Lavin has no manners and I'm not surprised (must read)

by yellcrew on Jul 10, 2007 3:38 PM PDT

UPDATE III: Its official. Lavo is now a national embarrassment. BN story is now linked on SI.com and Deadspin. -N

UPDATE II: The story has gone national. AOL's Fanhouse now has a post on it which tracks how the story spread from BN. -N

UPDATE: Bumped. Now that the story is in the LA Times. Note the LAT didn't bother to give BN any credit even though it is pretty clear the story appeared here first. Gotta love the traditional media taking stories from blog and then "reporting" it without any attribution whatsover. Anyways now that the story is out, it should be pretty much clear to everyone else why we have found Lavin to be so detestable, dishonest, scumbag, and a fraud all these years. GO BRUINS. -N

Read the email Steve Lavin sent to his wedding guests. This goes against all rules of wedding etiquette!

Update from the Jarou/Lavin wedding headquarters in Newport Beach.

Unexpectedly we have received a stunning 95% RSVP on sent out wedding invitations. As a result, our wedding guest list has far exceeded the maximum capacity for a traditional ceremony and reception at The Montage Resort.

After giving serious consideration to alternative plans we have decided the best option at this late stage is to head to Europe to create a magical wedding day.

Please accept our sincere apologies for any inconveniences this change in our wedding plans may have caused you.

We are sorry that we will not be able to share our big day with family and friends. We will be sure to send you photos of our wedding upon our return from Europe.

Please confirm that you received this email.

Thanks in advance for your understanding.

Warm regards,

Steve & Mary

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of BruinsNation's (BN) editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of BN's editors.

Tweet Comment 72 comments | 0 recs |

Do you like this story?

Comments

How do I know ...

this is not a joke.

This just can't be true. Can it?

by bluestreet on Jul 9, 2007 12:48 PM PDT reply actions

Ditto

I can't believe this. But then again...

If this is a real email, I am just at a loss for words here.

by Barnes2JJ on Jul 9, 2007 12:50 PM PDT up reply actions

Classy!

The Lizard of Westwood strikes again!

by tasser10 on Jul 9, 2007 1:06 PM PDT reply actions

Ok

I will go out on a limb and trust this is real because:

You say it is real; and,
I really, really, really, want to believe that this guy is a true scumsucker and this proves it.

by Barnes2JJ on Jul 9, 2007 1:29 PM PDT reply actions

unless...

lavin wants to uninvite my friend to the wedding. still bad wedding etiquette to uninvite someone.

by yellcrew on Jul 9, 2007 1:42 PM PDT up reply actions

It's horrible

etiquette. The guy has some bucks. The Montage is a major league resort. I find it very hard to believe that either he, or the resort, cannot figure out some alternate arrangement.

My wife is an event planner and there is always a solution to this kind of problem. It's not rocket science to figure out what to do with more guests (especially when you know in advance). And I cannot believe he singled out your friend. Surely, if the wedding goes forward, people would hear about this.

You don't just tell everyong "Kidding!" and take off for Europe.

Wasn't Coach Wooden going to be Best Man? Was he "disinvited," too? By email? This whole thing is just wild.

by Barnes2JJ on Jul 9, 2007 1:54 PM PDT up reply actions

This can't be true but...

I am willing to keep an open mind because I am sure my story about pom pom and the Angels seemed hard to believe. And that was definitely truthful.

However, I am a caterer and if he is cancelling that wedding, then he is going to lose all of his deposit money which will not be a small amount.

If he did send that email, my guess is that he is trying to throw off wedding crashers who, we all know won't be there to see his Flintstone head.

Or he is trying to shake loose some not-so-necessary guests and then will make private calls to those he still wants attending.

I wonder if Moose Bailey made the list? He owes lavin a lot for the free education he received at the expense of the Bruin Basketball team

by UCngLA on Jul 9, 2007 2:13 PM PDT reply actions

Speaking of a free education

Don't forget Ryan Walcott.

by bluestreet on Jul 9, 2007 2:37 PM PDT up reply actions

OK, that's it

I was going to send them a Blender, but now that's completely out.

by Fox 71 on Jul 9, 2007 2:36 PM PDT reply actions

Can I have it?

