A Rant Against Playground Pedophiles and Pimps
Warning: This is a Rant, a personal Editorial, devoid of fact and full of emotion. You may not want to read it.
For the last week, I've tried to figure out what upset me so much about the OJ2 scandal. I was deeply disappointed because, against all odds, toward the end of the year I started liking OJ2.
What follows is what I came up with -- my reasons for being upset.
OJ Mayo and the Playground Perverts
Adults should never exploit children for their own purposes. Never. Whether the exploitation is physical or commercial, it is unacceptable. Using children for one’s own purposes is wrong.
Where I come from, if an adult is hanging around a playground watching kids swing, slide and play tag – it’s wrong and we move them off. We teach or kids to scream and run from these playground pedophiles. We have yard monitors who keep them away.
When a strange adult approaches a kid on the playground with promises of money and nice things – those are words and acts that can get a man shot.
We don’t let strangers buy our kids clothes or take them on road trips.
The exploitation of children, by adults, for the benefit of adults, is wrong.
Except, I guess, when it comes to exploiting young kids who can dribble and dunk.
Then, somehow, in the eyes of many in the sports world, it becomes acceptable.
What sickens me most about the OJ2 situation is not what OJ2 did and not how sc is covering it up.
What sickens me most is what went on, years ago, on the playgrounds where OJ2 was “discovered”. We’ve all seen it. Leering men surrounding playground hoops. Making comments, promises, offers. Fortune, fame a future, just get in the car with me.
I cannot help but feel sorry for OJ2. Yes, he is an adult now. But, he wasn’t when all of this started.
The exploitation of OJ2, by adults, started when he was very young. From what I’ve read on the ‘net, Mayo came to prominence while a 6th grader when an article in a Kentucky newspaper called him a phenom. From that point on he was packaged and used by adults. The control was so strong, and OJ2’s relative bargaining position so weak, that, as one of the “Outside the Lines” commentators said, “OJ had no choice but to play along.”
From an early age, OJ2 was seen as a commodity, a way to win basketball games and championships in both high school and college, a way to sell shoes, a meal ticket, a means to fortune and fame by grown men who had no business using this child for their own purposes. Yes, OJ2 got some of the proceeds, but not a great percentage.
He was being pimped.
We try to keep these pimps away from our daughters.
Why don’t we offer the same protections to our sons – the ones who are 6 feet tall in elementary school, who can dribble and shoot with either hand?
Shame on the shoes companies. Shame on the “AAU” for allowing the exploitation of very young kids for selfish purposes.
Yes, these kids get exposure, get to play ball and they get uniforms, take trips and “broaden their horizons”.
So do the young run away girls, fresh off the busses from the midwest, who end up in the porn business – turned by slick adults who promise cool clothes and stardom.
There is something inherently wrong with grown men hanging around playgrounds, contacting kids, buying them things, making them promises and, ultimately, taking control of their lives.
How do we stop them?
We take the profit out of the enterprise. We create a situation where no one needs a pimp – where the pimps are punished, as well as the workers and customers.
Right now, OJ2 seems beyond the reach of sanctions. I think he’s old enough to punish for the conscious decisions made in the last year or so, but I really don’t hold him responsible. The path that led him to today started years ago – when he was too young to be held accountable. However, I would not oppose an NBA rule that denied entry for a year or two to someone in OJ2’s position. Yes, in the long run, he will have profited. But, no more than the pimps will have profited.
I’d like to give the AAU and the NBA a chance to create rules for the “development” of child talent – some “do’s” and “don’ts”. And, if they can’t come up with rules, I’d like to see the government take a stab at it. (When children were being exploited in the entertainment business, rules were passed to protect them. I don’t see the situation as being much different.)
I’d like to see the NBA create a licensing procedure for agents and require all players to use a licensed agent or attorney. The NBA could then pull the license of anyone who engages in the exploitation of kids.
And, I’d like to see the NCAA grow some stones and enforce the rules already on the books. sc is complicit in the exploitation – no one in his or her right mind, knowing OJ2’s history, would not have seen this coming. No one. sc is not a victim. It is a perpetrator and should be punished, too.
This one year of college play is important to the pimps and their players. It’s the exposure that set’s the commodities market price. The NCAA has rules in place to control this year. By failing to enforce them, the NCAA but another link in the chain that stretches back to the playgrounds and the pedophiles and perverts that lurk around them.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of BruinsNation's (BN) editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of BN's editors.
19 comments
|
7 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Good stuff 66
To me the biggest problem right now is the lack of enforcement (or we could say “selective” enforcement) on the part of NCAA. If Miles and co grew a pair and sent a message by sanctioning some of the biggest culprits out there, it would give the offending parties something to think about. Keep it coming.
The other side of Nestor's Coin
As long as the ncaa continues to swear that the emperor is wearing fine new clothes, they act as enablers to the Guillorys et al., who prey on these kids. The ncaa does nothing. justsc, Timmeh, Calimari, huggins, et al., know it. Cheatie Petie allows OJ1 on his sidelines … (insert multi-page Menelaus post about the SCandals) .... Nothing happens, so the cheaters get more and more bold. The pedophiles (I think sjh chose his word wisely in this context) continue to do their thing, and business goes on as usual.
And since it’s a business, does anyone want to file against justsc for a violation of Business and Professions Code section 17200, and claim that what goes on over there is an unfair business practice? I think it’s a good case is we can find someone with standing.
