Bruins Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Tobias Harris signs with Tennessee

Pete Carroll, Tim Floyd, USC and Scandal (3rd Update)

It's that time of year again.

For the third year in a row, I present my updated collection of all of the available information regarding the scandal, criminality, investigations, embarrassing incidents and other assorted black eyes that have plagued USC since Pete Carroll's tenure began six years ago.

When this began in April 2006, it was strictly a football affair.  In the 2007 edition, however, I included the first entry for Southern Cal's basketball team, observing that "it appears likely that there will be trouble with Tim Floyd's program if he doesn't take steps to avoid the controversy surrounding Pete Carroll's program."  Well, he hasn't.  So, there has.

I remain surprised that Southern Cal athletes would be implicated in so many incidents during such a short period of time.  Even recently, I actually began to think that Southern Cal might have taken steps to limit additional incidents, or at least conceal them from view.  Perhaps they have for the football team.  But, clearly, not so for the basketball team.

Keep in mind, since I first posted this in April 2006, the list of incidents has nearly tripled.  One would think that, following the -- and there's no other way to put it -- massive uninterrupted deluge of problems, that USC compliance officials would be like a veteran army, standing ready to take swift and substantial action to prevent further problems.   Unfortunately, that does not seem to have happened.  Rather, Southern Cal appears to have opted for a strategy of calculated ignorance rather than genuine institutional control.

As before, I have endeavored to collect as much information as is publicly available.  Unfortunately, many of the news stories about these issues are no longer available online.  I've provided links where I found them, and relied upon second hand sources to the extent those are reliable.  Also, there are some dead links in the text below that I've left there both for posterity, and so you know that I wasn't making anything up.

I also continue to try to be as objective as reasonably possible.  The facts speak for themselves.  I see no need to embellish.  If anyone has any information that would help make this entry more accurate and complete, please let me know, and I will edit this accordingly.  

Once again, when I first posted this in 2006, a few people disagreed with a few items, but didn't provide any supporting evidence.  I offered to publish any such information, and did so again in the 2007 edition.  To date, however, no one has contradicted a single entry with any credible facts.  That said, if I'm wrong in any way, please tell me.

Finally, many moons ago, I shared my view that everyone doesn't really do it, and talked about those rationalizing mischief at USC.  To this day, some apologists continue to try to explain away the behavior detailed below by claiming that it "happens everywhere."  That's fine.  And, if you can show me a similar list for every other Division I program out there for the same six year period, I'll consider revisiting my opinion.

There are additional allegations swirling around out there, but I have not included anything I could not verify in at least two places.  I've also left out "on the field" misconduct, including various stories about blatant personal fouls and possible cheating.  Again, please provide any (verifiable) information or links you may have in the comments section.

Finally, let me address something that comes up every year.  As I've said above, this is a list of "scandal, criminality, investigations, embarrassing incidents and other assorted black eyes" affecting Southern Cal.  It's broader than just criminality.  So, dearest Southern Cal apologists, please spare me the arguments about how something above isn't really a crime, even if many of the items above do involve serious, sometime violent, criminal behavior.

GO BRUINS.

8 recs  |  Comment 57 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

beautifully done!

should be a permanent link on the site, updated as time goes on.

this “win at all costs” mentality that they have will eventually bite them

by glassbruin on May 15, 2008 7:50 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Make it a permanent link

I always have to look for this post to see if I recognize a name from before every time I see a new story that belongs.

by Rhapsode on May 15, 2008 7:03 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Outstanding!!!

As Joe Friday would say “Just the facts.” and this is just the facts. No emotion, no invective, just outstanding research and reporting.

Why must one go to a blog to find such a straightforward compilation of empirical data that suggests that there is no “institutional control” at sc?

And, if everyone does it, why aren’t there similar powerful compilations pointing at us? At other schools?

The answers are clear. No everyone does it and the MSM and NCAA don’t have either the courage, skill, or incentive to do what you do, every year.

