Bruins Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: Backing the Pack for NC State Fans!


Michigan Loss: The Bruin Angle

Before I post my initial notes and thoughts on the BYU Cougars, I wanted to bring to your attention the dominant topic that has been exploding like fire crackers in every corner of the internets, talk radio, and television dealing with college football: Michigan's epic loss to Appalachian State. I believe there is a Bruin angle to this story.

Obviously, a lot of Michigan fans took the loss very hard and some of them are still trying to figure out how to deal with the embarrassment of losing to some non D-1 team.

One particular Michigan alum though - Joey at Straight Bangin' - whose writing I have highlighted here on BN in previous years, posted these thoughts, that I thought were very germane to what we often talk about wrt UCLA football program (and would have about our basketball program as well if we were around during the Lavin years). Here is Joey (emphasis mine throughout):

Supposedly, no one could have seen Saturday's loss to Appalachian State coming, but yet we all sort of did, some more readily than others. These sorts of things--the embarrassments, the mind-boggling stubbornness, the routine failure on the big stage, the inability to defend the spread, the suspect special teams, the bland and unimaginative offense, the recurring problems from year to year and class to class and coordinator to coordinator--are not new. They happen a lot. For instance, when Appalachian State players were quoted after the game as saying that they felt good about their chances because they'd studied film and knew Michigan's simple schemes, were there not flashbacks to so many losses previous? USC, alone, seems to know Michigan better than the Wolverines do, and they only study the film for bowl game. What do you think Jim Tressel says? Lloyd Carr has made these absurd realities as much a part of his legacy as he has that one miracle season which he will never duplicate. Ever. Lloyd Carr football has been timid, self-defeating, predictable, naive football, and Michigan fans need to demand more.

Yet for years, most Michigan fans have tried to shout down any polemicist who has tried to point out the cracks in the foundation. Mainstream writers like Jim Carty and Drew Sharp are ridiculed on message boards for their anti-Carr bias; bloggers are nattering nabobs of negativity who can be easily dismissed as fringe crackpots; and even casual fans who'd like more from a program than empty consolations are told to be realistic. What's unrealistic about job accountability? What's so wrong with wanting a football team that doesn't make you fear a collapse or gird for disappointment? Is there any powerhouse program that does less with more? That makes winning feel like losing so often? That is so vainglorious that it will happily adhere to its old-world tactics, training regiments, and public relations protocols while everything else changes around it? Lloyd Carr is the man who inherited this great institution of college football and has allowed for this steady decay. And he no longer even runs a clean program, so what is he doing all day aside from seeking out more sand in which he can bury his head?

The saddest part, though, and perhaps the most damning, is that this has all been countenanced by the fan base at large. No Michigan alumnus or fan--not me, not my friends, not other "haters" who speak out of frustration and not malice--wants to see the school compromise its values or elevate winning to a place that forces the University of Michigan to become Ohio State. But there is a long way in between that and the prevailing mindset now: led by Carr, a culture of inertia and acceptance of mediocrity has enveloped Michigan football. It's the reason that Carr can fail in predictable ways year after year without being held accountable or asked to make real changes. And it needs to end if Michigan is still serious about college football.

I certainly didn't envision Michigan losing to a team that isn't even eligible for the BCS, but Saturday's loss to Appalachian State was just a miserable capstone in the continued decline Lloyd Carr has presided over. Anyone who can't see that, or who wants to pretend that lost Rose Bowls mitigate these damages, needs to move to whatever alternate reality Lloyd Carr has found.
And I will pile this on from my SBN colleague Maize n Brew Dave:
Sadly, we've known for years this was coming. Michigan was the program destined to do something this stupid, this lamentable, this shocking. Whether in the Rose Bowl or playing in a game it should actually win, Michigan has always been the team on the edge of catastrophic failure. Lloyd, no matter how much I may respect and admire him as a person, really is as bad a coach as outsiders have mocked. What is worse, the men he has hired, specifically Ron English, have shown themselves to be just as recalcitrant and opposed to change as Carr himself.

