Thoughts On Arizona State
Bumped. GO BRUINS. -N
[Edited and expanded from original comment]
Reading the majority of responses from fans (to use the term lightly) from other fansites, it was absolutely appalling and embarrassing at how negative they were towards CBH and how this game transpired. Arizona State is a top 15 team and second-best in the conference, and we stayed neck and neck (even taking a double-digit in the second half) throughout the game. We may have looked god-awful offensively the last 8 minutes and in OT, but we were going up against a fantastic zone defense, an unstoppable and superb athlete, and the normal SPTR's, and considering all of that, we were still able to send it to OT and have chances to take the lead and win the game. We should be happy that our defense pulled through multiple times and kept this game close when we didn’t score a field goal for 12 minutes. In many ways, I'm actually glad we lost because had we pulled it out, I think it would have masked many of the problems that need to be addressed following this game.
To address those who say CBH does not know how to plan against and defeat a zone defense: Our offense was clicking for 75% of the game, and the minutes leading up to our drought showed just how potent and athletic our offense could be. How did we take an 11-point lead midway through the second half? By executing on offense and getting wide-open looks. Had we been shooting as we normally do (Roll airballing an open 3, for example, is not normal), this game very well could have turned into a rout.
Having said all of that, a 12-minute drought without a field goal is nothing short of an offensive disaster, and two things contributed to this, among others (one of them NOT being CBH’s offensive philosophy and coaching):
- Arizona State’s defense + UCLA not being great against quality zones. I feel we were becoming a bit overconfident in UCLA’s ability to beat a quality zone. The teams whose zones we were picking apart are teams who do not specialize in zone defense, so we should have been expected to play well against them with the shooters and playmakers we have. Arizona State plays all zone, all the time, and similar to Michigan, because of how difficult their zone is to play against, we had troubles. Remember, we are most certainly not the only ones to have struggles against Arizona State's zone; there's a reason they use it every game for 40 minutes and win a lot of games.
- Depth. This is probably what contributed to our drought most, and it kind of puzzles me. While I am no position whatsoever to be questioning CBH’s coaching decisions, I can’t help but wonder why he stuck with the same 5 or 6 players throughout the game, and more importantly those last 10 minutes of regulation and OT. Our players are well-conditioned and can play for long stretches of time without getting tired, and we’ve seen that in action many times. This game, it was plainly obvious our key players, DC in particular, were just gassed out, and that was a main reason why we were so stagnant and unaggressive on offense.
I agree with muircoach in the postgame comments that having Roll, Drag, and Shipp in the game is not a very effective combo (it was them + DC + Aboya for the last 10 minutes, throughout the offensive drought). All three of these players are primarily shooters and do not have the athleticism nor the talent to break down and drive by a zone defense. DC was the only one out there who had the capability to break down the defense (and he was able to multiple times throughout the game), but because of how tired he was, he wasn’t able to do it on his own, and when he did create, he wasn't able to finish. I think we needed a larger rotation to get DC and the rest of the starters rest, and I would say ML and JA in particular could have helped tremendously in getting starters rest and giving us the ability to break down the zone.
The refs definitely contributed to the loss, but they did not account for our nonexistent offense and inability to put the game away. Our defense played well enough to keep us in the game, but our offensive struggles down the stretch outdid any superb defense we may have played. This is a learning experience for the team, but it’s a long season, and let’s hope the Bruins will come back strong from this tough, frustrating home loss.
Go Bruins!!!
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of BruinsNation's (BN) editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of BN's editors.
1 recs |
10 comments
|
Comments
Comments from "fans" from some other places
I am with you. I am a little taken aback by it.
Great takes 123.
yep
agree with pretty much everything. The other “fans” disgust me…That kind of crap is what we expect from the guys across town. Whining when any little thing goes wrong. People seem to think we’re entitled to win the national championship. We at Bruinsnation know better – we have to earn it. Go Bruins
I would like to respond to some of your comments:
1- I think you are overrating ASU. They’re OK. They were coming off a lost to USC, btw. If we had beaten them they would have been voted out of the top 25.
