Bruins Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Cal RB Jahvid Best Seriously Injured, Carted Off Field

DeWayne Walker and Eric Scott are...

Fantastic.

Star-divide

DeWayne Walker: I think he gets way more criticism on this site than he should. You could say he struggles with the spread but I honestly think its less him and more the personel. I am smitten with this guy and I'll be happy to tell you why.

Our defense made unbelievable strides on the defense and I won't rehash the statistics because we know them all: they are fantastic. We almost went up 100 freakin spots for chrissakes.

It's the attitude on the defensive side that really matters though.  Many on this site (including myself) and others cast off Walker's talk of a revitalized defense last year as BS. "Yeah, we've heard this all before." I thought the excitement on the defensive side was palpable. You could tell how excited the players were.  And we saw the results.

Now we know how Walker struggles with the spread, but, again, I thought it was more an issue with personnel rather than coaching: I don't think there was sufficient depth in the defensive backfield to really challenge a good spread. Most of the damage in the spread was done in the air and not on the ground.  With Norris and Kibble hurt last year, there was a big hit.  I also don't think the depth at corner, especially, was good enough. WIth Norris coming back and Viney being as good (and disciplined) as he is, I expect to see better performance in the crucial one on one situations that ultimately make or break the success of a spread defense.

That being said, I'm sure you know how terrific of a recruiter Walker is.  Most of these defensive recruits for this year and last year are there because Walker knows how to bring them in.  There are three CB's already coming in for 2008, and all of them are blue chippers. Also, Moore is probably going to be a five-star while aaron hester is due to recieve an offer from 'SC. Just these two recruits are the best in the Dorrell era (and maybe a tiny bit before). Besides the CB's the other recruits are all fantastic too, many of them also holding offers from SC. Should Dorrell get the axe, I would LOVE to see Dewayne Walker be a head coach.  This guy has balls, is running a great defense, and can recruit.

Eric Scott is also an unbelievable pickup for UCLA.  I actually had a chance to talk with him on the phone and I insantly fell in love with this guy.  If you talk to any of the newer recruits, you'll hear how much they love both Scott and Walker.  Scott will motivate and teach our recievers this year, I guarantee it. He will rejuvenate an underachieving recieving group in the same way that Walker rejuvenated the defense. Scott is also primarily responsible for bringing in the WR's in the 2008 class. Kemonte Bateman is a fantastic pickup and Jerry Johnson, also being recruited from SC, should also be pretty sick.

I wouldn't call Norvell a retread: I think Nebraska did pretty well last year with a subpar QB. Sure Norevell didn't ever call plays, but neither did Walker. I'm not saying Norvell will be good or great or terrible. I'm just reserving my judgment.

Expecting some criticisms, so bring em on...

and GO BRUINS!

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of BruinsNation's (BN) editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of BN's editors.

0 recs  |  Comment 12 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Eh...
You sound pretty confident and your logic seems pretty sound.

I think I'm going to fall in your category and take some criticism when I say this: I think that we're so jaded at this point in the Dorrell era (and we all have a legitimate right to be) that we are blinded by good fortunes that come our way. I mean, hey, I was not at all excited when DW came here and he did a very good job. Could he do better? Hell fuckin' yeah. But, he did a good job.

BUT, with KD at the helm, I couldn't recognize DW as  even a decent coach when he came in. Maybe this was because there wasn't enough info on him to see what he could actually do at UCLA. For me, personally, I know I didn't like DW from the get go because I hear so much bull shit from KD about how our next coordinator is "great" or some other boiler plate statement that doesn't really make you feel good.

I guess I just hope your right Blackjack. I want KD so do well so badly. He's a Bruin. I would do anything to see him do something great at UCLA just because he's such a good guy and a Bruin.

Do I think it will happen? No. But, I'm jaded. Aren't we all and don't we have good reason to be?

by BruinFan1 on Apr 8, 2007 11:10 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Additionally
I would like to add that now I understand why people like Nestor always add "thank God for Ben Howland" after football games. I always thought of it as a little knock on our basketball program just because football is the more important of the two sports. I really don't want to hear the two coaches names during the other's season.

Now I understand completely. Thank God for Ben Howland. He is a fantastic coach! He is probably the best coach is Westwood since Dick Vermeil.

Nestor, even though I don't agree with you a lot of times, you are deep in your wisdom.

Thank God for Ben Howland.

by BruinFan1 on Apr 8, 2007 11:13 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

curious about the spread and UCLA's D
I wasn't able to watch UCLA's games this year against Oregon and Cal. I was only able to watch some of the FSU debacle because I was also trying to keep my one-year old son and my other kid from destroying their grandmother's house. From reading the game accounts, UCLA had its defensive problems primarily against the spread offenses it faced, and I am curious: what specifically gave UCLA problems against the spread?  

