Feeling Alright
Bruins got a much needed win last night in Seattle. Even though it is clear what Washington is perhaps one of the worst teams in the history of the Pac-10 conference (along with Washington State), I think folks shouldn’t be dismissive of the effort our guys put together last night in Seattle.
Earlier in the day I was watching a Michigan team going through the same rebuilding pains we are experiencing during the first year of a new regime. Seeing the Wolverines struggle against Northwestern (which is having a good season) in the Big House and tumble to a 3-8 record was something that put what we have been going through in perspective.
After beating Washington we now have a record of 4-6, keeping alive a shot at a minor bowl game. As I said during the game threads, I don’t think our team is as mediocre as our 4-6 record indicates, just like we weren’t as good as that 10-2 record from the 2005-06 season. I think if we had either Pat Cowan or Ben Olson healthy for an entire season, I could see our team winning at least 3 games out of Arizona, Fresno State, Oregon, Cal and Oregon State. So, given all we have gone through this year with our injury and personnel issues, I am feeling all right with where we are at this point of this season:
Photo Credit:John Froschauer / Associated Press (via the LA Times)
So with the macro stuff out of the way, here are some the micro issues going through my mind this Sunday
Craft had a good start last night but after a solid first series he reverted back to some of the same habits that have plagued our team all season along. He threw three picks. The first one was not his fault as Dominique Johnson simply dropped a catchable pass. The other two were indefensible (one he threw into traffic trying to thread the needle, the other was a badly overthrown ball). He also gave up a sure TD when instead of running into the endzone, he inexplicably tried a shovel pass dumbfounding the entire Bruin Nation. There is not much to add to the Craft story at this point of the season. The kid is playing his heart out. He is being a warrior. But what is obvious to all of us is a best he is a below average QB. I don’ t think he is the worst QB in UCLA history because I don’t believe QBs like Brett Johnson, Rob Walker, Ryan Fien or Ryan McCann had the moxie and toughness Craft has shown this season. But at the same time Craft hasn’t done much to cement himself as the returning starter for next season.
Still if anyone is clamoring for Forcier, just consider the fact that even after the game was long over late in the fourth quarter, Forcier was nowhere to be seen. It is clear to me that Chow and Neuheisel have concluded based on his observations that Forcier is not a viable option as a UCLA QB. If that is their decision, I am going to defer to their experience as probably the best QB guru tandem in all of college football.
While the Craft is cemented as the starter at QB this season, the running back position is becoming intriguing. Derrick Coleman started last night. Per Dohn’s report he got the start because Bell was disciplined for being late into a team meeting:
"Kahlil was late for a meeting," UCLA coach Rick Neuheisel said.
Bell, who has been bothered by a sprained ankle much of the season, carried 25 times and scored on a pair of 1-yard touchdown runs. His plunge in the second quarter gave the Bruins a 14-7 lead, and his dive over the pile on the first play of the fourth quarter put the Bruins ahead 24-7.
"I think he's gradually getting better, and with another bye (next) week he may be getting fresher," Neuheisel said about Bell. "We'll probably nurse him more and see if we can get him even better for two weeks."
However, what got the Bruins' stagnant running game untracked was Coleman's performance on the first series. He carried four times on it, finishing with an 11-yard run around left end for UCLA's first opening drive touchdown of the season.
"Derrick Coleman came in and gave a huge spark to our offense," Bell said. "That set the tone for the game, especially controlling the line of scrimmage."
Everyone here knows, how much I love Coleman. I love his running style. He is a straight ahead North-South runner, who doesn’t dance around and waste time. He makes his decision fast and just pounds it. The energy and power he brought in that first drive was noticeable. I can only hope the coaches increase his carries even more in last two games. As for Bell, the kid is playing like a warrior. It’s obvious he doesn’t have the full power and menu of moves from last year. However, what was encouraging that he was getting stronger. It was great to see Carter make an appearance and he showed a burst of speed. But I guess I totally missed Aundre Dean’s 3 carries (for 9 yards) late in the fourth. So, you guys will have to fill me in on how he looked.
Hopefully our OL can generate the same kind of holes for our backs in our next game. Last night gave them a much needed confidence boost. Let’s hope they can maintain it.
As for our defense, it was mostly dominant:
With the running game, which averaged just 77.8 yards per game this season, in full swing, UCLA's defense was also dominant. The Bruins allowed a season-low 135 yards and tormented freshman Washington quarterback Ronnie Fouch -- a Redlands East Valley High graduate -- all night.
