Bruins Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: Backing the Pack for NC State Fans!


spread the word

Bright Spots (In A World Of Reality)

We are now three games into Rick Neuheisel’s first season at UCLA, and I think it is starting to become clear to everyone in BN, precisely what we were foreshadowing when we were writing all those posts with taglines “dose of reality” during this off season. There is no escaping from it. We find ourselves at this position not by accident. This is a result of total mismanagement and lack of competent leadership this program has endured for more than a decade (note we are not just pinning this on the previous HC, even though he hastened the downward spiral this program has been going since December 5, 1998).

Right now, I am not sure if there is any use for UCLA fans to get upset every loss this season and probably the next one. I agree with Telemachus that more than ever we need to stand behind our team and with Class of 66 that we need to circle the wagon by getting behind the kids we have in our program, while we wait for the recruits CRN, Chow and Walker bring in next few years. However, at the same time, I think it is important for us to make honest observations about our week to week performance that will enable us to maintain perspective and appreciate the week to week progress that might not be showing up in the final scoreboard.

With that in mind, I will start with the offense. Kevin Pearson from the Press Enterprise flagged the obvious positive marker from yesterday:

An offense that had gained a mere 38 yards rushing in two games, 29 inches for each of the 47 carries against Tennessee and BYU, had just picked up 115 yards and averaged 4.1 yards against the Wildcats.

Those totals beat Arizona's 111 net yards and 3.2-yard-per-carry average.

And how about the somewhat unlikely pair that put up those numbers. First was 232-pound Chane Moline, with a mere 23 yards in 13 attempts coming into this game, who ran for 72 on 11 carries (a 6.5 average).

Moline's first carry of 9 yards eclipsed the Bruins' previous season high of 7 by Ray Carter, one of three UCLA running backs to miss this game. Carter was out with a knee injury. Kahlil Bell and Aundre Dean were out with ankle problems.

So there was Moline, a junior from Mission Viejo, twisting and turning for 40 yards at the end of the first half and eclipsing UCLA's two-game team total in one run.

"I thought we rushed the ball all right," Moline said. "But we gotta stop shooting ourselves in the foot. We had a good week of practice. We focused on running the ball. And we had a chance today. But we've got to be perfect. And we have to build on it.

"We have to improve even more running the ball this week to get ready for Fresno State."

We also have to give our beleaguered OL some credit. They showed improvement yesterday and they started to get it going starting with the last drive at the end of the first half. Note how the coaches put in freshman Jeff Baca at LT to replace Kia to start the second half. I think that was a clear message sent to the entire OL that no one’s starting assignment is safe. Sure, the production of OL is not close to where we want it to be. But we still have to appreciate the obvious progress that took place yesterday. (UPDATE: It looks like Baca was inserted due to Kia's backpain (HT Bald Eagle). However, as noted the OL played much better once Baca got it).

Speaking of bright spots, Derrick Coleman made a nice debut at the Rose Bowl as he rushed for 24 yards in 7 carries. In the limited carries he got, it was clear DC hits the holes with authority and aggression. I liked the term Papadakis used to describe him as someone who runs with “violence and fight.”

That said, we can’t escape the fact about what went wrong with the offense. Tele already noted the bad and ugly below. I think we have to discuss the QB situation. There is no doubt the kid is giving a valiant effort and we will never forget his second half performance against Tennessee (who BTW is turning out to be a very over-rated, mediocre team which might be firing its head coach at the end of this season). However, based on what we have seen last two weeks, it wouldn’t be unreasonable for coaches to ponder about what other options they might have to jump start the offense. Here is Rick Neuheisel in Jill Painter’s DN report:

Craft's not getting the job done, and it's unclear if UCLA will turn to someone else - be it Kevin Prince or Ben Olson when he returns from injury. Everyone's position is tenuous, according to Bruins coach Rick Neuheisel.

"We're going to evaluate all the positions," Neuheisel said. "It's easy in these situations to hide behind the team. When you're the quarterback, you don't get to hide. It's easy to say he must be the reason you're unsuccessful.

"Kevin wants to (be successful). He works hard, and I hope he can continue to work hard and continue to improve. Just like all positions on the team, we're going to evaluate them and keep working to find answers."

And Norm Chow:

Asked if he was concerned Craft might be taking the brunt of the criticism, UCLA offensive coordinator Chow said: "He should. He's the leader of this group, and he needs to take responsibility. The other 10 guys need to take responsibility as well."

I think Craft is doing the best he can in terms of managing the game. To his credit he hasn’t thrown a pick since the first half of the Tennessee game. But at the same time the coaches need a little bit more at the QB position to keep the offense moving.