I love blenders. Plus I just got engaged.

by tasser10 on Jul 9, 2007 3:32 PM PDT up reply actions

Free advice

Add nothing to the kitchen (or any other part of the cave) until Mama Bear (aka Mrs. Tasser10) says it's OK.

by Fox 71 on Jul 9, 2007 3:35 PM PDT up reply actions

You haven't met Mr. BB

Currently, our big debate is if I should bring my microwave or not. He says no, claiming his works fine and is already in Alabama. I say yes, because for what ever strange reason, I just can't bear to part with it.

Mr. BB spent more time with the registry than I think is healthy for the average man.

by bruinbabe2000 on Jul 9, 2007 3:54 PM PDT up reply actions

Funny story about a blender

Last year, Mr. BB wanted to get some kitchen electrics. Not wanting to decrease my fun with a registry scanner, I told him to wait until we registered.

We were at Target, and I forget what items he was thinking of buying, but one of them was a blener. When he asked me which one I would be least excited to open as a wedding gift, I said the blender, which he immediatly purchased.

by bruinbabe2000 on Jul 9, 2007 4:03 PM PDT up reply actions

Another important point

When she wants your opinion on something she will tell you what it is.

The proper answer is always "Yes Dear".

by artybruin on Jul 9, 2007 3:39 PM PDT reply actions

Arty is once again correct

And you must immediately start choking on something and become abolutely unable to talk when she asks which pair of pants makes her rear end look fatter.

And you'll love getting "the look" when you come in after a tough day at the office. "What's the matter," you'll say, and that's wrong. It's wrong because that gives her a chance to say, "Well if you don't know, I'm certainly not going to tell you." When you get the look, leave, go to the local Kwikee Mart, buy a rose, and present it to her because you just felt like it. And hope that she hasn't changed the locks on the house. (And you never will know what it is that caused "the look.")

Oh, Tasser, you're so lucky to be getting all this advice from your Bruin Brothers.

by Fox 71 on Jul 9, 2007 3:46 PM PDT up reply actions

Looks

Fox is soooooooooo right.

Mine has 3 looks:

Level 1
Pay attention and read the signs and everything will be OK......or
Level 2
Just admit your wrong and move on.....or
Level 3
You don't want to know about level 3, it scares me and I'm practically fearless.

Remember, if the wife/mother is not happy, no one will be happy.

Experience brings pearls of wisdom in this area. Use it as you see fit.

by artybruin on Jul 9, 2007 5:00 PM PDT up reply actions

Ltes not forget to drop the last word of . . .

your intended sentence. For example: Its okay to say, "Whats wrong?" but NEVER say "Whats wrong NOW" or "Whats wrong THIS TIME" or . . . god forbid . . . "I have never seen that dirty magazine before."

by charnaw on Jul 10, 2007 12:57 PM PDT up reply actions

Oh no

With me it's usually more "what did I do?". But luckily there isn't much drama so those questions have very seldom been used.

by tasser10 on Jul 10, 2007 1:05 PM PDT up reply actions

Please tell Mr. BB that

Currently, his answers are "Whatever" and "You're wrong" and we aren't even living together.

If I don't have a job lined up right away, it will be nice to have the extra time to set up our apartment the way I want it.

by bruinbabe2000 on Jul 9, 2007 3:57 PM PDT up reply actions

One final thought

When tempted to engage in a "now I've had it" moment when obviously you are right and she is way off base, remember this advice until the day you are lowered into the ground... "Do you want to be right or happy?". The choice is always up to you.... Good luck trying to understand the "other half".
Bill

BillSouthBay

by Mensgym on Jul 9, 2007 3:58 PM PDT reply actions

Again, please tell Mr. BB that

Any other guy, I could have won my case with a long time ago, but I had to marry someone who is going to school to be a clinical psychologist and can play mind games with you all the time. That and the fact that he is one stubborn mule.

by bruinbabe2000 on Jul 9, 2007 4:06 PM PDT up reply actions

This HAS to be a joke, right?

I mean, who DOES this? Who dis-invites people from their own wedding?

That being said, we ARE talking about a guy who showed the kind of foresight you need to NOT RECRUIT A SINGLE TRUE POINT GUARD to have on the roster his last 2 years...

Guy couldn't effectively plan for and manage 12 guys -- why would he be able to handle a couple hundred or so?

