We Saw This Coming ...
All week we have talked about how John Beilein's team have given Howland's Bruins difficult time over the years. Going into this game with a team featuring five freshmen we had a feeling that this was going to be a tough night:
Photo Credit: AP Photo/Frank Franklin II (via ESPN)
Well it wasn't fun. The Bruins got off to a great start. But it was Michigan Wolverines, that pulled out the win with more hustle, intensity and poise down the stretch. Bruins lose 52-55. Here is the box score.
Of course losing is not fun but we have to keep things in perspective. We went through the same deal in 2005-06 season when Coach Howland was developing a team mixing in veterans with young players.
I am sure there is lot more to analyze this game. I will try gather my notes tomorrow am. The key issues are pretty apparent. Our seniors didn't step up. DC looked indecisive and JS was out of control. We need a credible interior presence and our freshmen will be going through growing pains.
Again ... we saw all of this coming. I am not too worried. I think we lost to a very solid team which was prepared by one of the better coaches in the game. We will go through our growing pains and end up where we need to be ... later this season.
Thread away.
GO BRUINS.
0 recs |
136 comments
Comments
on our last main possession
with 20 or so seconds left, i think holiday and dragovic were doing most of the ball-handling while collison was off on the right wing, waiting for a pass. DC is our senior, he is our veteran, he is our leader. In those situations, he needs to have the ball in control and he needs to be the leader on the floor. I was expecting a quick drive to the hoop and a quick 2. Instead, we dribbled around for 10 seconds and threw the ball away. That’s the essence of our performance in one crucial play: indecision, poor ball-handling skills, not enough leadership from our veterans.
slow down, look up
by Point Guard 08 on Nov 20, 2008 8:52 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
the dribbling
burning all that time at the end of the game, with no timeouts, was inexcusable
i don’t know if it was DC or Howland, but seeing as how this has gone on for yearas without changing, I’m starting to think it’s more than just the players now
by blinkshot on Nov 20, 2008 8:53 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
we might be solid
But with no inside presence of any kind, we’re going to be in big trouble.
The other thing is, I love that Howland is stubborn with his method, but the 1-3-1 zone is designed so we can’t waste 30 seconds on the perimeter and settle for shots. We have to push the pressure and BREAK the zone, not let pass around for 30 seconds then settle for a poor shot. Terrible game PERIOD.
And I’m even more pissed cause Im going to watch the game live and we should’ve played better
by blinkshot on Nov 20, 2008 8:52 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
agreed
All I want for Christmas is Mark Teixeira and Jake Peavy as Angels in 2009.
by deejayelleseven on Nov 20, 2008 9:00 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
My fault
I got home and tuned in just before half with us up by 7 or something.
Not sure why our senior PG, who has seen this defense before, seemed so lost as to how to attack it. And did CBH give him enough help is figuring it out? Weird how that UM coach really ties us up.
greg in denver - UCLA guy for life
by gbruin on Nov 20, 2008 8:53 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Holiday
Jrue was clearly the best player in the first half. He had 2 shots in the second half. That’s unacceptable.
The lack of an inside presence will be an issue all season. I’m hoping the freshmen can start stepping it up.
by Raisin on Nov 20, 2008 8:53 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Morgan needs to develop
J’Mison was the only scholarship player not to play tonight. I imagine that his D is not yet to Howland’s standards; getting him to a point where he can contribute to our front line rotation will be a key to the season.
by bruinhoo on Nov 20, 2008 9:02 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
We lost. It happens.
It sucks, but it won’t kill us.
This team just needs time to find its identity – to figure out who’s playing when and where the shots are coming. It’ll happen. It’s a long season, and we’re just at the beginning of it.
And let’s not bitch about the refs. Close calls go both ways, as we saw last year, and for what it’s worth, to me that looked like a clean block at the end.
Don’t let this get you too down tonight, friends. There is a lot of talent on our team, and they’ll give us plenty of fun moments this season.
by Dexter Fishmore on Nov 20, 2008 8:54 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Turn overs in the first half and FT's throughout the game
We out rebounded them. In the first half we shot over 50% and they were around 40. Our shooting dropped so at the end of the game we were around 42%.
We left 6 points at the line.
I’m prepared to lose a few while our young guys learn.
Surprising, in this game JH was probably the most mature and consistent player. But, we still played deep, as we should. More important to get young guys time and develop chemistry than to win all these games.
We were rated for where we will end up, not where we were. I don’t mind losing the rating, now. It’s a burden to carry. I want it back at the end of the year.
sjh
by Class of 66 on Nov 20, 2008 8:55 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
We need to continue to play the freshmen
We didn’t get to where we were in 05-06 by playing it safe. Our freshmen went out there and had their trial by fire. This team needs that as well.
by Tydides on Nov 20, 2008 8:59 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
We are overrated at this time of the year.
Clearly, we are not the #4 team in the country. More like top 20, but we will get better. Josh Shipp not taking over reminds me of his disappearing act from last year. DC was fouled and should have had 3 free throws at the end.
by bruin75 on Nov 20, 2008 8:55 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
I think we are a top-15 team. I always thought the top-5 ranking was kind of generous.
by Nestor on Nov 20, 2008 8:56 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I was surprised to see that too. I had seen some after last year’s tournament that had us at 14.
by baybruin415 on Nov 20, 2008 8:57 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Strangely
I don’t think there’s a whole lot to say. There wasn’t a lot to say after Memphis in 05-06. I knew there would be problems early in the year.
PS. Was a foul at the end of the game. Anyone saying otherwise didn’t watch the replay. No, we still didn’t deserve to win.
by Tydides on Nov 20, 2008 8:55 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Ty and other mods
Watch the thread for …trolls…who pop in after tough losses …to go after coaching staff/players …with quick fire shots.
by Nestor on Nov 20, 2008 8:57 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I knew our freshmen would lead to early growing pains
But man, does it suck to watch. In all honesty, we haven’t had a team like this at UCLA since the early days of Farmar/Afflalo/Shipp/LMR’s first year. As much as I hate Dickie V, he was right when he said we are not, right now, a top 4 team. In 3 months, I very much think we will be. But in the meantime, we have a LOT of growing up to do. The problem is, I thought it was just our freshmen who had to develop. Turns out, even DC is playing like a freshman (or at the very least not like an AA).
slow down, look up
by Point Guard 08 on Nov 20, 2008 8:56 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I'm with you all
I would be much more upset if this was completely overrated. Our offense relies too heavily on dribbling and that is never a good thing. I’m looking for Holiday to assert himself more offensively as the year goes on and hoping one of our big men will channel his inner KL. Hell, even MATA would do.
