Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: This Should Encourage Juan Mata

Spaulding Roundup: Getting Healthier & Sharper

We will start today’s roundup from Spaulding with some great news from the injury front. I was very concerned about the report of Carter getting x-rays this week based upon concerns that he might cracked a rib during the Cal game. Well the report came back and Carter and Bruins got some good news. The LA Times reports on Carter and few other Bruins who are getting healed up during this bye week:

Things are looking up for the Bruins in terms of some players who have been nursing injuries.

The X-rays on linebacker Reggie Carter's sore ribs were negative. He practiced Wednesday wearing a red jersey but is expected back at full strength next week.

The prognosis is similar for tackle Jeff Baca (strained hamstring) and tailback Kahlil Bell (ankle). Defensive end Reginald Stokes, who had arthroscopic surgery last week for a torn meniscus in his left knee, is recovering quickly enough to be considered for Oregon State on Nov. 8.

"We got an encouraging report this morning," Neuheisel said. "We might be able to get a few plays out of him."

As the Bruins are getting a little healthier, CRN is putting heavy emphasis on players getting sharper during practices. During last few weeks (especially on the road) Bruins have made a number of unenforced errors. Yesterday, CRN called out the entire team (including the OL and receivers) imploring them to focus harder during practices:

After watching his team struggle through another practice of poor execution similar to what they are doing in games, Neuheisel said that the mistakes that are hampering the Bruins on both sides of the ball should have been eliminated weeks ago and that there had to be some self-reflection by everybody involved.

"Way too many mistakes of things that should be rock solid now," Neuheisel said. "We have to get our guys to understand that this has to be a little bit more important than is being treated.

"Until that happens, we are going to struggle to improve. It has to be more important and we have to find guys that it is more important for. It isn't a knock on anybody, but it's a reality check."

Asked for specifics, Neuheisel declined to throw any players under the bus but said it was a problem across the board and did give an example.

He said that some receivers were running the wrong route repeatedly, even on plays that had been installed for a long time. Several reps later, other players would do the same thing, compounding the problem that he said is both a lack of concentration and a lack of understanding the importance of doing things correctly.

"Guys have to start realizing how important it is that they do the right things," Neuheisel said. "They have to have a come-to-grips meeting with everyone internally that this has to get better or we're not going to get better.

"When you're asking whose fault it is, it's mine, and everyone has to look in the mirror and realize that, myself included."

I thought the note re. WRs was interesting. I know the easy target during last couple of weeks has been Kevin Craft, who at times was throwing the ball where there was no Bruin receiver around. Looking at replays from last week at least during one of the interception it appeared to me an (experienced) receiver wasn’t around where he was supposed to be. So perhaps there is a reason as to why Chow and CRN after all their discussion, deliberation and observations during practices keep coming back to KC.

CRN also received a telling assist from one of the emotional leaders of this team. Here is Dohn:

After practice, injured quarterback Patrick Cowan spoke to only the players in the middle of the practice field to implore the Bruins to heed Neuheisel's advice.

"Patrick had to remind guys how lucky they are to be able to (play)," Neuheisel said. "He's sitting at a vantage point where it's no longer available to him."

Per Chris Foster’s account in the LA Times Cowan “was loud and animated and, according to players, his message was direct.”

It is pretty refreshing to see how some of the veteran leaders of this team has rallied around CRN. PC’s comments were backed up Brigham Harwell in the Press Enterprise who talked about "young guys" in the team having to "stay the course and keep getting focused."

Moreover, Harwell and Cowan’s comments from yesterday’s practices followed Carter’s comments to the press about how he was gutting it out during practices (despite being so hurt that he was having a hard time taking deep breaths) because he couldn’t look CRN and say, “Coach, I can’t go.”

We have thrown around the phrase – “culture change” – around here a lot since CRN has taken over the program. It is not going to happen overnight. However, to me at least we are starting to see lot of signs, that the program is moving towards the right direction.

Speaking of moving, we will end today’s roundup with a note on Walker, who expressed interest in the Washington head coaching position:

"I think the people who know football know what they're looking at," Walker said. "I think they know what it's all about."

The Bruins have played well enough against the pass but, with little help from the offense, rank in the bottom half of the Pac-10 in categories such as scoring and rushing defense.

"I can't control what the [athletic directors] think," Walker said. "But I think if they ask the right people what I'm all about, maybe that will spark some interest."

I see nothing wrong with Walker expressing interest in this position. He believes he is ready:

Walker said he thinks he is ready for a head coaching job.

