Bruins Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: Check out our NFL Scoreboard: scores, schedule and blogs Bar-right-arrows



Spaulding Roundup: Forward Progress

Looks like we are not the only ones who saw progress on Saturday. Ted Miller from ESPN also forwards the hope mantra by suggestions Bruins are “getting better”:

This may sound strange, but UCLA is getting better: As in most competitive games, there were a lot of "what ifs" in UCLA's 36-31 loss to Fresno State -- such as what if freshman running back Derrick Coleman didn't fumble on the Bulldogs' 10-yard line? Or what if the defense didn't yield a nine-minute, 86-yard drive to kill the clock thereafter? But the Bruins' performance suggested there's hope even at 1-3. Hope, first of all, in that Washington State is coming to town next weekend. Moreover, it appears that the Bruins will be able to find at least a few more wins inside the conference and thereby avoid making Rick Neuheisel's first season a complete train wreck. The most encouraging number was 234 yards rushing. A run game will help QB Kevin Craft feel more comfortable. On the downside, as the offense has improved, the defense has regressed.

Joining Miller was Kurt Streeter from the LA Times, who also noticed “real improvement” in the Bruin’s performance on Saturday:

Compared to what it's been so far this year, the running game was a juggernaut. In the season's first two games, the Bruins rushed for a total of 38 yards. Last week they had 115 yards. This week they had 234, much of that coming from freshman Derrick Coleman, a kid who despite a late fumble that helped doom his team for good in the fourth quarter, looks as if he'll be a difference-maker as the years go by.

And the quarterback? This contest proved that the forward pass still exists in Westwood, even if it's not exactly something that'll make good defenses shudder. Kevin Craft, foggy-headed and unsure most of this season, stood in the pocket with a good bit of calm, 11 times out of 20 hitting his mark. He finished with 150 yards, one touchdown and no interceptions.

Then there was Terrence Austin, who almost single-handedly made the difference for the Bruins. Austin had 250 yards' worth of kickoff and punt returns, a wonderful afternoon that none on hand would have ever forgotten if he hadn't had a 100-yard kickoff-return touchdown negated because of a UCLA holding call.

These were good signs for the Bruins. Real improvement. The defense, expected to be the foundation for this team, was another matter. Fresno State rolled up 443 yards and appeared unstoppable on the most important third-down conversions, all of which left Bruins defensive coordinator DeWayne Walker shaking his head. "It was unfortunate we wasted a nice performance by the offense," he said. "If the defense plays better, we could have won this thing."

Speaking of the defense, Dohn reports that UCLA coaches will reexamine their nickel package and “explore options” this week in practice:

"I think some teams are able to take advantage of some man-coverage situations," Neuheisel said. "We probably have to disguise our man coverage a little bit more."

UCLA used redshirt freshman Courtney Viney as its nickel back, but the blame does not fall solely to him since other players are also getting beat in nickel packages.

Meanwhile, Walker said he would explore options during the early part of practice this week.

"We've got to go back and look at it again," Walker said. "We have what we have. Now, we just have to go back and improve."

Again like we have preached with every facets of this team, we will also urge patience with our defensive coaches. Based on what I am reading from Walker’s comments, I think he understands that our defensive performance has to improve as the season goes along. Particularly I imagine he feels a little competitive pressure given the improvement we are seeing on the offensive side of the ball. Hopefully the offense’s continued improvement will have an impact on the defense during practices and move them to upgrade their performance on Saturdays.

While we mention about the offensive improvement at the macro level, at the micro level CRN talked about Derrick Coleman’s bright future at UCLA:

Running back Derrick Coleman fumbled on the 10-yard line during Saturday's decisive drive, and Neuheisel said that he spoke with the talented freshman after the game and told him to keep his head up.

Coleman was going to the right on the play, but Neuheisel said the ball was in his left hand -- it should have been in his right -- and was too low on his body, leading to the fumble.

"I told him to don't worry about it," Neuheisel said. "I think he has a great future, and I want him to understand the importance of ball security, but I want him to know he will have a great career here."

Neuheisel also talked about the need for Kevin Craft to stretch the defense and throw down the field:

"We'd like to have some more chances where we just throw it down the field," Neuheisel said. "Deep throws. We haven't really taken our shots down there yet, and I'd like to see us develop some of that."

Craft's longest completion of the season is 32 yards, and that came on tight end Ryan Moya's catch and run against the Bulldogs. That is also the Bruins' only pass play of more than 30 yards this season.

