Options For (A Diversified?) Ground Attack
Now that we have discussed the two biggest question marks around the unit, let’s shift our attention towards our running game. To start let’s go back to what Neuheisel and Chow told us back in April:
Neuheisel: "We’re formulating a scheme. I don’t know if it has the moniker that all the trendy offenses have now. I certainly wouldn’t call it Spread or the West Coast. I think where Norm is centered on is just being able to run the ball and protect the ball. It sounds overly simplistic, but if you can do both those things you can force defenses into a position where now big plays are available.
That doesn’t necessarily sound exciting. ‘Run the ball and protect the ball’ sounds very conservative. But I think if you can do both of those things successfully and commit to both of those things, the excitement then comes because the field now opens because you have to stop the run. You will bleed to death if you don’t stop run."
Chow: "We’re going to run the ball. To win in this game, in any league, you have to run the ball. I don’t think we’re going to revolutionize football. We’re going to continue to do things that [Neuheisel] and I know best.
"I think now it is a matter of what skills what kids can do. We’re not going to ask our kids to do something they are not capable of doing. Right now we put in base stuff that will fit just about anything, then we’ll wait and see."
I mentioned in my notes on our QBs about how for Ben Olson (or any other UCLA QB) to become effective they will have to focus on being more of a game manager than a gun slinger. For Ben or any other to become a successful game manager, it will be essential for UCLA to feature a consistent running attack, which hopefully will flourish taking advantage of multiple options (or at least potential of options) available in our depth chart.
So let’s review with what the coaches had to work with at the end of spring football:
| TB | FB |
|---|---|
| 36 Kahlil Bell (6-0, 206, Sr)(5) | 31 Trevor Theriot (6-0, 233, Jr**)(6) |
| 20 Raymond Carter (5-11, 202, Fr.**) |
45 Tobi Umodu (6-0, 235, So**) |
| 42 Chane Moline (6-1, 236, Jr)(1) OR |
|
| 24 Christian Ramirez (6-3, 211, Jr.) | |
| 21 Craig Sheppard (6-1, 193, Jr.**)^ |
** denotes red-shirt
^ denotes walk-on
() indicates number of games started in 06
And here is a look at their stats from last season:
| Name | CAR | YDS | YPC | LONG | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 36 Kahlil Bell |
142 |
795 |
5.6 |
64 |
5 |
| 42 Chane Moline |
55 |
196 |
3.6 |
35 |
1 |
| 24 Christian Ramirez |
19 |
98 |
5.2 |
24 (TD) |
1 |
| 21 Craig Sheppard | 28 | 133 | 4.8 | 20 (TD) | 2 |
In addition to looking at running stats we also need to look at the receiving stats of our backs. We can probably expect Chow to ask his QBs to throw a lot of quick, short passes to our RBs (based on our experience in watching Chow offenses at Southern Cal, NC State and BYU):
| Name | RECS | YDS | AVG | LONG | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 36 Kahlil Bell |
19 | 93 | 7.2 |
34 | 0 |
| 42 Chane Moline | 4 |
20 | 5.0 |
9 |
0 |
| 21 Craig Sheppard |
1 |
5 | 5.0 |
5 |
0 |
| 31 Trevor Theriot |
3 |
11 | 3.7 |
5 |
0 |
Let’s start with Bell who didn’t waste any time sending a signal last season that he was a Pac-10 level running back:
Before his season ended at
That brings us to Raymond Carter, who was a pretty highly recruited 4 star running back out of
Speaking of playmaker and freshmen, let’s talk about two of our freshmen tailbacks. There is Aundre Dean. Instead of describing his playmaking abilities, I will just go ahead and post these highlights that we put up in March (during the heat of Ben Ball season):
Aundre Dean ... Running Back ... Katy Texas from Bobby Gerry on Vimeo
I mean there is not much I need to add to that. Some folks are wondering whether AD will emerge as a starting RB this year. I don’t think he will. However, I do believe that he has the potential to make the same kind of impact as Foster did his freshman season. We will see how that works out.
