Bruins Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Sean Keeley's Week 12 College Football Buffet

Dose Of Reality: Projecting Expectations For 2008-09 Football Season

It is that time of the year again.  Menelaus’ post re Phil Steele's preview spurred a pretty good discussion wrt to expectations for next season.  This is a discussion we have had every year here on BN around this time during the off season (See 2007 and 2006).  And every time the discussions have centered on the difference between expectation and prediction.  IMHO the distinction between the two terms is basically semantics.  But we can still give it a shot in terms of what we think should be the expectation for this team given the current state of the program and information available at this snap shot of time.

As we noted this week, the mood around here wrt to our football team is lot different now than it was during those times, for obvious reasons:

Crnncdw

Photo Credit: karthulovesyou (flickr)

The feel around our entire football program is different as noted by even the most skeptical fans here on BN:

[T]he most important thing about the event is simply to say that CRN is the man. The Best CEO in America. He has changed the entire feel of the athletic department. There is an excitement, confidence and buzz that’s at a higher level than in way too long, if ever. My major complaint about the previous coaches (didn’t say his name Fox!) was not just that they weren’t the right type of dynamic leaders for the job, they had no plan on how to manage not only the team/game, but what is one of the most important jobs in athletics at a major school. That is no longer an issue. Rick has done more for UCLA in a few months than has been done in a very long time and it really showed at this event. He’s embracing (good and bad) the history of the program that had turned it’s back on great players and assets and is creating one of the best programs in the country. The family of Bruin athletics seems stronger than ever and I’m positive recruits, reporters and rivals can feel it.

We all feel the same sense of energy around our football program here on BN. However, at the same, we have to be cognizant of the realities surrounding our program, which has been underachieving on a consistent basis since the forgetful night of December 5, 1998.

I think given the instability in our roster arising from uncertainty in our quarterback situation, lack of depth on the offensive live, and the massive departure of upperclassmen from last year’s underachieving team, it is difficult to nail down expectations for next season.  But let’s see what we get if we try to take it one game at time and project our expectations on the team based on the information available at this snap shot of time.

