Bruins Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: Sounder At Heart for Seattle Sounders Fans!

Help needed in a "discussion" with a Trojan

I am involved in a good-natured debate with a USC fan about the type of players USC is able to recruit versus the ones our Bruins can pursue due to academic standards.

You all saw the Times article this weekend about Pete Carrol, right? Well, our discussion started out when I questioned (only a tad seriously) the real reason that Pete Carrol trolls the streets of South Central at midnight: he is selling the USC brand and building good will to see that the athletes from L.A. come to USC when that time comes.

I explained that UCLA can't touch many of those players due to our academics and my friend acted like she never heard of such a thing, and accused me of sour grapes (as would I her, if it were the other way around).

She said that it is harder to get into USC than UCLA and that the playing field was surely "even" in regards to admissions for athletes, with both schools having to meet the same standards.  

Now we know that is not true, but how do I prove that to her?  

Other than the anecdotal evidence, I can't think of what sources I have to win this debate. Can any of you help me?

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of BruinsNation's (BN) editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of BN's editors.

0 recs  |  Comment 58 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Admission
Reports.

And you cannot look at SAT scores.

USC takes the highest score per specific test, while UC's take one test overall. (So my USC Sat Score was 240 points higher than UCLA's).

Secondly our average freshman GPA was 4.3...

Hmmm... USC is nowhere close.

It is general knowledge that UCLA is harder to get into than USC... at least to intelligent people.

My friends from High School with 3.7./3.8 got in USC. People with 4.2 did not get into UCLA.

by dproduct on Apr 20, 2008 11:08 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Ask any recent USC admit
If you ask any USC freshman who is not on the football team, they will tell you that USC was not their first choice.  99 out of 100 will tell you that they would have loved to have gone to UCLA, but they could not get admitted.  So there you have it, there is always room for one idiot in this world.

by bruin75 on Apr 20, 2008 11:18 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I hope your friend is hot...
...because there doesn't seem to be a lot of other reasons (i.e. intelligence) to talk to her.

by dokein on Apr 20, 2008 11:23 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Ever heard the jokes about
the new "dream" school?

University of Second Choice

or how about

Bruins and Trojans have at least one thing in common... They all got into USC.

Kidding aside, they are working on their image. Too bad they can't give up the thug football program. Anyone know why they came up in the US NEWS or whatever it is "top schools" so quickly? I think they jumped from 40 something to top 20 in one year. How is that? Is it because alumni money is a factor and Lucas dumped all that money on them last year or two ago? The world may never know.

by Bruins100NCAA on Apr 21, 2008 3:24 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

No, my friend. You've got to
give USC credit in this one area you mentioned, when US News & World Report ranked them top not too long ago.

You see, with its location and elitist image, USC maintains an outstanding community outreach program that utilizes its medical, dental, pharmacy & other professional school students to provide free community healthcare & educational services not only for the residents but also elementary students enrolled in those administratively dysfuntional, instructionally dismal LAUSD campuses around that area.

Its comprehensive scope, backed by its resources does earn USC the gratitude of the impoverished, crime stricken communities within which the campus locates.

A few years back, when my eye suffered a retinal tear, my ophthalmologist also referred me to USC's Doheny Eye Institute, affiliated with its Keck School of Medicine, for treatment & laser surgery.

Not that I couldn't insist on going to UCLA's Jules Stein Eye Institure then.  But with the severity of the tear and the proximity of Keck School of Medicine's brand new medical complex closer to where I live, that was the one time I submitted to the "field enemy's" medical care.

They treated me well, not knowing I had my UCLA shirt tucked in under my jacket and bantered with me amicably to relieve my anxieties.  You can perhaps compare it to an enemy guard sharing his cigarette with a POW before pulling the trigger on him.  In my case, it was that laser device the Trojan retinal specialist trained on my dilated eyeball to seal the tear.

So I hope I won't get any "verbal grenades" hurled my way, or driving into some roadside explosives next time I come home ( just kidding ).  But I do feel that sports competition aside, USC's humanitarian work deserves our recognition too, much as we strives to maul them senseless either on the basketball court or football field.

by Htse005 on Apr 21, 2008 1:28 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Their humanitarian work
extends to LA County USC Medical Center.  Is that place still open?  The survival rate there was roughly the same as the trOJie's free throw percentage.