The culture has gone from "Leaders and the Best" to "Cover Your Ass." It's not about being the Champions, it's about not losing the championship. Do just enough to win. Never more, often less. And it is Carr's players' penchant for mailing in efforts against teams it considers beneath them that has delivered Michigan its greatest humiliation.
I certainly hope 2-3 years from now we don't have to go back and look up those posts to formulate our thoughts on our football program if it craters like the Michigan team did on Saturday or Lavin's basketball team did four years ago.

The sad thing is given the incredible talent the Wolverines have on offense and given the mediocrity of the Big-10, I can still see this team rebounding from that horrific loss and end up having a 8-9 win season, which may just be enough to save Carr's job given what he has done at Ann Arbor.

Sounds familiar? It reminds me of having to suffer through Donahue football in his later years when he was being able to stick around despite being an all around horrific and uninspiring head coach because of the Rose Bowl victories he accumulated early in the season.

Anyways, that post reminded me of posts on UCLA message boards during the days after the UCLA basketball team lost to CSUN at Pauley.

I know we haven't reached our final verdict on Karl Dorrell. I know we have to wait for a while to get our answers on whether Dorrell can deliver a money season at UCLA, which he can use as a base to replicate successful seasons in the coming years.

What we do know is that many of us here may never have been coaches in our real lives, but at this point we are experienced enough after following and obsessing about our football and basketball programs on a day-to-day basis, to know whether they are well coached, well prepared to be successful on the short team and long term basis.

Currently, the data point doesn't favor Dorrell. And a blowout win over a pathetic Stanford team doesn't do much to change the big picture. Dorrell still has to put together a season in which his team plays like a well-coached and well-prepared team on a week-to-week basis, finally delivering at least a BCS bowl game in his fifth season. And, even if he does deliver a 10 win season, we will have to take very close look at how those 10 wins came, so that we don't allow it to be spun as a "successful" and "gratifying" season as the "10 win" season from 2 years ago in which desperate, come-from-behind wins against lesser teams, hid the deficiencies of a mediocre football team. And even if Dorrell delivers that "Show Me" Season, that doesn't mean he gets a pass for sliding back to mediocrity of his previous four seasons. He needs to bring it every year and if he doesn't he needs to hear from us.

In other words, we have to stay vigilant.

We can't get complacent after few cheap wins. It sounds like certain Michigan football fans are getting their due, despite seeing all the signs in years of timid, self-defeating, predictable, naive football. In that Michigan loss there are some prescient signs and valuable lessons for everyone who loves UCLA football. I wanted to make sure no one misses those signs when it comes to our football program in this particular Nation.

GO BRUINS.

0 recs | Comment 22 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

The similarity is amazing
"The saddest part, though, and perhaps the most damning, is that this has all been countenanced by the fan base at large. No [UCLA] alumnus or fan--not me, not my friends, not other "haters" who speak out of frustration and not malice--wants to see the school compromise its values or elevate winning to a place that forces [UCLA] to become [USC]. But there is a long way in between that and the prevailing mindset now: led by [Dorrell], a culture of inertia and acceptance of mediocrity has enveloped [UCLA] football. It's the reason that [Dorrell] can fail in predictable ways year after year without being held accountable or asked to make real changes. And it needs to end if [UCLA] is still serious about college football."

by SuperBruinMan on Sep 4, 2007 6:08 PM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

If push comes to shove,
I would trade KD for Carr.  

by bluegold on Sep 4, 2007 6:20 PM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

That's not automatic
in my opinion.  I have often said I would trade Mr. Dorrell for any coach of any team anywhere in the country.  Coach Carr, for all his achievements (or actually, his one achievement) may be the only coach who brings less to the table than Mr. Dorrell.

