Bruins Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: Check out our NFL Scoreboard: scores, schedule and blogs Bar-right-arrows



spread the word

Additional Big Picture Thoughts After Saturday

Before we pivot to Arizona I wanted to get few more thoughts out of the way and throw up for discussion re. Saturday’s game, so that we can look to Arizona game with somewhat of a clean slate. I specifically want to talk about injury issues, instant gratification, and the so called network we had to watch the debacle this past Saturday afternoon.

Injury Issues

Let’s start with the topic of injury. There is no escaping from it. We have only had two games and yet we now have bruised and battered football team, going back to all the injuries from fall and spring camp. Byujim, a BYU fan who was gracious in his post game comment here on BN wondered about our strength and conditioning department. Michelleucla60 offered up the following post re. Mike Linn, our new S&C coach under  Neuheisel:  

I have known Mike Linn the s&c for 17 years, he was previously our s&c until Dorrell came on board, in 2002. So for byujim to blame him for what happened in regards to how our players are conditioned is a gross mistake. Anyone can ask Brigaham Harwell how much better condition he is in since Mike came back, he will tell you and I was at the first Bruin Touchdown Club breakfast on Aug 29th when he said that had lost weight and was in the best playing shape he’s been in since he came to UCLA. Anyone who follows football knows that no matter what kind of condition you are in injuries can and will happen no matter what you do. It’s just the nature of the game, it’s a tough game, injuries happens to the best of them. I think CRN who has known Mike as long as I have the same 17 years or more, knew what he was doing when he brought Mike back, that he was getting the best s&c out there for his team. Just ask any of the players how he has changed the way they work out compared to the previous s&c. We have to remember that we still have to wade thru all the problems from the past 5 years before we get to where we want to be.

Not only I agree with Michelle, I will also throw up couple of more points on this. First it is a little premature to come to any conclusion re. UCLA’s S&C program under the new regime only two games into RN’s first year at UCLA.

Secondly, perhaps there is another explanation for UCLA players getting injured at such an alarming rate in last few years. I think it’s worth discussing whether it is tied to our mediocre recruiting efforts in last several years (not counting last year’s class, which has as has been discussed ad nausea was previous regime’s best class in its fifth season at UCLA). It takes special caliber of athletes to compete at the highest level of D-1 football.  It takes special caliber of athletes to withstand the punishment and hits.

Instead of wondering about our S&C program, the correct question would be whether UCLA has recruited tough athletes who have the ability to withstand constant and brutal physical punishment at this level in last five years? This is where Neuheisel’s challenge is going to be enormous. People with good reasons have raised question about his ability to put together tough football teams given how his teams at UDub and at CU had a tendency to become “soft.” Well, if CRN achieves success in next 3-4 years in putting together a tough, well disciplined football team, no one is going to diminish that by pointing it as doing it with Dorrell’s recruits. It will be up to Neuheisel and his new staff to recruit tough, physical athletes who can stand the punishment not just in the Pac-10 but from great teams in the mid major conferences. As mentioned before that process of culture change will take time and it is somewhat foolish to expect dramatic changes in areas such as S&C in just two games into RN’s first season.

Looking For Instant Gratification

Speaking of expecting dramatic changes it’s not a surprise given that we live in a world of instant gratification, we have seen some people already jumping ship, calling out all the coaches as “gutless” while doing the same thing on giving up on the team. Again let me share couple of data points re two coaches in our conference.