  • Tennessee (L): The eyes of the entire college football world are going to be on the UCLA football program on September 1st when the Bruins officially kick off the Neuheisal era on the WWL. No doubt all of us – the entire Bruin Nation – will be at a fever pitch with excitement.  But, the Bruins are going to be taking on a powerful Volunteers team that is coming off a win over Big-10 power Wisconsin in the Outback Bowl, and the SEC East Championship.  The Volunteers have their own questions. They will be breaking in a new quarterback who will be looking to replace the dependable Eric Ainge, and a new OC, following the departure of David Cutcliffe (who coincidentally beat out KD for the HCing position at Duke). Dave Clawson, from Richmond, is taking over for Cutcliffe and is going to be running some version of the WCO. Tennessee, true to the spirit of the Fulmer Cup, once again has had an interesting off season.  But these guys still have a lot of talent.  Jonathan Crompton could emerge as the next dependable TN signal caller.  They have a solid group in the secondary and they are used to playing in the big stage.  I think this is going to be a close game.  However, I am expecting the Vols to pull out this game.  The Bruins start the season 0-1.
  • @ BYU (L): After taking on the Volunteers, the Bruins will head off to Provo to take on a Cougar team which has designs on being the 08-09 version of Hawaii and Boise State.  And this will be a statement game from them against a high profile team from the Pac-10.  The advantage the Bruins might have is that they will be familiar with BYU’s offensive and defensive schemes, while BYU will have one game of film to work with to scout the new Bruin offense.  Regardless, BYU will be coming in this game fired up with returning stars such as Max Hall (3,848 yards passing) and Harvey Unaga (1,227 yards).  This will be another close game.  However, I think the Cougars will pull this one out based on their home field advantage.  I expect the Bruins to fall to 0-2 and Neuheisel haters will be coming out of the woodwork to ridicule the program.
  • Arizona (T): The Bruins come back to the Rose Bowl with an 0-2 record to take on a Pac-10 football program with an embattled head coach.  Arizona beat up on the Bruins last year in Tucson by beating up on a hobbled Pat Cowan and running rough shot over DeWayne Walker’s offense.  It will be interesting to see how the Bruin D with its young cubs matchup against the 'Zona offense and whether Walker has an answer for an athletic, multi dimensional QB like Tuitama. The optimistic part of me thinks that the Bruin D will rise to the occasion and the offense will click a little in its third game under Chow.  But, still, this is a toss up game in my book.  Let’s go with two tracks.  Staying with my optimistic side, the Bruins record after this game will be 1-2 (L – "liberal" projection), but if it goes the other way the Bruins will fall to 0-3 (C – "conservative" projection).
  • Fresno St (T): Bulldogs are heading into the 08-09 season with their own high expectations.  WWL’s Mark Schlbach has them ranked in his top-25. They are also coming into the Rose Bowl with an experienced combo in the backfield (quarterback Tom Brandstater and tailback Ryan Mathews) and they will probably bring along about 25-30,000 fans via the I-5.  Again, the prospects for the Bruins in this game depends on how the offense is performing under Olson or Craft or Forcier with a brand new OL.  If the offense is off to a decent start, I feel good about a W in this game.  However, if it is still working its kinks out, I could see the Dogs pulling this out.  So this is another toss up.  If you want to stay on the "L" track, the Bruins up their record to 2-2; but if you want to go with the "C" track, the record falls to 0-4 . 1-3 if you took "L" track in the game before.
  • Washington St (W): The Cougars come into the Rose Bowl with Paul Wulff as their new HC.  The word is that Wulff will be running a no-huddle spread offense this coming season. So this will be a perfect test for DeWayne Walker.  This is a game I expect us to win at home as the Bruin defense should be able to shut down the Cougar offense.  The Bruins up their record to 3-2 (L) or 1-4/2-3 (depending on the "C" option selected above).
  • @ Oregon (L): After taking on Fresno State, the Bruins head up to Eugene. This is going to be a tough game. Eugene natives are going to be out for Neuheisel’s blood based on his past history at UDub. The Ducks will also have a pretty solid team which is coming off an impressive win in the Sun Bowl with Justin Roper at QB. Obviously, we will go into more details during the week leading up to this game. But, at this snap shot of time, I don’t see the Bruins beating the Ducks in Eugene. I fully expect us to lose this game and our record will fall to either 3-3 (L) or 1-5/2-4 (depending on the "C" options picked above).
  • Stanford (W): This will be the first game of the season in which UCLA should be favored.  Stanford came on strong this past season pulling off some great wins against Southern Cal and Cal.  The Bruins should have the advantage in terms of personnel.  And I expect the Bruin defense to shut down and dominate the Cardinals in this game, although we can’t get too over confident.  Bruins up there record to either 4-3 (L) or 2-5/3-4 (C).
  • @ California (L): After beating up on Stanford, the Bruins head off to the Bay Area on a positive note.  By this game, I would assume Jeff Tedford’s QB situation will become clear, in which (IMHO) Kevin Riley should emerge as the unquestioned number 1 QB in Strawberry Canyon.  I think Cal is positioned to have a decent season next year, but in this game IMHO they will be the favorites at home.  The Bruins fall to 4-4 (L) or 2-6/3-5 (C).
  • Oregon St (T):  The Bruins come back to the Rose Bowl to play their second to last home game of the season.  Oregon State is coming back from a solid 9-4 season.  And this year they should have Sammie Stroughter at their disposal.  If the Beavers live up to their pre-season hype, they should be the favorite to win this game.  But the Bruins have had their number in recent years.  Again, this is a toss up game and right now I am not sure what to expect.  So, again, going with a consistently optimistic projection, let’s say the Bruins should win this game and up their record to 5-4 (L).  On the flip side, the Bruins could drop to 2-7/3-6 (C).
  • @ Washington (L):  The Bruins head up to Seattle where the entire Husky nation will be out for CRN’s blood.  Willingham may be fighting for his coaching life and the Huskies will be anxious to feel better about Barbara Hedges’ follies by exacting "revenge" (in their minds) against Neuheisel. They will get their wish.  The Bruins fall to 5-5 (L) or 2-8/3-7 (C).
  • @ Arizona St (L):  At this point of the season, the Bruins are going to be down.  There will be a lot of doubts.  And I would not be surprised at all if the team gets a little lost just like Howland’s team did during his first season against St. Johns, when the entire season didn’t seem to have any purpose.  I just don’t see Bruins competing in this game against a pretty deep and talented ASU team under Erickson that could be competing for a shot at the Rose Bowl. This could get ugly and the Bruins drop to 5-6 (L) or 2-9/3-8 (C). 
  • Southern Cal (W):  So, the way I see it right now, I expect the Bruins at best to head into this game with a record of 5-6 and at worst with a record of 2-8. But this is the game in which Neuheisel will get the troops all fired up. The Trojans have had trouble dealing with Walker’s defense.  I think Walker will once again have the guys well prepared.  And Neuheisel and Chow will have the offense ready, fired up and ready to go.  The Bruins win this game, finishing the season with a record of 6-6 (L) or 3-9/4-8 (C) with a lot of momentum heading into the '09-10 season. 

