Bruins Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: The Boxing Bulletin for Boxing Fans!

Spaulding Roundup: Game Notes & Pom Pom's Humanitarian (Jersey) Gesture

We will start our Tuesday roundup focusing on the positive. Kevin Pearson from the Press Enterprise has a report on Bruin Defense, which has been rolling in its last two games:

"Right now we're rolling on defense," senior tackle Brigham Harwell said. "These young guys are learning the defense and are comfortable. We're clicking."

Despite having three first-year starters in the secondary, the Bruins' pass defense is second to only USC's in Division I-A, allowing just 158 yards per game, and the overall defense has been even better in the past two games, allowing just 135 yards to Washington and 122 at Arizona State. The totals were the lowest by a UCLA opponent since Arkansas managed just 42 in the 1989 Cotton Bowl.

Though UCLA has allowed 320 points, a great deal of those have been the result of turnovers and short fields created by a lackluster offense that has handcuffed its defense too often. Despite that, UCLA is ranked 35th in total defense.

"This Saturday, hopefully our defense can do the same thing," Harwell said. "Our defense is going to have to come on strong and play our best game this year."

That won't be easy against a USC offense that has found its groove. But like the 2006 matchup at the Rose Bowl, a 13-9 Bruins victory, this game could come down to a defensive slugfest and be a low-scoring affair.

While the goal is to turn Saturday into a low scoring game, Harwell and his team-mates know too well playing Southern Cal will be a little different than taking on Washington and ASU:

Harwell figures that he and his teammates are playing their best football, understanding defensive coordinator DeWayne Walker's schemes and executing their assignments.

But they also know that playing well against Washington and Arizona State doesn't guarantee success against the Trojans, who have the second-ranked offense in the Pacific 10 Conference.

"They're a monster," Harwell said.

To kill the monster Harwell and co will have to generate all out pressure on the trigger man. The game plan for Saturday will not be any different from 13-9, when Walker’s defense throttled the vaunted Trojan offense, by pounding Booty all afternoon.

The key for our defense will be to disrupt Sanchez by hammering him to the Rose Bowl turf all afternoon on Saturday. Sacking him will be gravy but more importantly they will have to make sure that he doesn’t get in any kind of rhythm. In addition, while we are being aggressive on defense, it will be imperative for our guys to stay disciplined and not rack up penalties like they were doing against Arizona State.

On the other side of the ball, the numbers aren’t pretty:

UCLA's lone motivation in pulling one of the great upsets in 77-game history of the series is pride. The Bruins (4-7) were eliminated from bowl consideration by the loss to Arizona State, and need a win to avoid its worst season since the 1989 team finished 3-7-1.

But this is a statistical mismatch when pitting USC's vaunted defense against UCLA's hollow offense.

The Trojans lead the nation in total defense (210.6 ypg) and points allowed per game (7.8ppg). UCLA is 110th out of 119 Football Bowl Subdivision teams in total offense (294.7 ypg) and 107th in scoring (18.6 ppg), and Arizona State scored four defensive touchdowns against the Bruins last week.

That was from Brian Dohn who has been full of positive energy this week. Again, it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out Trojan’s defensive game plan. They will force UCLA to win the game with Craft.

What could be interesting is that Pete Carroll is arrogant enough that he could dare UCLA to beat the Trojan offense without shaking up his defensive scheme (why should he … it has been working for him the whole season). Given the pathetic state of our OL, not sure Trojans even need to stack the LOS to stop our running game. So we will see what happens … could be amusing to watch if Carroll dares to Chow beat his offense straight up.

And Carrol is already sending signals that he will show no respect for this rivalry on Saturday. So he posted on his fansite yesterday that how he changed his mind on a whim and decided that his guys will be wearing home jerseys this Saturday. Wolfie from the Daily News has this on Carroll’s flip-flop w/o conferring with Neuheisel:           

Carroll's maneuver was an about-face from comments he made last week and Sunday night about the possibility of wearing cardinal jerseys.

"I don't know anything about that," he said Sunday. […]

He said he also brought the idea up to UCLA coach Rick Neuheisel but admitted the pair had not spoken since August and it was solely Carroll's idea to do it now.

Uh hum. He is such a Humanitarian.

He has so much respect for this “rivalry” that he decided to change his mind re. home jerseys without conferring with Neuheisel, putting him on the spot. Yeah. Okay.

It’s amusing to see Trojans to go ga ga over this jersey shenanigans, when they showed no interest in doing this while we were beating them up doing our 8 game winning streak.

Make no mistake about it. What Carroll is doing here is not some kind of grand gesture but a total disrespect of UCLA. This will just complement “own the Rose Bowl” rhetoric coming out of their mouths in coming days. They will use this PR stunt to amplify that rhetoric on the recruiting front.

