IOC: The Same Sad Story
The Olympics are supposed to be about sportsmanship and honest competition. At a time when our faith in the purity of athletic endevors is supposed to be renewed, we are once again reminded of the ugliness lurking in the shadows, and the incompetent and toothless organization that enables this behavior. No, not the NCAA, although this description could just as easily apply to them, but the International Olympic Committee.
It is precisely because the NCAA has been so absolutely negligent in addressing the elephant in the room that I find this behavior intolerable, and with the IOC, it is the same sad pathetic story. Imagine my surprise when I found myself in lockstep with a former hitman on our basketball legacy:
Jacques Rogge is so bought, so compromised, the president of the IOC doesn’t have the courage to criticize China for telling a decade of lies to land itself these Olympic Games.
All the promises made to get these Games — on Tibet, Darfur, pollution, worker safety, freedom of expression, dissident rights — turned out to be phony, perhaps as phony as the Chinese gymnasts’ birthdates Rogge was way too slow to investigate.
One of the most powerful men in sports turned the world away from his complicity. Instead, he has flexed his muscles by unloading on a powerless sprinter from a small island nation.
Wetzel is talking about Rogge's criticism of Usain "Lightning" Bolt regarding his celebration during one of his races. While I am somewhat ambivalent about his showboating, I don't see Mr. Rogge pointing out that the rest of the field would have done the exact same thing in his position. How do I know this? Because the silver and bronze medal winners were hamming it up on the track as well. 3 for 3 is a pretty damning sample size.
So what? What does this have to do with UCLA? Replace Rogge with Miles Brand, China with SUC Football, small island nation with Donnie Edwards or even John Wooden (contacting Kevin Love). It's the same sad story. And in this sad story, we may have a depressing glimpse of the future: Rogge attempting some terrible slight of hand by criticizing Bolt, for gestures that no one else seemed to be offended by.
American sprinter Shawn Crawford, who crossed the line fourth in the 200 but was upgraded to the silver medal after the disqualifications of Wallace Spearmon and Churandy Martina, said he saw nothing wrong in Bolt's showboating celebrations.
"I guess there's mixed feelings among athletes," he said. "To me, I don't feel like he's being disrespectful. If this guy has worked his tail off, every day, on his knees throwing up like I was in practice, he deserves to dance."
In our analogy, let's say this is Brand coming down "hard" on SUC's already decrepit basketball program due to the OJ2 Scandal. He'll go for the low hanging fruit and hope that it is enough to satisfy the masses.
I hope Mr. Brand is watching carefully, because the end of Wetzel's piece puts him on notice (with the appropriate parallels applied):
Apparently, Rogge would prefer 12-year-old gymnasts too frightened to crack a smile.
It got better when, in the same press conference, he pretended to forget all the lies China (SUC) told him to get this bid, all the troubles, all the challenges, and praised the host nation. Yes, these have been an exceptionally well-run Games from a tactical standpoint, and the Chinese people have displayed otherworldly kindness.
None of which denies the promises broken (recruiting violations), the innocent jailed (assault, rape, roids), the freedoms denied (FREE HOUSES FOR REGGIE BUSH) — the kind of issues someone with Jacques Rogge’s (Miles Brand's) standing should be talking about.
He has no spine for that. Not for China (SUC). Not for any big country (football moneymaker). He had to criticize someone (Wooden), he had to make headlines, he had to show he was a tough guy (SUC Basketball?). So who better than someone from somewhere that can’t ever touch him back?
Yes, Usain Bolt is the problem of the Olympics. He’s the embarrassment. He’s the one who needs to learn.
Why do we have rules if no one is willing to enforce them? Why would anyone play by the rules at all? China sure doesn't. Neither does SUC. And the honest programs are left in the lurch.
(And the similarities keep on coming. The IOC has "ordered an investigation" into China's 12-year-old gymnasts. Given Rogge's Brand-like behavior so far, where do you think this "investigation" is going to go?)
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of BruinsNation's (BN) editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of BN's editors.
