Spaulding Roundup: More California Game Notes
Let's get back to football and talk a little bit more about the game this Saturday. If you haven't done it yet make sure to listen to ryebreadraz and ucla13_usc9 talking about Bears-Bruins match up with Ragnarok from California Golden Blogs. The nugget I found most interesting was the discussion about the special teams. Now special teams have been a huge topic of discussion (or shall I say consternation) here on BN. I didn't know that it was such an issue for the Bears as well. Ragnarok pointed to a post from Jon Wilner that at least on surface points to a UCLA advantage for UCLA specials teams (don't LOL) on Saturday. I thought the numbers on punt and kick returns were especially surprising:
Punt returns
UCLA’s Terrence Austin averages 10.5 yards per return with a long of 45.
Cal’s Syd’Quan Thompson averages 5.6 ypr with a long of 12.Kick returns
Austin averages 24.8 ypr.
Cal’s Shane Vereen averages 25.6 ypr.Coverage units
It’s about even on kicks, although UCLA has 10 touchbacks and Cal has one.
UCLA has a huge edge in net punting, with a 41.3 average (first place) vs. Cal’s 33.9 net (last place). The Bears have also allowed one touchdown, the 66-yarder by USC’s Damian Williams.
Advantage
UCLA, by a substantial margin.
Again, I am not sure if we can get too comfortable looking at those numbers. In fact looking at those numbers it worries me even more for what could happen this Saturday. If anything it seems like now it's a done deal that Syd'Quan Thompson or Shane Vareen will take one to the House against us. Austin is a good kid but to me Vereen and Thompson are way more explosive than TA.
We saw last weekend how falling asleep in one play can change the dynamic of an entire game. They can't just depend on booming kicks from Locke ( leads the conference with a 46.3 net.) every time out. I hope our specials took that lesson to heart and are working extra hard this game week because they will need to focus as hard during punt and kickoff coverages as they did against Stanford's Chris Owusu in Palo Alto when they were able to bottle up Palo Alto. More on the game and other team notes after the jump.
The guys over at California Golden Blogs have the notes up on UCLA and I think they are pretty much on the mark. I have been saying all week Saturday is going to be about how UCLA offense performs against Cal's defense. Avinash's thoughts on the "biggest battle" on Saturday:
Not only is their starting tailback a frosh, but their starting o-line is very young. 1 frosh, 3 sophomores on the offensive line, Even more interestingly, their left tackle is a true frosh (although Su'a-Filo might be their best guy on the line). So they're going to struggle generating offense as they get their reps in and they make those mistakes.
It's why the biggest battle will be UCLA's offensive line playing Cal's defensive line. The Bears D-line has played well the last two weeks, but got overshadowed by the other deficiencies and strong O-line play by Oregon and Southern CalUCLA. They'll certainly want to make their mark, and Alualu might have his most favorable matchup of the season playing either Harris or Su'a-Filo. The Bruins have to hold their ground to make sure Kevin Prince is comfortable in the pocket and execute their blocks to get UCLA's running backs to that second level against our weaker linebackers.
Not only are we working in freshman and sophomores, two of our offensive line starters are also transfers. I actually think our guys have done an average job (which is substantial improvement from the miserable state of things last season) of giving our QBs time and opening up running lanes. They just need to do be working on becoming more consistent. They are aware of what they need to do:
Sophomore center Kai Maiava said he takes personal responsibility for the team's inability to punch it in from inside the 2-yard line on four consecutive plays against the Ducks.
"Shoot ... Oregon did a good job plugging up the holes," Maiava said. "We just couldn't execute it. We never really practiced that play. But either way, we should've punched it in. I take most of the responsibility on that. We should have wedged it in and gotten that seven."
The key question will be whether our guys (Prince or Brehaut) will be able to get in a rhtyhm early on. There was no doubt Prince was rusty early on against Oregon. He did get back into it somewhat in second quarter (IIRC at point he had completed something like 8 passes in a row) but he went back into a funk during that Duck explosion early in the 3rd. I think it will be imperative for Chow to call a game on Saturday that will put Prince in a comfortable spot and facilliate his game management decisions. Perhaps having Christian Ramirez this weekend will help:
"He's (Christian Ramirez) looking like he's healthy and he's starting to work his way back into the mix a little bit," UCLA running backs coach Wayne Moses said. "When you're away that long, it takes a little time to get your timing and rhythm back. It looks like he's starting to get into the flow."
Ramirez presents a completely different option than the team's more diminutive backs. At 6-foot-2, Ramirez is the biggest Bruin back, with two inches on Coleman, four inches on Franklin and six inches on Knox and Thigpen.
