Maybe its time for a Slight Change...
Upon reviewing the season I find myself at peace with how our team has been progressing. Frankly, If this had been an easy season for bruins, than expectations would be higher than the reality of where our football team is actually at. I believe these losses will be the statement that if UCLA football hits bottom, (no bowl game) there's nowhere to go but up.
On that note i have spent a good amount of my time reviewing our quarterbacks. And i really think that with the last few games we have left, We should really be focusing on a (S)light (C)hange. Let me expound.
Everyone knows our O-line is depleted. Its depth wouldn't even make it completely 6 feet under, Its more like 2 feet without a coffin. And while I have seen improvement on Kevin Craft's part, I think he is consistently lacking focus. I keep reading about how Craft is having a difficult time settling in first half's. He has also thrown a total of 11 interceptions spanning over the last 8 games. Including 2 games where he threw 4 in each (Tennessee) and now (Cal).
I believe Craft is the better of the quarterbacks. Given the opportunity I believe he can settle in the pocket and nail the target he needs to IF he has enough time. Well our schedule isn't going to be any easier, and from what we have all seen, the pocket that he needs, isn't a pocket at all. Its a porous, permeable membrane that isn't giving our QB's the time they need.
With all this in mind I'm sure you're wondering why I'm going on about this. Well I believe that in order to prepare for U(S)(C) we ought to be making Slight Changes to our game plan. I think that Craft needs the time especially at the beginning of games to collect himself, maybe reflect. I believe its time for Chris Forcier to take a few more snaps during games. The reasoning behind this belief is that Forcier has been able to demonstrate some hope in the idea of a moving offense. In other words, The kid can run.
Take for instance December 2nd 2006. Pat Cowan, taking over for Ben Olson at the Helm finished the game with 114 yards passing, and 55 yards rushing. I remember being at this great game where I noticed that USC's defense was so preoccupied with containing our receivers, leaving Cowan opportunities to run the ball. Now I certainly do not believe that we should consistently be doing Running QB plays, or that they should be anything like the automatic qb runs we were doing a few games back. BUT I sternly believe we need to be showing the opposing Defense that we have the option. Even if they see a glimpse of hope that Forcier could run it in for a first down, you're going to be causing some confusion where at least the safeties can second guess themselves. THUS giving us an opportunity to find open receivers.
Now I'm not saying I want to see Forcier start each and every game. However, We need to stop relying on a crippled offensive line, and institute more play actions, and even options where the quarterback is potentially going to take off but decides not to, If people remember watching Joe Montana, he would scan all his options while rolling out of the pocket. This is something I have seen glimpses of from both our quarterbacks, but not enough.
I will finish with this thought. Kevin Craft has shown he can be somewhat of a mobile quarterback. He finished the Fresno St. game with 46 yards rushing when given the opportunity throwing off defenders and bring the game to a close 31-36 loss. Anyway, I just wanted to post an idea as these next few weeks conclude and I know our coaching staff will be working several possibilities out over the bye week. Go Bruins!
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of BruinsNation's (BN) editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of BN's editors.
1 recs |
7 comments
Comments
Just a little correction
Mo Drew had moved on to the NFL by 2006.
Outside of that, I agree with you for the most part.
by Ryan Rosenblatt on Oct 27, 2008 5:15 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Touchy Subject
I think Kevin Craft has done an admirable job and deserves our support. (which he has)
But, I agree with you on several points. A speedy QB that can turn sacks into positive yardage adds another element to our team. We all witnessed 1st hand what Jake Locker brought to UW which like ourselves needed to overcome a lack of Blue Chip recruits and future NFLers. He worked wonders while he was healthy. I also think we need to think outside the box as the Miami Dolphins have done with the Wildcat Formation. It brings to mind some favorite games like Chess or Backgammon where you give your opponent something to fear and when he reacts, CHECKMATE.
After watching the CAL game, I came away convinced that there is no way we can beat U of South Central. (But, I also felt that way in 2006) That being said, and this is where it gets really tricky, do we slow Craft’s development and bring two underdeveloped QBs to the SC game? Or do we stick to our guns and hope everything will click come Rivalry Week? The thing of it is that there are no easy answers.
SC (under PC) has always struggled against speedy QBs since they come to the ball so quickly they can find themselves over-extended when a QB slips through the rush. As you said yourself, Craft has shown a little bit of that ability in the Fresno State game.
At this point i’m just rambling and don’t know anything anymore. I know I am really frustrated with Interceptions. I know KC is still locking in on targets and not looking off DBs. I hope he can correct this. I hope we beat South Central.
