Neuheisel's Feverish Recruitng Pitch
We are now in the midst of NCAA mandated dead period, which means Neuheisel and other football coaches around the country get to call a prospect only once a week and doesn’t get any face to face time during this period. I believe this dead period runs through most of the bowl season. Don’t know the exact date when it ends. I am going to assume it ends sometime before the Jan 9-11 weekend when the Bruins have a huge recruiting weekend set up in Westwood.
Just how busy though CRN and his staff were prior to this Monday? Dohn has a great report on UCLA’s feverish recruiting pace leading up to Monday:
Because there was no bowl practice and no scouting of an opponent, the staff has been able to fan out and visit dozens upon dozens of schools, and make in-home visits with a number of prospects.
Neuheisel went to 30 to 40schools, and was in approximately 10 homes to visit prospects and their families in Southern California, Arizona and Idaho. Not having a bowl to prepare for should also help with UCLA's 2010 recruiting class.
The Bruins were behind in recruiting much of this season because Neuheisel was hired in late December and then had to finish recruiting the 2008 class and hire a coaching staff. The lack of bowl practice allowed for the staff to play catch-up.
"The USC juggernaut was started because they were so out there (recruiting) and they got their classes done, and they were ahead," Neuheisel said. "This is important for 2009 and 2010. That's why I'm going to more schools instead of home visits. This is something that never was done here."
I am not going to beat up on the previous coach any more but CRN’s comment really tells us what we need to know.
CRN has been out there recruiting his tail off selling kids on the message of starting something special at UCLA:
Remarkably, though, Neuheisel said conversation with recruits rarely includes UCLA's 4-8 record and its non-bowl playing status.
"I talk about how hard we played, and I talk about the opportunity to play, the coaching staff we have," Neuheisel said. "And I also talk about the attendance. We finished with the third-highest attendance (72,795) in UCLA history, so if they're that excited about us now, think about how excited they will be when we get it going."
The results of CRN's pitch are pretty clear given what we have seen in recent days. Bruins now have 13 commitment from high school seniors punctuated by the blockbuster story on Morrell Presley. Morrell is such a done deal that he has already enrolled into UCLA and will be joined by fellow blue chipper Richard Brehaut. Bruins will also have in the fold JC lineman Ryan Taylor from Texas who will be available this spring. They also have commitments from 3 other JC recruits provided they clear the academic requirements before officially signing up with UCLA.
If there were any doubts about CRN’s entire staff’s commitment to this effort, look no further than Norm Chow:
Another sign recruiting took precedent over anything else is Chow's heavy involvement. When Chow was hired last offseason, the agreement included the stipulation he would not spend much time on the recruiting circuit.
However, earlier this month Chow flew to Hawaii to visit with prospects, and he was in Utah last week visiting with players, and will continue to recruit hard in an effort to rebuild UCLA's talent base.
"It's more (recruiting) than I thought it would be," Chow said. "But that's what we have to do."
I am going to take a guess and postulate that CRN’s relentless enthusiam and passion for this job has rubbed off on even an elder stateman like Chow. When someone as reserved as Chow get caught up in Neuheisel’s fever pitch, you can’t help but feel optimistic about what we might be in store for wrt to long term future of this program.
GO BRUINS.
10 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
you know its driving CRN crazy
Not being able to coach or recruit right now…
"when you've seen how big the world is, how can you make due with this?"
by silverlakebruin on Dec 23, 2008 11:44 AM PST reply actions
Chow
It’s long been said that Chow does not enjoy recruiting, but I agree, this is a good sign of his support for the program. In a way, if he can help pull in some good recruits, it makes Chow’s job easier because it will, hopefully, mean better players, an expanded playbook, and more wins.
This past year was kind of a blur. Call it a mulligan. Give this program another couple years and we are going to see some real results.
Recruiting
He’s still recruiting… If what the article said was that the letter of the rule said, that we can only call once a week on a recruit, you can bet he’s texting and emailing them instead! Also, I bet he’s branching out his recruiting efforts to other parts of the country make up for that for the more limited communications with prime targets.
Nestor
This is entirely off-topic, but as a fellow Bruins and 49ers fan, I’ve been curious to know your thoughts on the coaching situation with the Niners right now. I closely followed the coverage of the UCLA coaching search on BN, and I agreed with you that UCLA needed a proven head coach with prior experience. Although I thought Walker was a good coach (and still think he is), I breathed a sigh of relief when Guerrero hired Neuheisel, because the bleak state of the program last December dictated that UCLA should not be a place to train a fledgling head coach.
I see a parallel between UCLA’s situation last season and the Niners’ situation this season – Walker as UCLA’s interim coach and Singletary as the Niners’ interim coach are both loved and respected by the players, but neither have previous head coaching experience. (Actually, Singletary only started coaching football in 2003.) As much as I wanted UCLA to hire a proven head coach last season, whether I want the same for the Niners is not such a clear-cut decision for me. Of course I want to see the Niners restored to their former glory, and one part of me says that hiring a guy with HC experience would be the best way to do that, but at the same time, I kind of like Singletary and the team has shown progress under him so far. What do you think? Is there any difference between the two situations?
Other Bruins’ comments are welcome too.
Honestly I am not sure
I am not sure I am well situated to give informed thoughts on Niners given I don’t follow them (or any pro team) with the kind of attention I give to our Bruins. From far away I get the sense that they have been playing inspired ball under Singletery. But is he the long term answer? Not sure given how I have never been enamored with interim coaches.
What I do believe is the Niners will not get back to where they were as a franchiser unless they find themselves under a new ownership. The Yorks have been just as big of a joke for the Niners as Peter Dalis for our athletic program. I don’t care much for them and don’t trust that they will make any good decision to serve this great franchise and fans well.
Thanks for the input
I don’t follow the Niners as closely as the Bruins either, because I only get to watch about half the games. I’ve heard the same sentiment from many Niners fans though, that the franchise won’t return to prominence under the Yorks. Apparently much of the decision making has been turned over to the Yorks’ son (his name escapes me at the moment); maybe we can find some kind of hope in this. Mainly I was wondering what you thought because the general consensus on the Niners blogs I read is that Singletary is the right guy for the job, and that he seems to be a lock to get it after Sunday’s win vs. the Rams. Thanks again for offering your commentary.
My pleasure
I enjoy Niners Nation (SBN’s blog) a lot. Folks there seem to have confidence in Singletery. So if he is the guy I will certainly get behind him.
Nestor, You're Making Me Laugh
2 front page posts and a fan post while you are “away” from BN on vacation.
Keep it coming.
I agree with both Barnes and you about Chow. He’s had a complete transfusion and is bleeding Blue and Gold.
When he was being interviewed, the rap on him was that he wasn’t personable and would not be a good recruiter.
I must say that he is everything people said he wasn’t. He handled the O and Craft in a way few could have. He’s been a team mate of the other coaches that many men of his stature would not have.
We can give CRN some credit for that — but It is clear to me that he was the real deal before he got here and his interpersonal skills were clearly undervalued.
sjh
Good recruit
http://rivals100.rivals.com/viewprospect.asp?pr_key=75489&Sport=1
It says UCLA is in the running for this guy, but we haven’t visited yet? 5 star Olineman… seems like we should have paid him a visit by now.

by 




