His size gives him a built-in advantage in pass protection and in the receiving game, though he was admittedly shaky with his blocking against Oregon.
"I need to try to use the combination that I have - the size and speed. And I pride myself on catching the ball, being a receiving back. I can split out and turn it into a five-wide easily. I still need to get some more experience in (protection). I felt a little rocky out there Saturday. I'm coming. I need to get back into the groove, and try to establish myself again."
I wonder if we will see Ramirez in goal line situations this Saturday. As for the Jet Ski sounds like it's a day to day deal with him at this point. From the LA Times:
Franklin, who gives the Bruins speed in the backfield, was unable to get in a full workout.
It leaves coaches pondering other options.
"We'll find out on Saturday," Franklin said about whether he would play.
Asked what was difficult about running on the ankle, Franklin said, "No comment on that." Asked if it still hurt, Franklin said, "No comment on that."
For some reason I am not as worried about this as I should be. I am thinking in a situation like this is perfect for backs like Ramirez and Knox to pounce all over and take advantage of the opportunity. At least I hope that's the case and they get the chance to do it. We will see.
Speaking of personnel decisions it looks like Hester is not going to be available for this week. The earlier he might be available is for the Arizona game on October 24. But CRN might decide to work him in cautiously and wait till October 31 when the Bruins take on Oregon State (See the OC Register report). Meanwhile, Sheldon Price is scheduled to start against California this Sat:
The UCLA depth chart listed Price and sophomore Courtney Viney as possible starters this week, but Bullough said Price would keep the job.
"I think he's growing up more and more every game," Bullough said. "He's a very gifted player and hasn't had as many mental mistakes as you would expect as a freshman."
Honestly, I don't get this decision. No doubt Sheldon is giving eveyrthing he can but to me it seems like Viney brings a more noticable physical presence in the way he covers and tackles (despiting giving up size). At least that's what I remember from the effort he gave against pretty athletic Tennessee receivers at Neyland stadium. Anyway, we will see how it goes on Saturday.
Lastly, let's end with a note with a quick look into the mindset of the Bears. They are desperate for a win and per Jonathan Okanes of the MercuryNews.com, apparently Tedford has been tyring out some "new practice rituals" to fire up the Bears for this Saturday (and rest of the season):
Tedford also introduced some new practice rituals in an attempt to work on intangibles. The team began and ended practice by assembling in a big huddle, and jumping up and down and hooting and hollering, as though they were about to take the field for a game.
"That's the swagger that we have all day, every day," Kendricks said. "That was fun. That's what they're trying to install in us. You have to have fun while you're doing this. We always have a sense of urgency and we always want to win, but I feel like having fun while we're out there playing is just going to help us play better."
"A lot of people had high hopes for us. The season isn't over," Cal safety Marcus Ezeff said. "The season is brand new now. That's how we're looking at it. "
I hope it all works out for them ... starting on October 24th.
GO BRUINS.
22 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
No time for rituals
CAL can do all the jumping up and down they want before the game. After our D stops them a few times, they will stop bouncing.
I expect us to put on a good show this week. I expect to see more poise, determination and focus. That should translate to Execution! We are bound to make mistakes but I expect the team won’t collapse like they did last week. This week it is all about pride. Pride in being a Bruin. I hope the team keeps that in mind the entire game. GO BRUINS!!
Reminds me of SUC in 2006?
When OUR team got amped up and they were like “Oh! Me too! Look at Me!!! We’re excited too!”
Wasn’t genuine then and seems contrived now.
Ya...
“That’s the swagger that we have all day, every day,” Kendricks said. “That was fun. That’s what they’re trying to install in us. You have to have fun while you’re doing this. We always have a sense of urgency and we always want to win, but I feel like having fun while we’re out there playing is just going to help us play better.”
A little self contradiction there?
There's no one in the world that wants to beat UCLA more than _______.
Sheldon. Man, the only thing that gives me hope with this guy
is Sy’d-Quan’s story…..getting smoked as a freshman at Tennessee, but recovering to become one of the best corners in the Pac-10, if not the nation. But, right now, he’s playing like a Michael Norris before his end-of-the-season, unexplained improvement!!
I know Crompton sucked, but with Viney, I don’t remember seeing anything negative during thte TN game…even though I was keying on him b/c of the apparent mismatch. I mean, he obviously wasn’t blowing people up, but neither do I remember him getting clowned. And with the way Price has played, you really gotta wonder what went on or is going on with regard to Viney. Can’t wait for Hester to get back!!
I just about fell over when I read the same thing.