When I watched the Rose Bowl (with the sound off, of course) I was struck by the fact that Michigan's passing game had one and only one feature.  Henne would take the snap and do a seven step drop.  You could put an "X" on the field seven steps behind the center, and shortly after the snap, that's where Henne would be.  It took justsc no time to figure that out, so the DE's just took off for the "X" and waited for Henne to get there.  That's no different from two up the middle runs then a quick 3 yard out.

I didn't watch the MU ASU game, but from what I've heard, nothing came as a surprise to ASU.  Coach Carr seems to be more predictable than Mr. Dorrell.

So I am not ready to automatically trade Mr. Dorrell for Coach Carr.  Since we didn't fire him before the season, we can't very well trade him after he started with a win.  And bluegold, you didn't specify whether there were any other choices for the trade.  For example, a picture of Vince Lombardi might be available.  But Coach Carr is really bad.

by Fox 71 on Sep 4, 2007 7:03 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

And think about this
Everyone has annointed Southern Cal as OMG the Greatest Team Ever best on their destruction of a predictable, boring, vanilla Michigan team in the Rose Bowl. I think the Michigan game from Sat actually also takes some of the luster of the Trojans early season rankings.

by Nestor on Sep 4, 2007 7:06 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Valid points
However, Carr does have some achievements of note.  Plus, he seems to be able to string two English sentences together and make sense.

by bluegold on Sep 4, 2007 7:52 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I admit I'm stuck
Boy, what a choice.  An absolutely, unfailingly, totally predictable coach who can articulate actual thoughts versus an absolutely, unfailingly, totally predictable coach who utters only cliches.  I really don't know which is worse.  Would you rather hear cogent sentences that infuriate you to the point of self-immolation, or scratch your head until it bleeds trying to figure out what the gibberish is supposed to mean?  

I feel like I'm strapped to the gurney waiting the needle in the vein, and the warden runs in with some sort of important news, but I can't understand what he's saying.

Maybe if I just close my eyes real tight, I'll wake up and it will be basketball season.

by Fox 71 on Sep 4, 2007 8:16 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

wow
what an excellent well written piece!!!  This is Farmer/Hazzard/Donahue/Lavin/Dorrell ... incredible. Thanks for the great find!
editor, DumpDorrell.com ... formerly posted as DumpDorrell

by BruinCore on Sep 4, 2007 6:23 PM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Replace Carr/Michigan...
...with Dorrell/UCLA, and this thing does not skip a beat.

by Ajax on Sep 4, 2007 6:27 PM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I would point out
that Carr did win a national championship at Michigan, and Michigan has been to three Rose Bowls in the past four years. If Dorrell approached that level of competence, I'd be ecstatic. Carr still needs to be fired, all that said. Like tomorrow.

by CAJason80 on Sep 4, 2007 6:31 PM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yeap
I apologize if I didn't make that point clear.

My comparsion was more between Carr and Donahue because I think that's more apporpriate one in this case. We should have fired Donahue a while before left UCLA.

Dorrell doesn't compare to Carr in terms of achievements, however the same mentality that has plagued Michigan football can be seen in UCLA football as well.

by Nestor on Sep 4, 2007 6:35 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Thanks for the shout, guys
Always appreciate seeing the Bangin' among the smart, good writing here.

As an outsider, my sense of KD is that he has his moments but just isn't equipped to lead a team to an elite level. From strategy to in-game decisions to recruiting (though that seems to be getting better, especially this year), UCLA seems like it deserves better. And, of course, I think you should keep applying the measured scrutiny that you already do. People may not want to hear it, but what else is new? This is a country that has allowed George Bush to lead it further and further down the wrong side of the prosperity bell curve while "facts" are ignored. Fight on. (That's a joke.)

by straightbangin on Sep 4, 2007 9:06 PM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Thanks, Joey
You managed to bring in a political issue that has nothing to do with ANYTHING.  Let me ask you to re-write this and take a potshot at some other irrelevant issue such as religion.  Hey, Ben Olson is Mormon (or at least he went to BYU.)  There's plenty to talk about there.  And Mr. Dorrell is black.  Lots there.

