Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: New York Giants Super Bowl XLVI Ring Unveiled

Finding A Way ...

Bruins are going to put last night’s game in their rear view mirror and head out for West Virginia early this am. But before we put last night’s game on our backburner, let’s revisit some key moments from a tough game and then reflect a little. As usual our warriors found a way to win against an upstart opponent, who did their best to pull out a hall mark win for their mediocre program. Dohn reports on how Bruins grinded out a big win to pull ahead of the Pac:

It was a grin-and-bear-it night for the Bruins, who didn't attack USC's 2-3 zone well, defended poorly and got a poor shooting performance from leading scorer Arron Afflalo (a season-worst 3 for 11).

The Bruins trailed 20-10 early as USC made nine of its first 11shots.

Despite cutting USC's lead to 30-29 at the half, the Trojans started the second half strong and went ahead 38-31.

"I thought (USC) did a good job of changing their man (defense) right back to a 2-3 zone," UCLA point guard Darren Collison said. "That threw our rhythm out a little bit.
Trojans played inspired defense against a group of Bruins who perhaps were a little too keyed up from a fired up crowd. Trojans came out on fire, but their surreal shooting tapered off (until the desperate last seconds) when the Bruins went down into their lock down mode.

Give all those Henry Bibby recruits – Young, Pruitt, and Stewart – lot of credit for putting on quiet a show in early going. They as they have done through most of this season carried the scoring burden, finding holes early in Bruin’s uncharacteristic sieve like defense. However, once the Bruins adjusted and tightened up their defense, the better team, the experienced team (not necessarily the older team) took over. They stayed calm and composed just like their steely head coach, and found a way to nail down yet another huge win. As for their counterparts here is Adande on how Trojans melted when it counted (yet again):
[T]he Trojans didn't make the plays when the pressure mounted. Gabe Pruitt lost control of the ball against a double-team, Collison stole it and passed ahead to Afflalo for a breakaway dunk that gave UCLA its first lead, with less than six minutes left. Later, Lodrick Stewart lost control of his emotions.

After Shipp grabbed two of his own missed shots and finally made a layup plus a foul, Stewart grabbed the ball and slammed it to the ground. He was called for a technical foul. It was a bad 'T' since Stewart was more frustrated by the play than the call. Still, Stewart should not have put the officials in that position. UCLA got two bonus points from the technical free throws, plus Shipp made his free throw to complete the three-point play. UCLA didn't surrender the lead.

"We're used to winning," Afflalo said.
Yeap. And as mentioned above it’s not like we are led by bunch of seniors. The three key juniors – AA, Shipp, Mata – were ice cold in the first half. Mata was missing FTs. Shipp seemed out of sync, while AA was missing shots (due to a great Trojan defense). Sure Shipp was involved in the key play during which a Trojan senior lost his cool, and AA had his thunder dunk, that put up the Bruins by 2, it was the floor leadership of DC (who overcame some wild plays reflecting the fact that he is only a sophomore) and defensive tenacity of Luc, that played a huge part in Bruin’s characteristic second half surge. And let’s not forget AA2. I think it’s obvious by now this kid is in the process of taking the next step. He has simply taken his game to a different level ever since he was asked to step up for Luc (when he missed the Arizona game). AA2 was a huge factor inside pulling down 6 boards (4 offensive) and chipping in win 9 points. In others words bunch of sophomores keyed a Bruin win, when their junior leaders were having tough times on offense. These kids are not only learning and growing as a team, in the process of doing so they are finding a way to win.

Oh and guess what Bruins were $ from the FT line during the waning (key) moments of the game:
The Bruins, ranked ninth in the Pac-10 in free-throw shooting percentage at 64.3, hit 18 of 20 free throws in the second half and 11 of 12 free throws in the final minute as USC was getting three-pointers from Dwight Lewis, Pruitt and Young to keep the pressure on the Bruins.
Obviously Bruins still have a long way to go to completely fulfill their potential as a team. But I gotta tell you I am loving this season. I am enjoying watching our kids grow up to be winners. The most satisfying thing about Coach Howland’s program is while his youngsters are developing as players, they are actually winning. None of them resort to that moral victory nonsense. None of them take satisfaction in coming close. They are just feeding off the energy of their upperclassmen (who just happen to be juniors) and creating their own legacy of winning.

