Spaulding Roundup: UCLA Needs To Open Up & Execute On Offense Early On Against Arizona
Let's try our best to take our mind off this past weekend's game and look ahead to Saturday's match up against Arizona. Arizona is coming into this game on the opposite end of the emotional spectrum after stunning Stanford in an offensive shoot out last weekend in Tuscon. They are flying high and at least on offense clicking on all cylinders with brand new quarterback in sophomore Nick Foles. jthirtyfour already broke down the Arizona offense to get us started for this game week.
Right now UCLA is probably somewhere around a 9 to 9 1/2 point underdog against the Wildcats. Given what we have seen from the teams in recent weeks (note I am not a betting person) seems like smart money would be on the Wildcats to blow the Bruins out of the desert. I just don't think we have a defensive scheme that is dynamic enough or a personnel that is coached up to be disciplined enough to shut down Arizona. If we are going to even have a chance to win this game on Saturday, I think Neuheisel and Chow will have to trust their offense and open it up early instead of waiting to fall behind again due to usual defensive ineptness in the first few series. They will need to break away from the mindset of "managing" their way to a victory and instead think about being aggressive and attack early and often on offense.
Let's start with quick recap of the series history between these two teams:
SERIES WITH ARIZONA -- UCLA owns a 19-12-2 advatage in the series with Arizona, which dates back to 1927. The Wildcats own a 9-8 record in games played in Arizona and have won the last two played in Tucson. Arizona has also captured the last two meetings in the series, winning 31-10 last season in the Rose Bowl and 34-27 in the 2007 campaign. UCLA's last win in the series came in the 2006 season by a 27-7 score. The Bruins' last win at Arizona came in 2003, a 24-21 verdict. Coach Neuheisel is 4-1 overall, 0-1 while head coach at UCLA, versus the Wildcats.
A year ago, the Bruins played the Wildcats in their Pac-10 opener (game 3 - Sept. 20, 2008) in the Rose Bowl. Arizona jumped out to a 17-7 lead before a Kai Forbath field goal sent the teams to the dressing rooms with UA up 17-10. After a scoreless third quarter, the visitors tacked on 14 more points on a scoring pass and a touchdown run to come away with a 31-10 win. UCLA managed 196 yards of total offense in the contest. Arizona passed for 222 yards and ran for 111 more.
The second half collapse against Arizona at the Rose Bowl last year kind of reminds me of the collapses we have had in last two games during when we played opponents tough most of the game only to completly implode within small stretches when the team fell apart on all facets of the game.
Let me see if I can find any signs of hope going through the Arizona team stats for 2009 season. Not surprisingly the Wildcats have the number 1 passing offense and the 1 overall offense (560.33 yards per game) in the conference. The only vulnerability I see (on surface at least) is their scoring defense is ranked 8th (giving up 26 pts per game) in the Pac-10. They have gotten lit up in their last three games giving up 32 pts to Oregon State, 36 points (in a heartbreaking loss in Seattle) to Washington, and then giving up 38 points to Stanford this past weekend.
I am really not sure whether our defense has the ability to stop Arizona (more on our D after the fold). The question I have is whether our offense can set the tone early on against Wildcats making it a game. Yes, all this season we have talked about our defense setting the tone early. Well I think it's clear that they are probably not capable of it (I really hope I am wrong). The way the Chuck Bullough defense seems to be set up, it seems incapable of coming out and shutting down its opponent early on giving our team any sense of momentum (the only exception seems to be Oregon, even then you can't count too much into that performance given all the injuries Ducks were nursing in that game). More after the jump.
Going back to our defense ATV has more reflections on what has gone wrong this year:
"The past couple of weeks there has been a recurring theme -- we are just not playing sound, fundamental football," Verner said. "I mean tackling and playing within the structure of the defense."
Verner admitted his own culpability. He was beaten deep on a 43-yard touchdown pass by Cal. "I was expecting something different and took myself out of the play," he said.
Verner added, "A lot of our scheme is making sure everyone does what they are supposed to do, because if even one piece is off then the whole play explodes." That, Verner said, comes down to practice.
