Bruins Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Race to the Roses & BCS Bowl Predictions

Spaulding Roundup: Oregon (Road) Worries

We will start this Monday by turning our attention to Oregon right away. I am not sure there is any use in reflecting too much on the win against Washington State, which might be one of the worst Pac-10 teams in recent years. Whatever can be taken away from the Wazzu game will turn out to be irrelevant, if the Bruins come up with another horrific showing on the road like it did against BYU in Provo.

Ducks are coming off their own tough outing against Southern Cal. But you can bet they are going to be chomping at the opportunity to put a hurting on UCLA (and not to mention on Rick Neuheisel because they have their own set of issues dating back to his Washington days). We have at least couple of reasons to be worried right off the bat. First, Bruin’s horrific record on the road:

Since the start of the 2003 season, UCLA is 10-18 (.357) in road games, but 26-9 (.743) in games at the Rose Bowl.

UCLA plays at Oregon on Saturday.

"Already has come up," Neuheisel said. "For us to get to where we want to go, we have to be a better team on the road, and we're going to work on that this week."

Neuheisel said Sunday he did not plan to alter the team's travel regimen. There could be tweaks in practice, but Neuheisel added he was not going to ignore UCLA's road woes.

"We have to talk about it," he said. "We have to come up with a strategy for how we're going to go in and be a better team in a different environment. We just have to play better than we did in Utah. There's just no question about that."

Well whatever strategy CRN and his coaches devise, reviving the running game will be a big part of it. That brings me to the second reason for concern this Monday. UCLA’s running game took a step back against Washington State:

UCLA still cannot run. Sometimes. Outside of a 31-yard gain near the end of the fourth quarter, the Bruins gained 69 rushing yards. Washington State came in allowing 269 a game.

Not coincidentally, UCLA passed for 225 yards, continuing its trend to ineffectively pass and run the ball at the same time.

UCLA looked primarily to Bell on Saturday after finding success in splitting carries between multiple backs the past two games. Bell had 21 of the team's 37 attempts yet gained just 43 yards, second to Derrick Coleman (Troy High), who had 49.

"There were nine or ten guys in the box at any given time, so we couldn't run," Bell said. "But we made plays when we had the opportunity."

UCLA might have been looking for a boost to the run game as it tried two direct snaps, but both of those both went for short yardage.

"We'd love to (do that more)," Neuheisel said. "If you watch college football across the country it's becoming a weapon."

If you take away Coleman’s 31 yard run in garbage time, Bruins rushed for 69 yards in 38 carries, averaging about 1.8 yards per carry. Bell averaged 2 yards per carry rushing for 43 yards in 21 attempts (against a defensive frontline that up until last Saturday wasn’t stopping anybody):

2914669034_bd06472a9f_medium

Photo Credit: Jack Rosenfeld

That was not encouraging. However, Wazzzu did stack the box throwing their entire kitchen sink to stop our run. And it could be that the UCLA coaches kept the scheme very basic against a bad Washington State team, not wanting to give away their full arsenal heading into more difficult matchups like the one coming up this weekend. Bell didn’t look very explosive against the Cougars and tweaked his ankle in the first half. More from the LA Times:

Another concern may be tailback Kahlil Bell, who had 43 yards in 21 carries. But Bell "tweaked" his injured left ankle in the first half.

Neuheisel said that Bell was "fine" and would practice Tuesday. Bell suffered a high-ankle sprain in the season opener. He is also only 10 months removed from surgery to repair a torn anterior cruciate ligament in his right knee.

"Hopefully, we're rounding the corner on the ankle and will be able to get more out of him," Neuheisel said. "He does still have lingering effects of the ankle. He also has lingering effects from the ACL injury."

Perhaps a solution would be lighten up the load for Bell (who had 21 carries) and increase that of Coleman? Coleman to date has rushed for 159 yards in 23 carries averaging about 6.9 yards per carry. That is not bad at all. Plus there is Dean lurking around with his speed and athleticism. If the light goes on for him during practices, it might be worth it to given him a decent look during the game as well.