6 recs |
17
comments
Read Related
Comments
Usain
is absolutely entertaining. he’s representing his country, being lively, and most importantly, he’s not desecrating any other nation. he’s not doing anything obscene, and not putting down other athletes, he’s just amped. Rogge is trying to use Bolt as his means to look like he’s laying down the law, and intolerant of any sort of negativity, and that’s a damn shame.
by deepdish on Aug 21, 2008 9:07 PM PDT 0 recs
His complaints ring hollow
Given the culture of permissiveness that he has created. I don’t know if he even realizes how hypocritical he sounds. Wetzel mentions in his piece that Bolt has saved the post-Phelps games, and I’m inclined to agree. Imagine how anti-climatic the whole thing would be without him after an 8 gold medal performance.
by Tydides on
Aug 21, 2008 10:00 PM PDT
up
0 recs
I think that if basketball wasn’t shown in the middle of the night on a cable channel, that would be the sport that saves the post-Phelps games. To me, watching the US team pound the other teams by 30 points a game never gets old. The highlight reel dunks are a blast to watch.
Just a thought… the Olympics wouldn’t be the Olympics if there weren’t any gymnastics controversy. In 2002, Romania admitted that they used underage gymnasts during the 2000 games. I’m curious, would there be as much controversy and anger among the people here if it were a country like Romania, a democratic country, cheating today then if it were a communist country like China? In 2004, who can forget the gymnastics controversy that almost cost Paul Hamm his medal? This time around, the controversy just happens to surround China. If it wasn’t China and underage gymnasts, there probably would’ve been something else. lol
Keep in mind that it’s not Rogge’s IOC that will be doing the investigating, so to criticize him is probably unfair. His main job is just to pick a site and get all the sports bodies – FIG, FIBA, FIFA, etc- there. It’s the independent sports bodies that does the investigating and they make up their own rules, and then they present their findings and recommendations to the IOC, who then act on those recommendations. This is very different from how the NCAA is run. The FIG is conducting this investigation and while I’m glad something is being done about this quite blatent violation, the FIG is notorious for some really bad judgements, including the storm of controversy they caused during the 2004 Olympics and the inclusion of the current tiebreaker rules.
by chenalex on
Aug 21, 2008 10:26 PM PDT
up
0 recs
For me, it's not about the country
It’s that they are blatantly cheating right in front of everyone’s faces, kind of like another place we all know. For them to come out and tell the world that they don’t know what a 16 year old girl looks like is insulting to the intelligence of the seeing public. In this context, I don’t even mention the judging, which I do have misgivings about but does not fit with the message here. And I’m not buying that just because the FIG is the investigative body that the IOC has no say in whether they should conduct an investigation. As long as the IOC has jurisdiction over who gets the medals, they have the trump card, and therefore the responsibility to make sure that their games are clean. That’s why the analogy is apt. The NCAA has the kill switch. So does the IOC. Should the FIG do a faux investigation, then they too are complicit, and just as guilty as the IOC.
by Tydides on
Aug 21, 2008 11:37 PM PDT
up
0 recs
absolutely right.
In spite of the incredible presentation of the Olympics, the Chinese, I feel, have been acting as if they’re untouchable. They seem to figure that they have so many of their citizens already under their control, they have mind-blowing facilities, and they’ve reneged on all the “promises” they had to make just to get the games, so i think they figured that nothing would get officially scrutinized. they’ve already declared “victory” in their local presses.
by deepdish on
Aug 22, 2008 12:02 AM PDT
up
0 recs
hrmm
http://sports.yahoo.com/olympics/beijing/gymnastics/news?slug=ap-gym-underagechinese&prov=ap&type=lgns
they can’t seem to find anything wrong, and can’t understand why everyone is thinking otherwise.
by deepdish on Aug 22, 2008 1:16 AM PDT 0 recs
I sent a comment to Wetzel on this
I likened the ncaa and the olympic versions thereof to Sgt. Schultz – I see nothing! We’ll see if it gets published.
by Fox 71 on Aug 22, 2008 6:58 AM PDT 0 recs
when it comes to taunting your competitors
and looking at them before the race is over, staring back at them as you are about to win, Rogge is right. Ato Boldin even said some of the other sprinters, I think an older one who was maybe retired, told him to cut it out. He ended up curtailing it during the 200 and showed more class during the post-race talk with the nbc interview reporter.
