Tomorrow...and all the days after
I waited a few days to post, because a game like Saturday's can make one um, emotional. I want to look ahead at the big picture. The Desperation Bowl, or Cal game as some may refer to it, may be a watershed moment for the CRN regime. If we lose, we will be on the road as an underdog the next two games. In fact depending on how things go right now we may only be favored in one more game this year. It suddenly becomes difficult to see where six wins and a bowl game fit in here. Cal will be even more desperate. It could be that the wheels coming off is a Tedford trademark that he can't shake. Their hair will be on fire. Going on the road with a three game losing streak could be a huge toilet swirl swoon for this team. We will see what the staff and team are made of now.
So what progress have we made this season? Well, last season we scored 96 points in our first five games. This year 105. 9 points, not too impressive. If there is a playmaker on offense I must have missed him. People are quick to pile on Prince for having a bad game. Can you think of one time this year someone has made a big play for him? Why aren't we throwing it deep? Um, because nobodies open. Perhaps it's the scheme's or maybe it's the receivers. Either way it seems to me it's on the coaches to get something out of these guys. IMO Prince is a good leader, he's tough and has a lot of upside and I'm sure he will be better in his next game. The defense seems to playing pretty well, but I think the offense's struggles put a lot of pressure on them to be perfect. The return game and the kick-off coverage is weak and is hurting us weekly. Our kicker, unfortunately is the MVP for this team. The bottom line is they got to the end of three games with a lead. Which will have to serve as progress. More after the jump.
What concerns me is the future. There is a lot of talk about how great the future will be but consider this: We had a fantastic home schedule this year in conference. Next year Cal, Oregon, Washington are all on the road. I expect all three of these teams to be better. Check the standings, there is only one team in our conference with a losing record this season. The Pac-10, IMO, is the strongest conference top to bottom. Of course that won't get any run in the SECPN world. The point I'm making is there are a lot of good young QB's in this league who are all going to be better next year. So if you get better and your competitors get better right along with you how do you make progress in the conference standings? That's got to be keeping CRN awake nights. At least I hope it does.
Go Bruins! Beat the Bears!
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of BruinsNation's (BN) editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of BN's editors.
11 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I think the bottom line
Our OL has to get better at pass blocking (and our backs need to pick up blitzes better). I don’t know if that’s something you can fix during a season, and it doesn’t particularly surprise me either given how many young guys we’re rotating in at those positions. So bad news is that we’re probably stuck playing the hand we’re dealt the rest of the season. The good news is that there’s room for exponential improvement if our line can give whomever is under center time for the deeper routes to develop.
I don't think our OL has been too bad
I’d say they’ve been completely mediocre, which was my high hope for them. They’ve given our QB time to throw the ball deep before, but those receivers aren’t getting separation. I think our OL has been about as good as we could expect for as much youth and inexperience we have there.
by Ryan Rosenblatt on Oct 12, 2009 2:48 PM PDT up reply actions
For sure I didn't expect them to be anywhere above average
You don’t go from the worst OL in D1 to above average in one season. It just doesn’t work that way. I just think if our offense and our team as a whole is going to take the “next step”, then that’s the most obvious area of improvement. Sadly, I think that will have to wait till next year.
It starts with our OL and our QB
That seems painfully obvious, doesn’t it? In an ideal world, we’d have an OL and backs who can effectively pick up a blitz and give our QB time to find where the defense has left a gaping hole to exploit.
But, let’s be real: our stable of backs are all pretty young. Except for Moline, we really don’t have anyone in the backfield who has shown they can effectively pick up a blitzing linebacker.
The key is that our OL, instead of panicking when they see more men coming than they have available blockers, they need to stick to their assignments and block. If they bring 7 or 8 men, only 2 or 3 should get through our OL, period. There is five boys in blue. They need to each pick up a man.
What say you about those 2 or 3 blitzers? That’s when it all comes down to QB play and this is why the blitz has been so effective against us the last couple of seasons. We need a QB that can do the following, absolutely crucial things: (1) read the blitz once it’s coming and find the appropriate hot read, and/or (2) read the blitz once it’s coming and be able to step up in the pocket/roll out to space to buy time to either throw it away (and not lose yards) or find a TE, RB, or WR coming back to the play to pick up a few yards.
