Bruins Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: Check out our NFL Scoreboard: scores, schedule and blogs Bar-right-arrows



Tom Hansen To Retire- What's Next?

Pac 10 Commisioner Tom Hansen will retire following the 2008-2009 season after 26 years on the job. From Fox Sports:

Hansen will step down effective July 1, 2009. Pac-10 teams won 204 NCAA championships during his time running the league and he has seen the emergence of Pac-10 football and basketball in recent years - including men's basketball being widely considered the strongest conference in the nation this past season.

"It has been a unique opportunity and an honor to be associated with the 10 outstanding institutions of higher education which comprise the Pac-10 Conference," Hansen said. "I want to thank them for the opportunity to be Pac-10 Commissioner."

Hansen is a notorious traditionalist who has nixed a number of changes during his tenure. A number of complaints about Hansen include the lack of exposure for football and basketball (very few games on ESPN and an illogical allegiance to FSN), terrible bowl game arrangements for the conference, packaging the minor sport TV deals with football and not requiring FSN to show games, an allegiance to the Rose Bowl (and resistance to a playoff) and more. Keep in mind that Hansen reports to the university presidents so not everything is in his power.

I've met Hansen a number of times and even sat next to him at last year’s Pac 10 tournament. He’s an extremely nice guy and it’s clear that he cares more about academics than athletics, however his actions as commissioner have also made it clear that he is not very good at his job. There’s a laundry list of issues with the conference and Hansen has done little to fix them. It will be good to see a new person in charge.

The first thing that needs to be done is to stop this allegiance to FSN. I know for a fact that ESPN was preparing an amazing offer to cover Pac 10 football and basketball, but the conference agreed to their deal with FSN without even talking to ESPN. Along those lines, the conference needs to treat their minor sports better. FSN is required to show the Pac 10 Championships for a number of sports, but isn’t required to show a game or two a week. The conference has given FSn the rights to games, but the network is under no obligation to show games.

I’d also like to see the conference develop something similar to ACC Select. ACC select has webcasts of football and basketball games not on national TV and webcasts of minor sports available for a price ($10 per month, $50 for the entire spring). It’d be great if the Pac 10 also had this so our Bruins in exile could watch non-national games online and everyone can watch baseball, softball, soccer, gymnastics, volleyball, etc.

I could go on and on about the faults of the Pac 10, but I’ll end my rant here. If I feel inclined I'll add the rest of my thoughts on things the conference can improve on in a comment.

So with new leadership upon us, take this moment to a) rant about Hansen b) name any potential replacements you've heard of c) talk about some changes you'd like to see made in the future or d) all of the above.

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of BruinsNation's (BN) editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of BN's editors.

5 recs | Comment 14 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Oops

bluestreet beat me to it. Please delete this.

by ryebreadraz on Jun 9, 2008 1:33 PM PDT   0 recs

I like yours better rye

I will see if I can figure out how to delete mine.

by bluestreet on Jun 9, 2008 1:49 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

I think this is a great opportunity for the PAC-10 to shine

I’ve always been appalled at the lack of attention the PAC-10 gets despite its amazing record over the past 20 years. Granted football wasn’t its strongest asset but I think part of that problem has to do with the lack of coverage on terrible stations such as VS and even FSN. The PAC-10 needs recognition and the only way recruits, fans, and players can get and see this attention is by moving in to the national spotlight, and showing the rest of the nation what all these championships mean. I hope the next guy can move in this direction.

by UCLABRU1 on Jun 9, 2008 2:04 PM PDT   0 recs

Nominee

I nominate Mike Garrett for the position. Think of all the changes to rules he could bring.

Of course I am joking.

by artybruin on Jun 9, 2008 3:49 PM PDT   0 recs

Agree re: national playoff in FB

It infuriates me to know that the major blockade to a national championship playoff in FB is the Pac 10/Big 10 devotion to the RB game. Lets move on already. Half way thru our 20 game win streak, we could have beaten anyone in a playoff. Instead, we won a meaningless Cotton Bowl.

by Give me a B... on Jun 9, 2008 9:40 PM PDT   0 recs

A blockade to a playoff

but not a major one. Remember that only one conference was in favor of the 4 team playoff and a 4 team playoff is useless anyways. If the 6 major conference winners aren’t given an automatic spot in a playoff than its just an expanded BCS. You need to be able to earn your way in regardless of people’s opinions and the only way to do that is allow conference winners in.