Great place.  Great humanitarians.  

by Fox 71 on Apr 21, 2008 1:34 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

RE: Fox 71
that location by Soto street, Freeway 10 exit has been upgraded to the extent possible, consider the clients and their social background it serves, plus the county budgets allocated annually for upkeeping such eyesore.  The hospital facilities still operates in that 1930's building that looks straight out of the backdrop in Roman Polanski's film noir classic "Chinatown" but USC just opened, no more than three years max, both a teaching hospital plus a medical complex several miles up from where the current dilapidated site.

Because you are in Florida now, but if you still  vaguely remember that part of downtown Los Angeles, the comtemporary USC medical complex plus the hospital sits atop a hilly area overlooking the railroad tracks, ramshackled industrial areas west of the Cal State LA campus.

With UCLA's sleekly polished, ultra modern, state of the art Ronald Reagan Medical Plaza eclipsing  over every metropolitan medical facilities in Los Angeles, I had the feeling on that " D Day ", when I nervously stepped inside the brand new Keck School of Medicine for my scheduled laser eye surgery, that they were desperately trying to catch up with us in the medical field.

But my friend, let's be objective.  I bash Trojans
ferociously too, sometimes with such deathly shrill tones that my posts never appeared.  Yet on that occasion, their medical personnels, especially the retinal expert, a middle eastern fellow that looked every bit easy target for Homeland Security agents, treated my eye ailment perfectly to a fault.  I am grateful to them.

Just last week, Keck School of Medicine lost one of its pereminent expert in bladder cancer and urinological research, a designated department head too, at a young age of 45 while attending a conference in Florida.

Vanquish USC all we want here, but we've got to give it to them in other areas they excel.

by Htse005 on Apr 21, 2008 3:06 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't know
I love UCLA as much as anyone but I had to take issue with this one. My uncle's one of head cardiologists at USC med center and I worked there for a few months  for kicks once. They're about as dedicated a group of doctors as I've ever seen. I know my uncle at least could easily make far more for far less work anywhere else.

by oldblueeyes on Apr 22, 2008 3:45 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hello, oldblueyes
Here is the book of atonement I will write.  

The content has to do with a computer geek (me actually) hacking into the computer systems at the business office of the Keck medical complex.  You know what he found out !?!  Those doctors' biweekly pay indeed have way too many digits over the work hours they claimed.  Enraged, the computer geek proceeded to transfer all those billion$$$$$$, slated for various bank deposits the next work day over into the UCLA Athletic Department accounts.  He could just visualize the smile on Dan Guerrero, Gene Block, Edwin Pauley's heir and even those Morgan Center secretaries' faces.

Because someone already summoned LAPD upon seeing some shimmering of lights inside the business office late in the night, so he had to hurry or be caught by LAPD, already punching in the entry codes with guns drawn, tear gas launchers mounted, ready to fire.

Not to end this upcoming Pulitzer prize winner on a sad note, the LAPD captain leading the charge into the building was none other than Mike Warren, moonlighting to augment his retirement income.  So all's well ends well.  Walter Annenberg's estate simply reimbursed Keck's medical complex everything.  End of story.

by Htse005 on Apr 22, 2008 10:32 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Traitor!
After toiling for two years in a pathology lab at the Jules Stein Eye Institute, I am thoroughly insulted that you went to the Doh!eny eye institute instead!

Besides that, I am very glad that they helped you out because a retina tear is no joke.

by tasser10 on Apr 22, 2008 11:11 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I apprecaite the humor
A retinal tear cannot be compared with retinal detachment in its medical severity.  I grant you that, knowing what I know. But the proximity of the Keck medical complex made it handy for me to receive immediate care.  Given that the tear occured Friday after hours, and my primary Ophthalmologist didn't diagnose the condition until the following Monday noon time, with laser surgery scheduled immediately on Tuesday morning
9 am.

If the doctor could somehow arrange for a helicopter flight from San Marino to Westwood's Jules Stein Eye Institute, landing right by the campus kiosk, I would have gladly foot the bill after the medical insurance payment.  No kidding.
I could not have survived those enemy sniper fire.  Apparently Hillary Clinton didn't dare to brave that either in Kosovo.

But you read my part that I had my Bruin sweatshirt under my jacket, right ?  So I held my head high, albeit a heightened sense of nervousness akin to a blindfolded Dan Rather being led in to interview Osama Bin Laden.  

