Bruins Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: ANIMATED BLOGPOLL: COMPARING PELTS? UNFAIR! Bar-right-arrows



Spaulding Roundup: Long Way To Go

In midst of the euphoria of last 48 hours we talked about slowing things down a bit last night. Apparently Coach Neuheisel agrees with us and hit on the same point yesterday:

Bruins coach Rick Neuheisel, had a message for the giddy masses.

He was thrilled with his program, from the players to his coaching staff, but stressed that much more work is needed.

"It's way to early for us to be considering ourselves anything close to a finished product," Neuheisel said Tuesday. "We need to improve drastically, but I think we have the kids that will understand that, and buy into that, and do the work necessary to get it done.

"We're never going to beat anybody just by showing up. We have to play intelligent football."

Pressing matters include a trio of injuries to senior starters, a nonexistent running game and a leaky run defense, all of which must be improved before the Bruins return to the field Sept. 13 at No. 15 BYU.

Running game is going to be one of the main (among many) issues fix heading into next game. It will be interesting to see how many reps Dean gets in practice in the coming days and whether even “Jet Ski” and Knox are considered in the mix. I would think if Bell is not ready to go in next game, coaches will have one of the last two guys in the mix because it’s always good to have more than 3 backs lined up and ready to go.

The main concern with Carter right now is his ability to catch the ball out of the backfield. We didn’t see much of that in our last game. I wonder what Dean and other backs can bring to the table wrt to that skill because in Chow’s scheme tailbacks ability to catch it out of the backfield can have a discernable impact on the overall offensive game plan.

Dean, “Jet Ski” and Knox are part of a freshmen class that is already making its presence felt. Chris Foster from the LA Times has a report on the freshmen rising to occasion on Monday night:

UCLA's freshman class has been lauded and applauded. That it deserved such treatment seemed clear after the Bruins' 27-24 overtime victory over Tennessee that bumped the Bruins to No. 23 on Monday in the Associated Press poll.

Moore recovered a fumble and was mistake-free at safety.

Linebacker Sean Westgate returned a blocked punt for the Bruins' first touchdown.

Wide receivers Taylor Embree and Nelson Rosario had key receptions during UCLA's two fourth-quarter touchdown drives.

Tight end Cory Harkey, wide receiver Antwon Moutra and defensive back Tony Dye all logged playing time.

So the UCLA class of 2012 displayed its class in 2008.

"I'm amazed on a couple fronts," Coach Rick Neuheisel said. "One, that the freshmen were playing so well. Two, that they had to be playing. It is always gratifying when young kids answer the call, that's what makes them so special."

Foster also noted a specific veteran move by Rahim Moore when he recovered a key Arian Foster fumble in the second half:

"I saw the ball bouncing and I could have picked it up and gone the other way," Moore said. "Instead, I fell on it. Maybe I could have gone all the way, but I would rather we had the ball right there than to take the chance of giving them the ball back."

Credit here goes to DeWayne Walker. As we have been reading during the Fall camp, Walker wasted no time in throwing the whole kitchen sink at Moore (part due to Moore’s talent and part due to the necessity arising from Lockett’s suspension). Walker treated him like a veteran from the get go and got him in a kind of mindset in which he had to embrace his responsibilities as a key cog in the defensive scheme. It will be interesting to see whether Lockett gets his starting assignment back when he becomes eligible to return.

As good as Moore was (along with Verner) our DBs will have to play even better in the next game as they prepare to face a prolific passer in Max Hall. More on that game in the coming days.

Lastly, we will end this roundup with a note re. reactions to some Fulmer post-game comments (which generated some discussion on BN here and here) after the game. From the OC Register:

Tennessee coach Phillip Fulmer said after the game that his team would see tougher opponents when it enters SEC play.

Maybe, but the record indicates that the Pac-10 is 10-6 against the SEC in the BCS era, including 6-2 in games played on the West Coast.

That prompted USC coach Pete Carroll to say UCLA's victory “does make a big statement.”

Neuheisel stopped short of saying that.

“I don't usually pay too much attention to what coaches say after a game,” Neuheisel said. “I know he was very gracious when we met at midfield and I know he's got a tough schedule ahead. I'm concerned about our tough Pac-10 schedule.”

CRN’s comments pretty much diffuses any controversy that might have resulted from those Fulmer comments heading into next season. But it’s funny to hear about Pom Pom taking note.

Also along the same topic, before we finish closing the book on this year's UCLA-Tenn game, we need to note the class and grace shown by Tennessee fans from Rocky Top Talk. I already let Joel know in an email yesterday what a pleasure it was to go back and forth with RTT heading into Monday night’s game. They have built a wonderful community with some incredibly knowledgeable and classy bloggers over at RTT. I think the Vols will rebound from their heartbreaking loss (and we have had our share of those) and go on to have a great season. We will look forward to the same back and forth next season, when we get ready for Knoxville.

As for matters on hand – as CRN mentioned above while we are all enjoying the euphoria from Monday, we need to get back to reality and worry about how the team can build from the first game. Coaches and players still have lot of issues to fix and collectively we still have a long way to go.