Meanwhile, Oregon who has tried out 4 different QBs this season has their own injury issues:

Oregon coach Mike Bellotti told Oregon reporters it was uncertain if Justin Roper would be back at practice today. Roper injured his knee early in the season and was out last week because of an illness. But even if Roper is back, it may not matter. Bellotti told reporters Roper would likely begin the week as the backup to Jeremiah Masoli, but could compete for the starting job if his knee holds up.

Masoli’s numbers look more solid than Roper’s to this point of the season. This game is absolutely huge for DeWayne Walker. While the D put up some good numbers against Washington State, there are still reasons to be concerned. Our tackling was not great at all early in the game. If the Cougars had an explosive offense (like the one we are going to face against in Oregon), it could have gotten ugly early on. Bret Lockett was still missing a number of open field tackles, and our frontline was not putting a lot of pressure on Lobbestael, until Walker mixed up his blitz packages later in the game.

So it will be very interesting to see how the UCLA defense comes out on Saturday. Are they going to come out in a bend don’t break mode, sit  back, and let the action come to them from an explosive Oregon attack  or are they going to be aggressive and force the action early on? How the Bruin defense responds to the challenge (along with rest of the team) will tell us a lot about rest of the season on Saturday. Oregon will be the overwhelming favorite to win this game handily on Saturday, but it would bode really well for the CRN’s program if his team can bring the same kind of fire and aggressiveness, it has shown against Tennessee and during last two games at the Rose Bowl.

GO BRUINS.

0 recs  |  Comment 11 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I watched the game yesterday on tape

(had my 20 year high school reunion sat night) and thought the Oline took a step back. The running game was poor, but if you notice Kraft had very little time to throw the ball all night. He never had enough time to throw the ball down the field.

"when you've seen how big the world is, how can you make due with this?"

by silverlakebruin on Oct 6, 2008 8:30 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

meant Craft

duh…

"when you've seen how big the world is, how can you make due with this?"

by silverlakebruin on Oct 6, 2008 3:57 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not optimistic

Saturday could get really ugly, really quickly.

My Goals for/Keys to the game:

1) Defense needs to keep the game within reach. This Oregon team is going to score on us. I’d just like to see them earn it. No easy TDs.
2) Craft needs to continue to manage the game well. It will be loud and nasty in Autzen and he’ll need to play within himself to avoid making game changing mistakes.
3) Win the turnover battle or at least avoid turnovers deep in our out territory.
4) Special teams; We need some big plays and have to limit big plays from them.
5) Open the play book up a bit – I think NC has really dumbed the play book down to avoid mistakes. This has worked to some degree over the past 2 games, but most likely won’t be as successful Saturday. We have been doing a lot of basic run plays with little deception; We should pass to set up the run more and avoid the power run sets where we try and jam it down the defense’s throats. We’re not big enough or skilled enough up front to do that yet.

Maybe these are all too obvious, but I can stomach a loss if these things materialize Saturday. If its 42-0, all we’ll hear again is how inconsistent we are and how the team gave up. That I can’t stand.

by Bald Eagle on Oct 6, 2008 9:00 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

The future is now and it looks bright.

  First things first, in step with school starting last week, I want to thank my teacher “Tasser” for schooling this freshman on his first day. I always learned more from my mistakes anyway, but from now on I will use paragraphs and no more …… Now onward and upwards to bigger things, thanks again teach.

  I think the biggest thing that has caught my eye the last two weeks in the play of the freshman. Embree, Coleman, Ayers, Baca and R. Moore to name a few have really stepped up huge, but they are not just playing well, they are already becoming play makers. What makes this so exciting to me is it bodes not only well for this year obviously, but it should play HUGE dividends in recruiting this spring when all the recruits can see that it is not just lip service that the best player will play, regardless of grade, the coaches can point to it and the players can see it.

  The top recruits all have such huge egos, they of course think that they will all be the ONE that plays, and if on top of that you can get coached by NFL experienced coaches like Walker, DC and CRN on top of that! Well how sweet it is! I really think they are going to be able to play that angle up huge this spring, just as SC has always been able too. If your a top recruit, do you want to be one of 5-6 top recruits at your position, hoping to beat them out; or would you like to be THEE top recruit and play for our coaches? It really becomes a no-brainer, can wait to watch as this spring unfolds.

