Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Ohio State And Florida Target 2013 Receiver Recruits

Serving Notice: UCLA Recruiting Reset

Let’s zero in on the biggest news of the week. No I am not talking about the expected mauling from our Ben Ball warriors last night at Pauley, I am talking about the commitment of Morrell Presley of Carson High – only the number 1 TE recruit in the nation – to Rick Neuheisel’s UCLA football program (HT to muircoach for first posting the blockbuster news on BN). Not only was this a commitment to Neuheisel, to make it even more delicious this was Morrell decommiting from the Humanitarian of college football:

Presley was a USC commit, but said he made the switch because he has liked UCLA for a long time.

The 6-foot-4, 215-pounder, who has been clocked at 4.5 seconds in the 40-yard dash, had 35 catches for 604 yards and five touchdowns for the Colts this season.

Uhm, I guess Morrell wasn’t all that impressed by the propaganda from 60 Minutes and more swayed by the fact how TEs play a huge part in Chow's offense as evidenced by Moya's season (in which he finished 3rd in the team in receptions and 4th in receiving yards). More from WWL on the significance of this development:

ESPN's Craig Haubert added, "UCLA threw a little gasoline on what was the flickering fire of a rivalry between cross-town foes. The battle for LA has been basically all USC in recent years, but yesterday head coach Rick Neuheisel struck his first real blow in the showdown by landing a commitment from No. 1-ranked tight end Morrell Presley who was a longtime USC commit."

"While USC will move on this is a big blow for the Trojans as they were on course to land the No. 1 rated tight end in the country for the second straight year and were going to potentially have one of the top tight end tandems in all of college football with Presley paired alongside Blake Ayles. That is no more has Presley is slated to enroll at UCLA early."

"This is a big get for UCLA on two fronts. The first is the recruiting victory over USC. This switch is not a complete shock, but still a big steal as Presley was one of USC's top recruits. In addition to the USC / UCLA battle and more importantly this was big because Presley is an excellent prospect. He is an athletic tight end with good size. Offensive coordinator Norm Chow can use Presley as an in-line player or flex him out and use him like a wide receiver. He has good hands and speed and can be a player that creates some match-up problems and can add a dimension to the UCLA attack. While he is a tight end that can catch his fair share of balls, Presley is also a productive in-line blocker who can stay on the field and help UCLA's ground game."

Here are the youtube highlights of Morrell.

Honestly, I am somewhat surprised by this. I knew CRN was going hard after Morrell even though he was a Trojan commit (more on that in a bit) but I didn’t think he had a snowball chance in hell in prying Morrell away from Petey’s grasp given the tough (but expected) rebuilding season we experience, and the 24-7 Trojan/Rose Bowl propaganda all around the Southland traditional media. Simply an incredible effort on the part of CRN and his staff if Morrell’s commitment sticks through signing day (you know Petey and his cronies will be relentless over next few weeks).

What I think is the most important aspect of this news is the message Neuheisel and his staff is sending across town and rest of the college recruiting world. UCLA will no longer just sit back and accept Trojan domination in the recruiting world. Sure the guys across town have a great football program (albeit drenched in scandals). But no longer UCLA is going to let them go uncontested on the recruiting front. Unlike the previous regime, Neuheisel and his staff whenever they find the slightest daylight, they are going to make those guys compete for every elite recruit. Keep in mind Morrell is not the only Trojan recruit CRN is after. He is also going after Trojan commit receiver DeVon Flournoy of Birmingham High of Lake Balboa (alma mater of Milton Knox, who I am hearing is talking up UCLA to every local recruit he can talk to). Per BlueReign (who nailed the significance of this news) DeVon also happens to be a cousin of our JetSki Franklin.