A coach is someone who can give correction without causing resentment. John Wooden
by MexiBruin on Oct 27, 2008 6:55 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
SHHHHHHHHH
Enough with the rationality Mexi. We’re not very good as we’re going to struggle the rest of the way, but we can always beat SC. ALWAYS!
by Ryan Rosenblatt on Oct 27, 2008 6:59 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Because KC...
is a junior, I would have to disagree that we would be hindering his development. He’s a gutsy QB that was put in a tough situation but really doesn’t have the ability to lead the team next year (KC will make a solid backup). NC and RN will be looking to develop Kevin Prince or Richard Brehaut for the coming years. With that said, I think C-Force at least deserves a shot with the way KC has performed and the season has played out. I can’t help but think that there seems to be differing opinions between RN and NC on which quarterback should start from the quotes we hear from respective parties following games. NC supports KC and says that the team has no one else to turn to and that he sees no change at the position after each loss. But RN has been really close to pulling KC out of games (talked out of it by NC two times) and inserting C-Force and is trying to open up the competition. Not trying to stir up any bad vibes, but does anyone else see the makings of possible tension b/w the two offensive gurus? Let’s get C-Force in there for a couple of starts and see what he can do. Go Bruins!
by eoj703 on Oct 27, 2008 10:26 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
May the Force Be With Us (C-Force)
C-Force gives us an added dimension—the ability to takeoff like a jackrabbit when he sees pressure coming. I watched him during spring ball and he has a Jake Locker mentality—when the going gets tough, run for your life! Yes he has happy feet in the pocket, but that is not necessarily a negative. Let’s turn that into a positive thing. Especially if the front line is constantly breaking down and he can produce with positive yards. C-Force doesn’t have the passing skill as K-Craft, but does that really matter when K-Craft gets picked 4 times in a game with 2 going to the house for Pick-6s?
I say, let’s give C-Force a shot. He could be the sparkplug we need to jumpstart a struggling offense. And if he doesn’t, go back to K-Craft or maybe try out the Fresh Prince. Just because K-Craft got the early starts doesn’t mean he gets to keep the keys to Caddy…er, Chevy.
by bruin75 on Oct 27, 2008 11:07 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
CRN and NC
have no rift at all. At least that is what CRN after the Cal game.
Our OL is not performing very well which is an understatement. But, it is not all their faullt. The picks are on KC. IMO, KC’s confidence has been pretty much destroyed. Because he was running for his life from the beginning of the season, anytime he sees a different color jersey in his peripheral vision, he starts to panic. He immediately goes to the intial read or hot route to get rid of the ball. KC does not go through his progressions. He has been banged on so much that saying he has happy feet is an understatement. There were numerous times wherein other recievers (TA) was wide open. I forgot at what point of the game it was but he threw an out to his left into double coverage when TA from the slot was wide open on a streak. There were a lot of times when KC didn’t really have the type of pressure that he thought he had yet he was just getting rid of the ball. Some were just really ugly while others due to him rushing were high or behind the receivers. I guess you can’t blame the kid.
I personally would like CForce to get a shot. Not happy reading about his lack of dediction in the fall but I think it is time. KC is most likely not going to be our starting QB next year. It is going to be a battle between CForce, Prince, Crissman (if healthy) and Brehaut who is enrolling in the Spring. Put CForce out there so the staff can determine if he can be the QB of the future. If not, then we’ll have to see if Prince is the guy after redshirting or if Brehaut can make the adjustment by coming in early and is the real deal. He is not the passer that KC is at this moment but we’ll never know what he can be without giving him an opportunity. At the very least, he’ll have to improve on his passing and QB duties through real game experience.
by BlueReign on Oct 28, 2008 12:14 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Great Discussion,
I really want to emphasize also that I appreciate Norm Chow and view him as one of the most important assets we have at UCLA. . And I’m not suggesting to remove KC, but he should at least be “in the zone” when he runs on that field. I think that the disagreements are healthy for the team, Norm Chow is a Wizard, and I see some similarities in how he conducts himself in a similar manner to Coach Wooden and that is something I really respect. (I’ll be putting up a post on that). I hope that he can just use his amazing intelligence and incorporate a dual threat system with Forcier that We have seen U$C can’t handle, which is a quick quarterback that can take off if need be. and Ryebreadaz thanks for the correction, I fixed it. I must have been on crack or something because there’s no reason why i should have mixed that up haha.
by UCLABRU1 on Oct 28, 2008 12:24 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 




