"We didn't scout them to blitz that much," Fouch said. "They blitzed a lot more than we thought they would."
Fouch was 7 for 22 for 39 yards and threw two interceptions and was sacked twice. Washington (0-10, 0-7) turned the ball over five times and averaged just 3.2 yards per carry against a UCLA defense that blitzed more than it had all season and looked like it had a different mind-set than it had of late.
"We went all four quarters," said safety Rahim Moore, who had an interception and a team-high six tackles. "That was the best defensive game we've played all year. We came out here and got a nice win and it feels really good."
Rahim Moore had a great game. As did Akeem Ayers. Ayers was simply a menace. He was the catalyst in two of Washington’s 5 turnovers while registering 2 sacks for a loss of 15 yards. He terrorized Fouch all night by repeatedly blowing through the Husky OL like a guided missile going straight after the QB. Given the way Ayers has emerged this year and the solid play from Carter and Sloan, the future at our LB is looking great.
In addition to those two ATV and Norris had great games. I can’t remember who it was on, but ATV put on a bone crushing hit on a Husky player that would have made Matt Darby proud.
My only two complaints re. the defense from last night was first, early on they looked a little tentative against the run. Also, I thought they folded a little too easy in giving up the TD when they were put in a short field after Craft’s pick. Still all in all a great effort and I hope they can replicate that for an entire game against Arizona State in about couple of weeks. It would have them peaking going into the biggest game of the season.
In terms of injuries and personnel issues, here are the notes from the LAT:
Quarterback Ben Olson, who is recovering from a broken foot, did not make the trip to Seattle. . . . Olson, who is recovering from a broken foot suffered in the summer, has been trying to get back onto the field before the season ends.
He took snaps in practice during the week but had to back off. Neuheisel said he did not travel with the team because he would not have been ready to play.
UCLA offensive lineman Darius Savage tore a ligament in his left ankle during the first half of Saturday night's game at Washington. Savage will require surgery.
The note re. Savage is a huge bummer, especially considering the great start our OL had last night. Here is to hoping a full and healthy recovery.Glicksberg took over for Savage last night.
As for Olson, I wonder where did the broadcasters last night got the info re. Olson being at the game last night.
Speaking of broadcasters, one side note. I am getting sick and tired of announcers bloviating about CRN and Craft’s sideline discussions. It is pointless and tiresome. Guess what guys? I like the fact that my head coach is coaching his heart out and showing passion and care for his players. That’s how CRN has coached QBs all his life and he has a track record to back him up. The announcers commenting on CRN’s sideline discussions with Craft is just about as tiresome about reading knee jerk, reactionary comments about wanting Forcier, beating a dead horse. It’s boring and pointless.
Lastly, speaking of CRN we will end this Sunday by closing the loop on Washington-Neuheisel-UCLA story line:
"Emotional," Neuheisel said in describing his Montlake return. "Pleasantly, there were a lot of friendly faces. There's a number of great people here at the University of Washington. Contrary to all the articles and stuff, my memories are mostly favorable. I understand the messy ending. I apologized for my role in it. I'm hoping we can put this behind us as both programs look to the future."
CRN didn't mention it ... we will ... that was his 70th win in his 9th year as a head coach in college football.
Washington drama is certainly behind us now and we can now look forward to Arizona State.
Enjoy a feel good Sunday.
GO BRUINS.
1 recs |
15 comments
|
Comments
I know we've been agreeing a lot lately, but I'm gonna have to disagree on this
I think we are actually worse than our record. I’m not saying that to be critical of the team or the staff, but I think it is true.
2 of our 4 wins have been against teams that are a combined 0-19 against D1 opponents.
Tennessee ended up being terrible this year.
Stanford was a big win.
If we had played in a normal Pac 10 year, where the teams aren’t as week as they are now, or a normal Tennessee squad, I think we would be looking at a 2 or 3 win season with this squad.
I think we’ve been fortunate to be in a down year for the whole conference and Tennessees worse year in at least a quarter century.
"when you've seen how big the world is, how can you make due with this?"
by silverlakebruin on Nov 16, 2008 8:08 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
What about Fresno State?
We were one fumble away from (possibly) winning the game against Fresno.
And if we had made a key play here or there, we might have been Cal.
I am the last person to claim coulda, woulda, shoulda, but I think our record is pretty close to being correct when you put everything in context (conference being down, Tennessee being down, etc.).