"It's a cliche, but practice makes perfect," he said. "Some guys in practice are like, 'Oh man, I just want to get this done.' No. You use practice as a learning tool and get ready for the game. There are no excuses."
Verner said the seniors on the defense would deliver that message before today's practice, with linebacker Reggie Carter taking the lead.
"Reggie keeps telling us, 'You never know when you won't be able to play this game anymore, so don't go through the motions,' " Verner said. "We have to drill that into their heads and drill that into their hearts."
That's nice and all but remember the team apparently called a "player only" meeting after the Oregon game too. So I don't care much about rhetoric like this in the paper. I think the main problem with this team defense is not necessarily bad tackling (although no doubt it needs to get better and crisper) or needing to show more aggression (I think we have seen plenty of it). I think the main problem with this defense is a lack of discipline and staying with its assignments.
Time and time again we are seeing in tapes our front 7 finding overshooting their targets and finding themselves helplessly out of the position. It has been happening with regularity since the Tennessee game. I believe that is on the coaches. That is not only on Chuck Bullough and the defensive coaches, I sure hope CRN also takes responsibility for it, if this situation doesn't improve in the next 6 games. To his credit it looks like CRN has identified the key defensive issues himself:
On what ails the defense:
"It's not one thing. It's a combination of a lot of things. The big play was the haunting thing in this game. One of the big plays came when we missed an assignment and we didn't follow our guy in motion so we were a man short. One of them we kind of guessed on a route rather than played a route. One of them was a bad angle and a guy out of control in a run scheme where Best goes 93 yards. Those are the little things I'm talking about. Practice will be a giant array of those little things."On what's gone wrong the past three games defensively:
"We talked about the Stanford game having more missed assignments than in any of the previous three games. We work hard to shore that up and I thought we played pretty darn good defense against Oregon. The Oregon was a four minute spell with a kick return and an interception return that gave them 14 points."
Again taking bad angles and missing assignments shouldn't be happening 6 games into the season. I am not sure if the problem at this point is so systematic that it can be fixed before next Saturday. At the very least, I hope to see some modicum of changes of improvement against Arizona in Tucson. As for the Zona offense, here are some of the tactics the Wildcats have been successfully using on offense this season:
1. Running the no-huddle offense. Arizona switched to a hurry-up attack on the final drive of the first half, and responded by going 89 yards in 2 minutes 39 seconds. Wildcats' players called the drive, which was capped by Foles' 11-yard touchdown pass to Terrell Turner, the turning point in the game. The score cut Stanford's halftime lead to 28-20, with Arizona due to receive the second-half kickoff.Arizona ran the no-huddle attack the rest of the way with great success. The Wildcats' game-deciding drive covered 92 yards in 2:30."I love playing up-tempo," Foles said. "I love it, the guys love it. " [...]2. Resting their tailbacks. Injuries to Nicolas Grigsby and Keola Antolin threatened to derail the Wildcats' season.Foles' ability to make plays has allowed the UA to be productive on offense without overtaxing its banged-up backs.Arizona ran the ball just 14 times against Stanford, but still managed to get long touchdown runs from both
Grigsby and Greg Nwoko. The Wildcats are still using their running backs, but they're using them smarter.3. Spreading the ball. Coaches trust Foles to change plays at the line of scrimmage and go through his progressions once the ball is snapped. The results: A spread-the-wealth attitude on offense that the Wildcats never really enjoyed with Willie Tuitama under center. Foles has had a new favorite target in each of his three starts: Nwoko (Oregon State), David Roberts (Washington) and Juron Criner (Stanford)."He throws a good deep ball," Dykes said. "He gives those guys chances to make plays."
At this point, I don't expect our defense to shut down or dominate the Arizona defense. Not sure we have a dynamic scheme or a personnel disciplined enough to keep them bottled up for 60 mintues. However, it would be considered an accomplishment if they can keep those guys under 30 points in the desert.
