary of $350,000 per year with all kinds of incentives that supposedly would have pushed that to around a million. Neuheisel's contract with incentives almost doubles that and UCLA is cheap?

"Well not cheap, but cheap-ish."

The stiffs who wrote that column fail to realize it was a contract UCLA and Neuheisel agreed to. No one had put a gun to his head and told him to sign, I assume.

by whp68 on Dec 31, 2007 1:34 AM PST up reply actions  

UCLA Fan...but you guys make me laugh
I am a UCLA supporter and season ticket holder and I like coming to this site to get all the latest UCLA information...but half of these columns are a joke. Everything is skewed to the way you want to see it.  I wouldn't say I am a Neuheisal fan, but since he is the coach, i will support him.

The stories on here defend him and say how he didnt do anything wrong, but I guarantee if this happened to Dewayne Walker instead of Neuheisal you guys would be saying how could they hire a guy who has all these violations against him.

The most ridiculous of stories was the one that was written after UCLA lost to BYU. After a great game..and one terrible block by an offensive lineman away from a win. You guys look to criticize the coach. Saying stupid stuff like, Walker should have went for 2 at the end of the the half.

Some of the stories on here are as hard to take as Petros Papadakis

by DaBruins07 on Dec 30, 2007 10:58 PM PST reply actions  

Selective Reading at its finest
What here is inaccurate? The violations he committed are being listed are they not? Whether the violations pass the common sense test are another matter, but when you put minor recruiting violations up against the pattern of criminal behavior right down the freeway, it is not unreasonable to call foul on the MSM's selective reporting on this hire. If, instead, you are against giving people second chances, then you better have been against Eric Scott's hiring, since his transgressions were criminal, as opposed to a recruiting violation sanctioned by the selective enforcement of the NCAA. Otherwise, you, like the MSM on this issue, are a hypocrite.

Let me guess, you, like the butthurt mainstream media, didn't get your no-head-coaching-experience choice DyNoMite so now you're here grasping at straws and throwing out your infantile rant.

by Tydides on Dec 30, 2007 11:16 PM PST up reply actions  

Three dollars? THAT makes me laugh.
All these reporters clutching their pearls over THREE DOLLARS? And a game of H-O-R-S-E?

Ridiculing the reporters who blow that out of proportion? You be your ass. If that stuff hadn't been blown out of proportion for all these years, RN would have been appointed last time around. As it was, he wasn't even considered and we had to endure five years of horror.

by Chandler on Dec 31, 2007 12:34 AM PST up reply actions  

07, you must not be an alum...
as you seem to be lacking in your reading comprehension skills.  Before you go on drawing any more wildly inaccurate conclusions from folks with a lot more analytical skill than yourself I advise you to read more carefully.
Not much football experience in your resume either, eh?  To assess the sloppy, poorly executed Las Vegas game as "great" simply defies logic.  Read the stats, they speak for themselves.
Since you won't say you're a Neuheisel fan let me guess - the columns you think are "jokes" are the ones that don't match your take on things, which would make you decidedly pro-Walker.  But then if you enjoyed the Las Vegas game that much I guess I can see why.

by East Coast Bruin on Dec 30, 2007 11:43 PM PST reply actions  

Lol
Let me see you coach a against a top 25 ranked team with a QB that started the season at wide reciever and another QB who couldn't get a scholarship and get them seconds from winning a game.

by DaBruins07 on Dec 31, 2007 9:55 AM PST up reply actions  

Would that be the same team
that even the fired Karl Dorrell beat that his temporary successor could not?

by Tydides on Dec 31, 2007 10:54 AM PST up reply actions  

lol
so you re saying that Walker is a terrible coach cause he couldn't beat the same team Dorrell beat the same year? I am pretty sure I was at that game and I dont remember Dorrell playing Rashaan or Bethel-Thompson at QB.