This loss could have easily come against Miami and it was surely going to come against Duke.
by baybruin415 on Nov 20, 2008 8:56 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Disagree
I actually think we’d have a better shot against Duke.
by bruin8uclap on Nov 20, 2008 9:28 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
we need JH
to begin to assert himself
2 shots in the 2nd half is unacceptable
i don’t know who or what is limiting him, but for god’s sake, use your ridiculous ability to finish around the basket to finish around the rim and get to the line!
by blinkshot on Nov 20, 2008 8:57 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
It's just a matter of growing
The players don’t have established roles yet. JH doesn’t know when he’s supposed to get aggressive and when he’s supposed to distribute. As they play together more they’ll learn these things.
by Ryan Rosenblatt on Nov 20, 2008 9:00 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
frustration
extra frustration especially since I saw exactly how this loss would happen, as did everyone else. Poor ball handling, too many turnovers, missed layups, … the list continues. Bottom line, i think many overlooked this game toward Duke and never gave Michigan a chance. Agreed that we were overrated this early especially with a big freshman still very raw offensively, and with the way Duke played tonight (and they way we have played the last 2 games) I am unsure of how we could have beat them.
GO BRUINS!!! CHEER LIKE CHAMPIONS!!!
by bk bruin on Nov 20, 2008 8:58 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I had been preaching all week
Not to think about Duke. Have seen this happen all the time.
by Nestor on Nov 20, 2008 8:59 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not sure anyone really was looking at Duke -- most of us saw this as a possibility
sjh
by Class of 66 on Nov 20, 2008 9:00 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Check out the comments in my post on the topic
Despite asking people not to think about Duke, people were still thinking about them. :-) I think it’s natural I guess. I imagine some of our freshmen might have fallen into the trap.
by Nestor on Nov 20, 2008 9:02 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You were on point all week
as were most of us.
This is not a surprise.
And, really not a big disappointent.
We will lose games before we mesh and figure out all of our roles.
My biggest concern is that we seem to rely on Keefe and Drago for our inside scoring. Drago is playing well. But, the entire team missed too many lay ups.
But, we’ve been there before in the past several years and still came togethr to get to the Final Four.
sjh
by Class of 66 on Nov 20, 2008 9:05 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I am hoping Gordon will develop
it will be interesting to see if he can push AA2 for more mins.
by Nestor on Nov 20, 2008 9:10 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
I see the 05-06 comparisons.
Hopefully this team grows like that one.
by Raisin on Nov 20, 2008 8:59 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
The ONE thing that I am a little pleased about
is that Drago stepped up his game tonight. He missed a lot of shots (4/10, 2/6 from 3) but just the fact that he was looking to take those big shots, and making one huge one, was a good sign. At least SOMEONE was looking to take control.
slow down, look up
by Point Guard 08 on Nov 20, 2008 9:00 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I disagree completely...
the one thing I noticed about Dragovic – he’s a black hole. When he gets the ball, he shoots it about 80% of the time and location/game situation/clock situation does not change that. I’ll be much happier when the young guys step up and take some of his minutes.
by cabz on Nov 20, 2008 11:27 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
yea I cant say I'm entirely surprised
i’m not upset by the no call at the end, in my opinion we didn’t deserve the game, and we’ve has calls like that (T A&M) go in our favor as well. I think we were all prepared for some early growing pains, but that first loss hurts no matter what.
I think these freshman aren’t playing true ben ball yet, but they will, and when they do, we’ll be on the other side of games like this because we’ll scrap, fight, play tougher D, and be mentally strong.
well on to catch the kings and lakers results
O.A.
by Ollie on Nov 20, 2008 9:00 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Where was Bobo?
With the questions about the inside game, where was J’Mison Morgan? Is he not ready for varsity yet?
by Joe Bruin on Nov 20, 2008 9:00 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
He played maybe a minute.
Is he the inside scorer we need?
sjh
by Class of 66 on Nov 20, 2008 9:01 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Good question. CBH didn’t use him much in the Miami game either. He is definitely not in game shape though.
by baybruin415 on Nov 20, 2008 9:02 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Offense, anybody?
I’m sorry, but for all of Howland’s defensive genious, there is some real offensive stupidity. Why are we always holding the ball for thirty seconds before settling for a terrible shot? We have some real athletes that refuse to push the tempo. We are always slowing it down, which is why all of the games are close. Can we start to let these guys open it up a little bit? Holliday is clearly an amazing offensive player, yet we continue to fail to give him the ball in places where he can score. And also, it seems like all of our baskets are hard earned. We need to generate some easy points. These freshmen need to grow up, becuase Shipp, Aboya and Keefe are clearly not as talented as they need to be.
And also, lets get a few things straight. One, we are clearly not deserving of a top 5 ranking. We have talent, but it just hasn’t shown up yet. Two, don’t blame the refs. The only reason that they became a factor is because the game was close. If we play better, they aren’t a factor.
Lastly, I am not blaming Howland for this loss, but I have a few questions. He seems extremely stubborn in his offensive style. It worked last year when we had Love, but this year we have some real athletes who can open up the floor. I think he needs to adapt to the athletes that HE has recruited. Let ’em run a little bit.
Anyways, that’s all I got to say.
by WestsideBrandon on Nov 20, 2008 9:02 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
absolutely agree
Defense is great. It always is. But the reason the Wizard was great was he won in so many styles. We had years where we lacked size, we had years where we had size, etc.
We have to adapt to our strengths, and that is our guard play
by blinkshot on Nov 20, 2008 9:04 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Totally agree
I love what CBH has done in reviving our program, but I do think that he is stuck in his offensive methods. Our lack of offense is nothing new, but the real issue is adaption to our personnel. Playing the slow down offense works when you are at a school like Pittsburgh or even UCLA when CBH first arrived when you have a team that doesn’t have the best players on the court. But with the players we have now and coming in the future, it only makes sense to let them loose and do what they can do.
Tonight our offense was like watching a broken record. DC WALKED the ball up, stopped at mid court, passed to the sideline to JK who then passed it back, then DC and JS passed it back and forth with an occasional swing pass. Every time DC decided to drive past his guy, he did and got to the basket. Same thing with JH. But far too often EVERYONE on the team seems hesitant to shoot. I know CBH doesn’t want them to take rushed shots, but EVERYONE passes up way too many good shots. ND had a good game because he doesn’t really have a concious and is willing to shoot the ball. He got yanked a couple of times for taking these shots.
The biggest problem with a slow down offense is that the margin for error is so slim because there are fewer possessions. With the players we have, we should be able to get into the offense faster than 30 seconds and should be willing to pull the trigger. It is still early in the season and hopefully as the season goes on and the team evolves, CBH will evolve his offensive schemes to best take advantage of our personnel.