I will start with Jeff Tedford, the coach up at Cal, who I have a lot of respect for in terms of how he has built a program. Tedford inherited a 1-10 program from Tom Holmoe in 2001 and went on to put together a 7-5 season in Berkeley in his first year in 2002, which became the foundation of his current program. Now go back and take a look at that. It featured a 3-1 start with an OOC scheduled that featured Baylor, New Mexico State, Michigan State and Air Force. His first loss was against Air Force. He won against Michigan State which turned out to be a very mediocre 4-8 program that season. Tedford went 4-4 during rest of the Pac-10 including a nail biting win over Toledo’s UCLA up in Berkeley, which IIRC was one of the most mismanaged games during Toledo’s final years at UCLA (failing to come up no points with a first and goal in the closing mins which would have tied the game … but hey whatever).  But don’t forget who Tedford had at his disposal. He had a senior QB in Kyle Boller to work with in his first year at UCLA. Kyle turned out to be an NFL caliber talent (he started for couple of seasons and was arguably lot more than an also ran/journey man QB who got a “cup of coffee” in practice squads). Compare that to what RN has had to work with to date at UCLA.

And then there is of course Pete Carroll. We have mentioned this already before. But it’s worth bringing up again. PC started at Southern Cal in 2001. He inherited a roster that included Carson Palmer, Kareem Kelly, Justin Fargas, Kenechi Udeze, Shaun Cody and Troy Polamalu. How did PC get started at Southern Cal with that kind of sick talent? He started with a record of 1-4. That’s right 1-4, including two home losses against Kansas State and Stanford in his first three games at the Mausoleum. He did all that with Carson Palmer playing QB. To PC’s credit he finished the regular season strong thanks to the talent on his roster but still laid an egg against Utah in a bowl game against Vegas, ending his first year with a record of 6-6.

So really people … for those who got a little bit delusional after our first stirring win against Tennessee, let’s get a grip and come back to reality with a little perspective. I will stick to what I said this off season. If this team given the huge gaping holes in our roster and its schedule which is one of the toughest in the conference manages to win 5-6 games, it will be nothing short of a miracle and a testament to the efforts of this coaching staff.

The sane among us expected this team to start 0-2. We are 1-1. So we are kind of doing ok and will be back in business if we come back, respond and show some fight at the Rose Bowl on Saturday.

No doubt this will be the toughest challenge in CRN’s career to date either as a player or a coach. However, given what he has gone through in his professional career last few years, we have seen his ability to bounce back and redeem himself through grinding out and hard work, and taking advantage of opportunities when they show up. I wouldn’t bet against him in getting this program to get back on track following Saturday.

Versus

Lastly, before I put Saturday out of mind, I have a request for UCLA folks in the Morgan Center. Never, ever agree to any scheduling arrangements in future, which would entail broadcasting UCLA games on a joke network such as “Versus.” Versus broadcast yesterday and previously have been total disgraces at every level.  Where to start? From its clueless announcers, to its joke sideline “reporter” (who couldn’t provide any legit updates on injured players) to its awful camera angles and audio arrangements, it was an utter, complete, painful disaster. I have seen more enjoyable high school games on local cable television than what we have been subjected to on Versus last couple of years. It was a total abomination.

Anyway, we will turn our attention to Arizona next, who will also come into the Rose Bowl in a desperation mode following its loss against New Mexico. But the game will present an opportunity for our entire team to respond and move forward with the immense rebuilding project , which we all know and love as UCLA football.

GO BRUINS.

 

0 recs | Comment 29 comments | Digg!

Read Related

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Versus

I was kind of glad that Versus showed this thumping, to limit the exposure. Far better to have Tennessee on ESPN and BYU on Versus than the other way around.

Isn’t the problem more with the Mountain West conference? From the promotions that were run during Saturday’s game, it sounds like Versus is the provider of choice for MWC teams. If I were a BYU fan, I would be upset to have this second rate network (as you, Nestor, rightly pointed out) showing the games of a team making a run at a BCS bowl.

This brings up a question. When UCLA plays an out of conference game, who controls the TV rights- the home team or the away team? If it is the home team, it is not clear what the folks at Morgan could do other than not play games in Utah (which has been suggested in other posts, given recent results).

Any word on the Pac-10 commissioner search? As was mentioned when Hanson retired, the Pac-10 TV coverage for all sports is woeful. Versus we are not, but FSN is only one step above.

by islandbruin on Sep 15, 2008 6:20 AM PDT   0 recs

The away team always controls TV rights

The only way UCLA could’ve avoided playing BYU on Versus was not playing at BYU.

by gilbert on Sep 15, 2008 11:27 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Agreed, on multiple points...