From what we have seen to date, it looks like KC doesn’t have the arm strength to look off the D and complete a medium range pass over 10 yards. That’s a problem because it is allowing the opposing D to cheat and bring up their LBs to completely stuff the short passes. Those short passes are effective when the defense has to be wary about the QB being able to go downfield. Right now from what we have seen it looks like KC doesn’t have the physical tools to keep the opposing D honest and off balance.

Also there were couple of plays yesterday  that really pointed to the glaring talent issue (I know it’s not a fun topic to discuss, but it has to be pointed out to keep things in perspective) in this offense. There were two potential situations that could have been game changing moments in Bruins favor. First, there was that Moline rumble for 40 yards. Moline was able to get himself in a nice space and then bust into the open field. All he had to do is just break away from one takler. But he didn’t have the speed to break away. Again, big ups to Chane for giving the effort he did yesterday. However, you would have to think that if the Bruins had an elite back with true breakaway speed, the game could have turned. Similarly Dominique had a chance to catch a Craft slant pass and house it. I think that’s the kind of opportunity we have to take advantage of. As I pointed out during the game thread Arizona had three dependable game breakers in Gronkowski, Thomas and Grigsby (along with Tuitama). To date we have no one has emerged as a game breaker in our team.

I think Chane is getting lot of reps because he looks like he is the best blocker among our backs. And given the tenuous situation with our OL, it is understandable why coaches would give him large chunk of our reps. Hopefully Bell will get healthy soon because if he comes back in top form, our offense could become serviceable if the OL continues to show same the improvement it did on Saturday.

Shifting our focus to defense, Walker’s unit made a decent showing yesterday. The run defense was much better as Harwell and Price sealed up the middle. We are still having issues with tackling though. Perhaps as our young secondary gets more experience, they will become better at it.  

Also, speaking of our secondary, our pass coverage is still an issue. I think Walker has been solid in terms of scheming against pro-set base offense. However, I think for him to emerge as truly one of the best five defensive coordinators in the country, he will need to improve his schemes against spread offense formations. I don’t think I was the only one holding my breath when Tuitama was airing it out deep at the Rose Bowl. Well, I think the silver lining here is that I think if Walker brings in few more good recruits this season and next, he will have that opportunity to improve on that aspect of coaching and emerge as one of the best in the game.

Moving over the special teams, it was an ugly performance for Gansz’s crew.  Let’s start with the return coverage. Arizona piled up more than 200 yards in return yardage at the Rose Bowl. Seems like they are couple of issues FG needs to correct. First, let’s start with Perez. He had two booming kicks. However, he also had few line drives with not much hang time not allowing our guys much time to get up field. Second, our gunners were atrocious. We are hoping this is something coaches can correct in the short term because the horrific coverage led to short field, putting our defense in bad spots.

Also, speaking of special teams, I wonder if the coaches can look at other options for punt returning. Austin is a talented athlete but he needs to work on getting up the field, instead of dancing around too much to avoid tackles. There was another situation where he let the ball go even though he had room to catch and go. Again, just like coaches are making sure no positions are safe (as they showed by starting Baca over Kia and putting Craft on notice), I am assuming they will take a close look at punt returning position in the coming week.

Well despite the above reference concerns about our current personnel, I trust these coaches to make the right decision. I don’t think there is a better combination than Chow and Neuheisel to address quarterback issues. I think they will make the right decision when it comes to trying out Prince or Olson (whenever he is 100 percent healthy).

It’s not a fun situation that we are in right now. There is a long road ahead, as CRN mustered up the following remarks to stay with his relentlessly positive mantra following yesterday’s game:

"There is not, I don't think, a quick-fix solution to this," he said. "It's about everybody getting focused, and really getting involved with individual improvement, that will then show collectively. I am optimistic. I'm always optimistic. I do believe there will be brighter days ahead."

UCLA's anemic showing was so mesmerizingly inept, Neuheisel showed gratitude to those of the 65,434 in attendance who endured all 60 minutes, of all things, not booing.

"I appreciate our fans for staying," Neuheisel said. "It must have been hard to watch as we were trying to climb back into the game, and yet there was very little in the way of booing. It showed a lot of class."

Losing should never be acceptable and we deplore moral victories. However, as mentioned above the situation we are in right now didn’t happen overnight, and our coaches no matter how good they are, cannot resolve it over night. This is going to take a lot of time and patience on our part collectively as member of the larger Bruin athletic community.

We will need our coaches to recruit speed and athleticism at all the skill positions (on both offense and defense) so that we can emerge as an above average BCS conference team in next three seasons. Meantime, we have to ride this out and appreciate the progress we are making on a week to week basis.