All I am saying is that we now have great athletes who are very talented. This team should be willing to shoot when they have an open shot and not be scared of not running the proper offense.
by bruinponcho on Nov 20, 2008 11:21 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly how I felt
Everything you say about our offense is dead on. Our style of play allows teams with inferior talent levels to hang around and keep games close when they should get blown out. It’s not the first time it’s happened and I’m sure it won’t be the last.
by turs12 on Nov 20, 2008 11:36 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
play freshmen more
it’s clear that now we’re no longer going to be #4, maybe the pressure will be off and Howland needs to TRUST our freshmen more
He has always had a tendency to take players out of the game when they messed up, but messing up is the quickest way to learn
We need to teach them by experience
by blinkshot on Nov 20, 2008 9:03 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Howland needs to keep doing what has been working for him
and not respond to critics who come out of the woodwork after rare losses or commenters who show up here only during basketball season.
by Nestor on Nov 20, 2008 9:05 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You are completely right, but
I just want to mention that these are players that he has recruited, so he should make some adjustments. We have athletes that can really open up the floor. Howland should utilize them some more. Look, I love Coach Howland, and I know that I wouldn’t have these expectations of my team if he weren’t here. I’m just talking about minor changes. Nothing drastic just becuase we lost a November game. It happens.
by WestsideBrandon on Nov 20, 2008 9:09 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
He will make adjustments
based on what he sees in tape. It will come in due time not after some ranting and raving by bunch of fans who might have gotten spoiled already after three years.
by Nestor on Nov 20, 2008 9:12 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Alright.
I just don’t want to come to here and feel like I’m doing something wrong by pointing something out. I’m sorry that I don’t comment here very often, but I read all the posts and am a huge fan. I’m not criticizing Howland because I’m looking for a place to vent. I don’t have a whole lot of people to talk about UCLA athletics with, and I just wanted to see how others’ views compared with mine. We’ll right this ship (hopefully Shipp too) and get it turned around. GO BRUINS.
by WestsideBrandon on Nov 20, 2008 9:17 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Stick around lot more
and partake in the discussions in both up and down times.
by Nestor on Nov 20, 2008 9:19 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
This team will take shape in the Weight Room.
Once you get used to the prototype Ben Ball player, you notice how thin guys like Lee are.
They will be great second year players ala Westbrook.
They will be good this year and great next year.
sjh
by Class of 66 on Nov 20, 2008 9:03 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
This could be a theme not just Beilein's team
This game was no different then the last. Southern Illinois will be similar as well. We can’t look past anyone at this point. We will grind out game after game hoping for an interior player to get better. And that is unlikely to happen. Does anyone think we have an interior player that is even close to Hollins at this point? Apparently Howland doesn’t think Morgan is ready. I hope after a few more weeks of slo down, passive offense Howland will finally realize he may need to take the offensive reigns off our guards and let them go. We may actually have to become a pressing team to get easy baskets. I think everyone is too tight on offense and there is no sense of urgency. I think we need some up tempo ball. We have quick guards and some shooters or are afraid to shoot except for Dragovic. Our saving grace is a crappy Pac-10 this season since we are likely a borderline tournament team if we continue to do what we have been doing. That being said I can’t sit through two 40-38 wash st games.
I agree our offense is terrible and to be honest has never been that good. We have had some playmakers that have made buckets and our defense has won games up to this point. But every time even with our better teams we ran into a team like Florida and Memphis that we could not on our best defensive day hold under 70 then our weak offense has been exposed. Defense puts you in a position to win, but great offense is needed to get us over the hump.
by Penny2i on Nov 20, 2008 9:05 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
More pushing the debunked "offense is always terrible" line
Google kenpom plz.
by Tydides on Nov 20, 2008 9:06 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
It irritates me
Because it’s so lazy.
by Tydides on Nov 20, 2008 9:10 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I am going to turn out
If you see more drive by trolls … you all know what to do. Don’t want to see that rubbish on BN.
by Nestor on Nov 20, 2008 9:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
offense eft fg% TO % OFF reb% FTM/FGA raw adj
2008 UCLA1 (P10) 52.2 ( 75) 18.6 ( 47) 39.3 ( 10) 27.4 ( 89) 11 7
2007 UCLA2 (P10) 53.5 ( 41) 18.4 ( 36) 33.5 (166) 21.9 (274) 41 23
2006 UCLA2 (P10) 53.2 ( 36) 22.3 (224) 36.2 ( 50) 26.6 (112) 54 28
2005 UCLA11 (P10) 50.9 ( 94) 22.0 (211) 33.1 (123) 27.6 ( 83) 120 79
defense
2008 UCLA1 (P10) 46.5 ( 37) 21.7 (131) 27.8 ( 9) 25.6 ( 9) 8 3
2007 UCLA2 (P10) 47.6 ( 76) 23.2 ( 54) 29.9 ( 38) 30.2 ( 47) 10 2
2006 UCLA2 (P10) 45.9 ( 37) 22.1 (104) 29.1 ( 49) 31.7 ( 73) 23 3
2005 UCLA11 (P10) 49.4 (172) 19.8 (245) 28.8 ( 46) 33.0 ( 96) 133 58
I may have overstated my disenchantment with the offense making it seem like I am displeased with Howland. If I had to grade his tenure it would be the best since I have been watching UCLA basketball since 1981 or so… an A-. If I have 1 critiique of the tenure using your kenpom it would be to point out our offensive ability trails our defensive ability. the adjusted final rankings each year reflect that. Clearly I think we would all agree last year was our best offensive team both with our eyes and the final number.
Notice in the breakdown where we really shined was the offensive glass which propelled our final adjusted number. In the other categories we don’t finish higher than 47th in 2008. We have clearly improved year to year over the last 4 in the adjusted number. Obviously minus Love/mbah a moute/mata/and westbrook gone it is a ton to replace and will most likely crush our 10th rating in offensive rebounding. It is illogical to expect to improve this year on offense unless we attempt something different in my opinion.