If we win 5-6 games it will be a success in my book. Everyone should have expected this season to be beyond difficult given the empty cupboard thanks to Dorrell…

As far as Versus, wow…Their coverage last years was horrible and it is still horrible. Nothing like missing plays, I remember at least 3, because the director is either clueless and is showing the reply too long or has the wrong camera activated…Sadly I think we are stuck with Versus as I think it is a PAC-10 contract…

All hail the Mighty Bruins, conquerers of troy!

by seernst on Sep 15, 2008 7:26 AM PDT   0 recs

Versus

is contracted with MWC. They get the rights to televise games wherein a MWC team is at home against other non-MWC teams. The Pac 10 really, really needs to get with ESPN and get some sort of K for both football and basketball. I believe the issue is with FSN and ESPN and who would televise what. They would be battling for dibs on the most attractive match-ups. When it comes to exposure, the SEC has it down pat. They have an entire network (CBS) dedicated to their conference. I wish TBS was still showing college football because their weekly Pac 10 match-up was a good thing for exposure. We’ll see what happens.

by BlueReign on Sep 15, 2008 9:02 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Disaster

I went backpacking this weekend, and came home to what I thought was a disaster. My DVR failed to record the football game! I stomped around the house, tried to blame the kitten, and sulked for 45 mintues. Until, that is, I checked the score in the newspaper. There is a god.

59-0. Embarassing. For the record, I still believe in the coaches, and I think we are going to head in the right direction. I am not jumping ship. But what I really want to know is, what does CRN think of Coach Walker now. 59 points?!?

Ok, so bad offense makes defense tough. But I’m tired of blaming the offense for defensive woes. Everyone in the world knew Max Hall would come out firing, and we did nothing. Thank god we retained Walker, his “recruits” sure played well under his defensive system.

(I didn’t watch the game, so if Walker doesn’t deserve blame please correct me. I just saw the score and jumped to conclusions. Maybe I hold him to a higher standard since he is part of the last administration).

by rfirpo on Sep 15, 2008 8:26 AM PDT   0 recs

it was everything

It wouldn’t be right to point fingers at any particular thing because it was across the board. We were just miserable. But, to be fair to Walker and the defense, they often found themselves starting in the red zone because of turnovers. That’s one of the reasons the score was so high. Turnover. March 20-30 yards. Touchdown. Repeat. We even had turnovers on the kickoff return! Even so, however, I really wish they could’ve made some stops and held BYU to a few FGs. The truth is that it looks like we really need some work on our fundamentals. We lost our composure. After we dug ourselves in a fairly deep hole, I could sense that the players wanted to make some big plays to turn things around, on both sides of the ball. Unfortunately, this just led to turnovers and missed tackles.

Despite this game, I remain optimistic. I think the next few games will say a lot about us as a team. We will either resign as a losing team, or we’ll fight and scrap and pull out some wins. I believe we’ll do the latter. CRN will not give up and I hope that he can convince our players that they shouldn’t either. This is a time for the new players to show their stuff. Time to refill that passion bucket!

by UCLAbruin920 on Sep 15, 2008 8:45 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

That Pounding Makes No Sense

This is the same team we played twice last year and should have beaten twice, but for a missed field goal. We have the same defensive coordinator, a better defensive line and yet we were shredded completely. Turnovers cost us any chance of winning, but 59 points against our defense. It was hard to believe. Keep in mind we had two weeks to prepare. Its just a total head scratcher and horrible for recruiting. I hope they can put it back together for the Pac 10. Go Bruins.

by 75NatChamps on Sep 15, 2008 10:09 AM PDT   0 recs

Not so fast

While you mention that the BYU was “the same team we played twice last year and should have beaten twice, but for a missed field goal,” you forgot to include the fact that we lost 20 starters from last year’s team including two of our top QBs, 3/4 of our secondary and Bruce Davis.