GO BRUINS.

0 recs | Comment 21 comments | Share on Facebook Digg!

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Some follow on thoughts

I think Kia was pulled due to back probles that flared in Q2 which he has a history of, apparently. This was in the LATimes. So Idon’t think he was pulled for performance reasons.

On Craft, I believe he has the arm strength, but lacks touch and precision at times. He threw several underneath balls that were off target yesterday. In addition, I’m not sure he is making great reads. I’m not sure Prince is the answer either, but I do believe the coaches may have no other choice but to give him some game time reps if KC continues to underperform.

I also think Chow didn’t call a very creative game. We were committed to the run a bit too much, I thought. I would have preferred to throw to set up the run a bit more.

As for our punt coverage, I agree that when Perez outkicks our coverage or kicks line drives you have to expect that the other team will take advantage. This is one area we hoped there would be more consistency, let alone actual success. Poor performance by this group is extremely disappointing.

I hate to say it but this season is shaping up to be as bad as Notre Dame’s was last year. While expectations were modest from the beginning in terms of wins, I think its safe to say that 3 wins is all we can hope for. DWalker said in the paper today that all he expects is to improve each week. I think the defense probably did but the offense and special teams didn’t and therefore, on the whole, I didn’t see the type of improvement that was expected. Many will point to the result on the scoreboard as improvement, (“at least we scored” or “31-10 is better than 59-0”) but when you really drill down, what we saw yesterday, really wasn’t much better then what we saw last week. And that is what is so difficult.

While the rhetoric was cute about the “Monopoly” being over, lets face reality. The monopoly is safe for at least another 3 three years.

See you all at the game next week.

by Bald Eagle on Sep 21, 2008 11:53 AM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

How can Chow call a "creative" game?

When he doesn’t have the chess pieces.

As for Kia info, duly noted.

by Nestor on Sep 21, 2008 12:00 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Kia was pulled because of back issues BUT

Dohn reports that Baca is likely to get first team reps in practice this week – and not because of Kia’s back.
here’s the link: http://www.insidesocal.com/ucla/2008/09/props-to-baca.html

Kia’s been struggling mightily this year, and I hope this lights a fire under him – as of now he’s clearly got the best mix of talent and experience on our line.

by bucknellbruin on Sep 21, 2008 6:06 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Interesting

I just read that too … will have to keep an eye on this next couple of days. I feel bad for Kia. By all accounts the kid has talent. But he has been injured and dealing with that broken hand. However, the coaches need to look elsewhere if there is a better option at least for this snap shot of time (and hopefully it will give him time to heal up).

by Nestor on Sep 21, 2008 6:14 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

1st Team Snaps

Baca got first team snaps last week too, recall. Competition is good and has been preached by the coaches since spring. I think Kia has talent and having Baca continuing to scratch at his heels will only make him better.

by Bald Eagle on Sep 21, 2008 7:47 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Dose of Reality

Hey I’m new to the blog – well as far as posting is concerned. Let me initiate my post by conveying my genuine appreciation for the informative and insightful material that consistently comprises this website. I have worked for UCLA on two different occassions – originally with Dr Lovaas – and then again as an intern at Harbor-UCLA medical center. I have never been anything but overwhelmingly impressed with my experiences at UCLA. Okay – hopefully I qualified myself here as far as authenticating my fanhood.

I recently attended the USC-Ohio St football game (I live in Newport Beach and it’s pretty much impossible to get away from obnoxious USC alums). I wore Bruin colors right into the Trojan den – and even got misty eyed when they flashed the UCLA-BYU score on the jumbotron at the Colisseum (there was an incendiary explosion of approval). It was really tough for me to comprehend how we could lose a game in such a lopsided fashion (I couldn’t tivo the game because I don’t get Versus – but I think that this has already been adequately covered on this site). Then again this week we lose to a middle of the road Arizona team in a fairly comprehensive fashion.

Okay – to the point – I am really excited about Neuheisal and the staff put in place – I actually thought he was the right hire when they brought in Dorrell. The charismatic presence that he brings is such a stark contrast to the previous regime – and I wholeheartedly believe that his infectious personality will permeate throughout the entire Bruins football culture. However, one aspect of this website that I feel sometimes gets overlooked is the fact that we are getting wiped out in recruiting (you take away Breuhat and the incoming recruiting class is very underwhelming). We just lost Shaq Evans – who was a Bruin fan growing up – to freaking USC. This is a big blow – as most of us are aware that we have not really had an electrifying receiver for quite some time. We also lost out on Byron Moore – who was at least a lifelong USC fan – but each day I peruse the recruiting websites hoping for progress – and we haven’t had good news on this front in some time.