As for the end of the Wetzel piece and Rogge praising the host nation and forgetting all the lies, presently the IOC is launching an investigation now that they might have proof into the age of one of the female gymnasts.
by bruin95 on Aug 22, 2008 11:11 AM PDT 0 recs
Might as well do away with the 100m then
The short events always attract the flamboyant characters. We had guys that night flopping around on the track and taking victory laps for getting silver and bronze. As for not celebrating in the 200, Michael Johnson’s world record that everyone thought was going to stand for decades was in the balance. Rogge’s comments came after the 200, so clearly that had no bearing on Bolt’s performance. Might as well criticize a dog for barking. Strutting and preening and wearing gold shoes is what sprinters do. I’m sure it’s mere coincidence that Rogge is suddenly outspoken about this age old issue when he’s under fire for bending over and turning a blind eye to the host country.
Call me when the investigation results in justice being served. Until then, we’re looking at another dog and pony show. To reveal evidence of wrongdoing is for the IOC to admit that they dropped the ball earlier. I for one am not holding my breath. They have a choice between their integrity and their judgment. My guess is that since no one respects their integrity, they figure they might as well protect the charade that they have good judgment, which means that the evidence will be “inconclusive” and nothing will be done.
The investigation is a good start, but as Wetzel says, it’s a long way from addressing all the lies and broken promises from China. These were problems brewing from long before China decided to cheat in gymnastics, when those same gymnasts still had all of their baby teeth (which a couple are evidently still in the process of losing).
by Tydides on
Aug 22, 2008 12:03 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Mixed feelings
about Bolt’s showboating. On the one hand, I can see the utter joy in his whole body, not to mention the surprise that no one is with him as he nears the finish of the 100.
On the other hand, I’m not down with taunting. Respect your opponents and all that. Moreover, I’m disappointed that I didn’t get to witness what would have been a Bob Beamon moment, had he run through. Instead of lowering the world record by a hundredth or two, he would have shaved an unbelievable tenth or two right off the top.
Bolt said he didn’t care about the WR; he just wanted to win gold. For me, it’s a shame he didn’t want to perform to the best of his own abilities, as Coach would have him do.
They have a choice between their integrity and their judgment. My guess is that since no one respects their integrity, they figure they might as well protect the charade that they have good judgment, which means that the evidence will be "inconclusive" and nothing will be done.
Brilliant. I’m not going to take that bet.
by Bruinut on
Aug 22, 2008 1:10 PM PDT
up
0 recs
IOC "launching an investigation"?
That just reinforces the point Tydides made.
I have as much faith in these goober’s ability to “investigate” China as much I have in Brand’s ability to punish SuC.
by UniversityofSecondChoice on
Aug 22, 2008 1:08 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Well, it seems that the IOC is making at least a concerted effort to gather documents that the Chinese government probably has little to no control over – Rogge mentioned that he had requested family books. I don’t know if Americans have them, but it’s basically a record of everybody who’s ever lived and when they were born in your family. I’m surprised that Rogge asked for them because, in Chinese culture, that’s pretty secretive. That’s like asking to read someone’s diary. I didn’t even know my family had one until my grandfather died and they pulled it out and made a ceremony out of writing in his death at the funeral. Rogge also said that he asked for school records. So I guess if he wants to investigate, he’s at least making an effort to do it right.