Here is my point on expecting to shut down superior offensive teams with a great defense…all over our big wins came against teams who were not statistically among the top few teams, but our losses were against superior offensive teams that would be difficult to keep under 70.
offense eft fg% TO % OFF reb% FTM/FGA raw adj
2008 Kansas1 (B12) 56.6 ( 5) 19.1 ( 61) 37.8 ( 24) 25.7 (161) 2 2
2008 Memphis1 (CUSA) 52.8 ( 53) 16.5 ( 8) 38.3 ( 19) 24.8 (193) 9 4
2007 Kansas1 (B12) 54.5 ( 20) 20.0 ( 94) 37.8 ( 38) 23.9 (213) 27 17
2007 Florida1 (SEC) 59.6 ( 1) 20.7 (132) 37.6 ( 42) 30.2 ( 41) 1 1
2006 Gonzaga3 (WCC) 52.3 ( 55) 17.5 ( 12) 33.7 (115) 35.5 ( 2) 1 1
2006 Memphis1 (CUSA) 51.2 ( 91) 21.0 (150) 40.7 ( 6) 26.9 ( 98) 37 29
2006 LSU (4] (SEC) 50.1 (131) 21.9 (196) 38.4 ( 18) 25.9 (130) 114 50
2006 Florida3 (SEC) 56.9 ( 3) 20.7 (139) 34.5 ( 88) 30.3 ( 22) 2 2
The exception was that dramatic, frenetic win over gonzaga in a miracle comeback.
gonzaga’s defense however was not nearly up to par with the other squads that beat us or in Kansas case went on to win the title the last 3 years.
2006 Gonzaga3 (WCC) 49.4 (156) 18.4 (312) 31.2 (121) 32.0 ( 76) 223 178
2006 Florida3 (SEC) 45.0 ( 15) 22.4 ( 92) 30.9 (108) 29.4 ( 42) 19 5
2007 Florida1 (SEC) 45.2 ( 18) 18.8 (290) 28.1 ( 8) 27.7 ( 13) 14 12
2008 Kansas1 (B12) 44.3 ( 9) 21.9 (114) 28.8 ( 23) 31.0 ( 64) 4 1
2008 Memphis1 (CUSA) 43.4 ( 6) 21.9 (119) 29.2 ( 36) 31.7 ( 73) 2 4
Again I believe these statistics reflect that our offense needs to improve to get over that hump. Clearly we can’t be championship contenders every year and perhaps howland can work his magic and we can grit our way to a nice run this season. Also I believe this system contrary to the mainstream media’s opinion is absolutely perfect for getting his players into the NBA. He forces them to play lockdown straightup defense and the NBA loves that. No one is more prepared fundamentally on defense to play in the NBA than Howland players. That being said winning titles may require something else or some serious ungodly offensive talent given our framework at the moment.
I apologize for appearing to bandwagon losses. I read here all the time and appreciate on the insight. I do care as much about football, but I only post because I have something different to say. What more could I have said about Dorrell’s horrible tenure that was football’s Lavin/Farmer/Hazzard tenures rolled into one. I am not going crazy with the tough season we are having at the moment in football because I believe we will be going in the right direction at the moment and that is well covered territory. My only issue that seems to ride against prevailing opinion is just this one item about our offense. I would be happy to post on wins when I feel it was not up to snuff as well. I think we escape many games thanks to our defense and timely play over the last few years.
Sorry for the long post, but I felt the least I could provide was a more substantive analysis.
by Penny2i on Nov 20, 2008 10:57 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
yeah we'll improve bla bla
we could have won this game
sorry for my bitterness. i have tickets for tomorrow
going up from dc for this.. souther illinois
we need to unleash the athleticism of holiday, gordon, and lee with collison
pick up man full court, or press somehow. we should lose to teams with this little athleticism, that goes for duke and so. illinois who played in the first game
by realfabfive on Nov 20, 2008 9:05 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
i have tix too
and that just makes it more frustrating
i’ll still root for us, but we should not have lost in this style
by blinkshot on Nov 20, 2008 9:06 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
See my message above
If you are going to rant and rave about Howland’s offense … after one loss … take it to a message board. Consider yourself as warned. Take a time out or a chill pill.
by Nestor on Nov 20, 2008 9:07 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
apologies
Im just frustrated cause I would have loved to see them play a big team even if its a major loss.
And I know I don’t post often during football season, but I’m not always available online due to how my work being seasonal
We’ll get better absolutely, I just want to see our freshmen get some more play time to learn
by blinkshot on Nov 20, 2008 9:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Its all right to be frustrated
Losing sucks. I hate it. But here on BN we’d like people to keep in mind the big picture.
I think it’s legit to offer thoughts,constructive criticisms on Howland. But you have to come with data and reasoned analysis. Scant, drive by comments on a post game thread …we don’t really care for those that much.
Sure there are others who are making quips, short comments … but they have been around over the years. This is a real community.
Stick around … commiserate … but we are not going to let people get away with taking cheap, rash shots at our HC.
by Nestor on Nov 20, 2008 9:16 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Take the bitterness
To a message board.
by Nestor on Nov 20, 2008 9:06 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Trolls
Who only pop up after losses and are nowhere to be found during football season.
by Nestor on Nov 20, 2008 9:09 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
chill man
i’m a die hard howland supporter
i know things will evolve this season. like a couple years ago
by realfabfive on Nov 20, 2008 9:10 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Hard to tell "supporters"
when folks are popping up only after losses.
by Nestor on Nov 20, 2008 9:10 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
i've posted before not on this all the time though
i just wanted us to play duke, cause i’m going to the game
by realfabfive on Nov 20, 2008 9:11 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Then you can watch Duke tomorrow and enjoy
by Nestor on Nov 20, 2008 9:12 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
not quite - ucla play them
this was definitely a possibility though. we all knew it. considering we almost lost to michigan last year with team that was a bit better at this stage. i was at that game as well.
southern ill will be interesting though. they are a pretty solid program.
by realfabfive on Nov 20, 2008 9:28 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
um i also paid for both exhibition games watched them online
watched the pv a and m game and miami game
not drive by
by realfabfive on Nov 20, 2008 9:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Drive by critics with absolutely no substance
And, anger is not appropriate.
Does anyone really believe any other coach would do better?
CBH brought these great kids here and it is special. This is our 3rd game. These kids have played for Howland for several weeks. They are young, and skinny. Get some perspective.
It is so tiring to see all these new people whining after losses but not making constructive posts during the week.
I’m going to skip over them.
sjh
by Class of 66 on Nov 20, 2008 9:11 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
apologies to your forum
i’ll be cheering hard tomorrow.
by realfabfive on Nov 20, 2008 9:09 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Keefe
I’d like to see more screen and roll with Keefe. He can make the mid-range shot. Their bigs were double teaming DC all game. If teams know we don’t have an inside game, our guards will get plenty of pressure.