Our biggest problems has been our OL has not picked up their assignments when the opposing defense brings the blitz. I don’t know if that’s a psychological problem or what, but for whatever reason, when our guys realize there are more rushers than available blockers, the guys who are left to block don’t even pick up their man. That has to stop. It’s a lot easier to elude 2 defenders (especially if they’re both coming from the edge (i.e. step up in the pocket) or if they’re coming from one side (i.e. roll out of the pocket away from pressure)) than it is to elude 5 or 6 and the whole damn pocket is collapsing. Maybe the answer is that we need bigger, more athletic offensive lineman. And that wouldn’t shock me, given how thin we have been on OL since KD destroyed the program.
The other major problem is that we don’t have a QB who has proven he can read the blitz and make the right read. I know a lot of people have been on NC, but he’s freakin’ NC. Even junior high coaches know that any pass play needs to have a “hot read” (i.e. a safe pass for the QB to dump the ball to), like a RB in the flat, a WR on a short slant, a TE drag, etc. I’m pretty confident NC is drawing up plays that give our QB options if there’s a blitz. Especially given that it comes at us all the damn time. The problem isn’t that guys aren’t open on those hot reads: our QB isn’t seeing them, be it because of inexperience or lack of skill.
To me that’s where this whole QB debate boils down: Prince has much more pocket presence than Brehaut does. He seems to know when the blitz is coming and he’s done a better (albeit marginally) job of doing something to mitigate the damage. Brehaut is still not at a game speed and doesn’t seem to know when the heat is on. Maybe more snaps will help him, but if we’re going to win now, then Prince is the go to guy, at least for now.
The blitz, not conservative play-calling, is the number one thing cutting our offense down. The key on offense, as simplistic as it sounds, is to avoid negative yards. Rolling out of the pocket and chucking the ball into the 10th row isn’t a bad option sometimes. You live and get another play out of it.
If we can eliminate the blitz from opposing teams’ playbook, by rendering it ineffective by mitigating the damage it could do, then we stand a better chance of being able to develop to the deep routes down the field.
Our QB
Has to play and develop that feel for the game. I agree that Brehaut is not as aware in the pocket as Prince. Prince has got to play and pick it up. Saturday would be good LOL.
Experience is Key
Experience on the offensive line is key. 8 of the 10 teams in the conference start at least 3 upperclassmen on the offensive line (not UCLA or OSU). 8 of 10 start at least one senior (not UCLA or Oregon). Only 1 starts 4 underclassmen (UCLA; OSU has 3).
We also have the fewest returning starters (1) and are the only team with 0 upperclassmen starters who have played division 1 football before this season.
I know we all know it, but this line is woefully inexperienced compared to the other 9 teams in the league. Despite the total lack of experience, I think our line has improved from beyond dreadful to mediocre. That’s a huge leap. Next year, when everyone has a year under their belts and a year of spring practice, it will improve by leaps and bounds to be, dare I say, somewhere between adequate and above average.
By the way, when you look to the entire offense, here is the number of upperclassmen starters on each team in the conference
USC: 9
Arizona: 9
ASU: 9
OSU: 7
Oregon: 7
WSU: 7
Cal: 6
WSU: 6 (4 on OL)
UW: 5 (4 of whom play QB or OL)
UCLA: 4 (1 at OL or QB)
Right now, it’s our inexperience at too many critical positions that is keeping us from playing good offense.
by BruinsRule on Oct 13, 2009 1:50 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
That's pure talent talking
They clearly don’t have the experience part down, and that includes individual experience as well as the experience of working together as a unit. When you look at it that way, it’s actually pretty remarkable that this line does approach average. I think it’s going to be difficult to show that kind or improvement midseason though, so our defense is probably still going to have to win games for us.
BruinAI Wrote
“So if you get better and your competitors get better right along with you how do you make progress in the conference standings?”
Recruiting, and it looks pretty good so far. We definitely need to get a few quality wins under our belt before this season ends though. This weekend would be nice start.
I think if Prince had not gone out with the injury, the Oregon game would have ended very different. I think all of you would agree that Oregon did not win that game, we gave it to them.
Go Bruins
Recruiting
Is definitely looking better and better. It would be great to show that kid from Texas a winning good time at the Rose Bowl Saturday. If we we are going to to make a break for the top of the conference, top tier talent is the way to get there.
I would never
say that, in a game where UCLA scores 0 offensive touchdowns, we gave the game away. We never had it in the first place.
Oregon indeed won it. So at least I disagree and I’m sure plenty more do too.

by 






