Plus we have also set up visits of number of elite recruits who have already committed to other programs. Per Dohn here are some of the players who will be visiting Westwood during the weekend of January 9-11:

TE Zach Ertz of Danville Monte Vista (Stanford commit)
DE Devon Kennard of Phoenix Desert Vista
CB Marlon Pollard of San Bernardino Cajon (Notre Dame commit)
DE Iuta Tepa of Long Beach Poly (Hawaii commit)
LB Marquis Simmons of Compton Dominguez (USC commit)
TE/DE Billy Sanders of Coeur d'Alene Lake City (Miami commit)

Remember Marlon Pollard had committed to us earlier only to decommit and switch over to the Irish during summer. Given the instability in the Irish program right now, can’t fault the kid for looking at us. As for Zach Ertz, keep an eye on Harbaugh and the San Diego Chargers (rumors are percolating in the background). I think Simmons and Kennard are total long shots. But we will have a shot with Tepa and Sanders.

Just how relentlessly CRN is recruiting Tepa from Long Beach Poly? From Robert Morales’s report in Long Beach Press-Telegram on the eve of Friday’s state battle royal between Poly and De La Salle Sacramento Grant:

As Jackrabbits coach Raul Lara sat with reporters at Home Depot Center on Monday, he received a text from UCLA coach Rick Neuheisel.

Lara said Neuheisel sent a congratulatory note regarding the success of the Jackrabbits.

A reporter jokingly asked Lara if Neuheisel was being sincere, or just buttering him up because he wants to recruit some of his players.

"I think he wants my players," Lara said, laughing.

Lara said that although defensive end Iuta Tepa has verbally committed to Hawaii, there are several other teams "all over" Tepa.

UCLA is one of them.

And that’s not all (just like you hear in those infomercials).

Norm Chow has been out in Hawaii shoring up our three stud recruits from the Island and also staying on pursuit of Manti Te’o:

UCLA offensive coordinator Norm Chow was in Hawaii recently and from what I'm hearing did well with the Bruins' trio of commits, as well as highly regarded linebacker Manti Te'o.
Chow was able to visit with Punahou of Honolulu receiver Roby Toma and running back Dalton Hilliard, and Kapolei High offensive lineman Stanley Hasiak.
Chow also spent time with Te'o, who plays at Punahou.

Manti is going to be another uphill challenge just like Kennard and Simons. But after Morrell’s commitment, I am not going to count our staff out. These guys clearly won’t give up given how they have been relentless.

I don’t ever recall reading stories like this about UCLA coaches being this intense in their recruiting. Toledo was piling up those top-10 classes thanks to Cade engineered 20 game winning streak. Dorrell was cruising through his early years concentrating on remember people’s birthdays until Walker came in towards the end and a lit a fire on the defensive recruiting front. But I just don’t remember UCLA coaches gunning so hard after the Trojans in recent years.

Meanwhile, if you are wondering how UCLA is going to enough rides (we are already at 17) to accommodate scholarships for all these recruits, here is a clue from Dohn’s report today:

The Bruins will have a new kickoff specialist next season after walk-on Jimmy Rotstein informed coach Rick Neuheisel during a meeting last week he was not coming back for a fifth season.

Rotstein spent the past two seasons kicking off. Neuheisel said Rotstein will graduate in the spring with a degree in communications.

Also, Neuheisel said reserve tight end Adam Heater will not return for a fifth season. Heater also will graduate in the spring. Heater, who played on special teams, will graduate in the spring. His leaving frees up a scholarship to be used in the 2009 class.

Good luck to Jimmy and Adam.

Another note to keep in mind which is already out on message boards and I have heard this from a good friend of mine. CRN also has a high profile “silent verbal” locked up from a recruit who is committed to another program. Needless to say from what I have read about this kid, when he makes it official, the news will serve notice to rest of the college football just like Presley’s commitment did last night.

So with Pressley’s commitment UCLA’s class has already jumped into top-25 rankings per both Scout.com and Rivals.com. Our class is now ranked number 22 per Scout.com and 19 according to Rivals.com. Here are the rankings for UCLA’s recruiting classes dating back to Dorrell’s first year:

Year

Scout.com Rankings

Rivals.com Rankings

Avg. Rankings

2002-03

35

36

36

2003-04

24

34

29

2004-05

24

26

25

2005-06

20

17

19

2006-07

36

40

38

2007-08

10

13

12

2008-09

22

19

21

 

Again keep in mind Dorrell inherited an 8 win team that was just 4 years removed from an appearance in the Bowl game. I’d give him a pass for his mediocre first class but the effort that was shown in the way the second class was put together was a complete joke. I shudder to think what kind of class we would have had in Dorrell’s second year if he inherited a program devoid of talent at OL and disastrous situation at QB.