Nothing prevents you from choosing whatever figure of speech you choose.  But in my family (and the BN is family) we considered it a gaffe of the first magnitude to discuss politics or religion at the dinner table.  I think you detract from your main point when you take that tack, but that's just my opinion.

by Fox 71 on Sep 4, 2007 10:14 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Ben Olson=Mormon
He went on a 2 year Mormon mission.  If he is not Mormon, I don't know why he did that.  They don't sound like Club Med vacations.

by MOlson on Sep 4, 2007 10:50 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Was just trying to draw a parallel
From the comments that preceded mine, it seemed like many people here agreed that KD might not be the right coach for UCLA even as some UCLA fans have tried to shout down those who object. That's not so dissimilar from the media environment that surrounds politics. Maybe I shouldn't have dissed Bush. Sorry.

by straightbangin on Sep 4, 2007 10:54 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Hm...
I got your point Joey, and don't think you crossed any lines... Don't worry about it.

by jatteratious on Sep 4, 2007 11:17 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

You didn't cross any line
GWB is exactly who I think of when I think of incompetent leadership.

by Nestor on Sep 5, 2007 4:33 AM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

We are all adults here
and we respectively understand what you are trying to say Joey.  Besides, I thought by this point in time, Bush's legacy is a foregone conclusion. lol

by Steven on Sep 5, 2007 1:56 AM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

We disagree about where the lines are, I guess
I still think it's a distraction.  But I confess also that I am well out of the mainstream in many ways.  I think it has to do with age.

by Fox 71 on Sep 5, 2007 5:40 AM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Politics and Religion
I agree with Fox71 on this point. Others may disagree and assume that any particular political comment is a mainstream journalistic fact, but unfortunately, that may not play across the fruited plains. IMO it distracts from the message, so if the idea is to express a football or UCLA related concept, and we stick with the point rather than throw in gratuitous references, the point is better made. You may have the freedom to say anything you want, but the question is what makes sense to express to buttress an argument or proposition?
Bill
BillSouthBay

by BillSouthBay on Sep 5, 2007 9:03 AM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The point is not political
but the way it was formulated was. The point, in my opinion, was that GWB's tenure has been as divisive as KD's. It should be left at that. It is irresistible to take pot shots sometimes, understandably. But we'll stick to all things Bruin and we'll be fine.

by tasser10 on Sep 5, 2007 1:27 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bruins Nation, an unofficial daily online scrap book covering the greatest collegiate athletic program in the nation. GO BRUINS.
Start posting about the Bruins »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Thoughts on the Campaign of Champions Point Plan
Bruinsnation_small
UCLA: Where Amazing Begins

Recent FanPosts

Bruinsnation_small
Bruin Alum Chase Utley = A Starter For NL All Stars
Griffin_clippers_small
Hi Bruins.
2603_1028618641249_1398823305_30086007_6195771_n_small
OT: The Downfall of the MSM
080513__0038_1_small
OT -- Ariza to the Houston Rockets Artest to the Lakers
Small
UCLA U$C* football listed as #4 in top current rivalries
Bruinsnation_small
The Point Program For The Renovated Pauley "Seating Plan"
Small
Stephenson to Cincy
Small
New Top Safety Commit Earnest Thomas
Bruinsnation_small
Mustain's Academic Issues Get "Resolved" Magically

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini

SPONSORS


Managers

094_small Ajax

Bruinsnation_small Nestor

Menelaus2_small Menelaus

Arron_afflalo1_small Tydides

Brad_pitt_as_achilles_small Achilles

Small Meriones

Telemachus_small Telemachus

Small Odysseus

Blue_bellerophon_small Bellerophon

Authors

Images_small ryebreadraz

Official Partner of CBS Sports