Moreover, it’s a testament to their head coach how they stayed calm, composed and focused during the key moments of a big game (yet again). It’s not a conincidence that they are making stupid decisions causing their team a game. Their coach is not out there embarrassing himself a lunatic jackass, always screaming like a whining little baby outside the coach’s box. It certainly effects a team’s composure and confidence during crunch time. And, it couldn’t be more obvious last night at Pauley.

Lastly, time to put the all the hype wrt to gap closing aside. People who actually follow college basketball closely (not just going by what’s written by bunch of hyperventilating beat writers covering Heritage Hall) know Floyd’s program doesn’t have a strong foundation. It is no where close to what Coach Howland has in Westwood. Actually it’s almost as flimsy as what UCLA had under Lavin during those dark years prior to Howland.

Sure they have a decent team this year (like I said before it happens once in a blue moon). They may finish in the top 3 or 4 in the conference, get a good seed in the tourney, and could make it to the sweet 16, then again they could implode down the stretch and finish with 10-11 losses.

And yet, this will probably turn out to be the best Southern Cal basketball team for years to come. Chances are pretty good that if Pruitt and Young (again both Bibby recruits) continue to do well, they will be projected as reasonably high draft picks. And we all know how much they "love" going to class. And there is that 22 year old Gibson, who is not all that keen on going to school. They may not have Senora Ross around to get through school in the coming year. If two of those three guys leave early (keep in mind Lodrick Stewart is a senior), even with a head case like Mayo leading bunch of rag tags, they will be a huge question mark next season. Certainly not the mark of a stable program. Plus Timmeh is going by a recruiting strategy in which he is targeting name players with baggage, who are only being recruited by Bob Huggins of the world. He has a long way to go just to match the recruiting efforts of Bibby, let alone even be considered in the same league as Coach Howland. In other words there hasn’t really been any solid groundwork for a good, reputable program at Southern Cal, despite of the constant hype you read from the lap dogs in the traditional media and from the delusional fan base, who doesn’t know anything about the game. Despite all their hype their team still cannot win the big games.

Anyways, we will leave that score behind and move. Bruins have an interesting non conference game coming up this Saturday. We will talk about West Virginia and discuss what the Bruins need to do to keep finding ways to win.

GO BRUINS.

Comment 30 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

The technical foul
not only turned the game around, it could turn SC's season around.  They won't openly admit it, but it was a demoralizing loss, from which they might not easily recover.

by bluegold on Feb 8, 2007 7:34 AM PST reply actions  

The tech
I do believe that the technical foul changed the momentum of the game at that time but the MSM are focusing on it as if it GAVE the game to the Trojans.  ESPN's article is titled "Late game technical gives UCLA winning edge over USC."  There was still 4 1/2 minutes left and we were only up 3 after Shipp's free throw.  That's just a huge excuse how their team crumbles under pressure and our team thrives.

Also, Adande's has a completely snarky tone as if UCLA fans only care about football if we beat SC and chant "Just like football".  I have news for you Adande, SC FANS HAVE BEEN SAYING THAT AT BASKETBALL GAMES THE LAST 7 YEARS IF THEY BEAT US.  Trojans are now going to get defensive and call Bruins mean and insensitive for rubbing our winning in their face.  Well fuck it, I don't care.  We won, we're better, this is our town and the Trojans are our bitch.

Go Bruins!

by BruinMac04 on Feb 8, 2007 8:00 AM PST up reply actions  

That tech was key
There were SC fans behind me yelling at Floyd when that happened.  He's not emotional and inspiring on the sidelines, but sort of a distraction.  There was one time up the floor when we were on offense, I don't know if anyone noticed it, but Floyd bumped Michael Roll as he ran down his 3 lane.  He gestured apologetically, but I thought it should have been his first technical foul.  

by bruin95 on Feb 8, 2007 10:10 AM PST up reply actions  

What is it with the media?
Seriously, is there some sort of vast anti-UCLA sentiment in the media? Is it because Wooden's teams dominated for so long?