So, to sum it up right now at this snap shot of time, I expect UCLA to lose against Tennessee, BYU, Oregon, California, Washington and Arizona State

I see three toss up games against Arizona, Fresno State, Oregon State and three wins against Stanford, Washington State, and Southern Cal. 

So depending on how the toss up games go, the Bruins could finish either 6-6 or 3-9/4-8 (depending on which "conservative" projection we take as we go through the list above).

In other words, I will be ecstatic if somehow, despite all the questions surrounding this team, the program manages to finish with 6 wins and a victory over Southern Cal.

As many have said already, I am not sure we can use wins and losses as  the barometer of success for next year.  Rick Neuheisel’s first year is going to be different from Karl Dorrell’s first year for a few reasons.  He is not inheriting the same level of talent as Karl Dorrell did following the departure of Toledo.  Dorrell took over a team which was stocked with talents (especially on defense) and two highly recruited young quarterbacks – Moore and Olson – who were entering their second season.  Neuheisel will not have the same level of talent of experience with him given how recruiting was fairly mediocre during Dorrell era until this past season (and we have written many posts addressing that issue).

So, with that in mind, what we need to look for is to see whether Neuheisel can field a team that doesn’t quit despite the expected difficulties this coming season. Keep in mind, even a coach like Howland kind of "lost" his team his first season. So it wouldn’t be a total surprise if we see the football team look a little dispirited despite the unending enthusiasm, experience and skills of the Neuheisal and his coaching staff. 

What will be more important than ever for all of us to remain patient and maintain perspective and a sense of reality while the coaching staff and players work to right the ship for the long term in what I think is going to be a very difficult season.

GO BRUINS.

0 recs  |  Comment 15 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Thoughtful and Sobering -- But Hopeful, Too

Great job, N.

I agree with you that the season will be defined in terms of effort and growth rather than wins and losses. It we play consistently with passion, if we improve with each game, the season will be a success. (And, we will win some games we will be predicted to lose.)

Although it seems ridiculous that some will blame CRN if your conservative scenario plays out, I agree that will happen, and we will have to cover his back.

I think the O line will be the key. We have some great running backs, we should be “good” at QB and maybe better than that. But, with O line play like last year’s, that backfield talent will be neutralized. That said, Coach Chow knows the limitations of the O line and I trust him to scheme to work within them.

Although we are all singing “Cum by ya” around the campfire, I remain very concerned about our inconsistent D. When CRN chose DW, I stopped criticizing DW. I’m hoping that CRN and NC help DW fill the gaps so that our D learns to take on the spread and innovative O’s. It sounds like WSU is going to a Texas Tech type O—which very few teams in the nation have been able to stop. People beat TT by outscoring them. With our O line, I’m not sure we will be outscoring anyone.

Funny, I agree with you on sc. And, because I think we can rise above our shortcomings because we have such strong, and inspirational coaching I see us winning more games than would be suggested by your proper analysis. Said another way, I think you are right on each game but in my heart believe we will win some we are supposed to lose.

That’s why I like your analysis so much. It gives room for the numbers side of me, but also gives room for my full passion bucket.

Once more, good job.

sjh

by Class of 66 on Jun 12, 2008 7:19 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

7-5

and I am very confident about that. I think this schedule looks real tough right now because we are going on the premise that 2007 will predict 2008, and historically that hardly ever turns out to be the case.