My gutsy Bruin spirit helped me survived the ordeal of numerous series of blastings emanated from the laser device into my eyeball for what seemed like eternity.  So in the end, "the enemy doctor" did provide me good medical care under the stipulations of the Geneva Convention 1954, Article XXYYZZ.  I salute them for that.

by Htse005 on Apr 22, 2008 2:07 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Fear not
Bruinhood just might come second to keeping your eyesight. It's a close second, but you know, how else are you going to watch the games? You did the right thing ;)

by tasser10 on Apr 22, 2008 3:42 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I Hear You Tasser
Periodically, I do go in for comprehensive eye examinations that include dilating the pupils for the ophthalmologist to see my retina, located at the back of my eye.  

I get it.  If UCLA students would camp outside Pauley, braving temperature in the low 30's at night just to see the Bruins duke it out the next afternoon with Coyote State, for sure next time I am going to apply for a camping permit from UCLA campus police first, then erect my own tent outside Jules Stein Eye Institute the evening before.  The size of my tent shall put to shame the one that houses the Libyan leader Mohmar Khadaffi, replete with snow leopard fur as carpet, servants at my command, etc.

So at the crack of dawn, when the building janitor checked in, I could then be the first one in line at the reception counter.  Well, I hope this will earn me back my sullied credential as a Bruin faithful, having made a judgemental error for personal health reason.  

No, please, never again your honor.

by Htse005 on Apr 22, 2008 10:13 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'd rather
put my own eye out than submit to a trOJie scum doctor.

by joeb on Apr 23, 2008 6:17 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Tongue in cheek, Joeb.
You dooooon't mean thaaaaaaat !?!
Conversely, perhaps a Trojan would do that were he in my shoes.

by Htse005 on Apr 23, 2008 9:21 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

BN always has timely commentary...
as my dad just had this surgery done last night!  Pretty funny.

by bornagainbruin on Apr 23, 2008 11:47 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Okay !
Was it a Bruin specialist or a Trojan "enemy doctor" that performed on your daddy ?  Either way, glad to hear your daddy's eye is well taken care of.  

At least in my case, they adhered to the Geneva Convention 1954, Article XXYYZZ and fixed it well - to a fault !  As you've read already, the next time something happens, I would demand an Apache helicopter to ferry me straight across town from San Marino to UCLA's Ronald Reagan Medical Plaza for treatment.  I would also remind the pilot to drop flares in diverting ground to air missiles from those South Central insurgents.

Having confessed that I once submitted to Trojan medical personnels' care is pushing it dangerously to the precipice here on BN.  Never, never again my friend. My wallet be darned.

by Htse005 on Apr 23, 2008 12:04 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Go To U.S.C.'s Website
and look at their "academic standards" for admission.  From the horse's mouth, so to speak.  If I recall correctly, they have no actual "minimum" G.P.A. requirement...

Then review the recent report linked here, (by Nestor, I think), regarding our 2008 freshman class.

That ought to do it.

Love My Bruins

by Bruingirl83 on Apr 21, 2008 7:28 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

To be fair...
Lots of schools claim to have no minimum GPA, including Yale, Harvard, Stanford, and Columbia. It's sort of wink-wink bullshit, I mean we all know no guy with a 2.5 GPA is getting into those schools unless he's already won a Nobel Prize, but they like to claim they look at everything.

The best counter to your friend's argument is that yes, USC reports higher SAT scores than UCLA, but that's because USC reports the highest "combined SAT score." That is to say, if you get a 700 on each section of the SAT the first time, but the second time, you get a 700, an 800, and a 600, USC reports your score as 700-800-700, while UCLA reports it as 700-700-700

by OverflowingPassionBucket on Apr 21, 2008 4:54 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Did you hear the one...
about the Bruin who failed out of UCLA and transferred to USC.

The average GPA of both schools went up.

by 90Bruin on Apr 21, 2008 9:10 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

That was..
..an actual person: Mike Sherman. I dunno about the GPA thing, but i can't seeing it not being true.
God, it's great to be a Bruin!

by whp68 on Apr 21, 2008 1:06 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh, "God" yes..
Thank you, senor Fox. (Senior Fox?) My how the synapses stop firing at this stage of our lives. Well, the youngsters may laugh at us but in the remaining remnant of our dotage we still know what is in store for them..