Carroll made this move because right now he is in a state of mind that is well beyond confidence. He is basically telling the world that his team and his players can wear their home jerseys in our house and beat us with their hands tied behind their back. As I said above, we never heard about such concern for tradition and pageantry from the Trojans during our 8 game winning streak.

Whatever. At this point Neuheisel should call Pom Pom's bluff and agree to give up one TO (in each half) and then call on Carroll to do the same next season at the Rose Bowl. But what Carroll did on Sunday w/o conferring with Neuheisel is a total sign of disrespect.

Anyway, it is their time now. They are clicking on all cylinders and this is par for the course for an out of control, unchecked program, which hasn’t been held accountable by the NCAA, Pac-10 or the traditional media. Let them have fun this week just like the Yankees and their fans were pouring it on the Red Sox Nation during their better days.

What goes around, comes around.

GO BRUINS.

0 recs  |  Comment 24 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Jerseys

I agree with your game plan predictions. SC’s defense against our O may be the most lopsided affair in the history of this series statistically. D and special teams will have to be huge to keep this close. As far as the jerseys go, I’m all for it, even if Petey is doing it for all the wrong reasons. Throughout my time at UCLA the teams wore home colors. It rocks! There was no more beautiful expression of rivalry in college football. When they line up at the line of scrimmage, I guarantee your hair will stand on end.
Beat SC!

by BruinAl on Dec 2, 2008 5:59 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Total Lack of Respect

The unilateral decision by Cheaty Petey to wear home jerseys belies the arrogance of the folks from across town. I believe Petey made the decision to wear home jerseys when it became clear that $c had the inside track to play in the Rose Bowl after Oregon State lost in the Civil War game.

It’s a coward move by Petey, all he had to do was call Rick and offer to wear home jerseys earlier this season, but he didn’t offer until it became clear that they would (most likely) play in the Rose Bowl. It’s an act of pure hubris. Nothing insults the Gods like raw hubris. I hope the Gods punish $c for this transgression.

Victory or until next year!

by ncrpz2 on Dec 2, 2008 8:09 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Pom Pom's an asshole

Water is wet. The sky is blue.

Excellent point about Pounding Booty. This year we’ll just have to get Sanchez a little…Dirty.

by Tydides on Dec 2, 2008 8:49 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

ROFLMAO

A coach is someone who can give correction without causing resentment. John Wooden

by MexiBruin on Dec 2, 2008 12:13 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Countermove

CRN can turn this whole thing around by calling a timeout right after kickoff at the beginning of each half, thereby “evening the score”, so to speak. PC can then be expected to return the favor next year at the Crapiseum.

by godblesstyus95 on Dec 2, 2008 9:06 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

An excellent idea

And I believe part of the plan when they were both talking previously.

by Free the 16 on Dec 2, 2008 9:25 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I mentioned the idea in my post

From my understanding when Neuheise and Carroll talked about in during, Neuheisel was more than open to it (however he wasn’t sure about giving up time outs for both half). Since then there hasn’t been much discussion and then Pom Pom uncorked this PR stunt w/o conferring with RN.

Anyway, at this point I expect RN to do what godblesstyus95 suggested (which I mentioned in my post).

And anyone who doesn’t see the sinister motive on part of Pom Pom is simply naive. He did this so that he and his coaches could use the recruiting rhetoric that they “own” the Rose Bowl where they can rub our noses in the dirt even playing with their arms tied in the back. It was a cowardly stunt on Pom Pom’s part after it became clear they would be the favorites to head back to the Rose Bowl.

by Nestor on Dec 2, 2008 9:29 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

CRN is not going to burn a 2nd half timeout

CRN is only going to burn a 1st half timeout. I don’t blame him, if this was truly a unilateral move on the part of USC.

by vantageSC on Dec 2, 2008 10:35 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I honestly don't see what the big deal is really.....?

I think it’s freaking awesome for some reason that both teams will wear their home jerseys on Saturday.
We both share LA why not…?
I don’t see whats the big deal about a different jersey is we need to be focused on trying to get some production on the offensive side of the ball rather then what USC is going to wear this isn’t a fashion show it’s football.
I feel like that’s such a lame rule by the NCAA, kinda like the whole celebratory penaltys etc.

All I want for Christmas is Mark Teixeira and Jake Peavy as Angels in 2009.

by deejayelleseven on Dec 2, 2008 9:15 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

I agree, to a point.

Unless you’re from Oregon, wearing a jersey shouldn’t be a fashion statement.