I think this Bruin team will play vastly different than the one we’ve grown accostomed to the last few years, and teams that gave KD trouble last year may not be doing the same this year. Although this team is younger and less experienced, I think there is more raw talent on this team right now, and I’ll take well-coached young talent over poorly coached experience any day.

Yes there are plenty of questions, and I think it is completely reasonable to have downgraded expectations based on that, but for some reason I feel better about our prospects right now than I did a year ago at this time, when many of us were predicting a 10-2 or 11-1 season.

Don’t get me wrong, I won’t be disappointed if my prediction of 7-5 somehow ends up at 4-8. And while we usually don’t celebrate 7-5 seasons around here, if my prediction holds true, we should all be ecstatic. I just have a feeling that our new leadership has and will be changing the culture of our football program, and this renewed vigor will lead to some surprising results next year.

I can’t wait.

by godblesstyus95 on Jun 12, 2008 8:42 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I keep going back and forth

between being sober and your take godbless. I feel much better about our program now than how I felt compared to this point last year when we were expecting 10-2 type of season (while predicting Dorrell would screw it up). I feel like this year I am expecting 5-6 win type of season (but optimistically predicting a 7-8 win season).

But the kind of post above by N and co. was necessary to keep everyone in check.

by bluestreet on Jun 12, 2008 9:07 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Winning Attitude

Everybody worries about the O-Line and for good reason, but are these a bunch of guys that were very good in high school and then flopped, or are they ones still with the potential? With CRN, NC and other coaches, I think this area will be okay, maybe not great, but will do the job. It’s going to be the schdule and how the ball bounces that dictate the record, but 7-5 sounds good, and if it was 2007, it would have been 10-2. CRN is a gifted salesman and he has assembled an excellent team of coaches and in college football, it’s teaching, improvement and a good scheme. We’ve got the foundation to be a winner. CRN loves everyone watching and by the way, he’s a pretty good coach of talent.

Go Bruins!!!

by whittier71 on Jun 12, 2008 9:42 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Are these really your expectations?

I think the analysis is great, but it seems to me like you’re trying to lower our expectations this year to give CRN a honeymoon. If the prior coach had not been fired and had the same personnel, I suspect that the expectations would be along the lines of 9 wins, including one over USC, and a bowl win, right? So why are we so negative when we now have a head coach who can coach and lead and an OC who “draws up touchdowns” according to a certain ballroom dancer from the OC.

I think it’s reasonable to expect this team to finish in the top tier of the Pac-10. Here’s why:

-We won 7 games with Dorrell as head coach and a terrible offensive coordinator (also Dorrell (not in name but he designed the “offense”)). With this coaching staff, it’s like having a toothless, overweight, dull, penniless wife and trading her in for Jennifer Aniston (just saw the Break Up last week, and was reminded how attractive she is). Suffice it to say we had a huge upgrade at coach. This in and of itself should be worth a 2-3 more Ws.

-We lost a lot of starters, but only 2 who were good enough to be drafted in the NFL (plus Slater, a kick returner who was not a starter). In other words, we are not replacing a ton of elite talent. The replacements were as highly regarded, possibly moreso than most of the players we lost. Thus, our overall talent level should be comparable to last year

-We should be better at the skill positions on offense this year. Why? The return of Raymond Carter, Marcus Everett and Ryan Moya. The infusion of Aundre Dean, Milton Knox and Nate Chandler. The expected improvement of Terence Austin and Dominique Johnson.

-We can’t possibly suffer as many injuries this year as we did last year (can we?).

-Our defense will keep us in most games. Just like last year. We still have defensive playmakers, especially Price (imagine how good he’ll be with some practice under his belt), Harwell (returning from injury), Carter and Verner. We lost some secondary players and Bruce Davis, but I think that they are replaceable.

-Our special teams should be good. Kai Forbath has a year under his belt. We have the skilled players to return kicks (though we probably won’t get as many kick returns for TDs without Slater). We have a proven special teams coach.