“If not now, when? I'm not getting any younger,” Walker, 47, said. “I'm three years into being a coordinator. I had a chance to do it one game. If you look at my resume, I've been around some of the best coaches in football.”

And CRN agrees with him:

“Any university would be wise to seek after him and we would support him in any way possible,” Neuheisel said.

I do believe he is going to be a head coach some day at a solid program. IMHO he is still a year or two away.

As I have mentioned before during the toxic and highly charged emotional days of previous head coach, we were very hard on everyone associated with the previous regime. Yet from we have started with a clean slate under CRN and I see no reason for anyone to hold on to any negative feelings towards anyone connected to the previous head coach. From pov this is CRN's staff. It's his team.

I do think under Walker UCLA defense has shown statistical improvements in previous two seasons. However, I think Walker still needs to take another extra step to establish beyond doubt that he is one of the elite defensive coaches in the country. Despite the statistical improvements in previous two seasons, the Bruin defense had serious let down in few games last two seasons [See Oregon (06), Washington State (06), Cal (06), Florida State (06), Utah (07), Washington State (07), Arizona (07)]. This year we have had tough games against BYU, Arizona and tackling issues in early part of the season.  I think the defense has responded well in last few games but I think Walker needs to show that his scheme can consistently shut down the spread/multi-dimensional offenses featuring mobile QBs in today's college football.

I think for Walker to emerge as an elite head coaching candidate he will need to put together a complete season at UCLA which will not include any performance (like the ones mentioned above) that will stick out. If the Bruins put together a great season in next 3-4 years in which the whole team comes together, I have no doubt Walker is going to lot of great options in college football. FWIW I think that would be a very healthy development for our program. Just like it is great to see Jamie Dixon and other Howland assistants doing well in college basketball, it will be great to see UCLA assistants coming out of Neuheisel’s program doing well college football in near future. So on that I am rooting for Walker and I hope the timing for his next move (whenever that is) works out for him. In the meantime, let’s hope our players are playing close attention to the words of CRN and all other veterans in the current program who are imploring our players to focus harder to get sharper during practices.

GO BRUINS.

Comment 20 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Walker

I’m still not sold on him. If he left UCLA now, or after this year, I think I would best remember his defenses for being inconsistent. The one and only positive thing I will remember about Dorrell over his 5 year tenure will be 13-9 and, frankly, that’s probably how I will recall Walker, too.

And maybe I’m missing something, but I don’t see why he would be such a top candidate for HC somewhere. As Nestor said, maybe in a couple years.

I’m not trying to be inflammatory—and maybe other teams are drooling over the guy—but I just don’t see it or understand the allure. Can anyone explain this?

Pete Carroll hates puppies.

by Barnes2JJ on Oct 30, 2008 7:50 AM PDT reply actions  

d walk

It’s pretty sad that walker does not get the credit he deserves for turning our defense around, it seems that year after year, the team has only managed to survive and have a chance to win games because of the defense! Our offense was anemic under dorrell and still is under chow due to o-line issues, and the defense is left on the field majority of the game, game after game. all the 3 and outs, to’s and bad spots they are put in by the offense are for some reason not put into consideration the wear and tear that leaves on a defense when theyre on the field the majority of the time! I cant believe walkers defense is taking the blame for that florida state game, I mean how many times did our offense or spt turn the ball over and put the defense in a bad spot? cmon wake up guys

by osc42 on Oct 30, 2008 8:07 AM PDT reply actions  

We have discussed many times before

that in a lot of the games in which we get punked, we get punked early and often. It has nothing to do with the defense being tired or being on the field too long. You can check all the previous posts on this, particularly from Class of 66 who delved into this quite a bit. The theory that the defense is suffering because of the O is a fallacy, we give up tons of big plays and miss tons of tackles. That has nothing to do with the offense.

Quit blaming the O to cover up for the deficiencies of the defense. It happens sometimes, sure, but look at the Utah game last year, the Wazzu game last year, the BYU game this year, the Arizona game this year…there are too many examples where our defense just makes mistakes, and it has nothing to do with fatigue or turnovers. We’re awake, you just may be in denial…

by tasser10 on Oct 30, 2008 8:49 AM PDT up reply actions  

Are we the only team that keeps struggling to "stay the course and keep getting focused"?