Along with Dean, Bruins will also welcome Milton Knox into the fold this Fall. As we have written before
But we are not done yet. Let’s get back to some of the returning backs who are currently listed on the depth chart. Christian Ramirez had a great spring camp and he finished off on a nice note during the scrimmage. He started the season at the safety spot last year. He was moved to TB after the injury to Carter and immediately made an impression during the Stanford game. However, he didn’t get another shot following a key fumble against
Speaking of "speed" don't forget about Jonathan "Jet Ski" Franklin, the incoming freshman RB-DB who happens to be a reality TV star. There is a chance Jet Ski could get redshirted because of the options we have at RB and infusion of talents such as Hester and Woods at DB. However, don't be too surprised if Jet Ski finds himself a spot in the special team because of his speed.
At FB Theriot did a serviceable job last season after the injury to Michael Pitre. Right now the position is thin. Tobi Umodu is a converted LB who has never played the position. So, I think it will be interesting to see whether Chane Moline remains at TB, if Dean (and Knox) emerge as viable options right away this Fall. It might not be a bad idea to shift
Speaking of doing an admirable job, Craig Sheppard did just that last season when he had to step up as our running backs were going down towards the end of the season. I imagine he is going to make the youngsters compete hard to take over this position during the Fall Camp. At the very least his game experience from last year will be helpful to the entire unit.
So in conclusion, this is one position our coaches will have options. They will have a lot of young talent at their disposal. If they can put together a diversified running attack featuring fully recovered and healthy crew from last year and blend them in with the talent of the young crew this year, it will a great development for our entire offensive unit. A dependable running attack will allow our QBs to manage the game more efficiently, and more importantly allow Chow to put together his patented schemes keeping the opposing DCs on their heels.
GO BRUINS.
0 recs |
9 comments
Comments
Just a note of thanks,
Nestor, for your incredibly tireless efforts. What a pleasure it is to get up and read posts such as this. Bruin food for thought. Running backs. Quarterbacks. Offensive line. Other sports. Other blogs. Broadcasting.
Phew. I’m tired, just imagining how much time BN consumes. Thank you.
(Not to slight other contributors. Just applauding the ring leader.)
by Bruinut on Jul 19, 2008 9:08 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Great job N
Excellent analysis of our running game, and of our offense overall in your last posts. I thought for a minute there I would have to mention the possibility of moving Chane to FB with the additions of Dean and Knox. But, I’m glad you brought up that point. If Bell and Carter remain healthy, and Dean comes in hungry, I think those 3 would form a solid nucleus at RB. I would rather see Chane in the backfield as FB with either of the 3 as he has the most experience playing offense, and the size and skill to effectively pick up the pass rush, lead block, run, or catch the ball out of the backfield. The analogy to Rathman is dead on and if utilized properly, a Bell/Chane combo can be a deadly part of our offense.
If the depth at RB remains solid, I wouldn’t mind seeing Ramirez switching back to S to provide depth at that position. Granted we do have solid recruits coming in, but his presence back in the secondary would make the competition even more fierce come August.
Franklin would be an interesting look at special teams this year. I haven’t seen any footage of his speed, but with his athleticism and experience as an LB in high school, he could be a gunner on kick offs and punts. Maybe he can even find a place returning kicks. I do like the idea of getting our best talent on the field, no matter where they play.
by Kerckhoff405 on Jul 19, 2008 12:01 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Fantastic
Great post ! Thanks for all the hard work.
I had seen tapes of Aundre Dean, but not Milton Knox. What a treat. Great analysis.
Leave it to the “Zen Master” Chow and “Tricky Ricky” to congur up some great offensive strategies not found in any books. I LIKE IT !!
by northbaybruin on Jul 19, 2008 2:04 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Fantastic
“Conjure” for goodness sakes.
by northbaybruin on Jul 19, 2008 2:16 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
FROM AN NFL PROSPECTIVE - THERIOT IS THE THREAT
A huge miss by Bruin Nation on Theriot. The best all round big back in the Pac 10, most experienced for the Bruins, best pure big back fullback combo is returning 13 games starter Trevor Theriot. Has anyone here seen Theriot carry the ball? One of the most prolific hole making speedsters we have in the backfield. Theriot touts 4.5 speed at 240 weight and is a projected top 6 rounds draft pick 2010.
Chane Moline will never, and we have said this for 2 years, ever play fullback. Can we get that straight?