For those reasons, especially the coaching, to me, we should be better than last year. Will that translate into more wins? I don’t know. Our schedule is more difficult this year because we play BYU on the road and we play Tennessee. Also we will play Cal, ASU and Oregon on the road. So there will be challenges. Despite those challenges, if the team is well-prepared and progresses throughout the season, I find it hard to imagine that we wouldn’t get the 6 wins needed for a bowl game. If the team embraces the enthusiasm of the coach and learns Chow’s offense by the time the season begins, 8 wins should be possible.

If we only win 4-5 games I will be disappointed and I will feel that expectations were not met. However, I would not pin that to the head coach. I’ll give him a 3-year rope, but I’m not going to lower my expectations.

by BruinsRule on Jun 12, 2008 10:51 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I agree ...

If Dorrell was the coach, BN would have higher “expectations.” I think it is a good stance to still have optimistic expectations, but if the Bruins don’t meet them, so what, as long as CRN shows that he is building the program (as has been the case).

I think the Bruins will be a 7-8 win team this year (including bowl game) and finish 7-6 or 8-5. Low predictions seem to be a “prepare for the worst” mentality. It actually kind of reminds me of when BN predicted UCLA to beat SC the year of 13-9. Prepare for the worst, I guess.

But regardless, I agree with the sentiment that, in this particular case, this particular season, wins and losses won’t determine what we think of our head coach.

by Dante on Jun 12, 2008 11:59 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Disagree; I'm more in line with Nestor on this one

I think Nestor is spot on with his analysis and predictions. I would not expect more than 8 wins from this team and that, in my opinion, is being very generous.

As an initial matter, whenever you have a total change in coaching regimes, it takes time for the team to adjust. Even with a coach as great as Ben Howland, our basketball team didn’t instantly flourish. In fact, they had about the same record under Howland in his first (11-17) than Lavin in his last (10-19). As smart as our football players may be relative to their peers at, say, U$C or ASU, football is a very complicated game and learning a whole new playbook and system doesn’t happen overnight. Mistakes are made. It happens.

Sure, we won 7 games under KD last year. Our schedule last year was MUCH easier than it is this year. When we get Cal, ASU, and Oregon at the Rose Bowl, we fare much better. When we go on the road to Berkeley, Tempe, and Eugene? Not so much. Look at the last 4 or 5 years. We beat Cal in the Rose Bowl. They beat us in Strawberry Canyon.

Moreover, BruinsRule, you’re vastly underestimating the seniors who graduated but who didn’t get drafted into the NFL. Dennis Keyes wasn’t drafted. But I don’t think you’ll find anyone on BN who will say he wasn’t a very valuable member of last year’s defense and a key senior leader. The same can be said about Chris Markey. Sure, he battled injuries. But he wasn’t drafted. Are you telling us it’ll be no problem replacing him. And Brandon Breazell. Not drafted, but one of our best receivers last year. He’ll be missed. Yes, we got new talent. But as great as Dean and Knox may be, it is VERY RARE for a freshman to come into NCAA football and be an instant impact player. I have no doubt that Dean and Knox will be solid contributors, but I don’t expect them to be the second coming of Adrian Peterson. Even MJD didn’t blow up until his second year on campus. And the key place you’re underestimating guys who graduated but weren’t drafted is along the line. We lost a lot of veteran linemen and that is, by far, our weakest link this year. Having those guys this year would have given us depth we’re sorely lacking up front.

Sure, Everett, Moya, and Carter return. But, except for Everett, they’re really unproven commodities. They may be great. They be average. We have no way of gauging their impact.

Yes, ATV is back. But on the other side of the field is Norris. I’m sure he’s a great kid, but I don’t think he is starter material for a major Pac-10 program. Keyes and Horton are gone. Our secondary is very inexperienced and lacking in depth. To just assume they are replaceable and we’ll see little to no measurable drop-off in our secondary is bewildering to me. Sure, we have some great playmakers coming in this year. But like I said, they’re freshman, and it’s rare to see an instant impact freshman, especially on the defensive side of the ball (and especially in the secondary).

So, I have to go with Nestor on this one. I think you’re being a bit optimistic and assuming the talent level is going to be the same. I think the loss of the seniors is huge and will impact how this season turns out (especially in the secondary and on the line).