As for UCLA on the offense, there is no secret at this points. We have to take advantage of opportunities in the red zone and get it done. That means catch the balls drilled between numbers, not missing open receivers and running with some passion to pick up the tough yardage. From the OC Register:
The previous week against Oregon, UCLA found itself inside the red zone twice. Quarterback Kevin Prince was stopped at the 1 on fourth down in the first quarter, and backup quarterback Richard Brehaut threw an incompletion on fourth down from the Oregon 10 in the fourth quarter.
"It just hasn't clicked yet," Prince said of the Bruins' red-zone inefficiency. "Those things will come. We're just going to keep on working, and those plays will come in the red zone."
The Bruins spend enough time working on their red-zone offense at practice but haven't figured out a way to produce the same success in the games.
"We're just going to do our normal deal and we're just going to have to execute better, especially in the red zone," Prince said. "There is always talk about doing things and once you get in the game, some things work and some things don't."
I think it will have to come down to our offense and I really hope going into this game Rick Neuheisel and Norm Chow contemplate opening things up early. Perhaps I am wrong but I don't think this is going to be one of those games in which we are going to be able to "manage" our way into a victory. In other words FGs for TDs are not going to get it done. It's pretty clear at this point that we don't have a defense that will win ball games for us (unless they are taking on another QB like Crompton, which is not going to happen rest of this season).
So, it will be up to our offense - Prince and co - to build on the improvements from last weekend and open it up early. More on our offense's inability to close the deal from the Daily News:
Perhaps there is nobody to blame, because every group has played a part in the inefficiency. The offensive line has failed to get enough push at times and made costly penalties at others. The running back corps has not made that extra burst into the end zone. The wide receivers have dropped passes in the end zone. The quarterbacks have overthrown open wide receivers.
"You do two things: No. 1 you look and see what you're capable of doing," UCLA head coach Rick Neuheisel said at Monday's weekly news conference. "But you have to see it demonstrated. We have memories of great red-zone offenses. But then you have to ask your individuals who play those positions, can they execute them?"
Hopefully the answer is more positive next weekend. It will certainly enable to feel lot more positive about the program after three brutal Saturdays.
GO BRUINS.
0 recs |
15 comments
|
Comments
I know there's more focus on offense for this one
But I can’t let the D off the hook right now. They still need to be the unit that steps up EARLY. That’s the key, because falling behind and making us play from behind all game is going to be big trouble for an offense that just found a pulse one week ago. I would prefer if we had our full playbook at our disposal throughout the game rather than what happened last week, falling behind by 2 touchdowns in the first 20 minutes.
by Tydides on Oct 20, 2009 8:44 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Oh I agree they need to step up
Do I have the confidence that they will? I have no idea.
by Nestor on Oct 20, 2009 8:52 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
FAITH...
is the only known antidote for failure.
I like the tone of this article Nes. Can the offense stand & deliver (esp. in the red zone)? Let’s hope the last 3 weeks & all the negatives that have come with it will act as a learning tool for this young team. If they treat this situation any other way we’re in for another 08. This team is better than that, now they need to prove it, more for themselves then to us.
Being a Bruin is a lot like Rocky— you get knocked down, but you get up again.
Eventually this team will live up to its’ promise.
I HAVE COMPLETE FAITH IN THAT BROTHER (& SISTER) BRUINS.
BTW: UCLA = HEART. You can hear from far and near the Mighty Bruin roar!
by Bruin4ver on Oct 20, 2009 9:15 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
My Sentiments Exactly
Granted, the growing pains have been tough to endure (along with the disappointments so far) but I feel confident that we’re on the right track and we’ll get to where we need to be.
Hope CRN & Co. take some time to study film on what my alma mater, Iowa, did in their win against ’Zona back in September in Iowa City. Whatever the Hawks did it seemed to work.