..and cackle fiendishly.

Sherman did recoup himself to some degree later by going on to play for the Raiders, did he not? Of course, I  make the assumption that the Raiders -- prior to Al Davis chewing off all his fingernails and becoming senile -- were a team worthy of some fragment of respect. (See, young guys, it happens to everybody.)

   

God, it's great to be a Bruin!

by whp68 on Apr 21, 2008 10:31 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

This shouldn't be hard...
Let's just compare the most famous alums of each school.

UCLA: Jackie Robinson
U$C: O.J. Simpson

Do I really need to say more?

by norcald503 on Apr 21, 2008 9:22 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Unfair!
I doubt if OJ actually graduated.  A more ready role model for trOJies is Matt Leinhart.  Now there's a guy who exemplifies being a trOJan.  (Although he probably should have worn one rather than be one.)

by Fox 71 on Apr 21, 2008 1:25 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think you are right, Fox
I remember during the trial when they submitted one of his letters to his ex-wife and how much misspelling there was. My old man commented, "Wow, that doesn't say much for a U$C education."

I was going to mentioned LenDale "Free Rent" White (DUI) and Frostee "We Own the LAPD" Rucker (numberous run-ins with the law), but I doubt these two actually graduated.

by bruinbabe2000 on Apr 23, 2008 12:51 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hey, how about...
John Wayne or Neil Armstrong?

That's not too bad...

by Bruins100NCAA on Apr 22, 2008 9:26 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Here's another role model out of USC
President Nixon's press secretary Donald Segretti
( correct spelling I hope ).  I have no idea if Haldemann was a Trojan but Erlichmann is one, for sure.  So now we have excellent role models for planning burglary, wiretappings too.  If anyone who's toilets, kitchen sinks etc do not flush or flow properly, call the heirs to these " plumbers unit ".  But I wouldn't guarantee next time you cuss, talk dirty over the phone, you wouldn't find the transcripts of your conversation all over NY Times.

by Htse005 on Apr 22, 2008 9:57 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

un, hate to say it
It appears that they were both Bruins. Haldeman did transfer from usc, but both graduated from UCLA.

by bruinhoo on Apr 26, 2008 1:36 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sadly
It wouldn't be very surprising if it turned out OJ is more famous than either of them.

by SuperBruinMan on Apr 22, 2008 11:56 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Of course !
Erlichmann & Haldemann didn't kill anybody.  Their own arrogance, vindictiveness and perjury got the best of them.  Trojans can't tell the difference between truth and their bowel stuffs in the morning.

OJ ? Well, well, well... I do believe the trans fat, cholesterol etc in his system, due to his years of living, eating on the cheap in Florida, are doing a number on him.  Hey, with that civil lawsuit's mega$$$$ decision shadowing him every moment of his waking life, he's got to really
" supersize " himself as a relief.  Then, is he still dedicating the rest of his life to catch "himself" as Nicole's murderer ?  We need to perhaps ask his kids if their daddy is working hard at it.

You know, the recent newspaper photos of him  resemble those wanted Central American drug lords living on the lam, with government agents never more than a step behind.

by Htse005 on Apr 23, 2008 9:44 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I myself have had the same arugment
and the funny thing is, once again UCLA is the most applied to school in the nation, and one of the most applied to in the world. It is recognized internationally as one of the finest institutions outside of the United States. Frankly i don't know why trojans feel the need to enter in to this discussion. It is not a secret that UCLA has the highest academic standards in the PAC-10 even above CAL. Secondly, how can anyone at USC possibly think its harder to get in to that school than UCLA, If our freshman classes haven't said it enough, lets look at the athletes at UCLA that go on to do more than just play sports.

by UCLABRU1 on Apr 21, 2008 1:07 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

well, not really
Cal has higher admission standards for non-athletes but UCLA has higher requirements for its scholarship athletes.  Overall, Stanford has the highest academic standrds in the Pac - 10

by schumd on Apr 21, 2008 8:57 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Here is how SuC wins this Argument
When you do the math of the actual admissions/applications received by each school, technically SuC is harder to get into.  

The Los Angeles Magazine printed a dual addition last year before our game with TrOJans (one Pro SC edition/one pro UCLA addition) They actually had this question in the article and it was astonishing to read.  (I tried to get a link to the article, but couldn't find one).  I couldn't believe it when I read this, but the numbers were right there.  