I hope you’re right BruinsRule, but I don’t want to get too far ahead of myself this early and with so many glaring problems still to be solved.

by norcald503 on Jun 12, 2008 1:38 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

My Over/Under 5.5

My expectations wouldn’t have changed if we still had to endure KD for another season. CRN isn’t getting a "honeymoon" although he fully deserves one (as do all new HC’s) because he is molding the program in his vision. This all takes time. 6-6 would have gotten KD the boot because as Bill Parcell’s would say, "he shopped for the groceries". You made the bed, now lie in it.

9 Wins would be awesome but that is not going to happen. Why?

-Every time there is a coaching change, there are "Growing Pains" within the program. There is a period wherein both coaches & players are in a "Lost in Translation Twilight Zone" no matter how hard both parties try to expedite this process. Everything is new/different for both parties. The only time there are smooth transitions (very, very few by the way) is when there is a coach within the program that is promoted that leads a talented AND veteran team. Like Miami (Butch to Coker). But there is also Louisville (Petrino to Kragthorpe) that didn’t work out so well.

-My expectations last year was a combination of what I believed was enough talent coupled with experience galore. This year, we are very, very green all over the place except for Special Teams. Just because a player does not get drafted by the NFL does not mean they will not make the league nor does it make them poor players. There is a laundry list of players in the NFL that have become stars or are contributors at that level.

-We have a lot of talented kids coming in the fall but they have zero experience. Eventually some of them will become good/great players but they’ll pay for it on the field to gain it. In high school, you have a bad read, you can still recover to make a play. In college, put 6 on the scoreboard. Depending on freshmen is a very, very dangerous game to play. Freshman are to be sprinkled in here & there and not to be the foundation of a program.

-2 good DT’s, 1 good LB & 1 good CB. How about the other 7? Brigham/Brian will be one of the top DT combos in the nation but we don’t have a DE that can consistently pressure the QB and can a light Bosworth be stout against the run? 2 new LB’s will be flanking Carter. 2 new Safeties and either Norris (career special teams player) or Viney (somebody feed this kid) opposite ATV. There are a lot of talented kids but they are green and this is a BIG step up in competition. I’m dreading what that experienced/talented/BIG Tennessee line is going to do to our defense on what should be a very warm day. They’re just going to lean on our guys all game long and wear us out.

I didn’t mean to write this much so I’m going to stop. I haven’t even talked about our OL, QB’s, RB injuries, etc.

Having said all this, I BELIEVE that we are going to see a team that will get beat up in the beginning of the season but will have improved at the end. The previous foundation was flawed but once CRN establishes his, UCLA will continue to rise and make the nation as well as the convicts across town take notice.

by BlueReign on Jun 12, 2008 4:55 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks

For summing up the big points I wanted to make in a much more direct and succinct way. Much appreciated.

by norcald503 on Jun 12, 2008 7:41 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree for the most part

but the only things I’d chance are Arizona and Washington. I’d consider Washington a toss up and Arizona a win. Arizona has had issues on the road and have had a slew of KD-like mistakes (play clock running out, not adjusting to other teams’ packages, etc.) under Stoops so I think we’ll win at the Rose Bowl. Washington I think is a toss up because I’m not sold on Jake Locker. I think he’ll give us a a few turnovers and they shouldn’t be able to run the ball overly well with our D-Line and solid linebacking core. I think it’s a good match-up for us. If we were playing them at home I’d chalk it up as a win, but in Seattle its a toss up to me.

by Ryan Rosenblatt on Jun 12, 2008 11:30 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Expectations for 2008

As usual, I can find no fault in anything you laid out in your vision for the upcoming season, Nestor. I know there is much reason to be excited about the future of our program under CRN and his coaches, but I think we’re definitely going to have a transition year in ‘08 just as we did under Coach Howland in his first year. I have been saying for some time now that UCLA will be lucky to win 5-6 games this year, considering the condition in which KD left the program and the difficult schedule we face. I just don’t see that there is enough returning talent to expect (there’s that word again) otherwise.