By tourney time, it will be our defense will be our calling card again.
by UCLA Championships Made Here on Nov 20, 2008 9:05 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Defining roles
JK has shown that he is much more comfortable on the perimeter then down low. While I think that he could be talented around the basket, his ability to hit jumpers is something that I expect CBH will take advantage of as the season moves on. Everyone is still finding their niche and by the time PAC 10 season comes around, I expect everyone’s roles to be better defined.
by bruinponcho on Nov 20, 2008 11:26 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I like
the way Keefe started out during the game. He was aggressive hitting the boards, seemed to be more confident, and showed no hesitation in hitting that three-pointer early on. After a good start though, he pretty much disappeared (theme of the night for the team). I think we are really seeing how much we do miss Luc. Keefe is a good role player and all but really is the type of guy you prefer to have coming off your bench and is really only a starter by default to start the season.
by turs12 on Nov 20, 2008 11:55 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Too Tentative on Offense
We need to let Holiday and Shipp use their athleticism to attack the rim and our perimeter shooter need to assert themselves and take the shot. No need for DC, Roll or Drago to hesitate on the outside shot. We had the same problem last year.
by bruin75 on Nov 20, 2008 9:07 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
According to the box score, Collison and Holiday didn’t start?
Why not?
by chenalex on Nov 20, 2008 9:10 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
At Lease We Can Forget Football Season
Holiday looked great, and will be as good as Westbrook before year’s end. Keefe looked very good, and may come close to Mbah A Moute’s performance. Collison underperformed and Shipp looked the same as last year. What’s left,? Aboya improved from last year and still doesn’t approximate 50 per cent of Love. KL was the difference maker over the second half of the season. He is the reason why this team isn’t close to last years, and we can’t expect this team to be nearly as good.
Its early in the season, so we can’t expect Collison to be in mid season form and that was the difference in the game. I don’t think we can depend on the team winning when it has to rely on Dragovic. He’s shoot us in to half the games and shoot us out of the others. Roll has to make his free throws.
Forgetting everything else, ITS BASKETBALL SEASON. I looked forward to this game all week and enjoyed the effort of our players and look forward to them getting better with each game. Its not the first game that you lose that matters, its the last one. If we lose in the final four, or end our season with a win, (meaning national champs) its going to be a great run. We have great players and a great coaching staff. Each game is like a strawberry sundae, win or lose. Go Bruins.
by 75NatChamps on Nov 20, 2008 9:12 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
not panic time
a poorly played game on the road against a well coached team playing a defense designed to slow us down. Keefe still struggling but we know he has game. Josh made lots of good moves but couldn’t finish. Yes, DC was fouled but we shouldn’t have been in that position. I still see this team coming together for a successful run through the Pac 10.
by Vanman7475 on Nov 20, 2008 9:12 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Too early
in the season to get too bothered by this game. What was telling is that JS seems to be in the same funk as last part of the year. He certainly didn’t show up for this game.
by brewinz on Nov 20, 2008 9:14 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Both JS and DC
were completely off tonight. DC has always been spooked by 1-3-1. It will be interesting to see how he reacts tomorrow because tonight JH looked like the best player on the team.
by Nestor on Nov 20, 2008 9:18 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
True
better to lose now and learn from our mistakes than to keep having the same problems and lose in March because of it. I bet when it is all said and done we won’t even remember that we lost to Michigan (we may even get to redeem this loss like we did against Memphis).
by turs12 on Nov 21, 2008 12:02 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
this may not be a terrible thing...
…take the pressure off the high ranking for both the players and the coaching staff.. Maybe play some more freshman and experiment a little more with the offense. Some more comfort games at home, not to mention Ben Howland’s coaching, will make this team automatically better in the next few weeks. By Pac-10 season, I’m confident all you critics out there certainly won’t be singing the same tune. I had a similar feeling about tonight’s game than I did about Michigan St. last year – but we pulled that one out. It’s easy to be discouraged but I’m still as excited as ever about the season.
by zinlinez on Nov 20, 2008 9:19 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Completely agreed.
This gives us a chance to see what we’ve got. We aren’t up tight about our ranking anymore. Let’s see what we can do to improve and go from there.
by WestsideBrandon on Nov 20, 2008 9:21 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I was just about to post something similar
One thing that the 05-06 team had an advantage with was low or no expectations. All we had was a first round exit to our names and no ranking. Asking these guys to be the #4 team in the country is tough. If we’re having these struggles in late December, then call me, but it’s mid November.
by Tydides on Nov 20, 2008 9:21 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah.
We’ve blown off some steam, now we have to settle down and take a look at the big picture.
by WestsideBrandon on Nov 20, 2008 9:25 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
how did keefe look throughout the the game
before i left for some untimely tutoring, he was seeming very comfortable out there…any thoughts on his overall game tonight?
O.A.
by Ollie on Nov 20, 2008 9:22 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Mixed
He made a 3, shot well, had 8 rebounds, but got beat on D a couple of times and had some turnovers.
I think the problem is that he may well be our “inside presence” and that’s not really his game. I do think he is much improved over last year and will grow into the role as the season progresses.
Everyone looked a little tentative — not knowing where to go with the ball. That will end soon enough.
sjh
by Class of 66 on Nov 20, 2008 9:56 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Good rebounding
but again, when he pulled down key offensive rebounds around the hoop he looked to kick out rather than go back up to draw a foul and/or convert. If he is going to play down low with the bigs, he needs to have that mindset.
by Bald Eagle on Nov 20, 2008 10:28 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
It's a long season
The past few years, it has been John Beilein’s 1-3-1 defense, suc junk defense, and Florida’s big men that have given us trouble. Fortunately, we don’t see them all the time.
I think we got the high ranking because of the returning seniors, #1 recruiting class, and lack of elite teams (except UNC)
We’ll be fine as the year progresses.
by UCLA Championships Made Here on Nov 20, 2008 9:25 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
We played strong D and weak O
When you look at the numbers, we played a strong defensive game.
JH played a great game on Harris.
Aboya played well — but this was not a game where his ability to screen really mattered.
This is the kind of game that KL would have pulled us through — BUT not in his first 3 games.
And, that’s what we have to remember. Most of our minutes were played by people who did not start last year and some who were in high school.
We miss all of the guys who left last year — and I think we really miss LMR. We need someone to step up and play as hard as he did — for the entire game. Everyone talks about missing KL, RW, and Luc, but LMR was a role model for all and we need someone like him. It should be JS or DC. Aboya is close. He really is solid just not multidimensional.
I’m not worried about this team. We will be where we need to be when the time comes.
And, all you whiners and critics will not be allowed to jump on the end of the year band wagon.
sjh
by Class of 66 on Nov 20, 2008 9:26 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Strong D?
Did you actually look at the numbers? We played strong D for the first half, that was it. The second half was another story. The first half we only allowed them to shoot 31% from the field while they went 1-12 from the 3pt line and outrebounded Michigan 21-8. However, in the second half we gave up nearly 62% shooting while Michigan went 4-8 from the 3pt line and outrebounded us 13-11. I wouldn’t exactly call that finishing the game “strong”.
by turs12 on Nov 21, 2008 12:13 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
DC
Needs to take those open outside looks.
by Raisin on Nov 20, 2008 9:27 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Wow.