In contrast when CRN came in he immediately went all in by teaming up with Walker and Chow to hold on to the good class from last year (which was Dorrell’s first true elite class after six years on the job). And now despite facing uphill challenges in a rebuilding season CRN has us positioned for a great finish. I can only imagine the kind of recruiting we might see from our current staff if we can somehow scratch and claw our way into a winning season in his second year, and then make a run for the conference title in the third season.

If Neuheisel is serving notice on the recruiting front with a 4-8 record, imagine the possibilities when (not if) the program becomes viable.

GO BRUINS.

Comment 24 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I know it's just one guy

and we still have a ways to go, but I wrote a long time ago that when we start taking elite recruits away from the evil empire, that that will herald the proverbial “turning of the corner” of our program, and perhaps this rivalry.

This is double victory in that we gain a elite, 5 star recruit, and take one away from the SUCsters.

This could be the most significant moment for this program in a long, long time.

by godblesstyus95 on Dec 18, 2008 6:27 AM PST reply actions  

Recruiting for Needs

Thanks to what CRN inherited, he does not have the luxury of recruiting the best available players regardless of position. He has specific holes to fill. The rankings by services like Scout.com and Rivals.com simply (I believe) base their results on average stars per recruit, number of recruits, etc. It is more important how CRN and staff are putting together a class which is filling holes, which is not measured as well by the class rankings.

By the way, I understand that we should give some slack to 17 year olds in terms of decision making ability. But, doesn’t it say something about character if a prospect has “committed” to UCLA, then switches his “commitment” to Notre Dame, and now apparently could be persuaded to do a 180 and “commit” to UCLA? Seems like this may go beyond uncertainty.

by islandbruin on Dec 18, 2008 6:44 AM PST reply actions  

Great news

I don’t care how crappy we played this past season (and, honestly, I don’t think our record was reflective of our competitiveness).

This program is on the way up. Period. There are some fun times ahead.

by Barnes2JJ on Dec 18, 2008 9:17 AM PST reply actions  

Relentless Optimism!

Long Live Coach Rick Neuheisel!

Okay that might be a little overboard, but probably not by much. If this other rumor pans out as well, you just can’t deny the ability it takes to sell a recruit after a 4 win season, not to mention two top notch coordinators on what was sure to be a rebuilding project.

Can’t wait to see what the redshirt guys have done with their year in waiting. I’m already excited for next year.

by Tydides on Dec 18, 2008 9:39 AM PST reply actions  

Good writeup N

Morrell: His aunt is a professor at UCLA. This is the tie in to the program. Also, he wanted to be recruited by UCLA but the prior staff was “slow-playing” him so that is the reason why he verballed early to suc. Also, he is supposed to register for spring within a week or two or whenever you’re supposed to register. This is welcome news because after next year, Moya & Paulsen will be gone so getting Morrell some experience/1 year in the program will be very important. The combo of Harkey (whom I’m very high on) and Morrell will stabalize the TE position with more depth to be added in the following classes.

Reading about the text to Lara put a smile on my face. Poly is a powerhouse of a program with multiple D1 kids year in and year out. In order to challenge suc, we need to get our fair share. Tepa would be a good start considering DE is a need position.

As I’ve stated before, I’m very excited about the direction of the program under CRN. Our record doesn’t reflect the “Culture Change” in the program nor the sense of direction that is prevelant under CRN.

by BlueReign on Dec 18, 2008 9:49 AM PST reply actions  

Correction

I believe JetSki’s cousin is Randall Carrol from Cathedral who happened to have been paid a visit after Morrell by our very own CRN. There are rumors about Patrick Hall floating out there on the message boards as well.

Something is going on at suc for these guys to be looking around after being committed to them for this long. I’m guessing it’s a combination of CRN’s “relentlessness”, lack of reputable OC, etc.

