Breaking Down the Cal Running Game
Bumped. GO BRUINS. -N
I took a look at the Cal run game for the Oregon and USC games and put together some clips. Both games were blowouts, so Cal abandoned the ran fairly early, but I just wanted to take a close look at what they do. Cal's consistently been one of the top rushing teams in the Pac-10 under Tedford, but they have expanded a bit in recent year. I believe their OC came from Utah last season, where they used a more wide-open approach, and I think it shows on their run game.
From the two games I saw, I wasn't really that impressed with Kevin Riley (although it was against two good teams). Between that, and our defense giving up 200+ to Oregon and close to that number against Stanford, I think that the run defense will be an important point on Saturday.
Here are some numbers:
|
Play |
Carries |
Yards |
YPC |
|
Direct |
4 |
16 |
4 |
|
Draw |
1 |
-2 |
-2 |
|
Zone (Inside) |
9 |
36 |
4 |
|
Toss |
1 |
8 |
8 |
|
Option |
1 |
2 |
2 |
|
Zone (Outside) |
6 |
17 |
2.8 |
|
Power |
14 |
61 |
4.4 |
|
Reverse |
2 |
24 |
12 |
|
Zone (Total) |
15 |
53 |
3.5 |
|
Wildcat (Total) |
6 |
26 |
4.3 |
You can see the popular schemes for Cal are their zone game (inside and outside) and their power game. Don't know if they had it last year, but against USC I saw them with a Wildcat-"lite" package that is not all that different from what they already do.
The last time I really took a look at Cal was when they had Marshawn Lynch, and their power game was a key play for them. They seem to have gone more to a zone scheme this year, as the bulk of their power plays that I charted came at the end of the Oregon game when they were just running clock with their backups.
Power
As I said, Power used to be a staple of the Cal offense. Seems that they prefer zone now (see below). Cal runs several variations with different blocking depending on what kind of look they get and how the defense plays them, but the basic idea is one player to kick out the end man on the line, and another to lead through and clean up the linebacker.
Here's two clips of them running power against Oregon as well as the diagram below.
Here is another diagram against a front that Cal might see from UCLA (it was one that we used against Stanford when they lined up in a similar formation).
You have the FB kicking out the strong backer, the TE taking on the defensive end, a double team on the DT with one guy sliding off to the backer when he threatens, and the guard pulling through to pick up the middle backer. They may change up a few things depending on the defensive look...sometimes they have their FB kick out the end, send the TE to the backers, have the guard pull and lead through on a different guy, etc, but the concept is the same. I couldn't find my copy of the 2005 Cal game but I remember Marshawn Lynch doing well on this play against us.
Zone
I broke down some zone last week for Oregon and there isn't much different, except that Cal is running it from under center. The one difference is that Cal doesn't really try to sell much of a fake with Kevin Riley, so they usually have a guy blocking the backside defender. Usually they will just send a guy across the formation to pick up this backside defender on inside zone, which usually breaks from hole to backside.
Here is Javhid Best running inside zone off a fake end-around look. The wing runs across the formation and picks up the backside defender, and sure enough the run cuts back for yardage. Reverse action aside, USC runs this exact same series, as their QBs usually aren't a threat to run either - they will often run playaction off this zone look, leak this backside blocker into the flat, and throw it to him.
Wildcat and Direct Snap
Cal has shown a direct snap look as well as a Wildcat in their last game against USC (the two aren't the same). The direct snap plays they showed against Oregon and USC mainly involved snapping the ball to Jahvid Best and letting him run - nothing fancy. It worked once against the Ducks because someone missed a tackle. They also tried to get fancy and run a sort of counter-type play out of the direct snap, but they didn't get anywhere with it. The TV announcers were talking about this being their "Wildcat", but I don't agree - it's just a direct snap to your great athlete and letting him work.
As far as the "true" Wildcat, Cal's version isn't full-grown yet. Not sure if they just installed it for USC week, but they didn't really seem to be all that comfortable with it, and just used it on a few drives late in the game. For those of you who didn't get to see the original Wildcat as run by Darren McFadden and the Arkansas Razorbacks, the Wildcat is three main things:
- Unbalanced line - providing a different look to align against, tilted towards the speed sweep side
- Fly motion across the formation - immediate threat to the outside
- An athlete to receive the snap - this is the most obvious trait and the one that gets pointed to first
- Series-based football of plays that complement each other
Here's a clip of Cal's Wildcat in action
Notice anything? The line is doing the same thing as they did above with the inside zone. Send the wing to the backside to pick up the end man, zone block frontside, and have the back take a direct angle looking to break from hole to backside. Once again, Best breaks backside for yardage. They run their same basic running game out of Wildcat - zone and power. Here they run inside zone with Javhid Best at QB and fly sweep action, diagrammed below.