by bluestreet on Sep 15, 2008 10:11 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Versus

Saturday’s game was on Versus because it was at BYU and BYU’s conference (the MWC) has a contract with Versus. That is also why last year’s game at Utah was on Versus. Our schedule is full through the 2011 season and we do not play another MWC conference team so that will not force us to play on Versus again. We do play against Kansas St. and Nebraska so those could end up on Versus because the Big 12 has either 5 or 6 games a season on Versus. We could also end up with a non-conference home game or conference game on Versus because FSN sold 5 games a year to Versus (the same package that used to go to TBS, but was picked up by Versus when TBS decided to buy the MLB package instead). The Pac 10’s deal with Versus is a multi-year deal, however I haven’t been able to find out the exact amount of years.

by ryebreadraz on Sep 15, 2008 11:18 AM PDT   0 recs

I could be wrong,

but did we not play Cal on Versus a couple years ago. Then again, maybe that was TBS.

by rfirpo on Sep 15, 2008 11:26 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Versus has a few Pac-10 games too

Not many, but they have a few. They famously had the USC-Stanford game last year.

by gilbert on Sep 15, 2008 11:28 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Last year we played Cal

on ABC regional. The year before we were in the covered primetime ABC slot and 3 years ago it was on TBS. The Versus contract started last year when TBS opted to buy the MLB contract and discontinue their college football coverage.

by ryebreadraz on Sep 15, 2008 1:21 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

S&C

I agree it is too early to make judgements about the S&C coach, but I am certainly not comfortable with him. When looking at the media guide, we are stacked with excellent proven coaches at almost every level. S&C is one where you read the biography and aren’t sold right away.

This doesn’t mean he won’t be good, but he doesn’t have the track record of success to make me confident.

"when you've seen how big the world is, how can you make due with this?"

by silverlakebruin on Sep 15, 2008 11:28 AM PDT   0 recs

Our Patience will be Tested

It’s clear that the Tennessee win masked some real weaknesses on the Bruins, most notably the O-Line and the team’s overall lack of size. The size difference between the BYU lineman and the Bruins was startling. That said, I was not expecting a 59-point loss.
Obviously, the roster is depleted and it will take RN and his staff several years to restock. And my hope is that will a better conditioning program will lead to fewer injuries and a deeper roster.
It’s fitting that the post referenced Cal’s situation when Tedford took over; I think UCLA will eventually displace Cal and Oregon as the second-best team in the Pac-10. But it will take time. I doubt Tedford took over a team as thin as the Bruins or had to work with a third-string QB and such an inexperienced line. Nor did Tedford (or Carroll for that matter) had to recruit against such a dominate program as in USC.
A 6-6 record would be a tremendous achievement this season, although given the injury situation we’d have to be prepared for something much worst. I am not expecting a quick fix, but I am confident that today’s pain will be worth it in the end.
Go Bruins!

richramus

by richramus on Sep 15, 2008 11:31 AM PDT   0 recs

I couldn't agree with you more.

I sat through that entire game on saturday and took all of the harassment and joking from my friends (none of which are Bruin fans). It’s going to take time, but in the long run it will be worth the wait. This is one Bruin fan that will never jump off this wagon. I hope the same goes for the rest of you.

Go Bruins!

by pudska35 on Sep 15, 2008 1:30 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

The Talent Issue

Nestor hits the nail on the head. When I couldn’t sleep last night, I thought about our talent level and how it just does not compare to the top programs or even to past UCLA programs. In the 80s and 90s, I seem to recall that UCLA always had a handful of studs, those sure-fire NFL players who are going to be drafted on the 1st day of the NFL draft, along with several guys who would make NFL rosters and a bunch solid college contributors—guys who would be recognized for at least honorable All-Pac-10 honors during their careers. The roster was usually rounded out by guys who were good enough athletes to fill in. In the mid-80s we had an embarrassment of riches at QB—Ramsey, Neuheisel, Bono and Norrie overlapped at some point and were followed by Aikman, who was followed by Maddox.

