I understand this site can be hard on dorrell, but it's not like its undue. The moderators and other posters continually give objective arguments that are always backed up with hard facts. I understand that numbers can be manipulated in many ways, but they always give there sources and from that information how they came to their conclusions. I like many other bruin fans are optimistic about the season, we want to see our time succeed, if we didn't we wouldn't spend our money on games we can watch on tv or at the local sports bar. So for anyone that plans to rip on this site again for being anti-dorrell please do your research and look at the body of work that this site has amassed. Read the about us section, so you understand who these ppl are.
About dorrell, I'm not too optimistic, I'll give him a chance but that obviously isn't by choice (were not the AD). For those pro-Dorrell people, please again take a look at the 7 games we won the past year, and read the posts following such games. We had a few quality wins. The one that sticks out is Rice. At half-time being up only 13-0 and 16-10 going into the 4th quarter is not acceptable. I also feel like the random posters who see this as an anti-dorrell, were non-existent between the suc game and the Emerald Bowl. If you read this blog, Nestor, dumpdorrell, and other posters were actually optimistic about Dorrell because for some reason he showed a different side of himself, (except for still conservative play calling), that gave us, and especially the moderators some hope. But then if you watched the disaster in bay, Dorrell for some reason regressed back to his old self. So for you people who see this as anti-dorrell, you're blind because Nestor and the other prominent posters will give Dorrell credit when its due, until then we're hoping he'll prove us wrong, and not just once, but consistently.