GO BRUINS.

0 recs | Comment 11 comments

Read Related

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Intelligent Football

It seems like it’s been forever since we’ve been able to say that.

by bornagainbruin on Sep 3, 2008 6:46 AM PDT   0 recs

Good tone

Great victory Saturday—but I still expect a .500 season. Tennessee’s offense wasn’t that good, and I personally think their play calling played right into our hands.

I am very concerned with our running game. Sure, without an experienced offensive line it is tougher to establish a running game. But we didn’t even come close. I will say it again, I am very unimpressed with our backs. I don’t see game changing talent on the field. Again, some of that is the O-line, but some of it is ability. Maybe we’ll see the freshman get a solid shot to shine—but outstanding freshman play every year in college football, and I think our young running backs would be playing if they had what it takes. Too bad about Bell’s injury, but I was never enamoured with him anyway. I say throw the young kids in there and see what they got.

We are going to need a running game in two weeks. Craft was brilliant when throwing short—the classic west coast offense throws if you ask me. However, when he tried to stretch the defense he got picked every time. The next defense we face is going to try to shut that down.

Anyway, a great victory on Saturday, and a really exciting moment for UCLA football. But the focus needs to be on getting better and building long term success—and thankfully, I think it is . Will a running back step up please!

by rfirpo on Sep 3, 2008 6:54 AM PDT   0 recs

# 23 in the AP Poll??

Sorry, we should not be ranked in my opinion. I will take it, because it could be motivating. But I’d prefer if we watched video of the first half and ignored irrelevant polling. I will say it again, Tennessee’s offense was not that good. If Crompton knew how to throw consistently like most D-I QBs and didn’t get so flustered with motion on defense, it could have been scary. [Not that our defense wasn’t pretty good at times].

by rfirpo on Sep 3, 2008 7:14 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Ranking more of a symbolic gesture

IMHO, our ranking in the AP says more about how some teams were overrated/underrated in the preseason, than our actual performance against Tennessee. Ranked teams like Pitt and Va Tech had no business being beaten last weekend, and who knew Clemson would get creamed that bad by Bama. So, we’re reaping the benefits as are Utah and Fresno State.

That still shouldn’t take away from the significance of our win. Granted, Tenn’s offense wasn’t good, but much of that was attributed to a new QB and O-Coord. They returned key personnel at RB, WR and have a very good OL, so many predicted them to have a strong team. Our win underscored our potential under CRN. The ranking also gives huge credit to our coaching staff. Coaching made a monumental difference in that game and we’re being recognized for it.

by Kerckhoff405 on Sep 3, 2008 10:54 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Yes, but...

First, you need to give credit where credit is due.

1) Tennessee’s offensive line is supposed to be one of the best in the country. Yet, consistently, our defensive front collapsed the pocket and made Crompton rush his throws. A couple of times, his receivers didn’t make the big plays they should have, but all in all, their performance had A LOT to do with our defense.

2) If the next team tries to take away the short passes, that will open up the running game since the linebackers won’t be crowding the box. It will be easier to run then. And not every team has Tennessee’s outstanding secondary.

3) You are rather quick to throw Bell under the bus. We don’t even know what he could have done, he went down in the first quarter. The youngun’s will get their shots, but he is clearly an established veteran who, if I’m not mistaken, was viewed as an NFL back by some in the coaching staff.

You throw way too many “if’s” that take away from this team’s accomplishment, in my opinion. Now, I’m all for sobriety and reality, and this team has a long way to go. But if the pundits were wrong about Tennessee, they could just as well have been wrong about UCLA…maybe we are a bit better than advertised. That was no chump team we just beat.

Oh, and IF Craft hadn’t thrown four INTs, we would have won by two touchdowns.

by tasser10 on Sep 3, 2008 2:10 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Good points, N

I agree especially with the credit being given to Coach Walker for actually coaching kids like Moore. All his life, Moore has been bigger and faster than his adversaries, and has had quicker reflexes and all that. In order to make himself the standout that got him recruited by UCLA, he had to pick up fumbles and return them for TD’s against high school opponents. But Coach Walker coached him – the instincts which up until then would have taken over and made him try to pick up the ball and make a HUGE play were tempered by the coaching that said all he had to make was a huge play. Naturally the credit goes to Moore for being where he was supposed to be and doing what he was supposed to do, but I give a lot of credit to Coach Walker for putting him where he was supposed to be and telling him what he was supposed to do.

And I also agree with your comments about Rocky Top Talk. I lurked over there after the game to see what they were talking about, and it sounded much like what we sounded like here during the Reign of Error. After things calmed down a bit, I paid a visit, and was treated respectfully and respectably by those guys. I also shared my own thoughts about the dangers involved when the new OC brings in a WCO, even if he calls it a Clawfense. I still don’t understand why we didn’t have those big backs running at us all night. Price and Harwell et al might have withstood the attack, but sheesh – a brusing SEC team putting it up over 40 times? I’m glad that Fullmer had an attack of the 1976 Woody Hayes Rose Bowl disease.

by Fox 71 on Sep 3, 2008 7:44 AM PDT   0 recs

Have to agree re the running backs

Dean and one of the other freshmen have to be ready to go if Bell cannot. Moline, at least based on game one, won’t be effective behind this line as a solo back. I would like to see the combo a FB plus Moline in short yardage. I believe it would also be effective to throw out of that lineup as you will have two backs who can pick up any blitzes.