Menelaus, you and your work make this place special.

sjh

by Class of 66 on May 15, 2008 8:16 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

That's very kind

And it means even more coming from someone like you, who is as much or more of a reason that this place is great.

by Menelaus on May 15, 2008 9:35 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

i didn't see the ecstacy distribution

wasn’t a Carroll player arrested for having hundreds of tabs of e in his dorm room? did i just miss it? the list is so long, its hard to keep track…

"when you've seen how big the world is, how can you make due with this?"

by silverlakebruin on May 15, 2008 8:30 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

silverlake

I seem to recall you post on other UCLA boards (was it BRO?). If you do, you should share this link with everyone. All Bruins should be united on this (and not hold any grudge from Dorrell era).

by bluestreet on May 15, 2008 8:43 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

If Menelaus is cool with it

I will. I think he might post on BRO as well though. I don’t know…

"when you've seen how big the world is, how can you make due with this?"

by silverlakebruin on May 15, 2008 9:00 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Good stuff, M

I found the following sort of interesting:

“On April 26, 2006, USC quarterback Mark Sanchez was arrested for investigation of sexually assaulting a female student earlier that same day. Sanchez was released upon posting $200,000 bail, and was ordered to appear in court on May 17, 2006.” (Emphasis added.)

Who posted bail? As I understand these things, the bail bond is 100% collateralized (i.e., someone’s house), and the bond premium is very high – maybe 10%. If those assumpions are correct, then someone put up $200K or a house, and paid $20,000 to a bondsman. Now that would not have been a problem for me to put up when I was in college, of course. I would just ask the butler to call pater at the compound and ask him to advance my next week’s allowance. Oh, wait. I didn’t go to justsc. I didn’t have $20, let alone $20K.

So who posted that bond? Is that a matter of public record? And can any of our smart computer people access that?

by Fox 71 on May 15, 2008 8:41 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

To Quote Inspector Renault, "I'm Shocked"

I am not surprised that a major college athletic program has interminable off the field problems. After all, doesn’t winning justify everything? However, I am wondering why this post is included on a UCLA centric blog. Would the same level of effort be applied to track another school’s foibles if that school was not our principle rival? Please don’t misinterpret my comment as condoning these activities. I just don’t think Bruin fans need to be $c’s conscience. Itemizing $c’s misdeeds does not make our program better. I like the John Wooden philosophy of being the best you can be and not worrying about your opponent.

I am sure some will argue that $c is not being held to a comparable standard and, therefore, the playing field is not level. Unfortunately, that’s life. Let the fools at $c delude themselves into believing their program is superior. They can have their fantasy world. I would prefer to revel in all things UCLA and celebrate all the good things that are happening to our program (Championship 101, three straight final fours and the number one incoming freshman class, the new era in football, etc.). The only time I want to hear about $c is when they are on the losing end of any contest (athletic or academic) played against the Bruins.

by Bruin77 on May 15, 2008 8:48 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

If the Bruins are not checking the TrOjans

Who will?

I am sorry Menelaus writes a great post itemizing all the sordid details from cross-town, which is not being covered by the MSM and you come here whining?

If you want to write something then post it.

Let me ask you something – are you paying Menelaus, Nestor, Tydides and others to write for you? You come here as a guest enjoying their content and the only thing you can do is just whine.

Sad.

by bluestreet on May 15, 2008 8:54 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Two Points

First, you can characterize my post as a whine; I would call it an alternative perspective. I thought that was one of the purposes of a blog, the exchange of ideas.

Second, if this information is not being exposed in the MSM, where did Menelaus get the detailed level of information for this post? I think your point is the MSM is not taking all the individual events and conflating them into an indictment of the $c athletic program. If that is your point, you are wrong. Look at the stories at WWL, SI, the Daily News and others (sorry I don’t have time to provide links, but Nestor put up a really good one this morning written by Paul Oberjuerge). $C is not being taken to task just for the Mayo situation, but the Mayo situation is being used as a jumping off point for other problems at $c and college sports, in general.

