Achilles Says: "Stanford Is A Must Win."
My feeling is that this week's game against Stanford is a "must win" for the Bruins.
Here is why:
1 - Stanford does not have "better athletes" than UCLA does.
Don't misunderstand, Stanford has some good players. If the two teams were combined, they definitely have some of the better players who would start for a combined team. But watching them play, you don't ask yourself "Man, how are we going to match up with their speed and their athleticism?"
2 - It's a home game.
Winning on the road is something that occurs after you learn how to win games. It's not just playing in front of a hostile crowd -- playing on the road forces a change of routine, a change of scenery that subliminally creates an air of discomfort. Teams that expect to win turn that discomfort into a challenge and winning programs thrive on big road wins.
UCLA isn't there yet. UCLA is far from ready to relish the road.
On the other hand, we must protect the home field. This week it is Stanford that must cope with the unfamiliar and UCLA's young and inexperienced team needs to turn their home comfort into confidence.
3 - It's one of the more winnable game left on the schedule/
Okay, the game at Washington might be the easiest if it were played on a neutral field, but it isn't, it's going to be played in Husky Stadium. And that Washington team only lost to BYU (the same 0-59 BYU) by one and that was partly due to Jake Locker's dumb celebration penalty at the end of the game. In other words, that game won't be easy for a team that gets road sick.
The other two home games are Oregon State and USC. One of those teams already upset the current number-four team in the nation and the other is the current number-four team in the nation.
Cal and Arizona State are the other, remaining road games.
In my opinion, Stanford-at-home is the most winnable game left on the schedule.
4 - This team has a little bit of momentum
No, I'm not crazy.
Yes, I know the team is coming off a loss to Oregon.
But the offense actually did some nice things in that game and maybe there were some questionable decisions that contributed to the loss. (Not saying there were any glaring coaching errors, not at all, just some decisions combined with less than perfect execution that ultimately figured into the final tally.
If the defense can hold Stanford close, perhaps the offense can build on the last three games (31 vs Fresno State, 28 vs Washington State, 24 vs Oregon) and do some damage.
5 - Speaking of the defense, Stanford is the type of team that DeWayne Walker has been able to scheme well against. They aren't a spread team. They don't posssess a plethora of great athletes who make match-ups a nightmare. It's more like they come right at you out of a pro set and try to just execute their plays. They execute well, but this is the type of team that Walker has schemed well against.
None of this should suggest that Stanford will be an easy win. Stanford is a good team with good players and a good coach in Jim Harbaugh. Harbaugh seems to have good game plans and he seems to get the most out of his team. (He might have to, too, Stanford's starting quarterback Tavita Pitchard is questionable at the moment.)
Still, with that acknowledgment respectfully made, the Stanford game is a must win for UCLA.. This is a season where progress will ultimately be assessed beyond the final won-loss record. But, there is too much that suggests the game is very winnable and this team can not afford to pass up an opportunity like this.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of BruinsNation's (BN) editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of BN's editors.
0 recs |
22 comments
|
Comments
Freesia says we better win this game
1. It’s homecoming
2. Stanford had it’s homecoming last weekend and they filled half of the stadium (which by the way has reduced the number of seats to boot)
3. Stanford’s student newspaper is on a bit of a high with the performance of their team although it’s nothing compared to the Daily Bruin, which is leaps and bounds better.
4. I work there now, and I hang up my UCLA banners with pride to negate the Cardinal’ness around here.
GOOOOOOO BRUINS!
by freesia39 on Oct 14, 2008 12:59 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Freesia - re number 4
I believe the proper word to use is cardinularity.
No thanks are necessary – it’s all part of the job.
by Fox 71 on Oct 14, 2008 1:47 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Charnaw says we better win this game . . .
because its the only one I can make this year and I’m bringing my 5 month old twins . . . let the brainwashing begin.
by charnaw on Oct 14, 2008 2:14 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I feel your pain
As a father of 4 yr old triplets, I can commiserate. Don’t expect to watch much of the game. Unless they are good sleepers and not distracted by noise. Although at this age the are portable. It will get tougher before it gets any easiler.
by Give me a B... on Oct 14, 2008 7:18 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
2 and 3 at a time?
I thought one was hard. How do you do it?
But, the more Bruins the better!
sjh
by Class of 66 on Oct 16, 2008 6:59 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The indoctrination does indeed start early
Their first board book: “UCLA 101 – My first board book”. They take their baths to the CD of the solid gold sounds ot the marching band. Imagine three toddlers right out of the tub dancing to Fire. They also love “Hello Joe Bruin” a book which needs to be updated as it includes a previous not to be named footbal HC. Of course I spent the last 3 pregames at the student store buying Kiddie cheerleader and FB jerseys along with hysterical foam FB helmets. So they are loaded up for pre K “sports day”.
by Give me a B... on Oct 16, 2008 6:11 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Are they
Cardinalites: or Cardinalarians? Jim Ignatowski,Taxi.circa. 1983.
by northbaybruin on Oct 14, 2008 2:30 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I also use the word "icky red color"
while being attacked on all sides by bicycles.
by freesia39 on Oct 14, 2008 6:43 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I wouldn’t criticize Stanford about their attendance figures if I were you. You guys didn’t even come close to selling out Tennessee or FSU, both National TV against ranked teams, and even so, a third of the fans in the stadium were from either Fresno or Knoxville.
