remember, Dorrell took us to the BCS bowl games 3 times, and we were even in the national championship during one of those years. Oh wait, that never happened?

I think we all know that the LAT will publish whatever it needs to elicit a response from someone. They can’t keep talking about our stifling defense, so they resort to publishing letters like this. What can you do?

Im with Mexi, a rebuttal is probably needed.

definitely not reflective of the majority or core bruin base. morons is the perfect phrasing. to top it off the final letter referred to sarkisian’s recruiting violations and said something like- he must’ve found neusheisel’s recruiting manual, um more like he was taught to break rules by the cheater himself, duh

You might point out that I cancelled my subscription before probably everyone on staff there was born, so I’m a little behind.

First, are they doing a weekly update on bu$hgate? If so, what have their investigative journalists found out?
Second, what’s the latest on the OJ2 SCandal? I’m sure they’re using their unlimited access to Inheritance Hall to get deeply into that.
Third, are there going to be pictures of the limo rides? Seems like all they need is to send a photographer to campus and there would be plenty of photo ops for that.
Fourth, what is the result of their investigation of White Nation?

I could ask about Jarrett, about the twins they recruited (Derozean and Little Romeo), about Senora Ross and things like that, but I’ll pass. I just want them to address those four, and also to explain why it is that in the entire world, the only person they could find to write the UCLA blog is a trOJie. (You might mention that I would be pleased to write the trOJie blog.)

They should answer those questions. After all, the fishwrap is loaded with integrity. Just like their editorial overseer, Cheatie Petie.

Now a question for you Bruins. Can you say you’re really surprised about anti-Bruin sentiment in the fishwrap? Are you surprised that they would do something that would take the focus off bu$h or OJ2?

and I think they choose the letters purposely to try to cause a riff in Westwood. They will do anything they can to try to rile people up in an effort to make CBH look bad (they know the stats) and try to downplay suc’s consistant missteps.

Bill Dwyer did have a decent article on CBH and the Bruins today which did repudiate the letters mentioned above.

my [former] SUC coworker is roomates with adam rose and all the facts that he gets from him are such garbage that I’ve come to the conclusion that any newspaper that would let such nonsense fly isn’t worth my time.