WHY NOT US? WHY NOT NOW?

by Meriones on Jul 9, 2007 4:15 PM PDT reply actions

confirmation

I'd like to see some independent confirmatio before believing this.Lavin came across as nothing short of scum in how he handled himself as the UCLA coach. But this would kick up the scum factor to an unimaginable level. Can you forward us the actual email?

by Nestor on Jul 9, 2007 5:15 PM PDT reply actions

this is 100% true

Someone in my office was invited to the wedding and told me this afternoon Lavin & his fiancee had eloped. She said the email went out last night at about 2:00 in the morning.

by SuinBruin on Jul 9, 2007 5:56 PM PDT reply actions

Unbelievable ...

I have gotten another email from a pretty solid source indicating that this may be true.

What a SCumbag.

by Nestor on Jul 10, 2007 4:52 AM PDT up reply actions

a stunning 95% RSVP

How was he supposed to know people like him?

by SuperBruinMan on Jul 9, 2007 6:01 PM PDT reply actions

That number must include . . .

Lav's hair, makeup, wardrobe, joke writing and spin doctor staff.

by charnaw on Jul 10, 2007 12:58 PM PDT up reply actions

You've all lost that Lavin feeling

...

if only we had "eloped" with our basketball program and uninvited Lavin to be our head coach ...

by DumpDorrell on Jul 9, 2007 7:45 PM PDT reply actions

If he gets married in Europe

then at least he'll be able to invite most of his former players to the wedding.

by Class of 86 on Jul 9, 2007 9:07 PM PDT up reply actions

LOL!!!

by bluegold on Jul 9, 2007 10:58 PM PDT up reply actions

Oh man....

this is so rude. I can tell you if I did this, I'd feel like crap, and never hear the end of it from my family. Lavin is a real dirtbag. Well, I guess this gets Coach Wooden off the hook from being the best man, right?

by sbizzy57 on Jul 9, 2007 11:47 PM PDT reply actions

FWIW

I related this affair to Mrs. Fox 71, who neither knows who Coach Howland's predecessor was nor cares. Yet even she was forced to roll her eyes. (By the way, Tasser, when the future Mrs. Tasser10 rolls her eyes at you, that's not anywhere near as bad as "the look." You still have hope.)

by Fox 71 on Jul 10, 2007 6:42 AM PDT up reply actions

Thanks fellas!

Well I've already surrendered so no worries there. Otherwise I wouldn't be leaving NY to join her in Cali. I do have some leeway in the kitchen since I know my way around there. But her tactic is not based on "looks". She just gets quiet, which is FAR more effective and quite frightening. It's refreshing though to be with someone who can put you in your place that easily, I wouldn't want to be with a pushover.

by tasser10 on Jul 10, 2007 6:51 AM PDT up reply actions

The worst thing about this

is that it sounds like a lie. Sure its rude, very rude. Just the lack of decorum is stunning. The way it was delivered and written hard to believe. But its the fact that is sounds like a big lie that gives it a contemptible feel. They could have just said that they had decided to elope and they're sorry and hope everyone understands ... that they would make it up to everyone with a party or something. To say that there was no way to accomodate everyone they invited is disingenuous at a minimum, as others have pointed out, and smacks of ulterior motives. It's slick and smarmy and just plain classless. I expect that from Laughin ... but his fiance? Well, maybe they are right for each other.

by DumpDorrell on Jul 10, 2007 8:33 AM PDT reply actions

Having gone through the wedding hoopla myself

This reaks of BS (the situation, not the source, which I fully believe to be credible).

First, as a couple of people have mentioned, if this resort is the five star place they say it is, they would bend over backwards to accomidate you. They ask you right away how many people you are inviting and you go from there.

Second, it must have cost them a pretty penny to cancel, as others have mentioned.

Which leads me to believe that they couldn't make their guaranteed head count. Instead of a 95% attendace, they meant 95% regrets and paying the cancellation fees were better than the embaressment of such a low attended wedding.

From what others have told me, he is pretty good when it comes to burning bridges. This just proves them right.

by bruinbabe2000 on Jul 10, 2007 8:48 AM PDT up reply actions

Update from the Fishwrap

Seems like this is the real deal, folks:

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/bruin/2007/07/coach-lav-leave.html

by Barnes2JJ on Jul 10, 2007 8:56 AM PDT reply actions

My comment on LAT blog

Here's what I added:

You have a source on this OTHER than BruinsNation, right? Because basically doing nothing besides cutting and pasting from a blog, while kind of sketchy already, without attribution is just plain unethical.

by Westwood Wizard on Jul 10, 2007 9:50 AM PDT reply actions

This guy was UCLA's headcoach??!!??