I just read the following comment in article discussing the political process. The article noted that instead of focusing on politicians’ policy differences, guilt by association and straw man arguments are used to win elections. I think this is analogous to UCLA fans’ focus on the problems at $c: "The process is the process, the game is the game. And you can spend your time exposing how flawed the game is, or you can spend your time winning it." As screwed up as $c is, what does that have to do with UCLA? Let’s be the best we can be and let the fools across town deal with their soiled house.

by Bruin77 on May 15, 2008 9:40 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wrong

You write:


Look at the stories at WWL, SI, the Daily News and others (sorry I don’t have time to provide links, but Nestor put up a really good one this morning written by Paul Oberjuerge). $C is not being taken to task just for the Mayo situation, but the Mayo situation is being used as a jumping off point for other problems at $c and college sports, in general.

So far all we have had is WWL column from Forde, SI column from Wynn who are speaking out for the FIRST TIME. Wolf on DN provided commentary but never got to the hear of the issue. No one to date has really grasped the systematic pattern of problem at SuC. So you are wrong to say that MSM is covering the big picture sufficiently. They are not.

And beating SuC has everything to do with being a Bruin. If you don’t see it that’s fine. But it is pathetic on your part to put downt the efforts of blogger on BN who are using their spare time to expose the evil empire. You may not appreciate. But I and many others over here do.

by bluestreet on May 15, 2008 9:48 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The genesis of this...

...back in 2006, was a simple proposition.

At the time, a number of scandals came up across town, and some people claimed that all universities were the same, that “everyone does it” and that some kind of moral equivalence existed between all schools. That didn’t seem consistent with the facts. (By the way, your post, which lumps together all “major college athletic program[s]” seems premised on that same sort of thinking, though I may be reading too much into it.) So, I ran a number of searches on both USC and UCLA (so, yes, I spent equal effort). I wanted to test the hypothesis.

What I found was that USC had a list that was both longer and also contained items of much greater severity. My findings also revealed that USC was less likely to punish misconduct responsibly. Afterwards, I posted it. And here it is today, two years later.

And I’m sorry that you don’t want to hear about this. I suggest you don’t read my posts. Or that you read my many other post celebrating UCLA athletics.

by Menelaus on May 15, 2008 9:27 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

No one is forcing you to read us

If you don’t like what we are writing, then don’t read us.

If you want to contribute to this community, write about something else, then step up.

If you want to whine about what we are writing (and yes your comment came across as pure whine), do it somewhere else.

Thanks.

by Nestor on May 15, 2008 9:51 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

great stuff...

the ONLY thing that I think doesn’t deserve to be on there is the Sanchez sexual assault accusation. I say this only because video has shown Sanchez to be at practice at the time when he supposedly committed the crime. The girl obviously just didn’t like him and wanted to pin something on him….and that doesn’t speak too well for his character does it?

That being said, there are probably over 50 incidents on here, and I only see 1 that SC people could argue about. Quite a rap sheet Carroll and his boys have created…

by bucknellbruin on May 15, 2008 8:54 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Here's the thing

I’ve heard a million different stories about Sanchez. Very, very few are backed up by any facts. I’ve heard everything from that the guy did it, to that the girl was bullied into making false charges by a religious mother. So, I posted the facts, nothing more or less.

If you have any facts, including a link to this video or a report discussing this video, please let me know. But, and I mean this respectfully, I’m sure you’ll understand that I just can’t take your word for it.

by Menelaus on May 15, 2008 9:30 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sanchez

I don’t know whether he committed the crime or not. He was not prosecuted because the decision-makers concluded that there was insufficient evidence to warrant a trial. I have seen nothing to suggest that Sanchez sued anyone for false arrest or false imprisonment. The presence or absence of litigation doesn’t really prove whether the sexual assault took place or whether the arrest was bogus. In fact, all I know about the incident is what I read here in the BN.

What still stands out to me is that he had to post $200,000 bail. That’s a LOT of money. When I was in college, $20,000 was probably the equivalent of $200,000 now, but even then I could not have posted the bond, even with my parents’ house going into the equation. So who posted the bond? The Sanchez family? I don’t know about their financial situation, but unless Sanchez pere is a left handed pitcher in the big leagues, it would be unlikely that they have that kind of money sitting in their cookie jar. So who posted it? The athletic department? Some alum? Three wealthy and influential alumni? Cheatie Petie himself? But if the family actually posted it, where did they get the money? And did they just eat the bond premium? To me, that’s as big a story as whether this nice, upstanding young trOJie acted like the other guys discussed in M’s column.