  Now back to this year. I agree with one post that said they like what DW started doing with the defense and mixing up the packages and schemes. I have been wondering why he didn’t start 3 games ago, but what I would like to see is to be totally aggressive from the kickoff, no need to wait until our back is against the wall. Personally I would rather get beat by trying to be aggressive, rather than sitting back in a prevent defense and die a slow, methodical death. Another by product of a VERY aggressive defense? Recruits flock to that style of play.

  I would also like to see us replace our SS Lockett, or at least move him to another position that might not be as critical. But as SS, he usually is the last man standing between the offense and the goal line. Maybe that is where we could put Ayers full time? Apparently he is gifted with incredible speed to keep up with the running backs and he delivers huge hits. It might be a little radical, and yes he is a freshman but aren’t those the qualities of a strong safety? Then maybe next year you can move him back to LB. But right now we have a desperate need at the SS, and he needs to be on the field more.

  Lastly, as for running backs, I say we go with the kids along with Bell. Dean, Coleman and Bell. Bell for all his heart is just not 100, and he may want all the carries, it would be better for the team to spread them out. Coleman with the power inside game, Dean with the speedy outside game, and Bell who (when 100) can pretty much go anywhere. That would not only give defenses different looks, and speeds it will help keep them all fresher and develop the kids quicker. I always read where the easiest spot to put in a young kid is running back. Because it is such a instinctual position and not so much technique, that is why it is not uncommon for rookie running backs to do really well right out of the gate. I also agree with the pass first to set up the run until the OL improves more.

  Lastly, great job on the improvement of the special teams. No quite there yet, but they have come a long ways. At this point in time, to me the defense has shown the least amount of improvement. Hopefully this week, we will finally see some improvement as they continue to tweak the personnel and schemes.

Go Bruins,

by tru-bleu on Oct 6, 2008 11:54 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Nice work!

Now people will read your post instead of just glancing over it and skipping it!

Enjoy school! You lucky dog.

by tasser10 on Oct 6, 2008 3:09 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I didn't think

that Lockett did anything really bad Saturday, it was Norris who got burned consistently. He is the main liability on the defense right now. He let about four 30 yard passes get completed to the same receiver, luckily we had one or two called back for penalties. I also think that we shouldn’t get too worried about the run so soon. They had 9 guys in the box, so what were we going to do? What we should have done is mixed in a screen or two and at LEAST some draw plays to try and take advantage of their extremely aggressive defensive scheme. I absolutely could not believe that I did not see a single draw play, that is just one thing Norm really overlooked on Saturday. You need to catch the loaded box when they are backpedaling to defend the pass.
Those were my two peeves from the game. I loved watching the boys in blue win one, though we all know we could have played better and will need to do so to pick up a few more down the stretch.

by sponkey21 on Oct 6, 2008 12:03 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Norris...

Norris is a definite liability. I can’t remember how many times he gets burned…and burned badly…and it happens way too often…

As far as offense, all I have to say is in Chow We Trust…He’s had to dumb it down for Craft and I’m fine with that…He knows how to coach and will get the offense clicking once we get some semblance of a line…

All hail the Mighty Bruins, conquerers of troy!

by seernst on Oct 6, 2008 2:01 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

To be fair to Norris

The man he was guarding that got so wide open? #85 Jeshua Anderson
All he’s done is win an NCAA title in the 400m hurdles. According to the Wazzu fan I was sitting next to, he almost made the Olympic team, so Norris has some justification for being toasted. They just sent him on streaks and chucked it downfield, hoping he could catch it in stride.

Their main receiver, #4 Brandon Gibson, was really the one that was beating our defense. He had six receptions for 62 yards, so they basically got a first down everytime he caught the ball. I still haven’t seen any good man coverage on an opponent’s top receiver this season – I thought Walker’s experience was with DBs?

As for the offense, I think Norm Chow made the change in offensive philosophy at halftime of the Tennessee game as a result of Craft’s inexperience and physical shortcomings, and has been inching incrementally forward toward the full playbook as Craft gets more experience, but we won’t see the full playbook until we have a solid second-year starter.

Spring ball and most of fall practice were geared towards running an offense with Ben Olson in the pocket. He may not have looked comfortable in the pocket for much of his time in Westwood, but that can be attributed to having a different, incompetent OC each year. His arm was solid, IMHO the best since McNown, he just didn’t know who to throw to, so he locked on to a receiver and tried to force the throw.