In the Yahoo Sports page, the headlines for the articles are "UNC takes care of Duke" and "UCLA holds off U$C". UNC won by 6 after trailing nearly the whole game. We won by 5 after trailing nearly the whole game. Maybe 5 is the threshold, if you win by more than 5 you've "taken care" of business, otherwise you've just barely "held off" your opponent. Perhaps I am making too much of this, or I should just keep on relying on this site for info as it is truly the only objective source out there.

by tasser10 on Feb 8, 2007 7:50 AM PST reply actions  

Nope
That is not your imagination.  MSM is getting so ridiculous.  I think maybe part of the problem is that every beat writer in LA is probably a JustSC grad, so that doesn't help either when those stories get put on the news wires.

by stevenucla on Feb 8, 2007 8:04 AM PST up reply actions  

Fawning over the gap closers
Lot of these idiots don't even know what it takes to build a program. If they did they wouldn't be so quick to declare that SuC is closing gap with us even though Pink's recruiting "strategy" is basically built on a house of cards.

by bluestreet on Feb 8, 2007 8:06 AM PST up reply actions  

The Character Difference
I think one of the most revealing comments in the post-game about the difference between SC character and UCLA character is displayed in this quote from SC's Stewart...

--Stewart, who wouldn't talk about his technical foul, said, "I don't really see that much of a difference. They're 2-0 on us but I feel we're just as good."

The character gap between our guys and theirs is just as important as the skill...

by glassbruin on Feb 8, 2007 7:52 AM PST reply actions  

Just like Arizona!
At least in delusional comments.  That's what JustSC is. Yeah, I was laughing when I saw that quote this morning!  Uh, Stewart, no, you're not as good because you lost, stupid.

by stevenucla on Feb 8, 2007 8:05 AM PST up reply actions  

20 wins
BTW, yesterday's win was our 20th for the season (really 21, but the NCAA doesn't count beating Chaminade since they're a Div 2 team).  Remember back in the dark ages when 20 wins was the goal?  I love how we don't even blink now, no hype, not even an acknowledgement, just keeping our eyes on the real prize.

Of course, JustSC's still hoping to make the tourney so they can put up a banner for that.

by stevenucla on Feb 8, 2007 8:13 AM PST reply actions  

Thing is, remember when we were 25-2...
...going into the '95 Tournament?

Shoot, we're 20-2, and we still have 7-10 games MORE (dep. on the Pac-10 Tournament) BEFORE the Big Dance.

Yeeesh.

MIM

by Meriones on Feb 8, 2007 9:24 AM PST up reply actions  

Mata
give credit where it's due man, you said he was "missing free throws" -- he was 2 of 3 :P

by ranelar on Feb 8, 2007 8:16 AM PST reply actions  

Lets be honest
USC is damn good basketball team. Not as good as ours but they are pretty damn close. They have 3 scorers in Young, Gibson and Pruitt. Also Stewart can flat out shoot.

It's great for us to win, because it shows how we beat another good team. They have closed the gap in their basketball program compared to our football program. And I'm not talking about tradition or championships I am talking about how well their team is playing this year.

Will they ever be as good as UCLA I doubt that. But they can be the second best team in the PAC-10. Their kids might not have character or class, but they can play basketball. And if anyone says they can't, they weren't watching the game last night.

They are a good team, and we are a great team. But them give them credit. They also have the second best defense in the country and have beaten 5 ranked teams this year. It is also makes the wins a whole lot sweeter beating a good team rather than a crappy one like Oregon State  

by abby8065 on Feb 8, 2007 8:58 AM PST reply actions  

JustSC
They have a decent squad this season. But they don't have the foundation to be succesful in long term. And the track they are taking I don't believe they are going anywhere.

