Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jim Irsay: We Can Make It Work With Peyton Manning

Repeating History?

It’s kind of funny. We have heard a lot about how we are going through a rebuilding season this year in Westwood. Yet our team finds itself in pretty much the same situation it found itself after 5 games during last year’s Pac-10 season. It was last year Bruins were heading into a weekend Pauley game against JustSC after destroying a solid Washington State team running their conference record to 4-0. Instead of taking control of the conference by beating Southern Cal, we got flummoxed on our own floor while losing LRMAM to injury. Amidst all the typical concern trolling from the beat reporters and poser fans, Bruins had to go up to Pacific Northwest taking on Oregon in one of the toughest venues in the conference without LRMAM. Well we all know what transpired on Mac Court. Epic performances from KL, DC and others saves the day and our warriors were off to another streak.

One year later Bruins find themselves in pretty much the same situation going up against a solid (and IMHO much better coached) Washington State team, which will be hungry and desperate its first victory against UCLA since 1992-93 season. Just how will the Bruin respond? Well, if they want to repeat last year’s history, they will have to focus on two solid players leading the way for Tony Bennett’s Cougars:

Senior guard Taylor Rochestie, who struggled early this season without departed backcourt mates Kyle Weaver and Derrick Low, has hit his stride. He scored 44 points in the two victories, including a career-best 30 at Oregon, where he sank all 16 of his free throws.

When Rochestie is at his best, he's creative and smart, an understated talent who understands what his team needs from him.

Likewise, senior center Aron Baynes got going in the right direction, with his first two double-doubles of the season. He averaged 18 points and 12 rebounds for the weekend, and is so big (6-foot-10, 270 pounds) that when he's playing well, he's a load for opposing defenses.

Which brings us to what the Cougars must always do to be successful -- defend.
They did that in both games, limiting Oregon State to 35.3 percent shooting in a 61-57 overtime victory, then holding the explosive Ducks to 38.9-percent shooting.

I am sure the Cougars were taking notes from last Saturday. But it will be interesting to see if they deviate from their typical game plan which depends on playing a very solid man to man defense. The key for Bruins will be to defend Rochestie who has been on fire. The folks at Coug Center have been going crazy this week crusading for Rochestie as the Pac-10 player of the week.

I imagine DC, JH and rest of our guards have been well drilled this week on studying the moves of the Wazzu floor general. I think the more interesting matchup will be the one between AA2 and Baynes. Baynes is a pretty skilled player downlow who is also a strong rebounder. AA2 and DG will have their work cut against the Aussie to make sure the Cougs are not getting any second or third opportunities.

CBH is pretty concerned with Baynes:

Baynes is of particular concern to Howland, who called him "a problem matchup." At 6 feet 10, he is averaging 11.7 points and 6.8 rebounds.

"He's always important to us if we can work to get him some touches," Bennett said.

As for their rotation it is still a little unsettled. Here are the usual starters per Sportsline.com notes:

Usual Starters -- F DeAngelo Casto, C Aron Baynes, G Marcus Capers, G Klay Thompson, G Taylor Rochestie. Key Subs -- G Nikola Koprivica; F Caleb Forrest; F Daven Harmeling

Nuss at Cougar Center prefers Capers and Harmeling as starters:

I love the energy Capers brings to the floor, and he seemed to handle the starting assignment very well on Saturday. While he occasionally botches a defensive assignment, his length and athleticism should be a real asset against a perimeter oriented team such as UCLA -- shooting a 3-pointer over Capers isn't the same as shooting a 3-pointer over Koprivica. And he also gives the Cougs' another good ballhandler against UCLA's defensive pressure.

I like Harmeling in this game because his 3-point shot is something that we simply must get back on track, and playing with the first unit is the best way to get him some shots. Plus, he's much less likely to be a defensive liability against UCLA, which, much like the Cougs, generally features only one post player on offense -- and Alfred Aboya isn't really a true post player. Besides, if Capers in the lineup, his defensive rebounding ability (16.1 DR%) more than makes up for the defensive rebounding liability of Harmeling (7.7 DR%), who actually contributes on the glass more than people realize with sound box-outs.

This leaves Casto, Koprivica and Forrest to come of the bench. I love Casto giving an infusion of energy when needed, I like Forrest to hold down the fort for 15-20 minutes, and I'm OK with Koprivica playing 10 minutes. But this smacks of the kind of game where Nik could really get abused.