But your points are well taken.
Pete Carroll wears ladies' clothes.
by Barnes2JJ on Nov 16, 2008 10:25 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I think we are one reason Tenn is down this year
Don’t underestimate the effect of a loss like that can have on a team going into the season. They win that one, I think their year comes out a little different.
by Give me a B... on Nov 16, 2008 1:18 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
On Dean
Dean looked much quicker to the hole than any of our other backs. It was only three plays, but he hit the hole much quicker than either Coleman or Bell.
"when you've seen how big the world is, how can you make due with this?"
by silverlakebruin on Nov 16, 2008 8:11 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Great shot for the 2nd half thread
Commenting has been disabled, but the picture shows a fan on the upper right hand side holding a sign “4-0 vs WSU, 33-16 record, 11-1-2001 Rose Bowl, I’M WITH RICK.” Shows that not all of them are bitter. (Saban got pure HELL from Tigers fans last week, and that was coming from the National Champs). It’s also sad to see how empty the stands were. We know we’re not as bad as they are, but people still attend our games (supposedly 83k last week?)
by drebruin on Nov 16, 2008 9:31 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Saban left LSU for more money
RN was kicked out of UW.
Very different situations. LSU fans are justified in being upset, UW not so much
"when you've seen how big the world is, how can you make due with this?"
by silverlakebruin on Nov 16, 2008 9:40 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Perspective
I was much more miserable last year compared to this year, even though at this point in the year we were “bowl eligible” and still mathematically alive for a Rose Bowl berth. Wierd.
by godblesstyus95 on Nov 16, 2008 9:44 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Isn't it
Probably because we know things are going to get better under CRN and company while we knew there was no chance under his predecessor.
by bruinbabe2000 on Nov 16, 2008 3:33 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The UW Fans dont hate CRN, but the media does
I was at the game Saturday, and spoke with a number of UW fans at the game, and for the most part, they had good things to say about CRN, and remember him fondly. This does not surprise me much as he did lead them to their last Rose Bowl, and the program has been on the downswing ever since then.
No, the people that REALLY hate CRN are the local Seattle media, especially the local radio guys. I am not sure exactly why, but my theory is that they felt more betrayed by CRN because even though he had permission from the UW admin to go interview for the 49 job, he told the local media that he was not interested in any other job, so they felt lied to. But maybe it is just more agnst because the local sports scene in Seattle is just so bad right now.
Anyways, it was a good win for the team, and it was nice to see our offense putting some real numbers on the board and the defense put in a solid effort for the full 4 quarters. Its just, well, UW is a really really really terrible football team. We thought things were bad with Dorell at the helm, and they were, but he is a football genius compared to Willingham.
by haster123 on Nov 16, 2008 8:39 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Gotta disagree, Haster
Willingham is indeed a horrible coach, but I still say that CTS was the worst coach ever. There is obviously a large subjective component to this, but based on the body of work for their careers, I stand by my take that CTS is a more inept coach than Willingham. I will concede that now that CTS is no longer around that Willingham is the worst. But when all is said and done, I would rather have Willingham as coach than that other guy. Then I would open my veins and that would be that.
by Fox 71 on Nov 17, 2008 5:32 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
LoL
You may be right Fox. Willingham may indeed be a better coach than CTS (what a sad argument this is!).
But, there is no denying that UW football is in an unimaginably bad place right now. Lower even than we were with CTS at the helm.
It just goes to remind us all of how thankfull we should all be that we have real coaches in place again
by haster123 on Nov 17, 2008 9:15 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
IF we still had CTS
as our head coach, this might have been a game of two winless teams.
by bornagainbruin on Nov 17, 2008 2:57 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed. Willingham did a very nice job at Stanford
and seemed to be close at ND (I would have kept him one more year to see), but has been a disaster at UW. KD has only one gig, and it was very bad…
"when you've seen how big the world is, how can you make due with this?"
by silverlakebruin on Nov 17, 2008 10:02 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
What a perfect illustration of how far we dropped in five years
We’re spending time and energy trying to figure out if our coach was the worst ever or only the second worst ever. That will certainly change, and the only question for me is how soon. Coach Neuheisel should get us out of the wilderness a lot quicker than Charleton Heston got the Children of Israel to the Promised Land. (Or at least I hope he does.)
by Fox 71 on Nov 17, 2008 11:40 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs

by 

