Go Bears!
by RollOnYouBears667 on Oct 15, 2008 9:46 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bear fans popping off about attendance figures
Attendance figure smack from a Bear fan is funny. Even with Tennessee at home you guys couldn’t beat a Dorrell coach UCLA program in attendance figures last season. Clime back up the tree Cal fan.
by bluestreet on Oct 15, 2008 10:04 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Perfect evidence
We’ve had a few discussions on why folks at Cal have this deep, unabiding, unexplainable, irrational hatred of everything UCLA.
Well, ladies and gentlemen of BN, here’s the proof. A Cal Bear (never mind the obvious trolling by a Bear . . . I mean, I guess some people just can’t get over the fact that they’re not Bruins too) stepping in to defend the school that is supposed to be his rival from the “ravages” of BN. I mean, could you ever see one of us defending anything U$C does when folks at Cal criticize the Little Boys of Troy?!
Un-freakin’-believable.
by norcald503 on Oct 16, 2008 6:50 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Their stadium seats 50,000 now.
They only seated in the 30,000 range. It was homecoming/reunion weekend, and all events are held on campus, which is also where the stadium is located.
It should have been closer to full. Jim Harbaugh was also disappointed that the stadium wasn’t full.
And in regards to the Tennessee game, 68,546 was the official attendance. I profusely apologize for playing in a stadium that seats over 90,000, for a game that was played before the fall quarter began and for people having lives on a long three day weekend. I personally was on my way back from my wedding, and didn’t even get to LA by the time kickoff started.
I can’t believe a Cal fan is defending Stanford.
by freesia39 on Oct 16, 2008 1:29 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
A well reasoned,written article,BUT...
How did $tanford beat UofA when we got beaten rather easlly?
by GogetemBruins on Oct 14, 2008 3:02 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
My thoughts exactly.
However, we have improved from Arizona.
And, we were in that game until the 4th, and I honestly think if played again tomorrow, UCLA would walk away with a win.
by dproduct on Oct 14, 2008 5:07 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's my theory ...
we’ve improved a bit since Arizona.
BTW — I didn’t say we will win easily or even win.
I just said it’s a must win for the reasons stated.
Stanford is pretty good. We’re 2-4. We need the win.
Go Bruins
by Achilles on Oct 15, 2008 2:47 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Mexi says we will win this game.
Cuz he is tired of losing. He also asks that you forgive his daliance in speaking (writing) in the 3rd person.
Seriously folks, I was very upbeat with our performance against Oregon. Yeah, we lost, but we went down fighting. my buddy at work asked why we can’t put a good 1st half together. I responded that the alternative is far worse. Shoot, under Dorrell we could not consistenly score 24 points to begin with.
Let’s go Bruins, time to sharpen up them axes and cut us down some of that tree.
A coach is someone who can give correction without causing resentment. John Wooden
by MexiBruin on Oct 14, 2008 9:21 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Exactly what I have been thinking
since the Oregon game ended. It’s not a case of being satisfied with our continuing to show improvement. We know a win is possible. That makes it necessary. I hope the team and the coaches feel the urgency. It’s time for a meaningful “W.”
by ReineSeite on Oct 14, 2008 10:47 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I Agree
To me this is a winnable game and I will be disappointed in a loss
by BruinWannabe on Oct 15, 2008 11:24 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
something else in our favor
Stanford hasn’t scored at the Rose Bowl in 10 quarters. 2006 we won 31-0 and in 2004 it was 21-0. They didn’t score in the 2nd half of the 2002 game either. So while I know that it’s an entirely different team at the Rose Bowl on saturday (for both sides), that’s just one of those things that might be in their heads. Maybe it could give our D a little confidence as well.
by bucknellbruin on Oct 15, 2008 6:49 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
The Homefield advantage will be our success
I agree that the homefield advantage will be a big factor in this weeks game, and it’s one of the reasons I also think The Bruins will ultimately come out on top.
It’s homecoming, so there will be tons of parents in the stands. And – a lesser known fact – it’s also high school band day, so that’s a bunch of potential Stanford seats that will be filled with young, energetic fans cheering for ucla. Nowhere near as boistrous as the kids from I’m Going to College (that neverending wave was fun, then impressive, then annoying, then impressive again), but I think there will be a lot of negative energy being thrown at Stanford, which should throw them off.
If we lose, it’ll be hard to stick to coach’s strick policy of staying positive….
There's a ninja right behind you. Don't see him? Exactly.
by ninjkabat on Oct 15, 2008 10:50 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 






