I think what most westerners don’t realize is that Asian girls raised in China or Taiwan are naturally smaller – their diets are different. They drink way less milk, eat less seafood and dairy products, and mostly eat vegetables… and that’s for the rich people too and those foods have hormones essential to growth and development. It’s not that they can’t afford meat, but I’m not going to eat escargot often even if I can afford it, you know? Eating meat is not a big part of their culture. Thus they develop at least 2 or 3 years later than girls raised in Europe or the US, and in gymnastics, they always pick the smallest girls to compete, and thus that’s probably why they look underage. My cousin got away with buying the kid’s ticket at Disneyland until she was 16, so I wouldn’t be entirely doubtful that the girls are of legal age to compete.
by chenalex on
Aug 25, 2008 10:32 AM PDT
up
0 recs
No Fly Zone
One girl was losing her baby teeth. That would be questionable even for a 14-year-old. 14-year-olds wear braces to correct the permanent teeth that have already come in. Last I heard, they were parsing over the same BS documents that the Chinese government forged to sneak them into this competition in the first place. Sounds more like a reaffirmation than an investigation to me.
As a contrast, look at the Little League World Series (Congrats to Waipio, those kids make me proud). The kids from Japan looked older than the Chinese gymnasts, and they’re legitimately 12 or 13, even the little 4’ 11" kids they had on the team looked older. The China/SUC and IOC/NCAA parallels become more similar by the day.
by Tydides on
Aug 25, 2008 11:04 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Wetzel Is Right
The attack on Bolt is just stupid, and it’s not even a decent effort at distraction. Usain has every right to dance, wiggle and bounce like Tigger over that finish line if he wants to—he put in the work, the sweat and the sacrifice, he is the fastest man in the world, and he is an absolute joy to watch. I don’t want to see an athlete who can do what he does not get giddy and celebrate—that would be a tremendous disappointment to me.
As for the gymnasts, I don’t think anyone sincerely believes all of those girls were 16. But, Nastia Liukin said (regarding He’s age), “She is an excellent athlete no matter how old she is. She put in the work. She deserves it.” Nastia also “felt that the third-place finisher, Yang Yilin of China, received the most unfair scores, lower than she deserved.”
IMHO, I think Nastia’s perspective on this should be taken into consideration and appreciated for what it really is—true sportsmanship.
Love My Bruins
by Bruingirl83 on Aug 25, 2008 1:20 PM PDT 0 recs
Here's the thing
In the end, I think had China put forth real 16-year-olds, I bet they still would have won that team competition. We did enough to screw up ourselves such that we can’t have complaints about judging, unless their 16-year-olds are so vastly inferior to their underaged gymnasts which I doubt. I think Liukin knows this as well. As a competitor, you want to beat the best, and I’m sure Liukin, Johnson, and Co. wanted to compete against the best regardless of age.
HOWEVER, the rules are there, and while you can argue the merit of the rule, you are still expected to comply. To not enforce the rules is to unbalance the playing field, and breaking of the rules should result in disqualification. End of story. I sure as hell wouldn’t be happy when I was playing Water Polo if my opponent was spotted a 1 goal lead in the beginning. The IOC is setting a horrendous precedent here and it is a sad day for sport and fair competition when we sit back and accept state sponsored cheating.
by Tydides on
Aug 25, 2008 2:38 PM PDT
up
0 recs
IOC
All anyone has to do is remember the Basketbal fiasco when Russia “beat” the USA after being given opportunities to score after time had run out 2 or 3 times. That’s all I need to know about the “judgement” and “integrity” of the IOC..
It is still one of the most shameful episodes in Olympic history.
by artybruin on Aug 26, 2008 10:51 AM PDT 0 recs
A travesty
What few remember about this incident, is that it was the head official from FIBA who has the clock reset the last time, although he had no authority under the FIBA rules to make that call.
One of the officials for the game refused to sign the score sheet, which should have invalidated the result. The US protest was denied by a straight Cold War vote (3-2) (Italy and Puerto RIco voted for the US protest, Poland, Cuba, and Hungary voted against the protest)
Bob O. (Signholder #3)
by TuneMan7 on
Aug 26, 2008 12:57 PM PDT
up
0 recs