The “key” play, called twice and flopping twice, had never “reallyl” been practiced? What is the excuse for that? We had no other package for short yardage on the goal line? What did we practice and why wasn’t it used? Mmmmm..
Wait a minute --
Did Kai Maiava really say, “We never really practiced that play.”?
Probably not
Considering they probably didn’t want Prince banging up against our DL during practices. That’s why we were so worked up over that call in the first place.
I caught that too, and raised an eyebrow
A coach is someone who can give correction without causing resentment. John Wooden
I just about fell over when I read the same thing.
The "key" play, called twice and flopping twice, had never "reallyl" been practiced? What is the excuse for that? We had no other package for short yardage on the goal line? What did we practice and why wasn’t it used? Mmmmm..
Complacent Kick Off Coverage Team?
The blessing of Locke is that he can put it in the end zone.
I wonder if we just assume that once it’s there, no one will run it out.
IIRC — the runback for the TD was on a kick that was into the zone. Am I right?
If so, Cover Damn It? Locke is doing his job. Everyone else has to step up.
sjh
You are correct ...
Officially, it was called a 102 yard return, but if so, I’d say it was closer to 103 than 102. I was a little surprised when the returner decided to run it out. Also, not sure if it made a difference, but the kick was right up against the West sideline which probably made it more difficult for the coverage team that started on the East side of the field to get in on the play. I think it was Sean Westgate (#11) who had the best shot at the tackle coming from the other side, but he was about 1/2 step too late. Still, I would have thought kicking it towards the sideline would be advantageous to the coverage team because they gain the sideline as an extra defender.
I wonder if those return numbers
include fair catches as a zero return? My guess is they don’t, and one of my biggest criticism of Austin is his hyper conservativism when it comes to fair catches or just flat out letting the ball bounce.
Im with you on Viney. I believe he is a much better option at this stage of his career.
"when you've seen how big the world is, how can you make due with this?"
by silverlakebruin on Oct 15, 2009 11:08 AM PDT reply actions
it's not just conservatism
It’s foolish decisions. Our field-position gets regularly killed by his decision to pass on balls he could easily catch.
On special teams
I think we’ve been really good this year, and I am serious. We’ve been kicking well, net punting well, kickoffs have been going in the end zone , we’ve blocked some kicks here and there… all that balanced against one truly bad kick off return for a touchdown, and I think we’re doing just fine. Ya there were some other long kick off returns and that is definitely a special teams weakness, but on balance I’d say our special teams are really strong.
agreed
one bad play does not affect our overall good special teams play, although some would argue that. 13/14 on FG’s counts as special teams play, don’t forget.
We're #118
in kick return yardage defense which measures average yards per kick return against us. Almost 29 yds/return. It’s not just one kick off. Taking away the 100 yard return entirely, and we’re still #100 at 24.25 yds/return. Either way, we’re terrible. If it’s not a touchback, and good majority of the time it isn’t, the other team starts past the 30.
On a positive note, only 9 returns on 23 punts from Locke. Under 40% return rate is pretty good. 10 touchbacks out of 27 kicks puts Locke at one of the best touchback rates in the nation.
Kick coverage is clearly the glaring hole of the special teams.
Cal is #19 in return yardage defense
So the coverage units aren’t really that close to even. Cal’s coverage team limits opposing returners to just under 19 yards/return. Not exactly the wash that Jon Wilner calls it. He’s way off base saying UCLA holds a substantial advantage in special teams. It’s much closer to even, the stats he selected don’t tell the whole story.
But that wouldn't mesh
with his storyline, and we see another reason why sports journalists are marginalizing themselves.
that is also misleading....as our kicks are so short that
a 19 yard return still puts one out at the 30 yard line. that’s why kicking is kind of a wash.
Go Bears Go
by Rocksanddirt on Oct 16, 2009 12:55 AM PDT up reply actions
Now I wish had chance to review the tapes
Are our guys getting a little too relaxed with Locke’s booming kicks? I hate even asking that question. The reasonable answer seems to be that we are just not staying with our assignments in our KO coverage.
This wasn’t really an issue until the KSU game. We saw the coverage slip for the first time this season against the Wildcats. IIRC it got a little better against Stanford again but then the costly mess from last weekend. Ugh.
Ack I screwed up
The Bears D-line has played well the last two weeks, but got overshadowed by the other deficiencies and strong O-line play by Oregon and UCLA.
As much as you would like that to be the case, I have no crystal ball. I meant USC.
Thanks for the thoughts though! And I really think it comes down to how well your tackles can handle Alualu and Jordan off the edge.
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Oct 15, 2009 5:06 PM PDT reply actions

by 






