by DaBruins07 on Dec 31, 2007 1:57 PM PST up reply actions  

Again
Dorrell = Bad Head Coach --> Beat BYU

Walker = ? --> Lost to BYU

Being "competitive" with BYU isn't a positive quality. It is neutral at best, but not something to put in ones portfolio. But hey, don't let me stop you from celebrating your moral victory.

by Tydides on Dec 31, 2007 2:31 PM PST up reply actions  

Check out my resume
go to easportsworld.com leaderboards. I am ranked #49 in the country.

by DaBruins07 on Dec 31, 2007 2:09 PM PST up reply actions  

BYU = Top 25
For one thing... I was joking comparing my online video games to a football resume.

 I didn't know you had such a great football resume and I was talking to a football GOD. Since you know so much about football you must be a Head Coach somewhere right? This must be Bob Toledo, it has to be. That would explain all the anger towards Dorrell and Walker. You re still pissed that Dorrell took your job and pissed that Walker learned how to get UCLA to play defense, something you couldn't figure out.

Another thing Bob, you must have cared about my resume joke enough to find a picture and post it on there.

by DaBruins07 on Dec 31, 2007 11:22 PM PST up reply actions  

You must smoke some powerful stuff
Fantasylands as vivid as yours typically only exist in children's story books, but I guess now we know what happens when some nutjob (you) daisychains his extrapolations together.

Your inability to construct a coherent thought here is disturbing, but not banworthy. Your homophobic comment below, however, is. Therefore, I believe a 48 hour temp ban is fair, and maybe you'll use that time to both grow up and learn how to carry on a conversation like a big boy.

Happy New Year ;-)

by Tydides on Jan 1, 2008 4:10 AM PST up reply actions  

PS
I also have plenty of pictures, like this one that happens to fit this occasion.

Have a Nice Day :-)

by Tydides on Jan 1, 2008 4:14 AM PST up reply actions  

OK, I checked.
Thanks for the laugh. I've never heard someone boast of gaming experience as a "résumé."

For the record, there was no "DaBruins07" in the top 99. At no. 49 was "N1KB0G," beat out by "SWAMP THING 5" at no. 46. Bringing up the rear, and apparently also beating you, was "WIPE URSELF" at no. 99.  

In any case, I'll take the perspectives and wisdom of folks here who can, you know, like express themselves well over the all-time, World Champeen online gamer. It has to do with experience in the real world. You can look it up on Wiki.

Just wondering, does it work to bring up your game geek experience in job interviews, if such applies?

by Bruinut on Dec 31, 2007 2:57 PM PST up reply actions  

It was a joke..but i am ranked #49
and I would whoop your ass...go to easportsworld.com go to "NCAA Football" then "Leaderboards" and click on "PS3" you find DaBruins07...if you got some game, ill kill you

Is there some gay rainbow font that you guys use to let people know when you are joking? or can i do some gay smiley faces, so you know what is a joke   ;)

by DaBruins07 on Dec 31, 2007 11:28 PM PST up reply actions  

Think I'll pass
on a return visit to Fantasyland. Once was enough.

I suggest you take your homophobic, infantile rants where they are better appreciated.

by Bruinut on Jan 1, 2008 10:20 AM PST up reply actions  

An on-line gaming resume?
Now that's a resume.  I was trial lawyer of the year - just read my resume at "Shark Attack - the New Trial Strategy Game."  Plus, I was Capt. Kirk's successor, and I taught Yoda a thing or two.  I'm not even going to try to tell you what Lara Croft - Tomb Raider and I do after hours.

But thanks.  I haven't had a belly laugh like that in a long time.  

Why don't you sign off and go back to your Dungeons and Dragon's marathon, now entering year four.

by Fox 71 on Dec 31, 2007 3:34 PM PST up reply actions  

Ah, come on
"I'm not even going to try to tell you what Lara Croft - Tomb Raider and I do after hours."

Oh, please do.

by Bruinut on Dec 31, 2007 3:53 PM PST up reply actions  

why the crusade
Why are you always on a crusade for some cause?  