During those years, you probably could have picked an “All-LA” team and it would have included as many Bruins as Trojans. Now, what do we have? Well, let’s compare to USC, which has an embarrassment of riches at every position. Who on our team would start for USC? Certainly no offensive linemen. Our top QB and top RB would probably not be better than 4th string on USC. Our wideouts, though blessed with some positive attributes, would rarely see the field. As USC brought in a true freshman left tackle near the end of Saturday’s blow out win, you could see just how physically gifted USC is up and down the roster. Defensively, we probably have 4 players who would receive significant playing time if they were on USC—Price, Harwell, Carter and Verner. Other than that, I can’t think of any. Our players tend to be much smaller, much slower in comparison.

The talent gulf was evident when we played BYU. Their O-line is enormous. Ours looks like a high school team in comparison. I am not saying that our players lack ability, but they do lack size in comparison to the very good teams in college football. Moreover, although I am no talent scout, I find it hard to believe that many of our current starters will be drafted at all in the NFL, much less on the first day. If I had to guess, I would say that Bell might be the only offensive starter who will be drafted—and that is probably on the second day. Austin and Johnson look good to me, but I suspect that Austin lacks NFL size and Johnson lacks NFL speed to be drafted. None of our offensive linemen seems to have NFL size. Defensively, Price is definitely an NFL player, and Harwell seems to have the size and talent you see in the NFL. Other than that? It’s hard to say. Carter and Verner are talented but may not be big enough to play at the next level. Rahim Moore has the look of a future NFL player. Other than that, I haven’t seen any.

So, to run a tally, we have only one guy who is an all-out stud: Brian Price. We have a few other guys who are solid college contributors and perhaps NFL players. We lack size in comparison to very good teams. We lack the number of “studs” that it takes to compete at a high level every week.

Neuheisel and staff have a large task ahead. They need to get bigger and faster players in an environment where the biggest and fastest all want to go to USC. Perhaps our best shot at getting there involves getting and developing a great QB who can lead the team to performances that are beyond its talent level and in so doing, convinces the world that you can build a winner at UCLA, even in the face of the 1000 pound gorilla that sits in the same city.

by BruinsRule on Sep 15, 2008 1:37 PM PDT   0 recs

Here they come

The whiners, the doubters, the over-analyzers.

The weak-minded, the lazy, the entitled.

I am so proud of this team. Let me tell you something: in nearly every game this season, our players will be outmatched. Every single game, except perhaps Washington State. I am talking on an overall level, not at specific positions. We were thoroughly outmatched even against Tennessee, except in the coaching department. The heart of the players wasn’t outmatched, but their abilities were. And you know what? I think they know this, and yet they come out and play hard every game because they believe in the coaches. If you don’t believe me, look at how ecstatic they were when we beat Tennessee. How often have you seen a QB go up and hug a coach like Craft did? And they played hard against BYU, even if they made some mistakes: just look at how few penalties we had, that is a sign of discipline.

The single, unifying, indisputable goal of this team is not to go to a bowl game or “overachieve”, but to lay down the foundation for a new UCLA dynasty. And the way to do that is to take your licks and keep getting up, to listen to your coaches, to learn how to practice efficiently and to create a positive environment that will entice top recruits to want to come here. Essentially, what the players should be demonstrating is that if these coaches can do “this” with us, imagine what they could do with you and for you. It will take a huge selfless act on their part, but it really is in their benefit anyway. The major, glaring obstacle for these coaches is to NOT LET THEM GIVE UP. And that, my friends, is why CRN keeps repeating his mantra of Relentless Optimism.

CRN will need to do some smart recruiting over the next two years, and to follow in Howland’s footsteps in recruiting winners, not just talent. The kind of players who will get in their teammates’ faces for not working hard enough in practice, for laughing it up on the sidelines during a blowout. I have no interest in the ra-ra “primeval” garbage spewing out from the thugs in the South Central locker room. I want some football players. I want me some Mata Real and some Afflalo…in pads.