A couple additional things caught my eye. Morrell stated to the effect that not only would CRN make him a better football player but a “better man”. Ouch…Finally somebody sees suc for what they truly are. A win at all costs program that has no regard for rules or doing what is right. TY Morrell. Also, he noted that he liked the fact that there were a lot of “City guys” on the team that he grew up with or knew. For all of KD’s faults, I did like the fact that he built a pipleline to Crenshaw and started to recruit LB Poly. Toledo avoided Poly like the plague and didn’t recruit the City Section hard. I remember most of our recruits coming from schools outside of metro LA. The last class had a lot of the top players from the City Section and I don’t expect this aspect of UCLA’s recruiting philosophy to change.

Man..it is going to get hot and heavy until we receive the faxed LOI’s. Who knows…maybe we’ll have another Durell Price-like occurence come Signing Day.

by BlueReign on Dec 18, 2008 2:28 PM PST up reply actions  

Way to go CRN!

Thanks for updating us N on this. I am completely confident in CRN’s ability to go after recruits within NCAA guidelines. I had no idea how past HC’s recruited, but its good to get a glimpse of what CRN is doing.

GO BRUINS!

by LoyalAlum94 on Dec 18, 2008 9:58 AM PST reply actions  

A Great Sign

We all know that UCLA is a great place to go to school. Kids want to go there. But elite athletes such as Morrell want to go to a program that will prepare them for the next level. As much as Morrell wanted to go to UCLA, he is not going to sacrifice his future and waste his time at a program in disarray. That period is over.
Now that the Bruins finally have a proven winner at coach and a top-notch staff, I think you’ll see more and more of 4-Star and 5-Star athletes coming to Westwood. This is only the beginning.

richramus

by Rich Ramus on Dec 18, 2008 9:59 AM PST reply actions  

ABC

Always Be Closing.

I like CRN showing some tenacity like Alec Baldwin’s character in Glengarry Glen Ross. It’s clear that Pom Pom already took up all the a-holeness of that character.

by UCLA4Life on Dec 18, 2008 10:05 AM PST reply actions  

The dude gives me chills

I almost want him to come to my house to recruit me and fire me up!

But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.

by tasser10 on Dec 18, 2008 11:17 AM PST reply actions  

Yep

I have a lot more confidence in our current coaching staff going into a recruit’s living room and representing our university the way it should be represented, as opposed to the prior regime, who seemed content on inking a few, nice 4 star recruits early and then picking up the sleepers late, hardly ever crossing paths with the SUCsters.

We want, and need, someone to go head to head with those clowns across town amongst their recruiting circles. It seems we are finally getting that.

by godblesstyus95 on Dec 18, 2008 1:34 PM PST up reply actions  

06-07 was better than the numbers

small in numbers, but high quality recruits.

One thing to keep in mind is that Pressly supposed flipped Byron Moore from UCLA to SUC, so maybe he’ll flip him again…. They are supposedly extremely tight. I don’t have any inside information, but it wouldn’t surprise me to see it…

I am so excited to see how strong CRN closes…

"when you've seen how big the world is, how can you make due with this?"

by silverlakebruin on Dec 18, 2008 11:26 AM PST reply actions  

Correction:
From Robert Morales’s report in Long Beach Press-Telegram on the eve of Friday’s state battle royal between Poly and De La Salle:

Poly isn’t playing De La Salle. We’re playing Sacramento Grant.

And I really hope that we can get Tepa (sorry, using “we” for UCLA now, Poly earlier). I know UCLA has changed things around a bit with recruits from the Home of Scholars and Champions (Marcedes, T. Austin), but UCLA still doesn’t get a lot of looks from Poly players. I know Tepa isn’t a U$C commit, but if we got a guy like him, it would just make us a stronger option to future Poly players. Trust me—for most of those guys, U$C is the dream destination. Let’s hope that continues to change.

by Westwood Wizard on Dec 18, 2008 12:04 PM PST reply actions  

Its official

According to Brian Dohn, Presley is enrolled at ucla for winter quarter so he’s for sure coming to ucla.

by exbruin on Dec 18, 2008 2:04 PM PST reply actions  

Season Tickets

I was thinking of taking the year off from season tickets since the budget is tight…. I think this just changed my mind. It says great things about the job CRN/Walker/Chow and Co. are doing with recruiting.

by captainqtp on Dec 18, 2008 2:34 PM PST reply actions  

Speaking of TEs

Is Moya or Paulson going to start next year? Moya seemed like a much better receiver last year than Paulson was in his year under KD. I confess I wasn’t paying much attention to the blocking they were delivering. Much of my perception could also be that Chow likes to use the TE more than KD did.