From reading some of these comments, one would think the sky is falling in Westwood. Folks, it’s November. It’s one loss. Have any of our Final Four teams been undefeated going into March? Nope. Not a single one.
I see a lot of criticism toward a team that is still working toward finding its identity. Of our starting five, only two were starters last year. One is a freshman and the other two were coming off the bench with limited minutes as role players. We lost the Flaming Mohawk, the Prince, and the Big Man. It’s going to take time for this group of guys to come together.
Yes, I’d like DC to take more outside shots given his high percentage. Yes, he and Josh disappeared down the stretch. Let the rust shake off before going into a panic. We’re still waiting for this year’s “Let’s Go!” moment. It’ll come and everything will be fine in Westwood.
I’ll trade this loss, and even a loss to Southern Illinois, if at the end of the season, our Ben Ball warriors are in the Final Four and looking at bringing another banner home to Westwood.
Calm down everyone. Yes, we were sloppy. Yes, our offense didn’t look great. Trust in CBH to get things right. He’s a master of fine tuning and fixing problems.
by Bellerophon on Nov 20, 2008 9:30 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Howland and offense
I believe in this coach, and it is early. But that was easily the worst performance I have seen since his first season. He was outcoached. He did not solve the 1-3-1, even with the veterans. How many times did we watch a open three not get taken. Howland players are afraid to shoot. I wish he would hire an offensive-minded assistant coach.
by loganeagle on Nov 20, 2008 9:34 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
the real problem
was not keeping up the penetrating and play making we did in the 1st half when we took the 6 point lead
drive and break the zone
by blinkshot on Nov 20, 2008 9:37 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Here's one thing we have no excuse for though...
…MAKE YOUR DAMN FREE THROWS
< Gob Bluth>COME ON</Gob Bluth>by Tydides on Nov 20, 2008 9:34 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
5-11 from the charity stripe
won’t do it at all for sure
by blinkshot on Nov 20, 2008 9:36 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Stop
I paid a lot of money to watch them at the Garden. Please just say for tonight that we sucked and that UCLA should at least pay for half my ticket. (I really did pay a lot for them)
by SmrtGuy82 on Nov 20, 2008 9:36 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
You are kidding, right?
Just in case you’re not,
I don’t give a shit how much you paid for your tickets.
You don’t buy a “win”, you get to watch a game.
And, we didn’t “suck” — we played like the team we are, young, inexperienced and one that has been together for very little time.
Get over it.
sjh
by Class of 66 on Nov 20, 2008 9:42 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
NICE, Class of 66! MY THOUGHTS EXACTLY!
GO BRUINS!
by rgalloucla on Nov 20, 2008 9:53 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
If
you come here again and sound off like that kind of arrogant, spoiled fan, you will be gone.
by Nestor on Nov 21, 2008 4:14 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Man this must be getting
old for all of you moderators. Good job cleaning up around here Nest.
Haha, paid a lot for the tickets… using the same reasoning, should I get my tuition back because I had an awful Polsci class my junior year? Being a UCLA fan/student should have illuminated to most that its the OVERALL experience that matters. No-one ought to expect a perfect season or an entirely flawless curriculum. Be a good sport and support your team/school through thick and thin. You might just come to appreciate the wins a whole lot more if you do. Thank you.
by eubruin on Nov 21, 2008 9:03 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Well said, eu
I suspect you are a geezer. And if you’re not, take that as a compliment. I hereby authorize you to get a Senior Coffee at McDonalds.
by Fox 71 on Nov 21, 2008 9:58 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
To All Who Showed Up to Whine
Nestor did a good job of explaining to you why drive-by-posts are so offensive here. It’s like someone you don’t know walking into your house and crapping on your kitchen floor because he felt like he had to go.
This is a great place. But, no one who’s here a lot wants to see a stranger drop in to blow off steam or relieve himself.
That’’s not what we do here. This is not an “it’s all about me place” — “I just dropped in to make myself feel better”.
It is a place to feel better — better because if you can make contributions backed up by facts and analysis you will become a part of the community and that, in itself, brings comfort after tough losses and joy with big wins.
As Nestor said, stick around and join in, in a constructive way. It’ll make you feel good.
sjh
by Class of 66 on Nov 20, 2008 9:39 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
as usual
very well said…by the way ‘66 If I remember correctly you are in Houston, are you by any chance thinking about going up to Austin ont he 4th. I’m entertaining the idea.
O.A.
by Ollie on Nov 20, 2008 9:43 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That's pretty tempting!
Are you going? Are there tickets available?
I love Austin. And, it was my “home” for several days after Ike. Time to go back and see my good friends at the Residence Inn.
You’re in Dallas, right?
My daughter wants to go to a concert in Dallas on the 5th — Death Cab for Cutie (?) — but I can’t see my wife letting me take her out of school for a 2 day road trip.
sjh
by Class of 66 on Nov 20, 2008 9:49 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I haven't looked into it alot yet
but a lot of my friends here are UT supporters so I’ve thought about it. Believe or not I haven’t been to Austin yet, but I know I’ll be there a lot during rush. My biggest concern is that I wouldn’t have any fellow bruin fans to come with me, and the idea of heading into Frank Erwin Center alone is a bit frightening haha. I believe thats the closest UCLA gets to me this year though, so that’s the main reason I was considering it.
O.A.
by Ollie on Nov 20, 2008 10:01 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
My Thoughts...
Josh Shipp scored the first basket of the game by slashing to the basket. He is much more effective when he utilizes his athleticism to penetrate, slash, and finish at the rim. The second half reminded me a lot of the second half of the season last year, where he camped out at the 3 point line and missed 3 point shots. He is a good 3 point shot when he shoots in rhythm, NOT when he is standing still. He needs to focus on getting to the basket and leave the 3 point shooting to DC, JH, etc.
I always forget about how frustrating the beginning of the season is for CBH teams, because the last 3 years have ended with such great success. CBH knows exactly what he is doing. We are playing 10 players, getting everyone experience, so come Pac-10 play and beyond, this team will gel and we will finally look like the Final Four caliber team that our pre-season ranking may have prematurely denoted.
Mike Roll played a decent game. He played some pretty good defense, had a nice putback, and I’ll give him a pass on the free-throws THIS time.
DC did NOT look like himself in the second half. This team is going to have to lean on his senior leadership, especially in the beginning of the season when playing away from home. I’m sure this is nothing to worry about and he will be back to himself tomorrow.