However, it seems Pete Carrol went out of his way to slight the Bruins. The manner of how he went about the home jersey situation is what is so bothersome; examples: he agreed to Rick’s proposal several months afterward and a few days before the game without contacting Rick to give his approval, he’s willing to waste a time out (without having UCLA waste one as well), finally, he only became willing to do this when the Rose Bowl was all but locked up for his team (which implies that $c narritive of “the rose bowl is our house”).

The whole thing reeks of arrogance, and belies the hubris of the thugs from across town.

Victory or until next year!

by ncrpz2 on Dec 2, 2008 10:16 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Yea that's the problem.

If he had simply stuck to the original plan I would have celebrated this arrangement as I think it adds character to the rivalry. Him going rogue, however, and unilaterally deciding to ‘give-up’ a timeout is a smear on the Bruins and a thoroughly classless act. The whole we own the Rose Bowl rhetoric is getting old, and this certainly does little to arrest it.

The great news is that such arrogance never does a team any good. I’m appalled.

by eubruin on Dec 2, 2008 10:26 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Meeting some one half way

Despite our mutual hatred for each other, reasonable minds can meet each other half way if there is a measure of respect between them. If Nixon can go to China then UCLA can agree with USC on game jerseys. It’s sad a great tradition was reborn in such a distasteful way.

Pete Carrol is just like school in the summer, no class.

Victory or until next year!

by ncrpz2 on Dec 2, 2008 10:58 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

UCLA's pass defense is #2 because teams don't throw against them?

UCLA’s D seems legit. At times, they have played quite well this season. The ASU is a great example where they stopped both the pass and run. But is UCLA’s pass D #2 in the country because they are that good, or because they can’t stop the run? UCLA’s rush D is in the 80’s or 90’s nationally and I wonder if teams don’t bother to pass against them.

I have not analyzed the statistics, but am curious to hear if this is a plausible explanation.

by vantageSC on Dec 2, 2008 10:29 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Our pass defense

I think you raise a very legit question. From what I have seen this year I think our pass defense has a improved a lot. We had a lot of problem earlier in the season as we inserted three new starters in our backfield. Add to the mix that our senior safety – Bret Lockett – was suspended to start the season it took a while for our safeties to settle in.

I think it is fair to question whether our pass defense is really the second best in the conference. There have been games such as the ones against Oregon and Stanford, when our pass defense put up good numbers because our opponents were able to run the ball right down our throats. Yet, as I mentioned above the defense has played better in recent games.

It will be interesting to see how they matchup against the Trojan weapons on Saturday. I think if he we show the same form we did against ASU, we will have a shot. But as I mentioned in my post SC is in a whole different league.

Again … pretty solid question.

by Nestor on Dec 2, 2008 5:59 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

That was certainly true in 2005...

But the run defense isn’t as bad this year.

by SuperBruinMan on Dec 2, 2008 8:02 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Jerseys

As much as I dislike Pom Pom, I hope the Trojans do wear their red jerseys. I recall the 1980 game that is my first memory of pulling for the Bruins (long before I moved to California and became a Bruin) and how good the two teams looked in those vivid blue and red jerseys. I think it’s a tradition worth restoring, and if Pom Pom takes the first step to bring it back, so be it. Sometimes it takes civil disobedience to promote changes to unjust or silly laws, and make no mistake, in the context of UCLA vs. USC football, this is a silly rule that needs to change.

This is not a sign of disrespect but of respect for the tradition that was UCLA-USC rivalry, a rivalry that produced 12 of the 15 Rose Bowl participants from 1966-1980.

by BruinsRule on Dec 2, 2008 11:56 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

I don't know that it was originally a silly rule as

in seasons past, it may have been a condition of the NCCA to address the use of black and white film coverage in which the two teams playing may have been indisiguishable by the viewers if both teams wore home uniforms, not to mention that in many cases, some teams home uniforms had been so similar as to confuse the teams playing as to requiring the need for road jerseys for visitors .

In the case of USC-UCLA until ’82, they had the unique situation of both teams calling the Mauseleum home, ergo each team had the right to wear its home jerseys in the game and were allowed to do so by the NCAA, and since, even in black and white, the home uniforms were and are so contrasting that it presented no problem to the viewer.

WIth modern color telecasts, more varied and distinguishable uniforms, the old rule could be done away with in most cases. Certainly for USC-UCLA.

As pumped as I am to see the Clowns from South Central beaten, the team uniform thing
should have been mutually agreed upon by both coaches, and not unilaterally decided by the visiting team.

The ToeJams may consider the Rose Bowl their second home – but ONLY on New Year’s Day, not this Saturday.

by powderkegbluengold on Dec 2, 2008 1:21 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Pom Pom and CRN

had already discussed that this is a tradition worth restoring. However, IIRC, the cost of a timeout in each half was more than either one of them was willing to pay. This was only a few months ago.