I know that (time to break up that paragraph – even if I am still on the same point) recruiting classes are relatively malleable up until the signing date – but this is the domain that we need to improve on the most – if we ever expect to achieve the glory that we feel we are destined and capable of reaching. We should be at the apogee of sports in every arena (I know that my sound a little greedy – but I imagine many of you on here feel the same way). If we continue to lose out on the recruiting battles in Southern California (Cierre Wood is another example – to ND) we are doomed. This cycle of mediocrity is self-fulfilling in that we bring recruits to games where we look terrible – and then they see USC winning huge games on national television (the fact that Cassell starts in the NFL after having never been a regular at SC – is good news for them – bad news for us).

I still believe that CRN is the absolute right guy for this reclamation project – but I also fear that the tremendous enthusiasm that he brings to the proverbial table – will abate as he glares at the uphill trudging that he necessarily has to complete in order to rebuild this beaten program. Perhaps the Dorrell era just has me experiencing some learned helplessness – but I could use a little hope – and I’m trying to find it on different fronts – only to come up empty. Brehaut is an awesome pickup – but we need a panoply of weapons to come into Westwood.

I guess I needed to vent – but I also wanted to post this because I want to know what we can do as fans to help this program. Is it talking to our nephews and neices – cousins – neighbors – and selling this program with fervent passion (delegation of passion bucket responsiblities?) in hopes of creating a youth that gets excited about Bruins athletics (like Howland has in BB – and we have in many other sports). I just want to be able to wear my Bruins colors to SUC with pride (well, I still do – but it’s hard to rationally defend my allegiance when scores are posted like 59-0 to a MWC program). During basketball season – I think we all feel our hearts swell with pride – as we achieve our manifest destiny – now we need to be able to feel the same thing in the Fall. How can we help make CRN’s uphill marathon more plausible?

Thanks for the opportunity to read this fantastic website (hope I don’t soudn too obsequious – just appreciate the site) and have a forum to cathart – my wife was doing her best to listen – but she’s from Ohio – and she’s still grieving from the Ohio State debacle we attended. Have a great week -

by freudianslip on Sep 21, 2008 12:09 PM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Good stuff

You should put this post in the FanPost section freudian. That’s the kind of contribution we appreciate here on BN.

by Nestor on Sep 21, 2008 3:29 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Bright Spot

I still can’t believe this, but I don’t think ANYONE got hurt yesterday!!!!!!!!!!! I mean, maybe for a play or two but we didn’t lose anyone for weeks which is amazing!

by uclafan11 on Sep 21, 2008 12:23 PM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

According to the LA Times

A couple had sprained ankles (John Hale and someone I don’t remember).

by SuperBruinMan on Sep 21, 2008 7:21 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

True

Harkey was already a little banged up and I didn’t realize Hale would be out more than during that game. With all our team has been through with injuries, this is the best game in a while on that front!

by uclafan11 on Sep 21, 2008 11:02 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Our OL

I think Jake Dean had one of the more impressive games from our OL. Now that doesn’t say much, but I’m optimistic about his future. He showed quick enough feet to pull and also get tot he second level. It was obvious at times he hadn’t played a center and that it was his first real playing time (a couple floating shotgun snaps and a whiff on 3 and 1), but I saw some good things from him. This kid may have a solid future.

by ryebreadraz on Sep 21, 2008 1:04 PM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Good Fan Understanding

As I read, our fans want to win, but will be patient. We all understand the process and believe that we have the right coaches to make the recovery.

by whittier71 on Sep 21, 2008 1:30 PM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Everybody knows already

There is fine line between pointing out the glaring deficiencies and demoralizing. That’s the task at hand for the coaching staff and us fans. Like Chow said “we are what we are.” So what’s left but cheer improvement, to appreciate these kids efforts, to highlight those baby steps of improvement. I don’t think it serves a purpose to repeatedly comment on our boys’ short comings at this stage of the Neu era.

by brewinz on Sep 21, 2008 2:36 PM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Nobody in my section has booed --

yet. But one “fan” to my left was berating the players on almost every play, and calling for wholesale replacement of the OL, the running backs, the receivers, the punter, the special teams, and, of course, the quarterback. He had a point here or there as we all could see, but he was very much the exception. Most fans were eager to find something to cheer about, and mostly just quiet when they couldn’t. So I think fan patience and understanding will prevail, as tough as this is to watch. There were some bright spots, but, unfortunately, Arizona played exactly the right defense against a team that has to pass to move the ball. Craft often could find no passing lane because there was none. And we had some catchable balls that weren’t pulled in. I know it will get better, but we can’t expect to win much this year. Improvement is the goal, and we will certainly win a few. Anyway, now and forever, Go Bruins!