Here’s to a split in New York! GO BRUINS! BEAT THE SALUKIS!!!!
GO BRUINS!
by rgalloucla on Nov 20, 2008 9:49 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
You are right
we see this early in the season because CBH has to bring along new players and form a new team. Last year we had to learn to play with KL and with RW as a starter.
Also, last year, we had serious injuries.
In the pre-game thread I said all I wanted from these games was to get playing time for everyone and to avoid injuries. Got my wish. Would have loved a win, but didn’t really expect it.
sjh
by Class of 66 on Nov 20, 2008 9:53 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Trust CBH
There is a reason why CBH felt that this tournament was too early for this team. He sees them in practice every day. The freshmen are learning not to jump pass, learning the pace of college ball, and the team is getting familiar with each other.
by UCLA Championships Made Here on Nov 20, 2008 9:49 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
No time to worry about this game
We have another game tomorrow. Hopefully, the Bruins will respond and show improvement.
by UCLA Championships Made Here on Nov 20, 2008 10:01 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
farmar just blocked
robin lopez….by the way
O.A.
by Ollie on Nov 20, 2008 10:04 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
i saw that
finally something made me smile tonight lol
by bucknellbruin on Nov 20, 2008 10:05 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Farmar was an amazing Bruin pg...
I can’t recall ever where Farmar was basically taken out of game. He was always on fire and absolutely would never give up. Recall the West Virginia game. His level of competitiveness does not come around so often.
by mplsbruin on Nov 20, 2008 10:26 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
He had quite a few poor shooting games
Where his belief in his shot didn’t match the reality that night. We lost a couple of games that way in the 04-05 season. So no, not “always on fire” but he would never, ever, give up. His mistake sealed the WV game at the very end by getting picked clean. But say what you will about him: he never lacked confidence.
I loved the kid as a Bruin and also as a Laker, but let’s not revise history here.
As a side note, being able to watch Bruins like Jordan and Ariza after tough games like this for UCLA takes A LOT of the sting out of tonight.
by Tydides on Nov 20, 2008 10:36 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That West Virginia game
when Hansey picked Jordan’s pocket to end the game. Ah. Bad memories.
by bruin8uclap on Nov 20, 2008 10:48 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I used the word "fire" in the wrong way. I meant it in the way you refer to his confidence.
By contrast, Darren seems to lose confidence occasionally. He doesn’t have Jordan’s “swagger”, and in the end it means less leadership in games where he may be making mistakes, but he’s got to try a will the team forward.
by mplsbruin on Nov 20, 2008 10:49 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Confidence is a double-edged sword
But man, did that sword cut the other team when it mattered most.
by Tydides on Nov 20, 2008 10:57 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I thought the stats put up on Howland vs. Beilein were pretty interesting (IIRC)
Howland at Pitt, Beilein at West Virginia: 2-0 Howland (82-46 at Pitt and 80-61 at WVU). They were only at these places at the same time for one season (2002-2003) – Howland’s last at Pitt, with a top 10 team, and Beilein’s first at WVU. Not surprising he was able to get both wins, and both blowouts at that.
Howland at UCLA, Beilein at West Virginia: 2-0 Beilein (60-56 at Pauley in ‘05-’06 and 70-65 at WVU in ‘06-’07). The first featured a still-young UCLA, against an experienced WVU in Beilein’s 4th season. In the second we missed Collison as Westbrook struggled in his first start (4 pts on 1-11, 4 assts, 3 TO in 32 mins), in Beilein’s 5th year at WVU.
Howland at UCLA, Beilein at Michigan: 1-1 (69-54 UCLA at Mich, and this game). Last year’s game was our 12th of the season and Beilein’s 12th at Michigan. Tonight’s game was the third in their career for much of our team, playing for the first time against a very uncommon attack.
What I take from this: Howland’s wins come against teams very inexperienced in Beilein’s unorthodox system, not built to play his way. Beilein’s team wins when they’re the more experienced. I would say tonight’s game fits this pattern. It may only be his second year at Michigan, but his team is much less reliant on freshmen (4 combined for 48 mins for us, 2 combined for 30 for them) adjusting to the college game. Our seniors didn’t play well either, true, but as mentioned above, the mixing and molding of the entire team around those new players hasn’t happened quite yet, and needs to happen.
by jaffa on Nov 20, 2008 10:30 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Yep
Experience means a lot. Sometimes that message gets lost when guys like Dookie V are salivating over “diaper dandies” but we’ve gone to Final Fours in large part because of our experience. That’s why it’s so critically important that our freshman see playing time now, results be damned. If we’re going to go anywhere significant this season, the freshmen will need to play beyond their years. Howland has shown that it is possible.
What makes things difficult, I think, is that while talent-wise, we are probably closest to 05-06 where we landed in the title game, experience-wise, we are more like 04-05, when Jordan, Arron and Co. were all true freshmen behind senior Dijon Thompson and we went 18-11.
by Tydides on Nov 20, 2008 10:46 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Good Game to Build On for the Future
I think that a lot of people got spoiled last year when KL came in and played like a veteran on offense from day 1, and (after watching LMR get critical minutes in early games), played like a veteran on defense very early on in his freshman season. He was clearly not a typical freshman.
With the current group of freshmen, CBH could have scheduled a bunch of cupcakes at home and let the current crop fly high. All the drive-by posters would probably be asking when the rings will be fitted at year-end and where the next banner be hoisted in Pauley. Instead, the freshmen had the experience of traveling across country to play in front of an indifferent/hostile crowd on a storied, neutral court, facing a team with an unorthodox defense and a patient, grind it out offense.
Down the road this will pay dividends. The downside is the carping and whining from the drive-bys, but that seems like a good trade in terms of the future.
Whether we can find the glue inside in time this season will be the big question. I seem to remember that in the 05-06 season, which is being used as the template, RH came on strong at the end and was a major force down the stretch. If I have the chronology wrong, apologies. We can hopefully find that magic again.
There is a reason that only 3 other teams have been to 4 or more consecutive final 4’s. To have that kind of consistency when players are turning over is special. The fact that the Bruins have a shot to reach that rarified air should be a major achievement. Obviously, that is not enough for the drive-by posting crowd.