Of course, this is all dependent on how the officials decide they're going to officiate two physical teams

Well we all know how predictable the SPTRs are in this conference.

I think the key again for our Bruins will be to show the same patience and disciplined they showed out in Pauley East. If I were them I would pretty much take into account they will have to battled through some horrific SPTRing. The focus for our guys will be to get off to a good start by playing our brand of lock down defense and sticking with our game plan on offense. This means our guards and wings will have to attack the rim every chance they get and not settle for jump shots. Moreover, as mentioned above they can’t afford to be tentative around the rim and everyone in this team has to show the same ferociousness we have gotten accustomed to from AA2.

Here is to history repeating tonight in Pullman.

GO BRUINS.

Comment 15 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Tough game

This is going to be a tough game, and a tough trip, no question. I believe our guys will be focused and will get the job done. I think they are probably sick of hearing about the unbelievable and humiliating defeat at the hands of ASU, all because of our offense.

Slightly OT, but worth noting from yesterday’s games involving Top 25 teams across the nation:

No. 1 Wake Forest lost (at home) to unranked Virignia Tech. Obviously, Wake needs to retool their entire offense.

No. 7 Michigan State was beaten (at home) by unranked Northwestern. Something must be very, very wrong with Michigan State’s offense.

No. 10 Clemson lost to No. 5 UNC. What in the world is wrong with Clemson’s offense?

No. 20 Nova was beaten by No. 3 Connecticut. I’m guessing that Nova’s problems on offense caused them not to score more points than Connecticut, leading to this loss.

and,

No. 24 Florida lost to unranked South Carolina. Again, the Gators’ problems on offense clearly led to this loss. Maybe the players simply didn’t realize that the goal of this game is to score more points than their opponent.

Go Bruins.

by Barnes2JJ on Jan 22, 2009 8:54 AM PST reply actions  

Thank you

You saved me a post!

That’s five soon-to-be coaching vacancies. What a bunch of slackers.

But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.

by tasser10 on Jan 22, 2009 9:12 AM PST up reply actions  

lets go for the W

and people can stop talkin about the ASU game

by blinkshot on Jan 22, 2009 10:33 AM PST reply actions  

Finally

These last 5 days have been difficult.

I am interested to see whether the freshmen get more playing time. I’d like to see us shut down Rochestie. And I can’t wait to see Baynes vs. our big men. He should be a good challenge for us because he’s so big.

Go Bruins!

by BruinsRule on Jan 22, 2009 11:56 AM PST reply actions  

Win 2 This Week

If we win out this week (a difficult task indeed), we will likely earn a win against a tournament team on the road, which we need. I think either Washington or Washington St. will be in the dance.

Luke Winn has us at # 11 in the Power Rankings, but notes again that we don’t have a good win. He also takes a fair jab at bruinsnation; our resume, afterall, speaks for itself.

Go Bruins.

by rfirpo on Jan 22, 2009 1:27 PM PST reply actions  

Huh?

The focus should be on winning tonight before getting worried about winning 2.

And exactly how is that SI.com jab a “fair” one? Luke is getting all sensitive for calling them out for insulting. They called us a “bubble” team and yet he himself logs UCLA as the 11th best team in the country in his own “power rankings.” The only person who got things wrong is Luke’s colleague on SI.com who somehow considers UCLA as a team that should be on the “bubble watch.” Ridiculous.

by Nestor on Jan 22, 2009 1:40 PM PST up reply actions  

SI didn't call us a "bubble team."

The article was titled “Bubble Watch” but the tournament profile of every top program is discussed therein: North Carolina, Wake, Pitt, Duke, Oklahoma, all of them. Just because a team is mentioned in the article can’t fairly be read as an assertion by the author that it’s a “bubble team,” especially when, in UCLA’s case, that term was never used. Glockner, moreover, opined that the Bruins should “easily” make the tournament field.