Or maybe , Presley just starts ahead of either one?

by captainqtp on Dec 18, 2008 3:14 PM PST up reply actions  

It’s a possible that presley will move to WR…he’s 6’4", about 210 and is pretty thin for a WR. I’ve seen marcedes lewis in person and marcedes was much thicker than morrell is, so I doubt he would get a start at TE as a freshman. I was at carson last season and he wasnt even really lined up tight half the time, he was split out wide or in the slot. I’ve got some video that i’ll try to get on youtube and posted on BN maybe tomorrow or whenever I get a chance.

by jtthirtyfour on Dec 18, 2008 5:01 PM PST up reply actions  

A Quick Question...

Far be it from me to defend the local pariah, but wouldn’t the recruiting statistics you posted actually support a gradual improvement by Dorrell over his entire tenure?

The only year in which he doesn’t improve on his class rankings is 2006-2007 – which was due to the fact that the team only had a dozen scholarships. The ‘average star ranking’ of that class was quite high regardless of which recruiting service you prefer. Taken that way the 2nd highest in the Pac-10 (ahead of Oregon in both services, whose class was ranked 9th in the country by Scout and 11th by Rivals).

You could make the argument that he would have had more scholarships with a better handling of redshirt years, but even a crystal ball to redshirt to perfection would likely have only given him one or two more spaces that season.

I hate to go offtopic… but then again, I wasn’t the one who brought up Dorrell – that comes from the original post. It seems intellectually dishonest to put up a chart showing gradual but consistent improvement (barring the above discussed outlier) and use that as proof of failure at recruiting. I would argue the product on the field would be a much better example of that – no need to resort to misleading statistics, I should think.

by FitForABruin on Dec 18, 2008 5:26 PM PST reply actions  

The recruiting classes Dorrell was putting together

In his first four years were not up to par with UCLA standards. I specifically noted in my post how the recruiting classes left much to be desired given the fact he inherited a program only four years removed from a BCS bowl game and was coming off an 8 win season, fairly stocked with talent. We have done numerous posts on Dorrell’s recruiting follies and we are not going to go round and round again.

And I hope no one here is moronic enough to make the argument that Dorrell would be putting together this kind of class and generate this kind of excitement with a 4-8 team. Also, Dorrell NEVER pryed away a committed recruit from Southern Cal. So don’t come here and accuse us of intellectual dishonesty without putting things in context.

by Nestor on Dec 18, 2008 5:38 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm not looking to claim Dorrell a great recruiter

As a matter of fact, I said above that when looking for “proof of failure at recruiting[,] I would argue the product on the field would be a much better example of that – no need to resort to misleading statistics, I should think.”

What I do believe, though, is that there’s no reason to bury a guy who, by the time he left UCLA, was not doing a poor job recruiting. The immense problems with ‘on the job training’ notwithstanding (obvs), the above chart suggests he was becoming a solid recruiter, having struggled in the early going but finding significant (sustained) success in his last few offseasons.

Just curious, why are you so certain Dorrell and his staff wouldn’t be putting together a good class? It’s not like the season before this past one was filled with triumphant moments of any sort – it got its coach fired, as you’ll recall. But the top 10/15 class Neuheisel inherited was effectively put together by Dorrell and his staff even so, both those who remain with the program and those who don’t. Given that, a top-20 class, even following another poor season, doesn’t seem so out of reach. Neuheisel’s had 8 years as a head coach before this last one. Dorrell was (a well-documented) newbie – we are, then, surprised that CRN hits the ground running better than Dorrell did?

