Pregame Guesses: Stanford
Not sure why I'm having trouble coming up with the Pregame Guesses for Stanford.
I thought about going with a joke:
How many Stanford professors does it take to change a light bulb?
Eleven. One to change the light bulb and ten to co-author the paper.
But it's not really that funny.
I thought about doing a "Stanford band" thing or a "Stanford Dollies" thing or maybe a "How tough can Stanford be when the school is named after a guy named Leland" thing but none of it was really working.
via www.sfmuseum.org (As noted in the comments, this picture is of Leland Stanford, who endowed the school in honor of his late son, Leland Stanford, Jr.)
For me, the "Stanford band is crazy" thing is sort of old. It's a cliche.
It's been done.
And Leland Stanford was actually a pretty tough guy -- a governor and a senator from California who would have been worth over a billion in today's dollars.
The fact of the matter is, my focus is more on the game than on the guesses.
As Nestor's been saying all week, it's a big one.
I agree.
I went on record last week by writing that 3-0 is great but since we really hadn't beaten a team worth anything, we still had a lot to prove.
The proving starts Saturday.
You know, Nestor gets mad at me when I look past the next game, but I always remind him that I'm not on the team and that it's okay if Iook past Stanford. And when I look past Stanford, I see the Cal-Oregon home stand looming. Point is: we're staring down the barrel of three tough games against three tough teams. While it's on the road, the Stanford game might be the most winnable of the trio.
It's a drag that we head north without our starting quarterback. No excuses, mind you, but it would have been nice to have a full clip when we face the Cardinal. My main concern so far is that the offense has looked very vanilla, a lot of the plays that SC used to run under Norm Chow are not in our arsenal yet and it's not clear to me if that's because we're once again playing with a back up quarterback or because we're relatively young or what. But the biggest advantage I see for UCLA over Stanford is speed. But if we don't find ways to get guys like Randall Carroll and Damien Thigpen involved then that advantage is negated.
Without further ado, here are the Stanford Pregame Guesses:
- Which team on Saturday will rush for more yards?
- True or False: UCLA will score a touchdown on either special teams or defense?
- Which team will lead at halftime (or will it be tied at halftime)?
83 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Stanford, True, Stanford
though I think ucla’s will win.
Go Bears Go
Yes, the school was named after Leland Stanford ...
but not this one. The school was a memorial to his son Leland Jr., who died of TB when he was only 16.
by Gen2Bruin1987 on Oct 2, 2009 11:19 AM PDT up reply actions
I knew that ...
maybe I didn’t write it well.
The senior Stanford endowed the school in honor of his son, who died as a teenager while in Europe.
I didn't know that...
and now making fun of them for being a “Junior University,” like a junior college? Not so funny.
Those dollies are pretty cute, especially . . .
. . . Shea and Kim. Better than they have been advertised in the past!
Of course, they look like they are in junior high. I just can guage the age of young women as I get higher up in years.
Stanford, False, UCLA
A coach is someone who can give correction without causing resentment. John Wooden
What was that old line....
supposedly in Playboy? Nine out of ten women that go to Pac 10 schools are good-looking; the other one goes to Stanford.
Stanford, True, TIED at half.
I really think our teams are evenly matched.
Our defense is stronger than theirs, but their running game is more consistent than ours.
Their special teams are almost split-second lethal, but our FG kicker is nails and Austin is just thisfreakingclose to bringing the hammer on a return.
Their end pressure on D is strong, and our end speed and downfield blocking is jsut as strong.
This should be a street fight, pure and simple.
M
"In this program your passion bucket must be full to play SC." -- CRN, to Dan Patrick, 1/2008
I hope they start
Thigpen on kickoffs though.
UCLA, True, UCLA
Here’s betting we stop the run holding Furd to less than 100
by brewnz on Oct 2, 2009 12:16 PM PDT via mobile reply actions
UCLA, No, UCLA
"The entire world that bleeds blue and gold ... they have been dying for this." - Coach Rick Neuheisel
UCLA, true, UCLA
Defense comes up big.
Go Bruins.
by Westwood is the best wood on Oct 2, 2009 1:09 PM PDT via mobile reply actions
Stanford, False, Stanford
But Craft has enough magic to pull it out with a late TD to Moya. 13-7 Bruins.
UCLA, True, UCLA
I’m going big on UCLA. I think we’ll get enough penetration on our Dline to Gerhart before he gets moving and our offensive line is healthy, young, and improving every week. 150 yards for Franklin!
Stanford. True. Tied 13-13.
1. Stanford – Gerhart will go over 100 in a slugfest with our defense.
2. ATV will take one to the house!
3. We’ll be tied at halftime and win a close game 23-20.
Stanford, False, UCLA
There's no one in the world that wants to beat UCLA more than _______.
by ucla13_usc9 on Oct 2, 2009 2:23 PM PDT via mobile reply actions
Stanford, true, UCLA
Los Angeles Rams and the UCLA Bruins!!!!!
by Minnesota Bruinfan on Oct 2, 2009 8:37 PM PDT reply actions
UCLA, False, Stanford
Bruins win !
UCLA 23
Standford 17
UCLA, True, UCLA
We have one huge run and they a decent day on the ground. Thigpen surprises on a return or Austin finally breaks it on the return. One of the two happen in the first half to help us take a lead to halftime.

by 


