It will happen, and I for one will continue to support the coaches and the players. It’s not their fault, really. I am trying to say this without being demeaning, but many of them shouldn’t even be at UCLA. And that is ALL CTS’s fault, bringing in the scraps from the rest of the Pac-10’s recruiting.

CTS had banked his UCLA coaching career on last year’s team. That’s how he recruited, with a one-year outlook. He figured, once he had another fake 10-win season, he’d get his extension and all would be fine. It wasn’t a bad strategy, for that one year…but he forgot about the coaching part, and he sure forgot about what would follow the “magical” season. And now we are left with his Lavinoma-like legacy: no center (OL) and no point guard (QB – even BO wouldn’t have been here if he hadn’t redshirted due to injury). So CRN still has my trust. I still expect no more than 4 or 5 wins this year, a bowl game next year and contending for the Pac-10 in 2010.

LET’S GO!!!

by tasser10 on Sep 15, 2008 1:44 PM PDT   0 recs

Agreed

Thank you, tasser. Despite what some people felt they were seeing during the open thread, I really never saw these guys quit—and God knows, they had every opportunity and reason to quit. They really tried, to the bitter, bitter end. That makes me so proud of them, I don’t really care that much about the lopsided score.

After they beat UT, I wrote that it wasn’t really the win, it was the way they played. Well, here, it wasn’t really the loss, it was the way they tried. They knew they were overmatched, they certainly knew they weren’t as big or as fast, as a group, than BYU’s team. They tried their hearts out, they tried everything, anyway, the same way they tried their hearts out in the one and only game they played previously. They just happened to win that one.

Give me these guys every time. These are Bruins. This is my team.

Love My Bruins

by Bruingirl83 on Sep 15, 2008 3:24 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

tasser 10 and Bruin Rule

Posts like yours … fellas … that’s good stuff … and you should put them up in FanPost section so that more folks can read them. Thanks!

by Nestor on Sep 15, 2008 6:43 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

I hope the team is embarrassed

by that loss. 59-0, that’s lack of effort. It’s embarrassing.

by bruin95 on Sep 15, 2008 9:45 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

It depends

Sure, if there was a lack of effort, that would be embarrassing not just for the players but for the coaches as well. I didn’t see a lack of effort, I really didn’t. I saw a lack of balls bouncing our way, and just a straight up lack of ability.

Are turnovers a lack of effort or are they caused by good defense? Probably a bit of both. I don’t hear anyone hear saying that the other team lacks effort when we are on the receiving end of a turnover, we usually credit the defense. Everything went wrong for us yesterday. And this was far, far less embarrassing than the losses to Utah (unranked, missing players) and Notre Dame (brother please!). We were HEAVY favorites in those games last year. This doesn’t even come close.

by tasser10 on Sep 16, 2008 12:24 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

I just think the attitude and effort is still

bad from the previous regime. Do you know we’re dead last in the country in run-offense? Come on, o-line, throw and hold a block, find a seam. The coaches I’m sure had a great game plan for BYU and they give up 59 and don’t score at all?

by bruin95 on Sep 16, 2008 2:06 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

I still disagree

And I think you still don’t get it. We don’t actually have an offensive line. Not only are they small…they’re actually not even real offensive linemen! I’m sorry, but it doesn’t matter if you have the best coaching staff in the universe when you are simply physically overmatched. You can make up for that in the skill positions, but not in the trenches.

by tasser10 on Sep 17, 2008 10:20 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

We'll just have to agree to disagree

Our line is made up of one DT, Savage and one reserve d-lineman in Jess Ward. The rest are recruited centers, tackles and guards. Chandler was back at tight end for BYU. I think the more we make excuses(balls not bouncing our way, lack of ability), the more chances we get beat and shut out. Give a better effort, don’t make so many mistakes, execute the coaches’ game plan and do better.

by bruin95 on Sep 17, 2008 11:17 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

What mistakes did the OL make?