It seems nearly every season of this decade, we’ve had letdown games followed by players’ comments about a lack of focus, underestimating the opponent, or needing to find more motivation. I don’t pay much attention to other schools, but when I read postgame summaries involving U$C, Oklahoma, etc., I almost never see any comments like these, regardless of whether the team won or lost. Why do our Bruins keep having “mental lapses” and a lack of motivation when playing a game they should love? Is there something in the Westwood air that lulls our players into a stupor? Most of our other sports teams seem to do just fine, but this chronic problem in UCLA football puzzles me. It can’t all be the coaches’ fault. Any theories?

by bryanucla on Oct 30, 2008 8:11 AM PDT reply actions  

Most of these players

are still KD’s recruits. They’re either still numb or that’s just the kind of player KD recruited. Also, under KD’s regime, there were no consequences to these mental lapses. I feel that, once we have a few more players and competition picks up, you won’t see this anymore because these coaches are serious, if you don’t perform there is someone right behind you who will take your spot.

by tasser10 on Oct 30, 2008 8:44 AM PDT up reply actions  

'SC losing to Stanford last year is them being focused?

It happens everywhere, but the schools you mentioned are the top ones, so naturally it happens less.

Think of programs like Cal or Clemson. Cal seems to lose their rudder towards the end of the season, especially after being #1 for 30 minutes last year.

by kidro2001 on Oct 30, 2008 9:39 AM PDT up reply actions  

Living in Exile ...

I hear how UCLA teams lack focus or “toughness”; and both deficiencies are linked to the fact that they are in laid back CA.

It is crap and I resent it.
No one says CBH’s teams aren’t focused or tough. Or our women’s softball teams? Our water polo teams? Tennis?

You don’t get all those national championships by being unfocused and soft.

I think the analyses in this thread, the ones that talk about coaching and players, hit the nail hard.

All that said, who wouldn’t want to kick back in Westwood? And, I’m sure our championship players do AFTER they take care of business.

sjh

by Class of 66 on Oct 30, 2008 10:31 AM PDT up reply actions  

One More Thing --

I think it was genuinely hard for the teams of the last few years to focus on the O schemes form the attempted WCO. If there was a scheme, it was complex and more than a little intangible.

Now, they are having to learn a new, if simpler, scheme.

And, they are having to “learn how to learn” from the new coaches.

None of this deals with the D side.

sjh

by Class of 66 on Oct 30, 2008 11:07 AM PDT up reply actions  

Be careful Nester....

But correct me if I’m wrong, nowhere in the LATimes article did it say that Walker expressed an interest in the UW job. Unless he was asked the question directly, which I didn’t see anywhere, it is a big leap to determine from his responses that he is interested in the UW job. Is it clear, as you and the article state, that he is interested in being a head coach somewhere. But I think it is wrong to post here that DW actually tossed his hat in the ring for this position. The tone of the post is a bit misleading and the last thing we need is to start rumors about us losing a key coach. Will he leave eventually. I think so. But for now, lets be careful about creating controversy where none appears to exist.

Let me know if I missed something, please.

by Bald Eagle on Oct 30, 2008 8:31 AM PDT reply actions  

Click on the links

The title of the OC Register article N linked reads ‘UCLA’s Walker interested in Washington job‘. N didn’t make anything up.

by bluestreet on Oct 30, 2008 8:40 AM PDT up reply actions  

The first link

was to the LATimes article that made no mention of DW’s interest in the position. But you’re right, the OC Register, which was linked later in the post, definitely makes it clear that he expressed an interest.

Thanks.

by Bald Eagle on Oct 30, 2008 10:45 AM PDT up reply actions  

I don't know if Coach Walker is "Ready" to be a head coach.

He might be absolutely perfect as a head coach. He might be another CTS. Nobody knows. No one knows if a person will be a successful head coach until he is given the job and told to go produce. Everyone who is currently a head coach got a start somewhere — someone took a chance on him. Coach Walker deserves that chance (as do lots and lots of other people.) If I were giving him advice, I would tell Coach Walker to jump at the chance to get a head coaching job at a big D-1 school like Washington. If I were advising Washington’s athletic director, I would give the advice that many people in the BN gave to Mr. Guerrero at the beginning of this year, which was to let someone else perform the leap of faith and the experiment. I would tell any big school to hire someone with a proven record as a head coach. Urban Meyer warmed up in the minors, as did Jim Tressel. I am sure there are tons of guys in smaller conferences or in D-2 or D-3 who have demonstrated the ability to lead a football team.

Unfortunately, some schools hire totally unproven people with a track record that is only hypothetical, and apparently they get deluded by lots of cliches and a clean cut look. The one experiment along those lines that I recall was an unmitigated disaster. No, wait. I remember two such experiments. Both were at UCLA. Both destroyed programs.