What are you trying to do, rid the world of the infidels who don't think exactly like you do about a football coach.

UCLA just hired a football coach, people are happy with it, things are looking great despite Guerrero's obvious screw ups, and I have heard a TON of good press from all over.

This entire site is so extremist about nothing. Its a football team not a political party.

by Drake44444 on Dec 30, 2007 11:59 PM PST reply actions  

Crusade against double standards?
That's what you have a problem with? Really? If you think our own local press, not to mention our own beat press, trashing our new head coach on Day 2 while a laundry list of criminal behavior goes unnoted across town isn't a problem, then we really have nothing to discuss.

If you'll notice, we were not the first ones to blog about it. We were at least third, so obviously other people noticed the MSM's duplicitous behavior as well. Save your pointless rant for the BRO forums. People might actually take you seriously there.

by Tydides on Dec 31, 2007 12:29 AM PST up reply actions  

Oops, Nevermind
Looks like you're a DW/Doh!n apologist, and based on your rhetoric in those forums, you were probably a Dorrellista to the bitter bitter (bitter) end.

Guess what, mediocrity sucks. Thank God our AD thinks more like BN and less like you.

by Tydides on Dec 31, 2007 12:53 AM PST up reply actions  

Birds of a feather
Well, a good crusade will certainly bring a lot of like-minded folks together...

...but the fact is Bruin Nation is a blogsite that I visit for reasons beyond the football program and its recent melodrama.  Of all the sites devoted to Bruin sports, it contains more cogent information with LESS personal attacks.  What those of us old guys know as civil discourse.  And, whether you recognize this or not, there are political, economic and sociological strains in many of the discussions that, superficially, revolve around college football.

And, as is obvious by the quality of writing here, most of us are ALUMNI, not casual fans.  We, or our families, passed tens of thousands of dollars into UCLA's coffers during the course of our educations, which we would like to think entitles us to make whatever comments we wish, as long as those comments further the discussion.

I work in a very contentious environment.  I retreat to Bruin Nation, and a few other nonrelated sites, to salve the pain I absorb while dealing with intransigent, shoot-from-the-hip adversaries.  I don't need more of the same when I'm away from the office.

Thanks to Nestor and the regulars I can detox in a friendly place.

UCLA - the finest public university in the world

by SecondGenBruin on Dec 31, 2007 10:33 AM PST up reply actions  

According to RN
that's why he thought it was OK. He said he knew tryouts weren't allowed, but because it was a different sport, he said he didn't think it was a problem.

by Ryan Rosenblatt on Dec 31, 2007 12:54 AM PST up reply actions  

I guess...
he could have been testing the guys vertical leap? Can't really test speed in HORSE. Passing abilitly...nope.

by Tydides on Dec 31, 2007 12:57 AM PST up reply actions  

Well the key in all this
is the NCAA. They pick and choose and I guess they picked RN. Trying to find logic in the NCAA is like trying to find an education in South Central.

by Ryan Rosenblatt on Dec 31, 2007 1:05 AM PST up reply actions  

A-holes.
They put UCLA people under the microscope because John Wooden kicked all those ACC boys' asses all those years and they're still not over it.

by Chandler on Dec 31, 2007 1:09 AM PST up reply actions  

So a friendly game in another sport...
...is a problem. But a free apartment? Move along, nothing to see here....

by Chandler on Dec 31, 2007 1:06 AM PST up reply actions  

In Street Clothes
Yes, in street clothes. Some tryout.

There's another wrinkle they went after -- but got wrong, too.

There was a "bet" involved. If RN won, the guy would "have to" come to UW. If the guy "won" he'd go somewhere else.

Some tryout. If the guys good enough to win, a superior athlete, he has to go somewhere else?

It was a JOKE.