"I still think we can get better throwing the ball down the field," Neuheisel said. "It's going to take some real work with Kevin and the wide receivers, and get the wide receivers to get off press coverage and so forth."

It’s nice to know Ben Howland is not the only head coach at UCLA’s major revenue programs who can offer frank and constructive  public criticism while offering words of positive encouragement at the same time for the players in his program. Neuheisel’s comments on Coleman is just one example why we continue remain upbeat about the forward progress we are noticing in this program as we follow it on a day to day basis.

GO BRUINS.

0 recs | Comment 9 comments

Read Related

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

There was progress. On offense.

The game was watchable, actually, on offense, and that was nice to see. But the defense was atrocious. Again. Bottom line, we have played 4 games and we have 4 poor games on defense. We won the first game because Tennesse’s QB was horrible . . . and even then, it took a missed field goal. I am all about being positive and looking for improvement. But I haven’t seen it on defense. This is supposed to be our best unit (ha!). Experienced corners . . . ? Holdover d-coordinator? Very disappointing. Pressure is still on guys. You can’t hide behind a new head coach.

Special teams. By the end of the game, I was psyched about T. Austin. He was huge and deserves a lot of credit. He was my player of the game (particularly after he made that great catch over the middle) (runner-up to Bell and the 0-line). HOWEVER, overall, special teams was disappointing. Holding penalty, come on! Returned punt for touchdown, come on! Again, Austin was good—and I guess some of that is good blocking. But overall, I’m giving them a B-.

Oh, and while I like risky play, I didn’t like the decision to take the holding penalty. My leash ain’t that big, and 4th and 12 means end of drive. Besides, when you’ve been getting torched 4 games in a row, expecting some kind of huge stop (or negative yards play) is wishful thinking.

Unfortunately, while we were better on offense (way better, relatively), I do not have an overwhelmingly good feeling about the weekend. Mostly because of defense and special teams. And at the end of the day, Fresno St. put it to us at our place. Say what you will, but we do have the better players on paper (in my opinion), and we weren’t able to tap into that fully.

by rfirpo on Sep 29, 2008 8:08 AM PDT   0 recs

I understand the reason for making it third and 22. One would think even our swiss cheese defense could stop them before getting the first down…The defense..well what can you say, it’s horrible…

All hail the Mighty Bruins, conquerers of troy!

by seernst on Sep 29, 2008 8:57 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

I Am Sincerely Grateful

that CRN doesn’t scapegoat or throw blame on these players. I feel we would be seeing absolutely no improvement or progress in this program—indeed, I’m sure we would see a significant regression—if he resorted to that type of cowardly BS.

On Loyalty: “Be true to yourself. Be true to those you lead.”—Coach John Wooden

Love My Bruins

by Bruingirl83 on Sep 29, 2008 8:55 AM PDT   0 recs

Oh I SO agree

if we had been listening to the previous coach he’d have thrown any and everyone he could under the bus to blame on any and every mistake.

He would have said: “I called the 4th and 1, that player just didn’t execute.” “3rd and 22? It’s DW’s fault we couldn’t hold them on that.” “Well you saw Derrick Coleman fumble the ball on our last drive.”

I swear, Dorrell got a free pass every damned week to rip his players and fellow coaches. I’ve never heard of any major sports coach being given such free reign with respect to dogging his own players. I mean the only one who remotely comes to mind is Phil Jackson. But even Phil uses it strategically – I always get the feeling he’ll call out Kobe to get him to do what needs to be done, not to side step blame. And Phil is always called out for ripping his own players!

by Seanny Rotten on Sep 29, 2008 8:29 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

I think the deep throws will come

as the Oline gets better. Craft still does not have a lot of time in the pocket.

"when you've seen how big the world is, how can you make due with this?"

by silverlakebruin on Sep 29, 2008 9:10 AM PDT   0 recs

Walker and Competitive Pressure

Nester’s point is an excellent one and something I have been thinking about as well given our overall sub par performance this year on D.

I hope CW feels the pressure being matched against and mentioned in the same breath, as CRN and CNC, two coaches who many believe are some of the best in the business.