I don’t know why it took so long for Carter to get in at TB. It was almost as if he was serving a one half suspension or something.

Good to see Craft bounce back. And good to know the team has his back. I think some of Craft’s trouble was he was mindful of the heat his line had taken in the press, so he wanted to be sure to get the ball off so he would not take a sack and hurt the confidence of his O line.

Have to concur re the ranking…it seems a little premature. While the D looked good, I think a good QB would have exploited us. But as long as Harwell and Price stay healthy, we should have a very good rush as opponents are going to have to spend lots of time accounting for them.

by Free the 16 on Sep 3, 2008 9:17 AM PDT   0 recs

Running Game and other thoughts

I think the running attack will come around as we get more games under our belt. I think the offensive line did OK for a first game considering how patchwork and inexperienced they are. With the bye week they have several extra days between games to review the film and work on fixing the problems in practice. I think we will see a huge improvent in the next game. We have very good backs but even the best backs cannot run through brick walls.

 As far as Craft is concerned, he took what was given to him by the Tenn defense in the second half and made it work. The 1st half of the BYU game will be a much better barometer of his playing in this offense. I just think he has to realize that every play does not have to be a touchdown.

I am more concerned about the injuries we keep having. Fortunately the positions that had injuries in the game were in areas we had some depth (and talent). If the OL line or other areas we lack depth (my heart just about stopped when Price limped off the field) we will then be in serious trouble. I also have concern for the tackling by our secondary, (shades of Toledo) that was poor at best. Tenn. got a lot more yards after lackluster tackling efforts. I will attribute it to first game jitters and look for improvement as the season progresses.

Thank you for coming, try the jello.

As the eternal optimist I saw several positives in the game. Victory of course, Craft didn’t get killed, several freshman stepped up and contributed and most importantly, the team did not give up on Kevin after that first half. All excellent things to build on as the season progresses. I think CRN and the other coaches will make sure the players keep their heads screwed on straight as we get ready for our next game.

by artybruin on Sep 3, 2008 9:44 AM PDT   0 recs

Tell Fulmer

that we understand. UCLA will definitely see tougher competition in the Pac 10 and, for that matter, in its two other non-conference opponents (BYU and Fresno).

There is nothing more sad to watch than some out of touch coach who once was good try to hang on past his time at the expense of the team and the university. I feel sorry for all of the Tennessee fans.

by Koach Karl I on Sep 3, 2008 10:30 AM PDT   0 recs

Now that the excitement has subsided...

No doubt, a great win for the Bruins. As Nuke Laloosh put it, “winning is better than losing”.

That being said, we can’t succumb to irrational exuberance. There were many weaknesses that we saw in the game, and no doubt the BYU staff, and our remaining opponents, will be looking to exploit the holes.

CRN himself said there is a lot of room for improvement, mostly on the O side of the ball. However, some of the returns allowed by Special teams need to be addressed.

Great coaching with moderate talent is good, but in the long run superior talent will win. I think this game will give UCLA a hand in the recruiting wars.

In the meantime, let’s pull for the team to work hard, play as a team, and give their best effort on the field. Coach Wooden’s definition of success wasn’t based upon W’s and L’s, but on having done the work to be the best you can be, and showing it when you played.

Bob O. (Signholder #3)

by TuneMan7 on Sep 3, 2008 10:37 AM PDT   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bruins Nation, an unofficial daily online scrap book covering the greatest collegiate athletic program in the nation. GO BRUINS.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Lb___dm_in_nd_stadium_small
Musings from Maui
10113_big_small
Chris Joseph Wins Rhodes Scholarship
Telemachus_small
Culture Change

Recent FanPosts

10113_big_small
The Impact of Tonight's Game on Tournament Seeding
Telemachus_small
The Five Days of sUckiness: Thursday
Small
War of Words Between MJD and Lendale White
Ucla-med_small
Please Allow Me to Introduce Myself
Telemachus_small
The Five Days of sUckiness: Wednesday
Small
TV Spot- 5 Reasons Why UCLA will Beat USC
Bruinsnation_small
Fait accompli?
Small
To Punt or Not To Punt?
Telemachus_small
The Five Days of sUckiness: Tuesday
Ucla_small
USC Law Fools

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Managers

094_small Ajax

Bruinsnation_small Nestor

Menelaus2_small Menelaus

Arron_afflalo1_small Tydides

Brad_pitt_as_achilles_small Achilles

Small Meriones

Telemachus_small Telemachus

Small Odysseus

Blue_bellerophon_small Bellerophon

Authors

10113_big_small ryebreadraz

ad

Site Meter