by Fox 71 on May 15, 2008 10:17 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

More damaging than a wooden horse

The football and basketball teams are setting fire to their own school’s reputation, sketchy as that already was. In isolation, one might dismiss each incidence as “just one misguided kid in need of direction,” but this mass of indiscretions is deeply disturbing. Doesn’t this school want to recruit and raise good citizens? Or is the behavior on these teams reflective of broader institutional values on this campus? USC has tried to convey itself as some kind of “Ivy League of the West” in recent years with stricter admissions standards, but the underlying culture of academic laxity, narcissism, and perceived privilege does not disappear so easily, whether in the athletic department or among the student body. Beneath the veneer of Heritage Hall, the band, and Traveler’s trot, there’s still a lot of rot. Thanks for rolling out a bonfire’s worth of evidence, Menelaus!

by bryanucla on May 15, 2008 9:03 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

broader institutional values

I don’t know the answers to all your questions, though I have my strong suspicions, and suspect that part of the answer is reflected in Paul Oberjuerge’s post linked yesterday.

by Menelaus on May 15, 2008 9:34 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

As Pat Forde

said on ESPN the other day, “USC has officially become an SEC school in the Pac 10”. As your very thorough, well-documented list shows, they are even worse than that.

Clearly, you can’t spell SCandal without ‘SC!

by godblesstyus95 on May 15, 2008 9:29 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Very well done

One forgets how extensive U$C’s transgressions are until you read this post. I kept reading, wondering time and time again, am I done yet?

All of these incidents come as no surprise. U$C cares about winning, no matter the cost. The whole mantra of “student-athlete” and “collegiate” athletics means nothing to them. It’s all about just win baby. So, as a result, look at the kind of “student” athlete they recruit: guys with little to no character and are able to go to college for the sole reason they can dunk a basketball or catch a football.

UCLA, on the other hand, recruits guys that are not just great athletes, but men of great character. Look at the future President of Cameroon. There is no doubt he’d still be at UCLA (or Stanford, Cal, or any prominent Ivy) if he was just another 5’9” guy, because he’s earned it in the classroom. KD wasn’t a great coach, but he didn’t bring in guys who embarassed the program (as our favorite wrecking ball in Jacksonville shows). It’s nice knowing our compliance folks are doing their jobs, that our coaches don’t bring in guys of questionable character (and if CBH did by accident, the dude would be gone after one year of being worked hard by CBH day in and day out), and that our student-athletes actually are students and go to class (I had a lot of classes with fellow history majors Ced Bozeman, Quinn Hawking, and Josiah Johnson) (although in fairness, Rodney Leslie and the Ball twins barely ever went to the one class I had with them; but then again, neither did I, and why would one when it was an open-note history final?).

All-in-all, a great post, with tons of information (although it’s the U.S. Attorney, not U.S. District Attorney, but that’s just b/c I do what I do).

by norcald503 on May 15, 2008 9:56 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

In regards to Aboya...

I believe he had previously committed to Georgetown before coming here, so that says something about his academic prowess.

Anyways, that was a great post. It just really annoys me that $C has been getting off the hook on numerous occasions without any sort of serious repercussions (until now, perhaps?) and yet the NCAA buries their nose into Drago’s European basketball career and the relationship between Love and Wooden. Sigh.

GO BRUINS!

by jlegs on May 15, 2008 11:36 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Great work M

This is a pretty impressive compilation of everything that makes Southern Cal who they are.

by Ajax on May 15, 2008 10:21 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Beautiful

A thing of beauty, Menelaus. Great work.

by DH91 on May 15, 2008 11:17 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Should we all email this to Adam Rose?

and ask him whether he will link this on LAT’s “What’s Bruin”?

by bluestreet on May 15, 2008 1:14 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Great idea

but methinks this list will never see the light of day in the fishwrap.