As were most of the other charges against RN.

sjh

by Class of 66 on Dec 31, 2007 6:24 AM PST up reply actions  

A $4.5 million Joke
BTW -- Interestingly enough, IIRC, the AD's of both CU and UW were fired.

At CU that's particularly important. When you look at the charges against RN at CU, they are not the "big charges" we've heard against the school -- like rape.

My favorite: After taking the job at UW, RN flew back to Boulder to tell his team. The team was in a room waiting for him to arrive. His plane was going to be 30 min late so he called the AD to ask him to tell the players. The AD or other athletic department person, sent the players home. Only a few stayed and RN, who had made a special trip to say "good bye" had to find another way to do so.

So, he called the ones he had not talked to, at home, to say good-bye, to tell them that he believed in them and that CU was in good shape and he wished them a good year.

THAT BECAME THE PLAYER TAMPERING CHARGE!

There's one better. When RN was on the phone with someone in the athletic department, one of his players came to the department to find out how to transfer to another school. The dep't guy put RN on the phone and RN talked the guy into staying at CU. Tampering? BS.

ANYONE WHO HAS READ THIS STUFF WILL BE OUTRAGED! And, that's why he won $4.5.

Rick, WE HAVE YOUR BACK.

sjh

PS. I was a Leach guy. I'm thrilled to have RN back. And, the more reading I've done about his past, the more I want him to prove them wrong by beating the crap out of anyone we play. Success is the best form of revenge.

sjh

by Class of 66 on Dec 31, 2007 6:34 AM PST up reply actions  

A common misperception
H-O-R-S-E has become a key tool in evaluating football players. The NFL combine, for example, now evaluates players solely on the basis of 40-yard dashes, the ability to lift 225-lb weights multiple times, and the ability to make a 17-foot off handed banked jumper, followed by a skyhook, and a 3-pointer from the baseline while hopping on one leg.

by bruinhoo on Dec 31, 2007 1:22 AM PST up reply actions  

Disunity in the Community
I can't wipe the smile off my face and yet others are worried about RN being "dirty".  Whatever, get over it and enjoy your competent fotball team.  LA Times is reporting this morning that RN wants to talk to Chow about being the OC!  I sure like the way this guy thinks and it's a great story.  Go Rick, go Bruins!

by BruinAl on Dec 31, 2007 7:18 AM PST reply actions  

I wouldn't totally whitewash Rick's past
As RN will himself acknowledge, he did make some serious mistakes, but he has owned up to them, had to start over as a HS football volunteer, and work his way back up. He has been clean for at least 5 years, and has learned his lesson. I think he got too big too soon and probably let it get to his head, but I do believe that is behind him now. We will have a great coach who will do great things for the university.

He doesn't have to be sinless, just repentent (both in thought and deed) and I think he is. That's the difference between him and someone like Erickson or Carroll. The difference isn't the severity of the offenses, the difference is the change in heart and growth in character.  

My main concern at this point is I hope he doesn't feel he has to make everyone in the Morgan Center comfortable. The place still needs a shake up, and I am hoping RN is the one to do it.

"when you've seen how big the world is, how can you make due with this?"

by silverlakebruin on Dec 31, 2007 8:26 AM PST reply actions  

I left out a word which is important
In paragraph 3, the third sentance should read:

The IMPORTANT difference between him and someone like Erickson or Carroll....

"when you've seen how big the world is, how can you make due with this?"

by silverlakebruin on Dec 31, 2007 8:30 AM PST up reply actions  

I can't wait to see
Pete Carrol dropping "F" bombs on Neiheisel rather than on Belotti!

by capecharles17 on Dec 31, 2007 9:34 AM PST reply actions  

Lots of questions
I do think Rick has the charisma to lead DW and make him feel good about his DC job.

My local paper had a REPORT regarding the Neuheisel hiring:
http://www.venturacountystar.com/news/2007/dec/30/bc-fbc--ucla-neuheisel-1st-ld-writethru0871-rick/
I thought that's what REPORTING the news was all about.