Blackjack seems to think that our problems were mostly personnel-related, primarily in the secondary; that doesn't strike me as correct, but since I didn't see too much of our games against teams utilizing the spread offense, I don't really think I am in a position to comment. However, others might have a contrary position and certainly will have a better understanding of our failures, so could someone please educate me? I am curious to know what some of the better informed BN posters saw as the central problem(s) with our D against the spread offense, particularly regarding Walker's schemes.

by ucladj89 on Apr 9, 2007 9:56 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I think he's right
Our secondary just isn't deep enough.  Oregon and Cal's third receiver seemed to be open all game (same goes for the game agianst WSU).  However, it may be that the main reason we weren't beaten on the ground was that there was no reason to run.  Why run if the other team can't stop the pass?
"Believe it or not, a website called FireHowland.com now exists."

by SuperBruinMan on Apr 9, 2007 4:35 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oregon game
Oregon rushed for 276 yards, passed for 148

The problem was stopping the run. Part of that was their big early lead, but we couldn't stop the run, so they kept running the ball.

"when you've seen how big the world is, how can you make due with this?"

by silverlakebruin on Apr 9, 2007 10:43 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Dixon ran for a bit didn't he?
But their third reciever (Pasinger?) was definetly open quite a bit.
"Believe it or not, a website called FireHowland.com now exists."

by SuperBruinMan on Apr 9, 2007 11:04 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I looked at them and don't know
exactly what conclusions to draw.  Sometimes we gave up more yards passing than running, and sometimes it went the other way.  Once we gave up very few yards, relatively speaking.  Other times we gave up what seemed like several miles.  What was so painfully obvious was that the games ceased being close quickly with the exception of that game in Indiana.

Now that I'm done with that little episode, I'm going off for some self-flagellation.  That was a painful experience reliving all of those disasters.

by Fox 71 on Apr 10, 2007 6:11 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I see one trend
Almost every game, there were multiple receivers that had big days (5 WSU receivers had 3 catches or more), or one receiver that really burned us (like Shackleford for UW).  I would say that points to depth being an issue.
"Believe it or not, a website called FireHowland.com now exists."

by SuperBruinMan on Apr 10, 2007 3:33 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I know, I know
Cal doesn't run a true spread, but IIRC they incorporated elements of the spread into their offense this year.

by ucladj89 on Apr 9, 2007 9:58 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

and...
having a pretty solid quarterback and running back in longshore and lynch helps.  plus, you got tedford up there who at least willing to try some new things and adjust his offense new trends, something that dorrell is has been very stubborn about

by redsand514 on Apr 10, 2007 8:35 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Next Year
For about the 100th time, I have watched again a reply of the UCLA/Southern Cal football game.  It lives in my DVD.  I am not the most technical fan on this site, but I do count myself amongst the most loyal.  I cannot, CANNOT watch the end of the UCLA/Southern Cal game, without a big ol' smile on my face.  I can only hope that we have more exciting games like that this year.  I now have license plate frames that read, "December 2, 2006" on the top, and the score "13-9" on the bottom, in UCLA colors.  My Easter gift to my sister/sharer of season tickets/equally obsessed UCLA fan.  So far, no reaction from fellow drivers, but then again, I live in LA.  I LOVE UCLA!  My very best wishes for next season!

by bluebruin on Apr 10, 2007 9:39 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bruins Nation, an unofficial daily online scrap book covering the greatest collegiate athletic program in the nation. GO BRUINS.
Start posting about the Bruins »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

13-9_ucla_baby____036_small
Videos from Washington/UCLA Football Game!
2145443360_ab27e15b11_b_small
Bleeding Blue and Gold ... Always
Morrell_small
The UCLA Passing Game Under Norm Chow
Arron_afflalo1_small
NBA Opening Night (Bruin Edition)
Rowing_picture_small
Football is like a box of chocolates

Recent FanPosts

Images_small
Non-Revenue Sports Bruin Review and Calendar
Telemachus_small
Washington @ UCLA Photos
Bruinsnation_small
A Quick Reflection On Steve Sarkasian For Rest Of 2009
Bruinsnation_small
Harrison Barnes' Amazing Trip To Howlandwood
Bruinsnation_small
The Big Red Signs Off
Moreyouknow_small
Pre-Game Guesses: Oregon State Results
Screen_shot_2009-09-28_at_6
13-9’s Tidbits: Washington Edition
Small
Hartman doesnt get it
Ucla_small
Ben Ball 09-10, Day 1

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS


Managers

094_small Ajax

Bruinsnation_small Nestor

Menelaus2_small Menelaus

Arron_afflalo1_small Tydides

Brad_pitt_as_achilles_small Achilles

Small Meriones

Telemachus_small Telemachus

Small Odysseus

Blue_bellerophon_small Bellerophon

Authors

Images_small Ryan Rosenblatt

Official Partner of CBS Sports