Formerly UCLA Class of 86

by Class of 86 on May 15, 2008 3:08 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Great Job

Your typing fingers must be aching from that post, Give them a good soak because i feel you will have to add a lot more in the foreseeable future. What an institution.

by artybruin on May 15, 2008 2:09 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Incredible

Amazing job. I couldn’t even read all of it, it made me so sick.

by Centric on May 15, 2008 2:14 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Forgot one thing

If you’re going to also talk about ex-USC players’ idiocy, then you’ll have to include the one about the player who used a derogatory comment towards homosexuals during an awareness event for incoming NFL rookies. I wish I could find the article, but all I remember was that an ex-NFL was talking about tolerance and whatnot and the ex-Trojan asked something along the lines of whether it’s okay to call them fg*ts.

by UCLA4Life on May 15, 2008 2:25 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Great stuff again

And how absolutely, utterly, and disgustingly embarrassing for $uC.

Formerly UCLA Class of 86

by Class of 86 on May 15, 2008 3:04 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Nothing embarrasses a trOJan

The assume an entitlement to this kind of stuff. There’s got to be a stronger word than “schnorrer,” but my command of Yiddish is very limited.

by Fox 71 on May 15, 2008 3:14 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Good point

The word “chutzpah” comes to mind too. Still not strong enough, though.

Formerly UCLA Class of 86

by Class of 86 on May 15, 2008 4:10 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

USC - Brandon and Ryan Ting - FALSE steriod accusations

As much as I’d like to see USC go down into flames, there is one allegation that is a blatant lie. Brandon Ting never tested positive for steriods, and neither did his twin brother, Ryan. They have never taken steroids in their lives.

The real reason they both decided to step down was to place their focus on medical school. As you may not know, Brandon and Ryan both graduted in 3 years, and had over 3.80 GPAs and excellent MCAT scores. They contemplated on returning for a senior season (with possibilities of starting) and even pursuing an NFL career. It was NFL or med school. They chose med school and they are doing well at USC med right now. In fact, Coach Carroll pushed them to return for their senior season, and they were seriously contemplating it, but decided that juggling football practices with rigors of med school was not in their best interest.

One last thing, the family has filed a lawsuit against the Times and the writers for defamation. That is why the link to the article was deleted.

I know all this because I personally know both of them and their family, and they are of the highest character.

by shakabruin on May 15, 2008 6:37 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

This is beautiful - One trOJan suing another

Some things are beautiful to watch. Here we have the trOJan Tings suing the trOJan MSM outlet. No matter which side wins, it will be a beautiful thing to watch.

But Shaka, a couple of points. You know the Tings and I don’t. But what I have seen is that Barry Bonds and Roger Clemens both deny taking steroids notwithstanding the contradictory evidence. I clicked on the links in M’s report, and the statement is still there that the Ting brothers testified positive for steroids. The fact that they denied taking ‘roids can hardly be deemed conclusive. I have not seen the test results, and the fact that some lab tech somewhere determined that there was a positive result does not necessarily mean that the Tings in fact took steroids.

But let me put it this way. If I had to choose which side of that case I would take, and the evidence was a positive test result on one side and a denial of steroid use on the other, I think I would take the side with actual evidence. (Now the exculpatory language: I would not choose to represent either side. I don’t represent serial child molesters, people who abuse animals, crooked politicians, crooked used car salesmen or trOJans, either the living breathing kind, or the kind made up of newsprint.)

by Fox 71 on May 15, 2008 7:09 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeap the AP story link is still active

And there is no retraction there. M is going by information available at hand. And the post we wrote back then was done based on specific information at hand.

by Nestor on May 15, 2008 7:14 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Their dad

Wasn’t he Barry Bonds’s surgeon? High character indeed.

by SuperBruinMan on May 15, 2008 8:18 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Do you have a link?

or specific citation proving that the LAT ran a correction to their report? The AP story is still up. Menelaus’s post also linked to a specific AP article. And there is no correction in it.

I think we need specific citation/link showing the allegation against Ting brothers were a blatant lie.

by Nestor on May 15, 2008 7:12 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Please send me a link

Any news story would help, or even the case number and venue of the lawsuit would be great. Also, I don’t know whether or not the LAT doesn’t have the story online for the reason you suggest or not. In my experience, the LAT stories all go dark in an annoyingly short time (which is why many of the sources above are from other places, and many of the dead links are from the LAT).