How is Doh!n and Oberjerk get away with trashing DG and RN the way they did?  IFFFFF I want their opinions, shouldn't that be kept to the Op/Ed page, or at least on their own Blog?  I hope they are never allowed interviews as our new coaching staff builds a winner.

Help me with a few questions:
1. I kinda thought RN might use the spread offense?
WRT RN talking to QB coaach Scott Loeffler and QB Mallett following

  1. Would he have a scheme (anything but WCO) that Mallett would fit into?
  2. With good coaches to help our current QB's improve (Olson, Cowen, maybe MBT??, maybe Rasshan????, or Forcier), do we need Mallett?
  3. Wouldn't he lose a year of eligibility?
  4. What recruits might we steal from other schools if we actually have RN/DW/NC (maybe include Scott Loeffler and Ken Norton)?
  5. Don't know much about Scott Loeffler, but might he pull in a top QB?
  6. Will RN go after bringing KNjr. home and will he be interested?
  7. Isn't DW's son planning on coming to UCLA?

by BruinFam on Dec 31, 2007 10:04 AM PST reply actions  

Rick Beat the NCAA Because It Didn't Follow
its own rules.  Under by-laws that were changed shortly before the investigation, the NCAA was required to give Neuheisel notice before talking with him about the basketball pool and it didn't do so.  Then, the NCAA didn't follow the rules of civil procedure by failing to disclose that it had changed the by-laws until trial was underway.  The judge was apparently sufficiently ticked off that he sanctioned the NCAA and forbade them from asserting that they had been in compliance with their own by-laws.  The case was well underway, and this sanction put a serious chink in the NCAA's (and UW's) armor.  The lion's share of the settlement was paid by the NCAA.  Apparently the jury was leaning in Neuheisel's favor at the time of the settlement.  If you want to read about it, go here:  http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=2007123.    

An organization that penalizes someone for playing a game of "HORSE" with a recruit as an unlawful tryout for football needs to be beyond reproach itself.  It is ridiculous that the NCAA obsesses over things like HORSE games but turns a blind eye to free houses, penthouse apartments and cars.  And then it doesn't even follow its own rules and tries to railroad someone out of a job.  It is an organization worthy of little, if any, respect and got what it deserved in the Neuheisel case.        

by bruin7982 on Dec 31, 2007 7:03 PM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bruins Nation, an unofficial daily online scrap book covering the greatest collegiate athletic program in the nation. Established June 16, 2005. GO BRUINS.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Ks_ucla_small
A Break From Sports: Fun Old Pix of UCLA, Westwood
Small
UCLA Vital Signs and the Chianti Cancer

Recent FanPosts

Ucla_trumpets_small
Photos from UCLA vs. U$C
Jaxnjaz_school_pic_11_2011_small
Ben Howland Cracks ESPN's Bottom 10
Licenseplate_small
Who Is Your Most Hated anti-UCLA Villian?
Small
Comparison to Stanford Athletics Fundraising
Brad_pitt_as_achilles_small
Warning: Southern Cal May Have Better Hoops Future than UCLA
Troll_small
Hoops Thoughts
Uclabear1_small
Atlanta Fans Are Not Too Amused By Jim Mora's Falcon Comments
Small
The Moment I Realized Howland Lost Me
Ucla_trumpets_small
Photos from UCLA vs. Cal

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Uclabear1_small Nestor

Arron_afflalo1_small Tydides

Brad_pitt_as_achilles_small Achilles

377011_2642084725867_1068030137_32302525_1166539782_n_small Ryan Rosenblatt

Telemachus_small Telemachus

Licenseplate_small gbruin

2761_small tasser10

Blue_bellerophon_small Bellerophon

Img_0052_2_small Patroclus

Small DCBruins

Of Counsels

094_small Ajax

Menelaus2_small Menelaus

Small Meriones

Small Odysseus

Associates

Eee_small freesia39

Uclabruins_small AHMB