Craft’s arm is weaker than Olson’s, and he is far less accurate. IIRC, in the Tennessee game, all of the first half interceptions were 10-20 yard routes that were poorly thrown. After halftime, every pass was a 5-10 yard route, and even those were not thrown all that well (I counted at least a half dozen “Amazing Catch” animations on the scoreboard as a result of receivers reaching behind or diving forward to make the catch).

I know Chow has said that they call a couple deep passes each game and that the only reason they aren’t making them is because the coverage is there, but I think the real reason is because Craft doesn’t have the arm to make the deep throw. Austin’s “breakout” against Wazzu was due to the fact that Craft was throwing timing-based slants, and Austin was able to get just enough separation to make the catch before being tackled. Against a team with decent corners, those throws wouldn’t be there.

Hopefully, Craft improves in his playmaking, and maybe gets more accurate with his throws.
Hopefully, the running game shows the same improvement from this week that it showed week-to-week from the first game through the Fresno game.
Hopefully, the defensive line actually puts some pressure on the QB, and the DBs cover the receivers better.
Hopefully, we keep it respectable in Autzen, and come away with hope of continued improvement, and maybe we’ll pull out a win against Stanford.

by cupanther on Oct 6, 2008 2:57 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Great takes

I have to say right now I am not optmistic about Autzen. I will have more thoughts on that game later … but I think Saturday could be a long night for our defense. Oregon’s D has some issues too. But they have issues against the long ball … and as you noted we are having problems in that dept. WIll be interesting to see what our coaches can come up with. But I think they are way too short handed given the personnel issues on our roster (which we have been discussing this season).

by Nestor on Oct 6, 2008 4:18 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nothing in my heart or head

tells me that we are not in for a rough time at Oregon. For all the reasons that Nestor and others have already enumerated with cold clarity, we may well have to endure a trouncing. I admit it. I am braced for it. But, in keeping with the theme of “relentless optimism”, let me raise this question: How much better than Fresno State is Oregon, do you think? Haven’t we played our two best games as an underdog? (I refer to Tennessee and Fresno State.) Of course, those were home games, probably an important factor for a young team. But, hey, there’s a certain freedom, a nothing-to-lose element, to our situation this week. So I agree with the hopes that others have expressed, that we will be aggressive, open it up, go for it, whatever you want to say. Just play like real Bruins. If we do, anything can happen.

by ReineSeite on Oct 6, 2008 9:06 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

We're in the same position as 41 point underdog Stanfurd was against justsc last year

It’s obviously totally impossible for us to win. Oh, wait … Never mind.

by Fox 71 on Oct 7, 2008 2:34 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bruins Nation, an unofficial daily online scrap book covering the greatest collegiate athletic program in the nation. GO BRUINS.
Start posting about the Bruins »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

13-9_ucla_baby____036_small
Videos from Washington/UCLA Football Game!
2145443360_ab27e15b11_b_small
Bleeding Blue and Gold ... Always
Morrell_small
The UCLA Passing Game Under Norm Chow
Arron_afflalo1_small
NBA Opening Night (Bruin Edition)

Recent FanPosts

Dodgers-ucla_day_009_small
Josh Smith commits to UCLA
Bruinsnation_small
Ben Ball Roundup: Back To Basics In Howlandwood & Injury Notes
Small
UCLA at Washington State: A memory
Th_ucla182c2_small
More photos from the UCLA vs U-dub game.
Images_small
Non-Revenue Sports Bruin Review and Calendar
Telemachus_small
Washington @ UCLA Photos
Bruinsnation_small
A Quick Reflection On Steve Sarkasian For Rest Of 2009
Bruinsnation_small
Harrison Barnes' Amazing Trip To Howlandwood
Bruinsnation_small
The Big Red Signs Off

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS


Managers

094_small Ajax

Bruinsnation_small Nestor

Menelaus2_small Menelaus

Arron_afflalo1_small Tydides

Brad_pitt_as_achilles_small Achilles

Small Meriones

Telemachus_small Telemachus

Small Odysseus

Blue_bellerophon_small Bellerophon

Authors

Images_small Ryan Rosenblatt

Official Partner of CBS Sports