That said, again, please post anything you have and I’m happy to look into it.

by Menelaus on May 15, 2008 7:38 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

By the way

I just ran a few searches on Ting, libel, defamation, steroids and other key words and wasn’t able to confirm any portion of your story. That said, if you are aware of other information I missed, please let me know.

by Menelaus on May 15, 2008 9:15 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Steroid issues aside at the moment

Your post reeks of trOJie shill-ery. I might have given some benefit of the doubt to what you are saying, or at least accepted it as a different view, but your words expose you as a trOJan troll.

You sign up as “shakabruin,” and you start off by saying, “As much as I’d like to see USC go down in flames,” which are typical tools that trolls use to try to give themselves some semblance of believability. Then you turn right around and give us the typical spin that sounds like it written word-for-word from a Heritage Hall brochure about two trOJan football players whom you may or may not personally know. The “Coach Carroll” reference cemented it.

I don’t mind hearing from a $uC fan, alumnus, or even “student” on BN; just admit right off the bat who you are and where your allegiances lie. Or at least do a better job of covering your tracks.

CHEAT ON.

Formerly UCLA Class of 86

by Class of 86 on May 15, 2008 8:02 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You have one post

So you signed up specifically to throw this out there. No one can corroborate your story, and I see nothing of a retraction. If/When your story comes out, it will be corrected. Until then, we’re going to believe the AP over “random guy on the internet”.

The Tings are roiders until further evidence suggests otherwise. Putting “Bruin” in your name does not give you credibility. Evidence does. Find it.

by Tydides on May 15, 2008 9:44 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

No Bruin...

...would ever call Pom Pom “Coach Carroll.”

Next time you’re going to fake being one of us, get it right sucker.

I mean, I know you losers across town envy us and would do anything to be a Bruin, but you didn’t get in, you don’t have nearly enough class, and well, judging by your lame attempt to troll here, you’re way too fucking stupid to ever be one of us.

Nothing but another trOJan dipshit.

by norcald503 on May 16, 2008 12:50 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

LenDale White

In regards to my previous post above, it appears that it was LenDale White who asked at the NFL rookie symposium “Is it offensive if I call you a f@gg#t if you are a f@gg#t?” Here are a couple of references to it:

And while looking up LenDale White, I found this little item:

Anybody know the story behind it?

by UCLA4Life on May 16, 2008 1:02 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Links didn't show up.

Let me try this again.

Mr. Enlightened LenDale White making an idiot out of himself

NFL player from Colorado cited

by UCLA4Life on May 16, 2008 1:14 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Two things

If I recall correctly, Sanchez used a fake ID at a bar before the alledged sexual assault took place. Not a big deal, but getting caught using a fake ID could be considered embarrassing.

Also, let’s not forget that Carroll sent a LIMO to pick up Brian Price.

by bornagainbruin on May 16, 2008 8:10 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Why do you care so much?

Dear Bruins,

I can’t understand the wasted energy that you Bruins fans spend on expressing your hatred, disgust, and outright anger towards USC. You will never find a single USC fan based website that is DEVOTED to such a cause. It really is pathetic how much this consumes you people. I am not here to refute any of the above information but ask this question. Why do you waste your time on this? Why are you people so angry? I don’t want to see UCLA win at anything (thus the rivalry) but I would never exude a single ounce of energy to set up a “hater” website to express this feeling beyond cheering at the games. In the end, it’s just sports and not the Palestinian/Israeli conflict. I guess I enjoy how much this bothers you and I will toast a cheers for your health, because such anger is not good for your blood pressure. So basically, relax or get a life. Either way, I’m still living the dream as a USC alumni. So I’m off back to Manhattan Beach where your Bruin bitterness gives me nothing more than reason to laugh and thank god that I went to USC.

Fight On!

by NordeezyU on May 16, 2008 9:47 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

The "hater" card

When all else fails.

Thanks for giving it away:

I am not here to refute any of the above information but ask this question.

Thank God for giving us a perfect example why you guys love “Cheating On.”

by bluestreet on May 16, 2008 10:38 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Another example of misplaced arrogance

Nordeezy does not capitalize “God” but he does capitalize justsc. I think that just about sums up the argument about arrogance.