Clearly, people should feel free to take issue with SI’s analysis, but in the course of doing so we shouldn’t seek to distort what was actually written.

by Dexter Fishmore on Jan 22, 2009 2:52 PM PST up reply actions  

labeling us "should be in" means we're involved in the bubble

personally, I agree with Glockner somewhat (at least the fact that we don’t have a marquee win) but honestly, we’re 10 points from being undefeated. SC was a win that is being way undervalued, and it should count for something how badly we beat Arizona. But that’s not the argument here. The fact is that by calling us “should be in” and not a “lock”, we were placed on the bubble.

by bucknellbruin on Jan 22, 2009 3:00 PM PST up reply actions  

Yep

thanks for saving me the response bb.

by Nestor on Jan 22, 2009 3:18 PM PST up reply actions  

disagree a bit

The article IMO was fair. Yeah we lost by a total of 10 points, but that’s basketball after all. And the top 3 teams we’ve played so far we’ve lost to. However, if we don’t play all the rest of the way, do we deserve to be in? We’ll probably still get in due to name, but then again Arizona made it in last year (unfairly imo) based on name too. We’re nowhere near that bad and that’s why we’re in the ‘Should be in’ – because if we play up to our potential, we should be in. If we underachieve, we can easily fall out.

Besides, ‘In the Mix’ is the category where the actual bubble teams in each league are.

by blinkshot on Jan 22, 2009 3:23 PM PST up reply actions  

It was stupid

for them to put UCLA in that category. And its sillier for Luke to take a shot at us especially considering the fact he has us as the number 11 team in the program in the country. If we are number 11 in his book what his problem for us pointing out that it is absurd to label as a team that “should be in” in their “bubble watch.”

by Nestor on Jan 22, 2009 3:28 PM PST up reply actions  

Winns ranking is what I have a problem with

I can see SI’s point that we don’t have a marquee win, our reputation is preceding our resume, etc. But then don’t rank us 11th. If they had us in the 20s in the rankings, then sure, put us on the edge of the bubble. But an 11th ranked team should never be on the bubble. They’re contradicting themselves, and that’s what’s bothering me.

by bucknellbruin on Jan 22, 2009 4:29 PM PST up reply actions  

I agree, focus on tonight.

I was just saying if we win two this weekend, I think we are guaranteed to get at least one quality win.

by rfirpo on Jan 22, 2009 3:08 PM PST up reply actions  

I don't get the bubble trouble?

So what if someone objectively put our team on the bubble just a quarter of the way into the conference season. It doesn’t matter. Besides, objectively speaking, we haven’t done anything to earn a lock into the Tourney. I think we’ll beat Cal, ASU, Washington, and Notre Dame because I believe we are a good team and capable of pulling of some wins. But, after watching our team lose the three tough games this year, a small part of me wonders how good we are capable of being this year.

If I were an outside observer, only able to watch a few games from every team (as opposed to watching all the games of a few teams) I would have to say we are not a lock based on our resume. I am not even sure how the argument that we are a lock for the tournament would go? The only way to make it is to predict we are going to start winning games against top teams, which could easily happen, but is no guarantee. I mean, if anything, the evidence shows that we have not been able to beat the best. Sure, I can personally ignore that because of what I believe is the potential of our team. But still, there are questions in my mind with respect to what we are capable of. And each time we lose to a good team, the questions are more pointed. In any case, I don’t think we can be a lock based on anything we’ve done so far.

Actually, I think the fact that we are currently ranked in the top 13 in both polls should be taken as a great compliment to our program and Ben Howland. Based on who we’ve played, and who we have beat, I personally do not think we have earned that high of a ranking. However, we are getting it because of expectations that people have of our program and the ability of Howland to get the best out of his players. Of course, our “ranking” can largely be thrown out the door once selection sunday comes around, because the committee is looking a lot more objectively at things—and they are looking hard at good wins. Rye made some good points in this area.

Anyway, given our current rankings and the “bubble” story from cnnsi.com, I think the more interesting story is that we are being respected in the rankings to a degree not necessarily supported by wins. That is cool.

by rfirpo on Jan 22, 2009 3:25 PM PST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bruins Nation, an unofficial daily online scrap book covering the greatest collegiate athletic program in the nation. Established June 16, 2005. GO BRUINS.

Managers

Uclabear1_small Nestor

Arron_afflalo1_small Tydides

Brad_pitt_as_achilles_small Achilles

377011_2642084725867_1068030137_32302525_1166539782_n_small Ryan Rosenblatt

Telemachus_small Telemachus

Licenseplate_small gbruin

2761_small tasser10

Blue_bellerophon_small Bellerophon

Img_0052_2_small Patroclus

Small DCBruins

Of Counsels

094_small Ajax

Menelaus2_small Menelaus

Small Meriones

Small Odysseus

Associates

Eee_small freesia39

Uclabruins_small AHMB