Fox, I am Intrigued
Twice you’ve put forth the idea of a “private enforcement” lawsuit—using the courts to enforce standards that the sanctioning body won’t.
In your first post, months ago, on Bushgate, you mentioned the truth finding power that civil discovery puts in the hands of a skilled lawyer. I would pay to see you depose Bush, cheety, Garrett, or Brand.
For those of you whose vision has not been clouded by law school, the concept of “standing” simply means that to sue someone, you have to have a real case against them, a real injury. The idea is that we want to make sure that whoever brings an action has a full and complete incentive to bring it well. Well, at least that’s the theory.
Unfortunately, in my eyes, it should not be an on field opponent that goes after sc in court; that will appear to be sour grapes and will allow sc to respond “they can’t beat us on the playing field so they are trying to beat us in court” and then they will argue how litigious we’ve become and how evil it is to use attorneys and courts to resolve conflicts.
We need to think about this.
One other thought: When I was a kid lawyer, in the Central Valley, representing farmworkers against growers, I learned one of my very favorite quotes about the legal system. It was from the great legal philosopher WC Fields: “In the halls of justice, the only justice is in the halls.”
With no real chance for justice in the courthouse, we began holding guerilla trials, on the courthouse steps. The media attention they garnered was often more powerful than what a judge could have done on our behalf.
I’m wondering if we ought not hold a guerilla trial of sc—using Menelaus great work as a starting place.
Heck, Fox, I’d even let you sing your lines.
sjh
Standing
Would a fan have standing? Peter Plaintiff buys a ticket to an amateur athletic contest, but to his horror learns that one of the teams is paying its players. Wouldn’t Peter Plaintiff, as a class representative, have standing to bring an action under B&P Code section 17200 to disgorge the profits earned by the defendant - oh heck, let’s just say hypothetically that the defendant was justsc - from all these football and basketball games, i.e., return a portion of the ticket price to a fund to be given to those who could prove they attended. Of course, justsc students, et al., would opt out of the class, but that’s OK.
Or if you could find an actual athlete to be a plaintiff, someone who solicited but did not receive a scholarship from—oh heck, let’s just say hypothetically that it’s justsc. That plaintiff could say that by giving scholarships to ineligible guys (those who have been paid), he was not given a scholarship.
Bruins, let’s get creative. And let’s also remember that justsc would probably try to copy anything we did. But then, there is nothing to find in the glass house at Morgan Center, whereas heritage hall is not quite as transparent once you get past the smoke and mirrors.
17200 is a powerful tool. But we need a plaintiff and we need a plaintiff’s lawyer.
Hey - I'm a geezer lawyer
I just tell the young guys what I want and let you figure out whether its before or after Prop 64 or Brew 102. (Or the Korea Supply case, but remember that we’re not interest in damages.)
Pretty sure I've found your man
IIRC, he’s a walk-on PG, from Canada, brought to light during the signing of the rapper: Ryan Wetherell. It’d probably take some convincing, but he fits the profile described in para. 2.
Go sign him up!
Jaffa, you’re not a lawyer yet, but you’re an opera guy, which (like staying in a Holiday Inn Express) is just as good. Go sign him up, and I’ll help you knock out a complaint.
Very Valid Postion, 66
The “grooming” pattern of exploitation is very similar to that of a classic pedophile’s. (I spent several years prosecuting those.)
I would like to add that the “I had no idea this was happening” feigned ignorance expressed by these coaches is chillingly similar to that of complicit (IMO) parents and caretakers of victimized children. These people provide pedophiles with access to the children, the protection of their “trust,” and often a well-developed defense against a struggling child’s accusations. It is absolutely nauseating, and frustrating beyond belief.
Floyd is a classic picture of this absurd postitioning and posturing, in OJ Mayo’s case. He should be held responsible and liable for every violative act committed by Mayo—he is a primary and critical accomplice to each and every one of them, and he personally benefitted.
Love My Bruins
You should get this post published.
If you clean up some of the BN shorthand, I feel this piece would fit perfectly in wider circulation. More people need to hear this comparison, because it is valid and speaks to the seedy nature of professional athletics in a way that grabs attention.
Thank You.
I get great satisfaction by posting here—and if what I write stops here, that’s OK. But, on this story I’m preaching to the choir.
Too bad sports pages don’t have “op-ed” pieces. I think it would be cool to get this story out.
Especially if I could incorporate Bruingirl’s comments which really round it out. I posted theory. She tied it to reality. I’d love to craft our pieces together, with her permission, and find a place to put them.
Again, thanks for your kind comments. This post means a lot to me. And, I’m glad you liked it.
sjh
Anyone Have An Idea on Where to Submit it?
If there are some places to send it, I’ll write it up.
sjh
Send it to the fishwrap
If they publish it, I’ll write a series of letters talking about what a crummy article it is, just to keep things percolating. I think I’ll sign them Bill and Ted.
I'm not going to follow up on this for a while
My mother-in-law, UCLA ‘38, just passed away. My father-in-law, also ‘38, passed away in October. Time to attend to family. My wife, ‘67, and I will be going to Pasadena to deal with the details, soon.
Maybe, if I need diversion, I’ll try to create the op-ed piece.
sjh

by 

