It's almost exactly like how they run zone from under center, except that they have a fake to the motion man and line up a little differently. They use an unbalanced line, but USC treats it pretty much like a normal 21 formation, they line up in an under front, and probably would have made the tackle for a short gain if Cal hadn't gotten an extra block by the umpire. SC rolls their safety down on the backside in their under look, and he's responsible for those runs to the backside - ref just gets in the way.
I respect the true Wildcat series, which can be a fundamentally sound and legitimate offensive package if you are able to teach it and implement it completely. I think it is one of those things where you need to be either all in or all out, just like the option - running it once or twice a game isn't really going to help you as it takes a lot of repetition to master.
I'm not sure how much time our defense is spending on this - it is possible that Cal has used their bye week to implement the whole series and some new tricks - if so, we might have a challenge defending it. However, seems like a lot of work to coach and rep something that doesn't really complement what you are already doing.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of BruinsNation's (BN) editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of BN's editors.
5 recs |
6 comments
|
Comments
Really Good Stuff
Thank you for sharing your insights and giving me a deeper understanding of the game.
sjh
by Class of 66 on Oct 12, 2009 6:38 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Hey man
Great stuff. what do you use for the playbooks?
There's no one in the world that wants to beat UCLA more than _______.
by ucla13_usc9 on Oct 12, 2009 6:50 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
A few comments
First of all, the key to Cal’s running game is the passing game. Kevin Riley has been mediocre-to-awful the last two games (not helped by poor pass-blocking and some receiver drops), and consequently, defenses have been keying much harder on containing Best. I don’t know what Cal’s coaches are going to try to do to settle Riley down and get him going, but the Bears only really have a chance this weekend, if they can make UCLA’s defense respect the pass.
The Bears have used direct snaps to the running back in previous years, though usually only about once every few games — the USC game was the first time I can recall more than one being called in the same game. Also, we haven’t had a running back who could throw the ball well since Marshawn Lynch (Best can’t throw at all, and Shane Vereen is barely passable). I’m pretty sure the mini-wildcat package is new this year. Actually, I’m pretty sure it was new for the USC game — I hadn’t seen anything like it before then.
As for the decreased prominence of the power run game, I haven’t done enough film study this year to comment. You might try looking at the Minnesota game, which I think more fairly represents what the Bears are trying to do on offense, instead of the last two faceplants.
So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!
by ragnarok on Oct 12, 2009 7:02 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
rags, jt34 isn’t too far off. Cal didn’t do much power run last year, and while they’ve mixed it in this season, there is much greater variety this season in the type of plays called (if you look at the Minny numbers they should be similar in the proportions). It’s a much different version of the 2004-2005 squads that relied almost 80% on power run scheme.
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash on Oct 13, 2009 12:31 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, I agree with Avi.
Best is a great zone running back, with his explosive speed, and great vision and patience. so….we’ve done a whole lot more zone than with either lynch or forsett who were both much more power-man runners.
imo, i’d like to see us use a bit more power-man to force the defense to play both.
Go Bears Go
by Rocksanddirt on Oct 14, 2009 8:18 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I tried to get ahold of the minnesota game but no luck. And for some reason my copy of the SC game is missing the first 1 or 2 cal drives where they ran it a bit. However in the Oregon game they pretty much came out running zone – not to say that they weren’t using the “power run game”, but they weren’t using the “power” run scheme, until late in the game when they were down big and had verheen in (they ran it something like 3 or 4 times in a row at the end, which leads me to believe that they still consider it one of their base plays). No idea if it’s a coaching staff change or because they believe their personnel was better suited for the inside zone, but we will have a better idea on saturday.
As far as the “Wildcat”, I’m not so sure they are looking to pass out of it, seems more just like a way to repackage their base concepts to give the defense another thing to think about, but we will also see about that – the fact that they showed it the week before a bye has me wondering if they are planning to install more.
by jtthirtyfour on Oct 13, 2009 7:15 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 






