If you consistently can’t open holes for running backs, that’s not a “mistake”. It just means you aren’t strong enough to push the defensive lineman out of the way. Fumbles, interceptions, missed field goals, yes, those are mistakes. Getting pushed around by bigger, stronger opponents, is not a mistake or an excuse.

Anyway, I don’t want to go around in circles here. I am pretty sure the coaches know who gave enough effort and who didn’t. I can see Palcic getting red in the face, and as we’ve seen he is not cutting the o-line any slack.

by tasser10 on Sep 17, 2008 1:09 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Versus

I knew we were in trouble when the announcer gave BYU the advantage on altitude and the sun. I can understand altitude, but the sun? I figured with that comment it was maybe cloes to 100 degrees in Provo. Oh no, I was 70 degrees. Apparently the sun does not rise in Westwood..

by lil eg not cs on Sep 15, 2008 1:45 PM PDT   0 recs

Thanks for the perspective, Nestor.

As for Versus, their coverage was minimally competent. Unfortunately, I was able to see just about everything that happened with more than adequate clarity. Better coverage wouldn’t have helped how I felt very much. From the relentlessly efficient opening drive to the last few unnecessary scores, I could only sit in astonishment, wondering where the Bruin team that managed to beat Tennessee had gone. I still can’t rationalize the dissonance between game 1 and game 2. So I think we still have a lot to learn about this group of Bruins. I think how we respond to this week’s challenge will tell us a lot. Don’t get me wrong. I am 110% behind these coaches and this team. They don’t deserve any cheap shots and they won’t get any from this fan. I thought we’d win four games, NOT including a win over Tennessee, so from my perspective, things aren’t that bad. As always, go Bruins!

by ReineSeite on Sep 15, 2008 6:42 PM PDT   0 recs

Additional Perspective

In 1993, I attended a game at the Rose Bowl where the visitors came in and just played horribly. They couldn’t do a thing right that day; they’d turn the ball over deep in their own territory, we’d score, and they’d fumble it back to us on the kickoff to give us another easy score. Things just kept snowballing out of control.

When all was said and done, we posted a 68-14 victory.

The opponent? BYU, of course! BTW, they regrouped enough that year to go 6-6 and made it to a bowl game.

Point being, this stuff happens sometimes and we can’t let it keep us down and ruin the rest of the season. I now relinquish the soap box.

by bru79 on Sep 16, 2008 10:14 AM PDT   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bruins Nation, an unofficial daily online scrap book covering the greatest collegiate athletic program in the nation. GO BRUINS.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
2009 FB Recruiting: Stretch Run
080513__0038_1_small
A Few Random Thoughts on the Oregon Game
Bruinsnation_small
R.I.P. Senator Claiborne Pell: A Thank You/Tribute From A Bruin
Vrsalovich_family_2006_small
[Updated w Original Letter] My letter to the L.A. Times on Cheaty Petey
Small
Pete is no John Wooden, that is for sure.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Hollinger predicts Westbrook as possible ROY
Telemachus_small
Remembering last year @ justsc
Small
Huge game this sunday
Arron_afflalo1_small
Defense? In my NBA?
Frt-mhltaik450-c_small
SUC Runs it Up
Small
Morrell Presley on campus
Bruinsnation_small
[UPDATED] Question For Women Members/Readers/Lurkers On BN
10113_big_small
Non-Revenue Sports Bruin Review and Calendar
Small
Why SC should be Football #1

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Managers

094_small Ajax

Bruinsnation_small Nestor

Menelaus2_small Menelaus

Arron_afflalo1_small Tydides

Brad_pitt_as_achilles_small Achilles

Small Meriones

Telemachus_small Telemachus

Small Odysseus

Blue_bellerophon_small Bellerophon

Authors

10113_big_small ryebreadraz

ad

Site Meter