If you followed Floyd's carree you'd known at Iowa State, his 2nd year, he got them to 24 wins.  His 3rd year, 22 wins.  His Fourth year?  The year a squad was made up of his own recruits: he went 12-18.

Sorry if I am not impressed with that kind of track record.

On top of that he is a classless asshole.

After the game last night he barely shaked Howland's hand and stormed off without shaking the hands of our players. While Coach Howland went out of his way to shake Floyd's hand and all Trojan basketball players.

Floyd is an embarrassment on the court. And he is taking the short cut way of building a program.

If you are getting swept in the faux Trojan hype, take your nonsense somewhere else.

I am sure there are plenty of places around the internets to relish in the fake hype of Trojan hoops.

JustSC will always be just that - JustSC.

by Nestor on Feb 8, 2007 9:07 AM PST up reply actions  

Agreed
$C got some talent, but their implosion last night shows they have nowhere near the composure and character of our Bruins, attributes you most certainly need to survive in the Tournament.

I predict they'll finish 3rd in the Pac10, get a 5 seed somwhere, and get unceremoniously bumped in the 1st round by some upstart midmajor 12 seed. And that's a pretty good year, for them.

by godblesstyus95 on Feb 8, 2007 9:28 AM PST up reply actions  

Close, but...
All in all, on paper, we were only 6 points better than U$C this year. They have played us very close, they do have some talent on that team. But it's only 6 players. They say the wrong things, their coach is taking shortcuts and there really isn't a common character to their team. I foresee Mayo killing whatever spirit they have, he loves the spotlight apparently. So, for the 80 minutes of basketball so far, U$C has been close. For the next five years, we will be a rock, they will be a pebble...

by tasser10 on Feb 8, 2007 10:00 AM PST up reply actions  

I didn't know that --
about Floyd's college W-L record.  Maybe he'll follow the new OJ into the NBA again.  (He had pretty nice numbers there, as I recall.)

Character counts.  He has no class (and frankly fits right in over on Figueroa.)  He and his trOJan friends are punished on a daily basis, knowing that they're not Bruins and never will be.  Frankly, I don't think he's worth the time it takes to write about him.  But that's just my opinion FWIW.

by Fox 71 on Feb 8, 2007 11:52 AM PST up reply actions  

Timmeh's NBA record
I'm assume you're being completely sarcastic, right? 90-231 for the record.

by stevenucla on Feb 8, 2007 12:44 PM PST up reply actions  

Including
some of those most hapless Bull's squads I've ever seen. You haven't seen ineptitude until you saw his version of the Bulls. Oh man, it was like they expected to get blown out every night.

by Tydides on Feb 8, 2007 12:59 PM PST up reply actions  

Fellas, fellas
Don't forget Timmeh also lost to Lavin.

That's right he lost to Lavin.

by bluestreet on Feb 8, 2007 1:04 PM PST up reply actions  

Quoth Timmeh --
"That is the unkindest cut of all."

(For all you trOJans, that's from Julius Caeser, by that Shakespeare guy.  Go find one of your English profs.  Maybe they've heard of him.)

by Fox 71 on Feb 8, 2007 1:25 PM PST up reply actions  

Sure, he was 90-231,
but it was a tough 90-231.  And there were a lot of moral victories.  And he was just turning the corner.  And he had to play the toughest schedule in the league (because his team couldn't play themselves.)

(I'm kind of sad that I had to explain I was being sarcastic.)

by Fox 71 on Feb 8, 2007 1:28 PM PST up reply actions  

Totally
I remember all my Chicago friends during that time.  All on suicide watch.

by stevenucla on Feb 8, 2007 4:55 PM PST up reply actions  

Abby, you're right
that they are good this year, but the gap isn't closing because Love is coming in with Stanback next year. It will be 4-0 against them after the 2007-08 season and that indicates a gap not closing to me.  I'll give credit to that team though last night, they shot really well and almost tied it at the end.  They hit 4 shots in a row, almost 4 threes if the refs hadn't caught the one 2.  