SuC gets a huge number of applicants, granted not as many as UCLA, but they also have a smaller Freshman class.  Thus, purely by this calculus they can claim it is harder to get into Suc vs. UCLA.

Granted, this argument falls like a house of cards when you look at the average scores (GPAs and admissions exams) of the incoming Freshman classes from each school, and how SuC takes the highest Admissions test scores from its applicants.  FActor in also the flexibility they have as a private instition to make exceptions for atheletes that UCLA doesn't have (at least to the exent of SuC).  

But when you just look at the applicantions/admissions numbers, can make a colorable argument.  And trust me, they made them.  Me and my UCLA buddies took a lot of Sh*t prior the game last year when this came out.  

Tough to swallow, but its "true".  

Good luck

by Bald Eagle on Apr 21, 2008 1:43 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

GREAT READING
we could always poll a few core industries in both the public and private sectors looking for published works across the arts, sciences, medicine, law and public policy.  

You'll find that (along with the University of Texas systems) the UC system has simply output more grad/postgrad industry leaders across a wider swath of fields than any other public education system on the planet... and I'd venture to say UCLA has had a huge sway on those figures.

Not a knock on $C. More of my friends/family have degrees from there than anywhere else. Academically, it's like debating which shines brighter, the Sun or the Moon... you could go on all night, but there's just no apt description for it.

GO BRUIN BLUE.

by theREAL_LOGAN5 on Apr 21, 2008 2:47 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

"it's like debating which shines brighter,
the Sun or the Moon..."

Let's extend this analogy a bit farther.  The sun actually creates it's own light whereas the moon only reflects the sun's energy.  So perhaps USC is able to "shine" as it does because it's proximity to UCLA allows it to reflect some of Westwood's excess energy.    I have a few friends that went to USC for graduate work after finding it difficult to get into UCLA graduate schools.  Plus there is the aforementioned joke about UCLA and USC students both getting into USC.

However, USC is trying very hard to recruit students with strong admissions numbers.  When I was applying to and choosing between schools in 99/00 USC was the first acceptance I received, the first scholarship offer and the first recruiting weekend I could attend.  They made a very strong push to indoctrinate potential students early and entice them with money and perks.  In fact they were persuasive enough that I had my dad (an UCLA alum) buy me a future oil rag from the student store.  Fortunately I came to my senses, gleefully turned down the $20,000 + a year they wanted to give me and never looked back.  Unfortunately I'm sure some very good people were lured to the dark side by the $C song and dance.

by TrueBlueBlood on Apr 21, 2008 8:36 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

NICE
we are just very fortunate to be in Los Angeles man.  That's the bottomline. Anything after that, $C included is just icing on the cake, though that True Blue icing is just so much sweeter.
GO BRUIN BLUE.

by theREAL_LOGAN5 on Apr 22, 2008 11:42 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks folks
I don't know what I can take from all of your help to help me win the debate, but I sure appreciate the help.

by Dodger Hater on Apr 21, 2008 10:08 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

You can take all of the facts and points..
..presented here and formulate them into a cogent argument in an attempt to convince this lady of the error of her ways. Hopefully, it is what you learned from your education at UCLA.

BN is, among other things, a great resource. Don't waste the advice and knowledge provided.

God, it's great to be a Bruin!

by whp68 on Apr 21, 2008 10:38 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I felt like your question
wasn't totally answered though, unfortunately, while i know the answer is out there, I don't know it off the top of my head.

What I thought you were getting at was UCLA's academic requirements for athletes vs. SUC's.  I know UCLA's is higher and that they(the ucla teams) have they have higher overall GPA's(without taking bogus classes like ballroom dancing that some usc alum have been know to take) than the SC players.

I bet someone has got the exact statistics though on avg. grades/sats for SC vs. UCLA athletes coming out of highschool, and grades in college.

O.A.

by Ollie on Apr 22, 2008 12:25 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agree
No one here really answered Dodger's question. Someone needs to look up the entering freshmen's GPA/scores from last few years from both schools.

by bluestreet on Apr 22, 2008 9:15 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Here, here!
We all KNOW that UCLA can't accept the same players SC does. But where is the proof. It is proving to be a little slippery to find.

by Dodger Hater on Apr 22, 2008 11:29 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The college experience
Ask your friend to visit you on campus and then take a stroll around, and end up in the Village.  Then ask her if she would take that same stroll around justsc, and what village would she want to end up in.  (You'll also have to explain that you would not be available to assist her on that stroll without a police escort.)