On an unrelated note, there has been a lot of praise (deserved) in the San Francisco papers for Pete Newell’s accomplishments. But wouldn’t you know that Bobby Knight would throw in a cheap shot- in his attempt to laud his mentor, he said that the Wizard was never more than a “very good” coach, and “great” should be reserved for Newell. There is no objective measure, whether on or off the court, that a comment like this could be made. Oh well- once a jerk always a jerk.
by islandbruin on Nov 20, 2008 10:53 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Lots of posts
Playing against Beilein’s 1-3-1 is like playing Paul Johnson’s offense. It is EXTREMELY difficult. Difficult because teams don’t get to see or play against this type of team often. It is very difficult to prepare for and no matter how much you prepare, you won’t really KNOW until you’re immersed in the game itself. Adding on a team with a bunch of cubs and people with different roles (roles which have yet to be defined; even for vets like Shipp & DC), is a tough proposition. If you follow college ball, I think we all knew that a loss was a very real possibility.
We’ll be fine as others have stated. #4 was not deserving for us nor any other team with our type of make-up. At the end of the year, players will have clearly defined roles, they’ll know each others strenghts & weaknesses and they’ll develop the type of chemistry needed to achieve what we have the past 3 seasons. They’ll also get a whole lotta Howland which is a very, very good thing per all the UCLA guys he has sent to the NBA. Rankings mean nothing at this point. This isn’t college football where you’re initial poll standing can have a positive or negative effect. We want the UCLA Machine to be hummin’ come March.
I didn’t get to see the game (Whether a W or L, it SUCKED) but there are some things I’d like to see.
1) The roles will be defined but for the time being, DC needs to take control of this team during this adjustment period. He has the most experience and is our best player at this moment. Jrue will likely take over at seasons end but he doesn’t have the experience nor the nuance to know when to take over a game, what to do in certain situations, etc. These subtle things only comes with experience via specific situations.
2) This team needs the Shipp from his FR year when he was slashing to the basket, getting offensive rebounds and just plain being a menace. Play-by-play shows he only took 3 jumpers. Shipp looked like he hit the boards hard. This is a good sign. He just needs to increase his assists but I’m confident that it’ll come once everyone gets comfortable with one another. Shipp deserves our respect after all that he has gone through physically to lay it on the line for us and he has been a great ambassador for UCLA basketball.
3) I know some people have been critical of Howland’s offense. I feel you because I’m a bit frustrated at times. But…can anyone argue with the results? Especially in the time period since he has taken over the program? That is what keeps me grounded because I remember those lean times & the con job that was Lavin. I do however think that if a post option doesn’t develop and teams adjust to this, I think we should explore some changes. I look at our starters and see Nova, circa Lowry/Ray/Foye. Keefe’s strength is that mid-range jumper with the occassional 3 and not the physical banging in the post. Aboya has always been better as a weak side rebounder crashing the boards. With DC, Jrue & Shipp all being able to handle the ball and hit the outside shot, a 4 out 1 in offense might be effective. Just my own personal imagination coming into play. Howland has been a godsend for a fan like me, I trust him and will just sit back and enjoy.
This ended up a lot longer than I intended it to be. Anyways…. I think our guys will come out with a renewed sence of urgency against S. Ill which is no cupcake at all. Another methodical team like Miami(OH) and Michigan. We’ll have to defend the entire shot clock and make smart decisions.
GO BRUINS!!!!
by BlueReign on Nov 20, 2008 10:59 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
not sure about the "inexperienced" claim, i think we just struggle against 1-3-1
we have collison, shipp, aboya who’ve been to 3 final fours (shipp redshirted one). i mean what kind of experience does michigan have? not much really. Manny Harris is a sophomore Sims is a junior.
shipp was 2-9 with 6 TOs. He is extremely erratic. I like him he’s done so much, but he keeps having these nightmare games. last year against michigan he was great. knocking down 3s with confidence probably the mvp of that game.
collison i thought was pretty good, but a little too tentative at times. when he attacks – he is awesome.
aboya was great at taking charges, played hard, but got back-doored twice i think late in the game at really costly times.
our defense in the second half was not up to howland standard. i think they shot like 60 percentish in the 2nd half.
our inexperienced player who played over 6 minutes (i guess drag, keefe should be considered inexperienced too) was jrue holiday. He was awesome. I wish he had the ball in his hands a little more.
j’mission and ja have a long way to go. lee and gordon i think will be very good contributors very soon.
by realfabfive on Nov 20, 2008 11:31 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Turnovers
I’ve said it before and it came true again: if we don’t force turnovers we will have a tough time winning. Tonight we lost the turnover battle 17 to 9. While I am not too worried about our turnovers since most of that can be attributed to Bielien’s stupid 1-3-1, our defense needs to force more turnovers or games like tonight and Miami will be common place this year. CBH’s defense isn’t based on gambling, but we didn’t do a very good job tonight or against Miami in trapping the ball and forcing opposing players into throwing tough passes that we can pick off and take to a fast break. Tomorrow is another step on the road to the NCAA tournament and I am looking forward to seeing the adjustments that CBH makes and hopefully our guys will come out playing with a chip on their shoulder.
by bruinponcho on Nov 20, 2008 11:34 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
The sky is not falling.
Just finished on the Tivo and was not really surprised by the result. First let me say that in two years reading of BN every day, I have never posted before. But today, I was kind of shocked to hear people panic and trash talk about this game, and I have to say something. Has everyone gone mad? These kids were playing in high school last year and now they’re playing in Madison Square Garden. Honestly, after seeing the last two games I would have been more surprised if we won by more than ten points against a good Michigan team. Tonight I saw a Bruin team that generally played good defense but was just a little too tentative on offense, and they lost a close game. The freshmen looked to tighten up a little after being involved in turnovers and other mistakes. Is that surprising? What kid would play super aggressively after making mistakes in their first "big"game, in an NBA arena, and just two weeks into their first season? Everyone on every team makes mistakes, but you never feel like that when you’re the new guy. They will gain confidence. The rest of the team will have some difficulties until they do, but until then we can’t expect the older guys to be able to carry the team completely. The magic of our team is not god given ability, it’s the ability of CBH to create a team of champions from a group of talented kids over the course of a year. That’s the difference between us and the rest of the country, and that’s why I watch each and every game. If you really thought there were only three teams in the country better than us before this game, it was only a matter of time before you freaked out anyways.
by bruin_2K on Nov 20, 2008 11:58 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Frustrating
I’m headed up from DC to NYC to see the consolation game. I had really been looking forward to a matchup with Duke. In many ways I would have rather lost to Duke than to Michigan.
What I see as lacking, beside poor decision making from our senior “leadership,” is offense. UCLA run the court ,get points in transition and wear down the other team, but that seems to have dissappeared in CBH’s methodical offense. While I like the tenacious D, I would like to see a more open, aggressive offense that doesn’t require us to depend on 3 pointers at the end of the game, especially with the bigger arc.
by vabruin98 on Nov 21, 2008 4:05 AM PST reply actions 0 recs

by 






