As Jim Healey would say: Who goofed, I've got to know.

The answer, of course, is Pete Dalis. Dalis handed over to this bozo clown the most esteemed program in college sports.

Howland is a rare exception, but UCLA has a pattern of these clown hirings.

The next circus begins September.

by bluegold on Jul 10, 2007 10:01 AM PDT reply actions

Re Coach Howland's predecessor -

Pushing another Jim Healy button - "Wow ... what a nerd."

And there are so many others that James the Great would have used about this guy.

by Fox 71 on Jul 10, 2007 10:13 AM PDT up reply actions

My old man and I were talking about Healy

Over the weekend. I didn't know that Patrick Healy, a reporter for KNBC-TV, was his son.

May he always rest in peace.

by bruinbabe2000 on Jul 10, 2007 10:36 AM PDT up reply actions

Gee, I didn't know that either

He should have, all along, signed off with

"...reporting, Patrick Healy, son of Jim Healy..."

I would not have blamed him for it.

by bluegold on Jul 10, 2007 11:25 AM PDT up reply actions

You got that right

That's very noble lineage.

Again, I request the keeper of knowledge of these things to remind us where the Healy tribute site is. It's worth spending a half an hour or so there.

by Fox 71 on Jul 10, 2007 3:42 PM PDT up reply actions

Here's one

http://www.johnspeedie.com/healy/healybytes.html

The Benoit Benjamin one cracks me up every time.

by bruinbabe2000 on Jul 10, 2007 8:55 PM PDT up reply actions

BB, that was very kind of you

I've always said about you - "She's a lovely lady, and my apologies to her."

by Fox 71 on Jul 10, 2007 9:44 PM PDT up reply actions

I always loved the sound bite of the man laughing

"a tih hih hihhhhhh"

by UCngLA on Jul 10, 2007 10:10 PM PDT up reply actions

It sounds like this may be real

since the Latimes said they verified with hotel caterer and they said it's still on. Lesson to Lav, don't put anything in an e-mail that you don't want to easily get into the hands of others. Also, pick up the phone! I can't believe he sent an e-mail. lol

by bruin95 on Jul 10, 2007 10:27 AM PDT reply actions

Lavin and wedding

It would fit perfectly for SL to send out twice as many invites as he could accommodate, and then invite JW, so all invited would want to come see JW (whose wedding is this?).... I hope Dalis bought a new tuxedo for this, spent his next month's dues at Bel-Air on preparations and guaranteed the deposit at the Montage. Maybe there will be a measure of justice after all.
Bill

BillSouthBay

by Mensgym on Jul 10, 2007 10:38 AM PDT reply actions

2 plagiarisms in one day, looking for the Trifecta

so two stories have been lifted from BruinsNation, allegedly, in just one day. The "protecting our borders" basketball story in the Daily Bruin and now the LA Times story on the Lavin fiasco. Anyone buy the Trifecta ticket? Could pay big ...

by DumpDorrell on Jul 10, 2007 11:36 AM PDT reply actions

does dumpdorrell.com count?

just kidding.

by uclaw1 on Jul 10, 2007 11:54 AM PDT up reply actions

The LA Times

On a side note, the paper continues to deteriorate, almost by the day.

Fewer stories. Shorter stories. Same old Trojan bias. The paper won't even acknowledge my complaining emails anymore. And if you hold up all sections of the paper to the light, you can almost see through it. It's that thin.

Fox, you will be proud. I have reduced my subscription to "weekends only" and have dropped delivery from Monday through Friday. I figured that if the LAT was going to continually reduce both quantity and quality, then I need not pay the same price for a lesser and smaller product.

And remember, I'm a 20 year subscriber. It's all about the baby steps.

by Barnes2JJ on Jul 10, 2007 12:23 PM PDT up reply actions

Newspapers in LA

It just doesn't work anymore. People do not have time to read the paper, what with the 1hr commute each way. At least in New York, people can read on the subway and on the train. I don't know, I think the printed news is on its way to extinction...and there is nothing better than the Long Tail of the Internet to get the news you want.

by tasser10 on Jul 10, 2007 12:55 PM PDT up reply actions

Well

I have to disagree to some extent, although you make some good points.

To some folks (like me), there is still something about holding on to an actual paper edition of the paper. I don't know what it is, but I enjoy it. And I do find a way to read the thing, even if I have to read a little in the morning, then finish it later at night.