2 – Harden is not unstoppable. In fact, just two games earlier, he had zero baskets and just four points against USC. (Seriously, before you refer to someone as unstoppable, you should go back at least one game to see if he’s ever been stopped.)
3 – We had 25 points at halftime. Is that how you define “clicking?”
4 – IMO – We build an 11 point lead because our defense was flat out lockdown, not because our offense was clicking.
5 – You wrote “Having said all of that, a 12-minute drought without a field goal is nothing short of an offensive disaster, and two things contributed to this, among others (one of them NOT being CBH’s offensive philosophy and coaching):”
Your first point here seems to be that because Arizona State plays zone defense as their base defense, we shouldn’t be expected to play well against it. This makes zero sense to me. What happened in the last 12 minutes is that we slowed things down and just tried to protect the lead. We built the 11 point lead because for the first part of the second half — the only time the offense was “clicking” we were attacking the zone. Once we built the lead, we started slowing things down. lost aggressiveness and they caught up. We actually did the exact same thing against AZ, but the lead was bigger and they aren’t very good and we won easily.
As to your second point about depth, Howland himself disagrees with you. He personally acknowledged in his post game interviews that he misused the bench and didn’t get enough rest for the starters. He specifically named Malcolm Lee and Jerime Anderson as guys he should have played more.
It wasn’t the refs who fouled Harden 40 feet from the basket, it was Shipp.
Now then, I do agree with your point about the fans on other sites panicking unnecessarily. But, as above, I disagree with your claim that Harden is unstoppable (he isn’t), that our offense was clicking all game until the drought (it wasn’t) and that Howland was above criticism in the loss (he himself criticized himself for at least one of your points — so you’re disagreeing with the coach while you defend him.)
I personally didn’t write anything critical about Howland (until this response) because I just chalked it up to a bad game and maybe a learning experience and the loss didn’t really change my perception of him or the team. But I don’t think he’s perfect.
I will say this: We’ve lost to the three best teams we played this year. I don’t think Arizona State is great, but they, along with Texas and Michigan, are the three best teams we played all season. We lost them all. We haven’t beaten a good team yet this year. I would say some quality wins are in order.
Go Bruins
I think a lot of this is subjective
And there are a lot of ways you can look at this game. I’ll briefly respond to your points:
1. Whether or not Arizona State is overrated, they are still in the top 15, still in the top 3 of the Pac-10 (Cal enters the discussion here as well), and they did just give us our first Pac-10 loss of the season. I’d hardly call that a pushover, even if they’re no top team.
2. Harden being unstoppable was definitely an overstatement and I probably should have used a different term (it wasn’t really supposed to be literally interpreted, more to prove that he’s an excellent player). One bad game against a decent team (IIRC, his only truly bad game of the year) hardly makes or breaks a player, and even the best will have a bad game once in a while.
3. Our offense wasn’t truly clicking until the second half, but let’s also consider the context: The game was played at a slow pace throughout, and zone defenses usually require most of a possession to break down and get something going. Considering that and our bad start and how we were only trailing by 2 at halftime (a testament to the slow nature of the game and also our defense), while our offense certainly wasn’t at its best in the first half, it was playing well enough to stay in the game. It certainly helped that JS was on his A-game in the first half too. ;)
4. It was some of both. From re-watching Tele’s last highlight video, when we took our 11-point lead, I saw a lot of offensive execution against the zone: Crisp passing, aggressive penetration (especially from DC), and open shots that were falling through. A lot of it started on the defensive end and we had to get stops to get a lead, but the offense was just as critical, and was certainly “clicking” there.