Theriot scored big in the spring game and FINALLY, Norm Chow is the answer to Theriot carrying at least 6 times per game next year out of the running back and full spot. Hester from LSU went top 3 rounds NFL. Theriot is better than Hester.
13 games last year – no carries. Part of the reason Dorrell got ousted. First Spring Game, only rushing touchdown, Theriot – big back. All Pac 10 Academic and why is he so good? Size, speed, smarts. Theriot also by NFL standards and combine tests now – top 5% in the nation for all backs.
Hobbs
Redding CA, Bruin Boosters/Sports Writer
by jameshobbs on Jul 20, 2008 9:22 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Not so fast Hobbs
Not everyone on BN overlooked your boy Theriot. Like I said before:
Yes, our OL is weak, but it does help our blocking schemes that we have a very good, very experienced pair of guys (Paulsen and Theriot) on the field who know how to pick up a blitz.
Now, I agree, Theriot has got legit skills and is a solid talent for us in the backfield. That said, the reason he really wasn’t hashed out here is, I think, exactly because of our rather thin OL. So while BN wasn’t giving him the love you’d like, I think it’s because a lot of people recognize if our ground attack is going to be effective, we’re going to need Theriot leading the way, creating holes, because, let’s be real, our OL is going to have real trouble with that this year.
Also, a “projected top 6 rounds draft pick” in 2010 isn’t going to sell anyone here. So, basically, all you’re saying is he’s good enough to not be drafted in the last round, two drafts from now. Future draft order and projections are pure speculation, plain and simple. I agree Theriot has a lot of talent and will absolutely key for us in ensuing our running game is effective, but speculative draft position isn’t the strongest indicator of talent.
Finally, I don’t see why Moline couldn’t play fullback. He’s listed at 236, which, last I checked, is four points lighter than the 240 you list for Theriot. If Moline puts on a bit more weight, I see no reason he couldn’t be an effective FB like Hester. Bear in mind our second-string FB is a converted LB. Depth is going to be an issue at FB and considering the abundance of young running back talent we have coming in, I don’t see why we couldn’t move Moline to FB if Theriot goes down with injury.
Simply saying he can’t doesn’t make it true. So until you give some reasons, I’ll never “get that straight” although I’d like to hear your thoughts on it.
by norcald503 on Jul 20, 2008 10:56 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well said
What is readily evident on the use of Theriot is that Theriot has not been utilized at the deeper back spot to allow for our testing of big back speed. Theriot is a legit 4.5 and top 5 fastest on the team last year for 20 yards. As a former coach and now writer with a focus on finding the weak uses on teams – Theriot was a blatant misuse of talent last year and the biggest gripe is, and maybe you can answer it, why has not Theriot ever once in practice or in game been tested at the single back deep I spot? Now on Moline, if you go Moline at full you must know that Moline is not a prolific blocker. Thus, if you are saying Moline be put at full to run? Why, Theriot from what we have seen as a big back is as effective with the ball if we go on only what we have seen and that is films from recruting at NHHS where Theriot was a one year wonder at tailback having never played the spot before. My question is this, one carry, one touchdown – why not let the big back run? Next, Theriot was rated as a 95% performer last year on blocking. Scout Back today rates him to be the best blocker out of multiple sets in the PAC 10. So, I guess the use of the word “serviceable” begs more definition. Now, what I would like to see is Theriot and Moline in the same backfield once in awhile.
by jameshobbs on Jul 20, 2008 12:26 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I think they were once.
(Theriot and Moline being in the backfield together). Well once that I remembr if my memory serves me correctly. It was late in the second BYU game on a fourth and 1 or so. It was obviously supposed to be a power run. It was a 2 TE set with Theriot blocking for Moline. But with all those short yardage situations Moline played in Theriot must have blocking in several of them.
PS If you were wondering what happened on the 4th down, we got it; but it was called back because of an illegal formation. I think one of the TE’s was covered on the line.
by Ewdtrey on Jul 20, 2008 12:43 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Yep
Yep, you are right. I missed that game but saw the film.
It will be interesting how many deep formations Theriot carries this year. Just to test out what we saw in 2004 at the Shrine Game.
by jameshobbs on Jul 20, 2008 12:54 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 


