by ryebreadraz on Jun 9, 2008 9:59 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Yes, but

the contract with the

the contract with the RB and the two conferences extends well beyond the BCS deal by several years. Its going to be a stumbling block in getting all the conferences together into a meaningful system. Especially because Hansen et al have been of the mind that the BCS has burned the Pac 10, and the Pac 10 was better off before. Agree that you need at least the six conference champions; I’d throw in two at larges to keep the WAC, MW and the domers happy. Later, expand to 16 teams. The money generated for the NCAA and the conferences would be huge.

by Give me a B... on Jun 9, 2008 11:19 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Disagree on useless

IMO, I believe a 4 team playoff would be a huge win. Yea, it would essentially be a expanded BCS, but it would be a step in the right direction. Plus, it satisfies the people who believe the regular season is one long playoff while doubling the number of teams with a shot.

But I do believe that 8 teams (6 BCS + 2 at-large) is the ideal setup

by kidro2001 on Jun 10, 2008 6:27 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

I say

good riddance. I’ve heard that Hansen was (along with the commish for the Big 10) one of the biggest proponents of the BCS and staunch opponents to a football playoff. If we could get someone with the guts to get rid of this ridiculous bowl system, I’m pretty confident that the smaller conferences would follow, leaving no choice but to switch.

by Centric on Jun 10, 2008 1:43 AM PDT   0 recs

FB Playoff vs. TV Exposure and New Year's Day Bowl Games

I find it interesting that most of the comments about Hansen are about finally removing a roadblock to a national FB playoff.

I was much less disturbed by that. The real issues to me were (A) seeing Southern Miss- TCU (or something similar) on ESPN, while the Pac-10 was relegated to FSN, and (B) having only one New Year’s Day Bowl Game for the Pac-10.

If the new commish can solve (A) and (B), I say hire him/her now. If the new commish can only solve the FB playoff issue, the Pac-10 will continue to remain less relevant on the national scene than the teams in the conference deserve.

In the interest of full disclosure, I will admit that I don’t really want a FB playoff. I like the Rose Bowl as a goal, instead of the goal being to make the semi-finals. But I would be willing to forego tradition to solve the TV and bowl game issues.

by islandbruin on Jun 10, 2008 6:24 AM PDT   0 recs

The new Commish

To quote a famous person (who’s name eludes me right now, Nestor), the new Commish must have “Testicular Fortitude” when it comes to what is best for the Pac-10.

by artybruin on Jun 10, 2008 9:21 AM PDT   0 recs

The real reason Hansen is retiring

By retiring now, he can keep his promise to the Trojies that the Pac 10 would do nothing resembling an investigation into Messrs. Bush and Mayo. Now, the Pac 10 can act to save face in the national collegiate community while he gets to keep his word of honor.

(cuz these sort of things can never be put down on paper.)

A coach is someone who can give correction without causing resentment. John Wooden

by MexiBruin on Jun 11, 2008 9:06 PM PDT   0 recs

Hansen=Dalis

Visionless bean counter

"when you've seen how big the world is, how can you make due with this?"

by silverlakebruin on Jun 12, 2008 12:24 PM PDT   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bruins Nation, an unofficial daily online scrap book covering the greatest collegiate athletic program in the nation. GO BRUINS.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Lb___dm_in_nd_stadium_small
Musings from Maui
10113_big_small
Chris Joseph Wins Rhodes Scholarship
Telemachus_small
Culture Change

Recent FanPosts

10113_big_small
The Impact of Tonight's Game on Tournament Seeding
Telemachus_small
The Five Days of sUckiness: Thursday
Small
War of Words Between MJD and Lendale White
Ucla-med_small
Please Allow Me to Introduce Myself
Telemachus_small
The Five Days of sUckiness: Wednesday
Small
TV Spot- 5 Reasons Why UCLA will Beat USC
Bruinsnation_small
Fait accompli?
Small
To Punt or Not To Punt?
Telemachus_small
The Five Days of sUckiness: Tuesday
Ucla_small
USC Law Fools

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Managers

094_small Ajax

Bruinsnation_small Nestor

Menelaus2_small Menelaus

Arron_afflalo1_small Tydides

Brad_pitt_as_achilles_small Achilles

Small Meriones

Telemachus_small Telemachus

Small Odysseus

Blue_bellerophon_small Bellerophon

Authors

10113_big_small ryebreadraz

ad

Site Meter