by bruin95 on Feb 8, 2007 10:19 AM PST up reply actions  

True!
I couldn't believe he wouldn't shake hands with Howland. Like Howland called the Technical on his player. I am waiting for Floyd to have a heart attack.

by abby8065 on Feb 8, 2007 9:14 AM PST reply actions  

Let's give some love to Westbrook
That guy made some big plays mid way through the first quarter that kept us in the game and took the momentum away from SUC.  He's a gamer.

by bornagainbruin on Feb 8, 2007 9:43 AM PST reply actions  

In his first entrance
to the game, he showed how to penetrate that zone.  His aggressiveness is impressive for a freshman.

by bruin95 on Feb 8, 2007 10:24 AM PST up reply actions  

Officiating
I often comment here about the terrible Pac 10 officiating and how it seems to hurt us, particularly in the Oregon loss. But in last night's  game, all the key calls seemed to go our way. It felt to me--a diehard Bruin and SC hater--a bit one-sided. I know the free throw numbers are a bit misleading beacause of the fouls at the end of the game. But it still felt atypically pro-UCLA last night. Believe me, I'll take it. And I feel we would have won without it. But if the refs had called the game the other way I think we would have lost.

I wonder, did it have to do with the energy level in Pauley last night? Normally we don't seem to have much of the typical home-court advantage. But the crowd was slightly more pumped than usual (not talking here about the students who were awesome as usual but are sadly confined to that small portion of the bleachers while the fat cats and "student-athletes" get the other nice courtside seats).

I'm sure that kind of crazy, loud crowd like you see at MacArthur Court in Eugene affects the refs. These Pac 10 boneheads seem to be especially susceptible to noise.

Bruins Forever

by bruinsince69 on Feb 8, 2007 10:57 AM PST reply actions  

It seemed to be fine
There were a couple times when Luc and Alfred were aggressive and typically would have gotten called fouls, but it went both ways I think.  SC had 23 and we had 13.  5 or 6 of those SC fouls can be attributed to the last minutes of the game when they were trying to catch us.  It's always going to go a little for the home team.  For the most part I think our guys stayed in front of the SC players and played good, sound defense.

by bruin95 on Feb 8, 2007 11:22 AM PST up reply actions  

Ref balance
I think it all balanced out with the crazy call on the Pruitt out-of-bounds toss off Aboya where both of his feet were out before he tossed it, and the little touch fouls on Josh and Alfred. It may have been a bit in our favor, but there were some nasty calls that benefited them earlier.

by dprodigy19 on Feb 8, 2007 12:26 PM PST up reply actions  

There were alot of bad call both ways...
I didn't have a great vantage point for most of the one's that went our way, but there were a few plays where we were hosed.  Luc going up for a layup and a Trojan banged into him with half his body going for a block, but no call AND SC got the rebound.  There were grabs and touches that went their way and not ours, but overall it was probably 50-50.

They played us tough and I hope they go deep (by Lavin Standards) in the tourney so people will realize how tough the Pac-10 is.  Right now I would classify them as a dangerous team, and I wouldn't bet for OR against them.  They could beat some really good teams, or they could choke because they don't have the winning attitude like our guys do.

by isodore on Feb 8, 2007 2:21 PM PST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bruins Nation, an unofficial daily online scrap book covering the greatest collegiate athletic program in the nation. Established June 16, 2005. GO BRUINS.

Managers

Uclabear1_small Nestor

Arron_afflalo1_small Tydides

Brad_pitt_as_achilles_small Achilles

377011_2642084725867_1068030137_32302525_1166539782_n_small Ryan Rosenblatt

Telemachus_small Telemachus

Licenseplate_small gbruin

2761_small tasser10

Blue_bellerophon_small Bellerophon

Img_0052_2_small Patroclus

Small DCBruins

Of Counsels

094_small Ajax

Menelaus2_small Menelaus

Small Meriones

Small Odysseus

Associates

Eee_small freesia39

Uclabruins_small AHMB