The college experience seems a little nicer at UCLA than at justsc.

Or go to a game at the Rose Bowl, then make the long hike to Old Pasadena for an aperetif.  (I've done it, even though it's mostly uphill so anyone can do it.)  Tell her that once the security arrangements have been double-checked, you'll get in the armored personnel carrier to go from the Crapaseum to ... where?  Where you you go for a nice post-game snack or libation?  Julies?  That's just Crapaseum-east.

Or you might ask her the ultimate question.  Where would she rather go to school - UCLA or justsc?  An honest answer would be revealing.  But if she says justsc, she is beyond help.  As some said higher in this thread, if she really think justsc is a better place to spend her college career, then she really, REALLY better be a hottie.

by Fox 71 on Apr 22, 2008 6:53 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oops
An aperitif is often better than an aperetif (which I believe means camel sweat in an obscure French dialect.)

by Fox 71 on Apr 22, 2008 6:55 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Julies
Is no more.  Gone.  Not sure where the SC folks go after a game these days.

by Free the 16 on Apr 22, 2008 9:58 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

SC vs. UCLA
So, fine. SC is a terribly hard to school to gain admission to... In your lifetimes, for this board, how many here have ever met, or heard about, anyone flunking out of SC. As long as daddy writes the checks, they figure out a way to keep them in school. When I checked into UCLA as a freshman, we all knew that if the competition got too fierce, there was always SMCC, or some other place nearby. I had several friends who flunked out. Some returned and some didn't.

I have a long time social acquaintance, an SC grad himself, whose daughter has special learning challenges. He specifically chose SC for her for college because "I didn't want her to be too challenged academically"..... Just passing it along.
Bill

BillSouthBay

by Mensgym on Apr 22, 2008 11:09 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Dodger..
academic admissibility to UCLA-combination of high school grades and standardized American test scores (SAT/ACT) where scores must be higher than NCAA Clearing House limits (2.5 gpa/820 SAT or 68 ACT (17 Average))

via http://uclabruins.cstv.com/genrel/ucla-recruiting-home.html

I couldn't find anything on SUC's admission requirements, I think they're just non existant

O.A.

by Ollie on Apr 22, 2008 12:00 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

But this is just for academics?
Does it count athletic participants?

Has anyone ever heard of a USC player being academically ineligible? Or have you ever heard that they want to play for SC but they have to pass something first?

by Dodger Hater on Apr 22, 2008 1:52 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

if it helps
I had a friend who worked for USC. Her job was to check and make sure all the athletes went to class regularly. She'd told me that it was made understood that that part of her job involved just driving around campus and never actually checking.  

by oldblueeyes on Apr 22, 2008 3:52 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Two words should help you win the debate
Davon Jefferson.  Argument over.  

by bruin7982 on Apr 22, 2008 12:28 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Football Admission Standards
The Orlando Sentinel has written on the admission standards for all Division 1 football programs at least two years in a row.  They have ranked the programs on 1-10 scale with 10 being the most difficult.

College Football Resource http://www.collegefootballresource.com/blog/2006/2/5/squeezing-the-cork-back-into-the-bottle.html
has the original link to the article.

Thing is, since the article is over 30 days old, you  now have to pay to see the entire article.  I remember reading it a while back, but I don't remember their methodology.  

Here is a link to a summary the Orlando Sentinel provides for free:

http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/orlandosentinel/access/969672081.html?dids=969672081:969672081&FMT=A BS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Jan+15%2C+2006&author=Alan+Schmadtke%2C+Sentinel+St aff+Writer&pub=Orlando+Sentinel&edition=&startpage=C.9&desc=NCAA+IS+KEEPING+SCORE+%3 B+Colleges+face+a+tougher+measuring+stick+in+regard+to+their+admission+decisions

These are the BCS conferences from CFR (first link above):

# Atlantic Coast: Virginia Tech-2, North Carolina State-2, Clemson-2, Miami (FL)-4, Florida State-4, Maryland-4, Virginia-6, North Carolina-6, Boston College-6, Georgia Tech-7, Duke-8, Wake Forest-9