I realize I am a dying breed with this opinion, but I think, for the foreseeable future, printed papers will still hang on, although their format is changing because of the internet (and they are also obviously hurting because of the net).

But I have been a faithful subscriber for nearly 20 years and have seriously enjoyed the Times, aside from certain writers in the sports pages, and the bias which I believe exists.

But with all of the recent turnover and budget saving measures at the Times, it's really a thin rag these days. It's a shame. It's like watching a dying animal in its last throes, except I do not think it will actually die out completely.

do u c? it is 2 kool 2 B me.

by Barnes2JJ on Jul 10, 2007 1:14 PM PDT up reply actions

Coupons

The only reason I would subscribe to any paper.

by bruinbabe2000 on Jul 10, 2007 1:25 PM PDT up reply actions

That is one reason

we are still getting the Sunday edition.

And the wife enjoys the comic pages, too. She would hit me if she knew I just wrote that.

Except it's true.

by Barnes2JJ on Jul 10, 2007 1:28 PM PDT up reply actions

Story about the comics

My mom is a vocational ed teacher. Several years ago, she was disgusted by her students' lack of knowledge of current events, so she brought the newspaper to class. One of her students asked her, "What about the funnies?" to which my mom replied, "You aren't getting the funnies."

My brother and I laughed about that for a long time.

by bruinbabe2000 on Jul 10, 2007 8:51 PM PDT up reply actions

Ha!

I am definitely not letting the wife read this thread!

by Barnes2JJ on Jul 11, 2007 5:34 AM PDT up reply actions

I know

It is still a nice feeling to have the actual paper in your hands, reading over a nice cup of Joe with your feet up on your terrace watching the sunrise or sunset. I think it will still be around until we find a way to print our own newspaper at home with only the articles we want (that day is coming). The Internet has simply changed the landscape, for nearly everything. To wit, I don't those kids who write like u will be subscribing to printed newspapers...though u r still kool!

by tasser10 on Jul 10, 2007 1:43 PM PDT up reply actions

The actual paper

I read the Washington Post every morning, not every word, but enough. I scan every page, and if I see something interesting, I can read it. It's more difficult to browse an online news source.

Bob O. (Signholder #3)

by TuneMan7 on Jul 10, 2007 2:05 PM PDT up reply actions

Thank you , Barnes

I feel like the doctor who just took care of the very difficult operation. I have completed a daunting task - a partial excision of the fishwrap gland.

Kids, don't try this at home. I'm a trained professional.

by Fox 71 on Jul 10, 2007 3:45 PM PDT up reply actions

Where do I send the bill, doc?

Wait, don't answer that.

by Barnes2JJ on Jul 10, 2007 4:04 PM PDT up reply actions

Whoops

I meant, where do I send my check for your services?

Still--don't answer that.

by Barnes2JJ on Jul 10, 2007 4:40 PM PDT up reply actions

From the AOL Fanhouse article above

"This story originally showed up in the diaries at Bruins Nation yesterday. At least four hours later the same story was reported on the LA Times UCLA blog (it may have been a mere coincidence, but it seems to be yet another example of a failure to attribute to a blog by a mainstream writer)."

I would say plagiarism by an LA Times writer is much worse than plagiarism by a Daily Bruin writer (if either of them are cases of plagiarism).

by SuperBruinMan on Jul 11, 2007 1:24 AM PDT reply actions

Laying aside whether it is or isn't

It's just so easy for the author to mention where he or she got the info. And it doesn't cause the author to lose anything in terms of prestige, as far as I can tell.

Ah well. Maybe the ethical generation gap is showing.

by Fox 71 on Jul 11, 2007 5:31 AM PDT up reply actions

From this morning's LA Times

Jerry Crowe wrote, "BTW, all reports to the contrary, John Wooden had respectfully declined an invitation to be Lavin's best man."

by SuperBruinMan on Jul 11, 2007 2:03 PM PDT reply actions

Thank God!

At least Coach Wooden was spared the absolute indignity of being "disinvited" (as Best Man, no less) by email!

Although now I wonder if Coach Wooden was planning to attend the wedding, even if not as Best Man. Was he also the recipient of Lavinoma's mass email saying ixnay to the whole event?

The whole thing disgusts me. I would love to hear from the people at the Montage about this. For those of you who have not been there, it is an unbelievable 5 star resort in Laguna. Great to relax with a $16 glass of cheap wine.