Do I think Karl would generate “this kind of excitement” going into the offseason? No. He was a flat personality, and would have been in his 6th year as coach. Neuheisel is far more charismatic, and has just come off his first season – regardless of my beliefs towards either of their skills towards recruiting, UCLA football would have more buzz surrounding the program due to those two facts alone. I don’t even know if Dorrell would have won the 4 games the team did this season (I rather doubt it, as I assume you do as well). I suppose one will never know how he would have handled a season like this one.

I’m simply asking if it’s necessary to attempt to further prove something (Dorrell is a unilaterally-poor recruiter) with information that doesn’t necessarily follow to prove said point. Compare that to the potential answer that, regardless of his other abilities as a coach, Dorrell actually did learn something with regards to recruiting during his time at UCLA (not that he should have been asked to learn it in the first place – but what happened happened). Which does the chart above seem to support more?

by FitForABruin on Dec 18, 2008 9:16 PM PST up reply actions  

Misleading statistics?

Exactly how the information above was misleading to advance the point that Dorrell got off to a very poor start on the recruiting front?

And if you actually followed recruiting on a day to day basis you would find plenty of posts with citations to reports here on BN which detailed the recruiting class that was signed last year came together due to DeWayne Walker’s efforts on the defensive side. In fact the key recruits from last two years’ classes are all on the defensive front.

So it’s a little bit of BS on your part to register a new account on BN yesterday to advance argument that somehow Dorrell was becoming a good recruiter in his last two years when it has been posted time and time again that lot of the recruiting success that UCLA experienced in last two years didn’t have much to do with Dorrell’s efforts but a lot to do w/ DeWayne Walker and an assistant coached named Eric Scott (who eventually had to leave the program for off the field issues).

If you want to go round and round in your attempt to revise history and burnish up Dorrell’s credential as some kind of good recruiter, find another venue. Not here.

by Nestor on Dec 19, 2008 4:48 AM PST up reply actions  

Eric Scott

I’ve lost track of him. Didn’t CRN keep him in some capacity? Or, am I having a gray moment?

sjh

by Class of 66 on Dec 19, 2008 7:32 AM PST up reply actions  

Not quite
It’s not like the season before this past one was filled with triumphant moments of any sort

Most of the players committed before the season after beating USC.

by SuperBruinMan on Dec 19, 2008 4:30 PM PST up reply actions  

CTS was a bad recruiter.

Just look at our offensive line for the past two years. Those guys were recruited by CTS. They are all Bruins, so I will not denigrate them. But it is a fact that the results they generated were well below mediocre. Forget about the number of stars next to a kid’s name. Look at the results those kids generated, and the kids recruited by CTS did not produce at a high level.

Or from another perspective, look at our offense in 2007. We stunk, and I think a lot of us blamed the odor on our inept head coach and his equally inept offensive coordinator. We then started 2008 with a new head coach who brought a record of success in his prior coaching stops. He hired an unparallelled offensive coordinator in Coach Chow. But our offense still stunk. I think the odor must be laid at the feet of the guy who recruited who we have, and couldn’t recruit the guys who went elsewhere and who helped other teams generate good offensive performances. It’s not Coach Toledo’s fault, and it’s not Coach Neuheisel’s fault. Who does that leave?

by Fox 71 on Dec 19, 2008 2:45 PM PST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bruins Nation, an unofficial daily online scrap book covering the greatest collegiate athletic program in the nation. Established June 16, 2005. GO BRUINS.

FanPosts


Managers

Uclabear1_small Nestor

Arron_afflalo1_small Tydides

Brad_pitt_as_achilles_small Achilles

377011_2642084725867_1068030137_32302525_1166539782_n_small Ryan Rosenblatt

Telemachus_small Telemachus

Licenseplate_small gbruin

2761_small tasser10

Blue_bellerophon_small Bellerophon

Img_0052_2_small Patroclus

Small DCBruins

Of Counsels

094_small Ajax

Menelaus2_small Menelaus

Small Meriones

Small Odysseus

Associates

Eee_small freesia39

Uclabruins_small AHMB