Having said that, I am very excited about the impact that CRN, Chow and Walker will have on our recruiting efforts and it seems that we’re already seeing dividends in that department. But for the short term outlook, I fear that it’s going to get worse before it gets better.

by SactoBruin on Jun 12, 2008 12:49 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

We also have to remember

just how poorly coached this team was last year. Four losses (Utah, ND, Wazzu, Zona) to teams we were favored to beat by at least a touchdown. Not just losses, BLOWOUT losses. FOUR TIMES. Unfrigginbelievable.

No matter our record, I think it’s safe to say we won’t get blown out by teams we are favored to beat by more than a touchdown in 2008.

by godblesstyus95 on Jun 12, 2008 2:22 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Wow.

Times are pretty grim if you project that your own team doesn’t have a chance to finish above
.500. I’m a Cal fan, but I only see you losing to Oregon, Tennessee, USC, Cal and ASU (I would say that you will end up beating one of those teams). I bet you pull it off against Fresno St. and BYU, Washington, WSU, Arizona and Stanfurd shouldn’t be a problem. I think you finish between 8-4 and 6-6 (I can see you beating ASU, maybe Cal, and maybe Oregon, but no way all of them).

by RollOnYouBears667 on Jun 12, 2008 3:11 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

REBUILDING

All of the above comments are worthwile trying to objectively analize a situation filled with emotion. But since this forum is populated by fans who are really interested in Bruin football and care a whole bunch, the effort for objectivity, with hope, is very appropriate – not lacking in Spirit.

Last years injuries were devastating. And this years in Spring camp the same. We have lost a signficant number of experienced players and the players remaining have relatively little or sporatic hours of playtime. We have one of the toughest schedules in the nation – ranked fourth most difficult by calculation of last years winning percentage of our opponents. We play no less than 6 teams that are projected to be in the top 25 in the nation; but not being there ourselves. Under the circumstances I feel that Steel’s projection that we would finish in the top one half of the Pac Ten is giving the Bruins more than the benefit of the doubt.

I would feel that we have done well if we win 5 games and stay in the games we lose. This is possible, maybe 6 or 7 in my opinion if Olson returns, stays healthy and performs the way that he is capable, the offensive line can perform eqeally as well as our very good running backs and the defense is as good as last year (all possible.)

by northbaybruin on Jun 12, 2008 7:38 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I would say

TN (T)
BYU (W)
Cal (T)
U-dub (T)

Finally, I hate to say it but let’s be realistic here. I expect the TrOJays to win but I think this game is winnable if the team is 1) pumped up and 2) having a better season than expected. I think the college game has a lot more to do with coaching and motivation. I think our coaches have this in spades. I guess we will have to see what develops.

by Bruins102NCAA on Jun 12, 2008 11:20 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bruins Nation, an unofficial daily online scrap book covering the greatest collegiate athletic program in the nation. GO BRUINS.
Start posting about the Bruins »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Morrell_small
Wildcat and the UCLA Running Game
Ucla_small
Everyone needs to calm down about Ben Ball
Trojanssuck_small
An Angel in the Defensive Backfield
Small
UCLA at Washington State: A memory
13-9_ucla_baby____036_small
Videos from Washington/UCLA Football Game!

Recent FanPosts

Small
My two game season starts tonight
Small
Have You Been Watching Darren?
2603_1028618641249_1398823305_30086007_6195771_n_small
Trying to Keep the Mojo Going
Bruinsnation_small
Ben Ball Roundup: Gameday Notes
Brad_pitt_as_achilles_small
SI Poll: They Like Us, They Really Like Us ... sort of ...
Bruinsnation_small
Colorado Interviewing Karl Dorrell To Be Their Next Head Coach?
Images_small
Bruins Find Bats As Blue-Gold World Series Game 2 Goes To The Blues
Small
"Carroll and Kiffin and Sark"
Bruinsnation_small
A Note Re. Evoking CHP (Con Artist/Sleazebag) To Criticize Howland

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS


Managers

094_small Ajax

Bruinsnation_small Nestor

Menelaus2_small Menelaus

Arron_afflalo1_small Tydides

Brad_pitt_as_achilles_small Achilles

Small Meriones

Telemachus_small Telemachus

Small Odysseus

Blue_bellerophon_small Bellerophon

Authors

Images_small Ryan Rosenblatt

Official Partner of CBS Sports