5. Lack of depth and getting tired, resulting in less aggressiveness, was what forced us into that protect offense, imo. Arizona State’s zone defense compounded this and what kept us from not even scoring a single point those last 8 minutes of regulation. Most of the time, to break down a zone, you need constant off-ball movement and crisp passing inside and out to get the zone out of sync and dysfunctional. That’s when you get open shots, solid penetration, and easy buckets. It’s very difficult to just a run a play with 10 seconds left (or try and penetrate to the lane and hope for the best) and succeed against a quality zone, and our offensive style those 8 minutes played right into Arizona State’s hands. Had we been up against a man-to-man defense, even in our protect offense, we probably would have gotten more penetration (off of screens, easier penetration when not against a zone, etc.) and better execution on last-ditch play-calls at the end of the shot clock than what transpired here.
Lastly, I’m kind of confused how you say I’m disagreeing with CBH. The only point I mentioned that he also brought up was the end-of-game substitutions/depth issue, and from what I can see, we were on the same page there.
Again, most of this is subjective, and there are a lot of ways you can dissect and analyze this game. Some of the words I used could have been better clarified, which is where I think a lot of our disagreements are stemming from. Regardless, it’s only one game, and I’m sure CBH and his staff will make the adjustments to keep what went wrong in this game from happening again.
by uclaisthebest123 on Jan 19, 2009 9:34 AM PST up reply actions
" Some quality wins are in order "
You bet we will have some down the road. This was a good learning experience about what they never should do in future, if that ever happened again. Period. Even the CBS commentator repeatedly said UCLA needed to speed it up, instead of staying in that twenty five miles an hour deliberate tempo we saw in the last few minutes.
What I have confidence in a Howland coached team is that it rarely dwells, if ever, in the past mistakes. This is still early in the season. We will see how they play in Tempe.
Nail meet head.
That sums up Achilles’ post.
I am surprised that anyone thinks the refs played a hand in this game. They were SPTRs but that always goes both ways. If we think that the refs had a hand in this loss, then surely they were the sole cause of our wins against Stanford and Cal and A&M last year (as our opponents were saying).
Your statement that it was Shipp who fouled Harden 40 feet from the basket is correct, and it got me to thinking: Why was Shipp guarding Harden? As much as I’ve watched UCLA basketball over the past 5 years, I cannot for the life of me understand why Shipp would be our choice to defend Harden when ASU needs a basket and the entire gym knows that Harden will be the one to shoot. It’s a bad matchup, made worse by the game situation. Does Howland think that highly of Shipp’s defense? Or did he make a huge coaching mistake. Either way, I am concerned.
Shipp was on Harden
because he has been our best defender the past 2 games. Against Arizona Shipp did a fantastic job in his time on Budinger and against Arizona St., he did a solid job on Harden. Shipp hasn’t been the best of defenders throughout his career, but for a weekend, he was very good. Harden was overpowering Holiday and muscling himself a seam, then blowing by Jrue. Shipp had been doing a very good job on Harden, forcing him right then muscling him into the double which got the ball out of his hands. Things clearly didn’t work out well on that last possession, but anyone who watched the games this weekend saw Shipp playing the best defense of our perimeter guys.
by Ryan Rosenblatt on Jan 20, 2009 2:30 PM PST up reply actions
my thoughts
I would love to see ML + JA get more game time. One of the strategies we’ve used against USC over the years was to use our depth advantage against them – having one guy play 38/39 minutes a game is guaranteed to tire him out. JA and ML, while still young and often raw, have shown flashes of brilliance, particularly in their passing and driving ability. I guess it’s cliche to say that a player is a “playmaker,” but there is no doubt that they have that athletic ablity to get things going, even if its for short stretches at a time. And either way, I’d rather give these guys more experience now, even if it means a few losses, than to find out we need them big in March.
I'm starting to come around on the notion of giving our young guys a little more time
As I recall, when Collison got hurt, we had a major problem and had to stick some really raw, unproven guy into the line up. I think his name was Westbrook. Of course, things were different at that point – we had no other choice. But I wouldn’t be against letting one of our all-star youngsters see if he can perform.
Having said all that, I still think I’ll defer to Coach Howland on personnel decisions.

by 


