# Big East: West Virginia-2, USF-2, Louisville-2, Cincinnati-2, Rutgers-4, Pittsburgh-6, Connecticut-6, Syracuse-7

# Big Ten: Ohio State-3, Michigan State-3, Minnesota-4, Wisconsin-5, Purdue-5, Iowa-5, Indiana-5, Illinois-6, Penn State-7, Michigan-7, Northwestern-9

# Big 12: Oklahoma State-2, Kansas State-2, Texas Tech-3, Iowa State-3, Texas A&M-4, Baylor-4, Nebraska-5, Kansas-5, Oklahoma-5, Colorado-5, Missouri-7, Texas-7

# Pacific-10: USC-3, Washington State-3, Oregon State-3, Arizona State-3, Washington-5, Oregon-5, Arizona-5, Cal-6, UCLA-8, Stanford-9

# Southeastern: Tennessee-2, South Carolina-2, Mississippi State-2, Ole Miss-3, LSU-3, Auburn-3, Arkansas-3, Alabama-3, Kentucky-5, Florida-5, Georgia-7, Vanderbilt-9

Hope this helps.

by truebluebruin on Apr 22, 2008 3:32 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

yea good find
thats the best info. found so far for sure
O.A.

by Ollie on Apr 22, 2008 4:55 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Now we are getting somewhere ....
I'd still like to see a link/page that provides info. re. min. academic requirements to come into Southern Cal as a freshmen via Pom Pom's football program.

by Nestor on Apr 22, 2008 6:12 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Cheating at SUC
I will just say that I know those things that we make fun of SUC for, athletes skirting academic responsibilities, are literally true (NOT just the Senora Ross type of skirting), and were confirmed to me by someone I know who is in a position to know (as a person within one of the major SUC sports programs and as a person who facilitated the actual cheating) and has no reason to lie to me.

I realize I have been extremely vague here but that is simply a "just in case" measure because I wish to protect the identity of the person who told this to me.

How Doh!n of me...Fox will be disappointed.

by Tydides on Apr 22, 2008 4:29 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Nah - I'm fine with it
The big reason I can live with your position and I can't with Doh!'s is that I believe you and I don't believe him.

I don't wish any misfortune for your friend, but I hope he or she gets improperly terminated, and then chooses to blow the whistle publicly.  The disgruntled employee, of course, is the great fear of any institution which cheats as a matter of course.  And it also puts your friend in a bullet-proof position:  "Cheatie Petie, I think I need a raise -- I'm starting to feel the need to call the same reporters at Yahoo who blew up bu$hgate."

by Fox 71 on Apr 22, 2008 9:39 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Moreover, with regards to the whistleblower issue
We will notify our congressman to convene a House Un-Bruin Activities Committee for formal investigations of such issues.  Kenneth Starr will serve as chief prosecutor.  

by Htse005 on Apr 23, 2008 12:11 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bruins Nation, an unofficial daily online scrap book covering the greatest collegiate athletic program in the nation. GO BRUINS.
Start posting about the Bruins »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

13-9_ucla_baby____036_small
Videos from Washington/UCLA Football Game!
2145443360_ab27e15b11_b_small
Bleeding Blue and Gold ... Always
Morrell_small
The UCLA Passing Game Under Norm Chow
Arron_afflalo1_small
NBA Opening Night (Bruin Edition)
Rowing_picture_small
Football is like a box of chocolates

Recent FanPosts

Th_ucla182c2_small
More photos from the UCLA vs U-dub game.
Images_small
Non-Revenue Sports Bruin Review and Calendar
Telemachus_small
Washington @ UCLA Photos
Bruinsnation_small
A Quick Reflection On Steve Sarkasian For Rest Of 2009
Bruinsnation_small
Harrison Barnes' Amazing Trip To Howlandwood
Bruinsnation_small
The Big Red Signs Off
Moreyouknow_small
Pre-Game Guesses: Oregon State Results
Screen_shot_2009-09-28_at_6
13-9’s Tidbits: Washington Edition
Small
Hartman doesnt get it

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS


Managers

094_small Ajax

Bruinsnation_small Nestor

Menelaus2_small Menelaus

Arron_afflalo1_small Tydides

Brad_pitt_as_achilles_small Achilles

Small Meriones

Telemachus_small Telemachus

Small Odysseus

Blue_bellerophon_small Bellerophon

Authors

Images_small Ryan Rosenblatt

Official Partner of CBS Sports