Why did Cheaty Petey change his mind? I’m not sure.
Could it have something to do with his confidence level for winning this game? It sure could. Add in the fact that he didn’t consult with CRN before doing this, and the move reaks of arrogance and rubbing our current struggles in our face.

by bornagainbruin on Dec 2, 2008 3:01 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I Don't Have A Problem With SC's Choice To Wear Home Jerseys

I think it’s a good thing to bring a part of the rivalry that stood out for so many years back. However, I do have serious issues with the way Cheatey Petey went about coming to that decision as Nestor describes. The thing that I always found strange was that, in the 1982 season which was our first at the Rose Bowl, the Trojans DID wear their red jerseys for that game but the next year in 1983 when we had to go over to the Coliseum to play them we wore our white jerseys which, in a small way, was a bit disappointing despite our 27-17 victory that day.

The only thing I know for sure right now – I am already PUMPED. I want to beat those clowns so bad I can’t stand myself.

Los Angeles Rams and the UCLA Bruins!!!!!

by Minnesota Bruinfan on Dec 2, 2008 1:00 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Jerseys

Why is everyone so surprised about Carroll wanting to don the home jerseys? Don’t you guys remember this post (http://www.bruinsnation.com/2008/2/14/73437/4023)?

I thought that this was pretty much all worked out……..anyways, I’m stoked for the game, and I’m rooting on my Bruins til I’m TRUE BLUE in the face!!!!

by BruinBabe4ever on Dec 2, 2008 1:52 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Time-out rule re-evaluated

It was a done deal until it was revealed that a time out would be lost both in the first and second halves. CRN thought twice about the idea after after this was known, so the issue was never agreed upon.

Dohn talked about it a little bit here:
http://www.insidesocal.com/ucla/2008/07/uclasc-jersey-debate.html

by solidgoldsound on Dec 2, 2008 2:16 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

rule changed

SC will now only be penalized a TO in the first half – which CRN will gladly burn
Dohn with the report: http://www.insidesocal.com/ucla/2008/12/ncaa-changes-jersey-rule.html

by bucknellbruin on Dec 2, 2008 3:16 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

There's only one way to shut Carroll up

and that’s to beat U$C on the field of play. The odds aren’t in our favor Saturday, but I’m sure we’ll have a motivated team wearing blue and gold.

But just think how sweet it will be to see that powder keg blue win a game at the Coliseum one day.

by FreewayBruin03 on Dec 2, 2008 4:29 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

I'm really uncomfortable with this 13-9 business.

Obviously cheaty peety is going to be riling up his team with that loss 2 years ago. And making sure that doesn’t happen again. Offensively we have nothing going for us. Craft will drill it to the red zone, and then USC’s defense will sweep up the pieces from an ineffective QB that can’t throw a TD. This is actually just making it worse, I hope I am wrong about what i just said, but this all just seems too familiar to the 2005 66-19 destruction of our team. Oh, I hope craft pulls out a miracle…

by UCLABRU1 on Dec 2, 2008 7:16 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bruins Nation, an unofficial daily online scrap book covering the greatest collegiate athletic program in the nation. GO BRUINS.
Start posting about the Bruins »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Morrell_small
Wildcat and the UCLA Running Game
Ucla_small
Everyone needs to calm down about Ben Ball
Trojanssuck_small
An Angel in the Defensive Backfield
Small
UCLA at Washington State: A memory
13-9_ucla_baby____036_small
Videos from Washington/UCLA Football Game!

Recent FanPosts

Small
My two game season starts tonight
Small
Have You Been Watching Darren?
2603_1028618641249_1398823305_30086007_6195771_n_small
Trying to Keep the Mojo Going
Bruinsnation_small
Ben Ball Roundup: Gameday Notes
Brad_pitt_as_achilles_small
SI Poll: They Like Us, They Really Like Us ... sort of ...
Bruinsnation_small
Colorado Interviewing Karl Dorrell To Be Their Next Head Coach?
Images_small
Bruins Find Bats As Blue-Gold World Series Game 2 Goes To The Blues
Small
"Carroll and Kiffin and Sark"
Bruinsnation_small
A Note Re. Evoking CHP (Con Artist/Sleazebag) To Criticize Howland

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS


Managers

094_small Ajax

Bruinsnation_small Nestor

Menelaus2_small Menelaus

Arron_afflalo1_small Tydides

Brad_pitt_as_achilles_small Achilles

Small Meriones

Telemachus_small Telemachus

Small Odysseus

Blue_bellerophon_small Bellerophon

Authors

Images_small Ryan Rosenblatt

Official Partner of CBS Sports