I will say it again: I think Lavin has some bucks. I am sure the Montage, being what it is, would have worked out some type of accommodation with the "unexpected" additional guests to the event (assuming Stevo coughed up some more dough).

I could be wrong but I think there is more to all this. Is it worth digging into? In the grand scheme of things, no, but it's a juicy story, no doubt.

by Barnes2JJ on Jul 11, 2007 2:13 PM PDT up reply actions

Is anything more needed?

Assuming there is more out there, would any incremental tidbits of knowledge cause any further deterioration or rehabilitation of the image or reputation of Coach Howland's predecessor? I can think of nothing that could be found that could make it any better or any worse. It is what it is - an example of the epitome of ill manners that has probably made the erstwhile best man say "Goodness gracious sakes alive."

I would prefer using the energy to figure a way to intensify the scrutiny on the thugs over on Figueroa.

(Having said that, I confess that I still look at the National Inquirer when I'm going through the check-out lines. So if it were determined that the RSVP's said that 95% would be no-shows rather than vice-versa, it would be fun to see how Coach Howland's predecessor would spin that one away.)

by Fox 71 on Jul 11, 2007 6:44 PM PDT up reply actions

Yep, I confess I look to

It started when I was in high school. I worked in a grocery store, and those magazines somehow had a way of ending up in the breakroom.

My guess is that is that it's a 95% no show. If this is the five store resort that Barnes2JJ says it is (and I have no reason to think that it wouldn't be) they would have easily accomidated those guests.

But I'm ready to move on. We all have better things to talk about.

by bruinbabe2000 on Jul 11, 2007 8:11 PM PDT up reply actions

Something else is up.

First let me say, as a cater, the comment about it being unheard of to have 95% of guests attend is absurd. There may be some truth into the idea that 95% rarely attend, but you do not use that as a measuring stick for how many spaces you reserve. The idea is that you commit to a certain number and then you have a deadline for final numbers. That deadline comes after your "RSVP by" date. That is the time when you can, if you like, invite those who did not make the cut for your first invite list.

Now let's suppose he did do exactly what he said he did and let's also assume his guest list was 200 (which is huge and probably isn't what he had but it will help make my point). If you assume that 95% won't attend, you have to assume that at least 75% will attend. Well, 95% of 200 = 190. 75% = 150. My point is that you can find space for 40 people or 4 more rounds (round tables that seat 10 people). If the guest list is smaller, say 150, then you are only looking for 3 more tables.

And finally I have to use my favorite go to piece of common sense: What is everyone else doing? And by that I mean if everyone else who gets married in the US is applying this 95% theory and we have all been to plenty of weddings, then why haven't anyone of us ever been on the receiving side of one of the "disinvites" ?

My guess is that he probably didn't want to explain why Coach wasn't at the wedding.

And to answer BB's comment about something better to do. Yes, I do but pointing out lav's absurdities is a great time out from my office work that I so dread.

by UCngLA on Jul 11, 2007 9:19 PM PDT up reply actions

EXACTLY!

I think he wanted to show off and have Coach at his wedding. People RSVP'ed and said they would come, I guarantee you mostly to see Coach, not for the Lizard's wedding. Then Coach respectfully declined...so the Lizard had nothing to show for it and cancelled the whole thing! SLEAZEBAG!

by tasser10 on Jul 12, 2007 7:12 AM PDT up reply actions

My gut feeling remains that they were disappointed

That so few people were going to attend.

The other thing that seemed very odd to me was the way the email ended with "warm regards". If these are family and friends, I think "All our love" or something to that extent is appropriate. "Warm regards" is something you use for a business relationship.

by bruinbabe2000 on Jul 12, 2007 10:27 AM PDT up reply actions

Come on, BB

Don't you send Mr. BB off to work every morning by giving him a firm handshake and saying, "Very truly yours"?

by Fox 71 on Jul 12, 2007 12:14 PM PDT up reply actions

You just reminded me of an episode of

"That 70s Show." It's their junior prom, and the guys try to convince Eric to get a hotel room so that he and Donna can have their first time. Eric argues that it won't be spontanious, and imagines him and Donna negotiating the event like two business people or lawyers.

It's two months today, so I still get the "Good night my dear wife." However, we'll see about next month after we actually move in together and have to work as a team.

by bruinbabe2000 on Jul 12, 2007 4:48 PM PDT up reply actions