by ReineSeite on Sep 21, 2008 3:05 PM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

agree with freudianslip

Recruiting should improve from the past five years. According to Rivals recruiting from 2003 to 2007, UCLA has had one 5-star player (BO) and twenty-three 4-star players (6-2003, 1-2004, 3-2005, 7-2007, 6-2008). In those 5 years Sc has had twenty–four 5-star recruits and forty-nine 4-star recruits. UCLA class of 2002 had two 5- star and twelve 4-star player commitments. As Nestor mentioned a downward spiral but I also believe it will take CRN 2 to 3 years to turn around our football program. And winning the Pac-10 will difficult if we don’t grab some 5-star players. I know its early in recruiting but hopefully with can pick more 4 and 5-star players for 2009 class. Currently the 2009 SC class has the number one qb, te, mlb in the nation as commitments, and a 5 star JUCO defensive tackle and ten 4-star players for 2009. UCLA has no 5-star players and three 4-star players, including a qb we’re all familiar with and a linebacker who is 5’11" (may be the next Tom Jackson, all pro linebacker 5’11" for Denver Bronco). As Nestor stated, we can emerge as an above average BCS conference team in next three years but emphasis needs to be placed on recruiting quality players and not settling for 3 star players

by bruin1998 on Sep 21, 2008 3:06 PM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Recruiting

Honestly right now given what we are going to endure this season, I expect the 2009 class to be ranked somewhere between top 25-40. The key right now is going to be for CRN and his coaches to be out there and pitch the 2010 class because it is going to be hard to get 4, 5 star recruits based on the results of this year. Our hope is for the coaching staff to round out the 2009 class based on solid talent evaluation and then go all out for the 2010 class, who they might be able to sell based on improved performance on the field next season. This is going to take a lot of time.

by Nestor on Sep 21, 2008 3:28 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Lessons From Howland

Available for 2009 will be the LMR’s of football — kids with a great work ethic, some native talent, and a burning desire to play for a great program with great coaches. Just as CBH turned non-5 stars into final four finalists, so too will CRN, DW and NC will get the best kids they can and get them on the right path, soon.

We will never recruit as well as sc because some of those 5 stars need Sra. Rosa to keep them in school. We just can’t and won’t do that.

I’m not worried about sc. And, I’m not worried about us.

I truly have faith in this staff, this set of players, and the players who make the choice to come here even though we are in a down moment.

CBH told JF, AA, and LMR he wanted them to help restore UCLA BB to its rightful place. They did.

CRN will tell our potential recruits the same thing, and they will, too.

sjh

by Class of 66 on Sep 21, 2008 4:55 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Postgame downer

It’s hard to muster up much emotion right now. The game was draining. There were a few bright spots; the improvement in the running game and the valiant effort of the defense. I guess we all know that this season we are going to be taking our lumps. There just is not enough talent and experience to execute the coaching schemes. That probably will not change this season. I hope the coaches give everybody a look. Valuable experience will be important for some of these young guys next season.

I don’t have any doubt that this coaching staff will figure out ways to improve our performance to competitive by the end of the season. I will remain “relentlessly optimistic”. Go Bruins!

by BruinAl on Sep 21, 2008 5:35 PM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bruins Nation, an unofficial daily online scrap book covering the greatest collegiate athletic program in the nation. GO BRUINS.
Start posting about the Bruins »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Thoughts on the Campaign of Champions Point Plan
Bruinsnation_small
UCLA: Where Amazing Begins

Recent FanPosts

Griffin_clippers_small
Hi Bruins.
2603_1028618641249_1398823305_30086007_6195771_n_small
OT: The Downfall of the MSM
080513__0038_1_small
OT -- Ariza to the Houston Rockets Artest to the Lakers
Small
UCLA U$C* football listed as #4 in top current rivalries
Bruinsnation_small
The Point Program For The Renovated Pauley "Seating Plan"
Small
Stephenson to Cincy
Small
New Top Safety Commit Earnest Thomas
Bruinsnation_small
Mustain's Academic Issues Get "Resolved" Magically
Small
The Rotten Apple doesn't fall far from the tree...

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini

SPONSORS


Managers

094_small Ajax

Bruinsnation_small Nestor

Menelaus2_small Menelaus

Arron_afflalo1_small Tydides

Brad_pitt_as_achilles_small Achilles

Small Meriones

Telemachus_small Telemachus

Small Odysseus

Blue_bellerophon_small Bellerophon

Authors

Images_small ryebreadraz

Official Partner of CBS Sports