So to Coach Walker, I say grab the brass ring if you can. And to Washington, I say I hope he works out better for you than a similar experiment worked out here. And a P.S. to Washington – now that CTS is out of the head coaching ranks, ANYBODY you get will be better than the guy you have now, who in fact is a horrible coach.

by Fox 71 on Oct 30, 2008 9:57 AM PDT reply actions  

If DW were my client --

I’d advise him not to take the offer. It is an invitation to failure. And, he won’t be given the time and deference we rightfully giving CRN.

DW’s best chance is to learn from CRN and NC — and to improve his reputation by building a first class D at UCLA.

sjh

by Class of 66 on Oct 30, 2008 11:10 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yeap

That’s a great point 66. I think Walker has a good chance of emerging as a great HC if he times it correctly. If he helps CRN in finishing up the rebuilding project at UCLA, he will be a hot commodity and will have options.

I can see Walker being successful at a program like UVa which might be looking for a new HC in couple of years (Al Groh, a mediocre hc is having a Lavin like season). He needs to build up his cache a little bit more to the point that where he goes next he will be able to go in with kind of proven record that will unify and impress an entire fan base. UDub doesn’t seem the right situation for him given what that program has been through for last few years.

by Nestor on Oct 30, 2008 3:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

I wasn't clear

I think Washington would be making a huge error hiring an unproven guy, just as we made a huge error in hiring CTS. My point was that from Coach Walker’s perspective, he is the right guy, and he’s ready, and he would immediately turn the school around, and not only that, he would improve the economy, end poverty and solve the problems in the Middle East. Everyone in big time sports has that sort of ego or they don’t get into a position to be one of the persons talked about for a particular job. N and SJH, I think Walker would also be making a mistake to take the UW job for the reasons you stated. He should start smaller and learn in a more friendly environment. But if he is offered the job, he should take it to prove guys like us are wrong.

And as far as the ability to be a head coach is concerned, an old joke sums things up. (I heard this about sopranos, but it applies to just about anyone (except lawyers, of course).) How many head coaches does it take to change a lightbulb? 1000. One to actually change it, and 999 to watch, narrow their eyes, and say “I could do that.”

by Fox 71 on Oct 30, 2008 5:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

P.S. - Silver, Go Get Em and Jason are surely correct.

Michigan didn’t hire some DC with a record that’s right in the middle of the pack or worse. The went out and made a splash. UW will make a similar splash, or at least try to.

by Fox 71 on Oct 30, 2008 6:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

There is absolutly no way UW is going to hire an assistant

they HAVE to make a splash with this hire, and D Walker just isn’t it. They will interview him, and he should take the job if offered, but he will not be offered.

"when you've seen how big the world is, how can you make due with this?"

by silverlakebruin on Oct 30, 2008 10:57 AM PDT reply actions  

After the Ty W.disaster...

and looking at Coach Walkers Dr.Jekyl and Mr. Hyde defensive record the chance of Coach Walker getting serious consideration at UW is bleak at best.
I agree whole heartedly with silverlakebruin the next UW coach will be the real deal.

by GogetemBruins on Oct 30, 2008 11:02 AM PDT reply actions  

There is ZERO chance

U-Dub takes a flyer on an unproven assistant coach after firing Willingham. Their boosters would revolt. It’s great that Walker’s interested in the job, but there’s a snowball’s chance in hell he gets that job.

by CAJason80 on Oct 30, 2008 12:10 PM PDT reply actions  

Refreshing
“When you’re asking whose fault it is, it’s mine, and everyone has to look in the mirror and realize that, myself included.” (CRN)

When you ask young players to take responsibility for their play and their behavior, it reinforces the message when you do the same.

by Bruinut on Oct 30, 2008 9:19 PM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bruins Nation, an unofficial daily online scrap book covering the greatest collegiate athletic program in the nation. Established June 16, 2005. GO BRUINS.

Managers

Uclabear1_small Nestor

Arron_afflalo1_small Tydides

Brad_pitt_as_achilles_small Achilles

377011_2642084725867_1068030137_32302525_1166539782_n_small Ryan Rosenblatt

Telemachus_small Telemachus

Licenseplate_small gbruin

2761_small tasser10

Blue_bellerophon_small Bellerophon

Img_0052_2_small Patroclus

Small DCBruins

Of Counsels

094_small Ajax

Menelaus2_small Menelaus

Small Meriones

Small Odysseus

Associates

Eee_small freesia39

Uclabruins_small AHMB