While much praise has been heaped upon CW in the past, I am one who thought it was a bit premature and somewhat unwarranted. Listen, his units have posted some very decent numbers over the past couple of years, but our D play has been inconsistent. For him to truly deserve the accolades, he needs to do more with the group he has this year. He needs to match the performance of the other premier coaches on the staff. He needs to outperform CRN and CNC and get this D unit to begin improving just like we have begun to see from the offense.

Competitive pressure posed by the other coaches on the staff will hopefully do that.

If we don’t see improvement over the next several games, I have to believe that all the praise he received over the past few years will quickly turn to doubt and criticism. We’ve started to see some of it in the traditional media. It’s not too late to turn the tide, but I am one who believes it has to start with CDW’s effort. Hopefully he can channel some of the competitive pressure and return this unit to at least the playing level we all expected before the season started.

Go Bruins!!!!!!!!!!

by Bald Eagle on Sep 29, 2008 10:14 AM PDT   0 recs

D gets some slack now, too

I have preached patience for the program and its results for this year and next, and the defense is extended that “grace period” as well, where the scoreboard is not the marker of the state of the team, but steady improvement is.

I have said that CRN has brought a new culture and attitude to Westwood, but it will take at least 3 years to bring in the better talent and for players to develop within the new culture for us to see a consistently competitive and winning program on the field.

Even though DCDW has been in Westwood a few years already, he is also working within this new culture for the first time himself. So it seems fair to say to allow that it will also take a little time for the benefits of the new direction in the program to become tangible on the defensive side of the ball, also.

Even tough DCDW has been in place for a while already, someone rightly pointed out that he has had only 2 recruiting classes, and that “his” players are still relatively young. They have also spent their first years in a culture of mediocrity and noncompetitveness, and I trust that they are now being shaken out of that.

Having said that, I think it is also fair to expect to see the same kind of improvements in the defense that we are seeing in the offense as the season progresses. Clearly, the defense has not paralleled the improvement in the offense to this point, but we’ve played 3 pretty good offensive teams in a row, and FSU’s defense may have falsely accelerated the real progress of our offense. So we should focus on little improvements as the next few weeks go by. Things like better tackling, fewer missed assignments, and better adherence to responsibilities are things we can fairly expect to improve from week to week, and I hope that DCDW and his players are up to the task.

greg in denver

by gbruin on Sep 29, 2008 2:21 PM PDT   0 recs

You're right, it takes time to build quality.

It takes time to build a reputation.
It takes time to build a system.
It takes time to build top-notch talent, and to have that talent develop…especially in football.

Just take a look at Ben Howland’s program. He didn’t have great success until his third year, so fruits of that success-based labor (top-notch recruits) didn’t arrive until year FIVE, with Kevin Love. It can take even longer in football, where difference makers are rarely freshmen.

We’re definitely heading in the right direction, it’s just going to take time.

by bornagainbruin on Sep 29, 2008 2:34 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

The Fresno State Game Was An Exciting Football Game

We were competitive with a good team, and had a good chance to win until the fumble. What makes no sense is that the offense was proficient but the defense, with a top coach and very good defensive lineman, folds like a cheap suitcase. Are the backs really unable to cover? Are the linebackers and lineman overrated? Is Walker not as good as touted?

by 75NatChamps on Sep 29, 2008 7:46 PM PDT   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bruins Nation, an unofficial daily online scrap book covering the greatest collegiate athletic program in the nation. GO BRUINS.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Lb___dm_in_nd_stadium_small
Musings from Maui
10113_big_small
Chris Joseph Wins Rhodes Scholarship
Telemachus_small
Culture Change

Recent FanPosts

10113_big_small
The Impact of Tonight's Game on Tournament Seeding
Telemachus_small
The Five Days of sUckiness: Thursday
Small
War of Words Between MJD and Lendale White
Ucla-med_small
Please Allow Me to Introduce Myself
Telemachus_small
The Five Days of sUckiness: Wednesday
Small
TV Spot- 5 Reasons Why UCLA will Beat USC
Bruinsnation_small
Fait accompli?
Small
To Punt or Not To Punt?
Telemachus_small
The Five Days of sUckiness: Tuesday
Ucla_small
USC Law Fools

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Managers

094_small Ajax

Bruinsnation_small Nestor

Menelaus2_small Menelaus

Arron_afflalo1_small Tydides

Brad_pitt_as_achilles_small Achilles

Small Meriones

Telemachus_small Telemachus

Small Odysseus

Blue_bellerophon_small Bellerophon

Authors

10113_big_small ryebreadraz

ad

Site Meter