And the interesting thing is that he comes here to get his news. Nestor, I think you should consider a “Bruins Nation Lite” for trOJies—all one syllable words.

by Fox 71 on May 16, 2008 11:50 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wow
I can’t understand the wasted energy that you Bruins fans spend on expressing your hatred, disgust, and outright anger towards USC. You will never find a single USC fan based website that is DEVOTED to such a cause.

That’s probably because USC fans don’t hate USC.

by SuperBruinMan on May 16, 2008 7:22 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I didn't know they had McDonalds at Manhattan Beach

Flip my burger, asshole. That’s all you trOJans are good for anyway.

by Tydides on May 19, 2008 10:51 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Taking It Seriously

Sorry homie, but I hate the TrOJays.

I have to say that I didn’t start out hating them, it just sort of evolved. Every time some illiterate idiot or gangbanger accosts me unprovoked and for no other reason than for the wearing my school colors, I grow more and more angry. Just imagine some idiot, who never went to SC, telling me the Bruins “suck” when we have the most NCAA national championships of any school in the country. Not that I shouldn’t be above this but I’m not that actualized as a person. So this anger doesn’t have to do with you beating us more in athletics or having a better academic record because you have neither.

The nature of this rivalry is unique in the country. Close proximity and level of competition mean that we are going to be at each other’s throats all the time.We usually have to deal with one another in our professional lives everyday. The competition between the two schools is enormous at all levels of society here in Los Angeles. Is this just dawning on you?

And I’m not going to let a TrOJay try to take the high-road. Maybe this would be more civil if your fans were more civil. Maybe we wouldn’t care if you wouldn’t. I’ll leave you with this: I have met plenty of cool Trojans. However, there are a few that act strange around Bruins during BeatSC week. During my first year of law school (at a school with an equal mix of Bruins and Trojans) when our section would cling together out of all sorts of emotions that you experience during those frightening 1L days, I was amazed that those Trojans in my section stopped talking to me because I was a Bruin. So my question is, who is angry really?

by Bruins101NCAA on May 19, 2008 8:24 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hawaii Incident

Can’t find a link, but there was also the incident from a couple years ago when a SCum football player was in Hawaii visiting his girlfriend. They were on her school’s campus and he hauled off and hit her in public in front of multiple witnesses. In a shocking development, all charges were dropped. If anyone can find a link, please pass on to Menelaus to update the list.

Charge On! at Charges Dropped U
The USC School of Insufficient Evidence

by trbruin on Jun 9, 2008 7:54 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bruins Nation, an unofficial daily online scrap book covering the greatest collegiate athletic program in the nation. GO BRUINS.
Start posting about the Bruins »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Morrell_small
Wildcat and the UCLA Running Game
Ucla_small
Everyone needs to calm down about Ben Ball
Trojanssuck_small
An Angel in the Defensive Backfield
Small
UCLA at Washington State: A memory
13-9_ucla_baby____036_small
Videos from Washington/UCLA Football Game!

Recent FanPosts

Small
My two game season starts tonight
Small
Have You Been Watching Darren?
2603_1028618641249_1398823305_30086007_6195771_n_small
Trying to Keep the Mojo Going
Bruinsnation_small
Ben Ball Roundup: Gameday Notes
Brad_pitt_as_achilles_small
SI Poll: They Like Us, They Really Like Us ... sort of ...
Bruinsnation_small
Colorado Interviewing Karl Dorrell To Be Their Next Head Coach?
Images_small
Bruins Find Bats As Blue-Gold World Series Game 2 Goes To The Blues
Small
"Carroll and Kiffin and Sark"
Bruinsnation_small
A Note Re. Evoking CHP (Con Artist/Sleazebag) To Criticize Howland

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS


Managers

094_small Ajax

Bruinsnation_small Nestor

Menelaus2_small Menelaus

Arron_afflalo1_small Tydides

Brad_pitt_as_achilles_small Achilles

Small Meriones

Telemachus_small Telemachus

Small Odysseus

Blue_bellerophon_small Bellerophon

Authors

Images_small Ryan Rosenblatt

Official Partner of CBS Sports