Los Angeles Rams and the UCLA Bruins!!!!!
by Minnesota Bruinfan on Oct 20, 2009 10:19 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Looking for something hopeful
I turned to accounts of the Washington game. The Huskies won by a combination of luck (a flukey interception), a few crucial defensive plays (after having been pretty much victimized by Arizona’s passing attack the whole game), and a scoring drive against an Arizona defense that is obviously not that stout. Of course, they were playing at Washington, for whatever that is worth. Apparently, Arizona can score and will score, even if we play good defense. I think Bullough will have guys in the right places; I mean, there is nothing secret about what Arizona is doing, but whether we can eliminate the kinds of mistakes we have been making remains to be seen. It follows, therefore, that we are going to have to score. That is why people have been turning to the offense as the key to winning. But Nestor is right. It is unrealistic to believe that our offense, though showing a lot of improvement, can match U of A’s recent point production unless the defense does significantly better than it has been doing. Stopping Arizona’s first drive (please, no third-down penalties!) would be tremendous.
by ReineSeite on Oct 20, 2009 9:58 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Football is won Tackle to Tackle.
This AZ team has allowed the fewest sacks and has the highest average per rush in the Pac-10. This equates to stellar O-Line play, and that is where the game is won or lost.
I Love my Bruins but the only way we win this game is if AZ gives it away.
by Rico Bruin on Oct 20, 2009 11:26 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Rhetoric never won a football game.
It has only made players feel better or worse about what they have done before.
O-Line has to push forward, D-Line has to keep Zona’s QB from scrambling.
Prince has to hit his receivers, Carter needs to hit the ballcarriers.
Our running backs have to fight for every yard, just like our linebackers.
Our WRs must not drop passes, and our DBs must not drop their focus.
The WHOLE TEAM has to improve. No pointing fingers unless it’s at a mirror.
Saturday is a WORK DAY.
M
"In this program your passion bucket must be full to play SC." -- CRN, to Dan Patrick, 1/2008
by Meriones on Oct 20, 2009 11:29 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
"Saturday is a WORK DAY"
That’s a great way too put it. Every Saturday should be a work day, but this one more than ever. The entire team needs to show up with the attitude that they’re in for a battle, and give 110 percent every down. This is not the game to slack off.
If the BRUINS show up with a nonchalant attitude, this game could get ugly. In the back of my mind that’s my fear.
I’m hopeful that the leaders on defense are in other guys faces, letting them know that they have to bring it every down. I’m hopeful that our offense doesn’t take a conservative approach, but let’s our athletes show what they can do. The reality of the last three weeks is still fresh in my mind, but I’m hopeful our guys will step up, show some pride, and play to win.
by Bruin37 on Oct 20, 2009 12:24 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Saturdays bring anxiety
I want these players and coaches to succeed or at least progress so badly that I fear a possible road-kill moment. I do feel that our offense will be better, MUCH better this week. I believe Prince has a lot of heart and talent and he will get the job done this week. I just don’t want to see Zona put a 40 on us. I have no idea what’s going to happen defensively and on special teams. It’s not a good feeling to be more anxious than hopeful. Joyful would be good. That’s been over a month…
by BruinAl on Oct 20, 2009 12:13 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Bad feeling
This feels like another byu/Utah in the
wings. Grigsby may go for 100 yds. Be afraid
be very afraid.
by hongerelli on Oct 20, 2009 1:17 PM PDT via mobile reply actions 0 recs
Bad feeling too
bad bad bad feeling about this game. Up until this point at least we haven’t quit in any game and actually been in all of them…
“please let’s get a little luck this weekend and win this thing or at least don’t get blown off the field.”
when did it come to this??
sigh
------ formerly bruinmikeh
by bruinduro on Oct 20, 2009 3:20 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
5 losses in a row...
Sorry, and surely I don’t mean to gloat, but I thought it could easily happen and got semi-ridiculed for it. I was hoping to be wrong and still do.
I really don’t know why everyone is so surprised and angry. I had us at 2-4 at this point in the season, with essentially the same team as last year save for some freshmen.
We all should be getting used to a shitty defense by now. We’re not deep and we’re predictable…what did you expect? Bullough runs the defense like KD ran the "West Coast Offense".
For the semi-uneducated who keep bashing on Norm Chow: his system needs a QB who makes the right read and WRs who actually have to decide what route to run. You tell me if we have that personnel yet.
CRN IS most definitely being conservative. I don’t blame him. Much. I think the goal was to build up the confidence by pulling out some wins and not getting blown out, then start turning it on. Hasn’t worked, but it almost did. We were in the game in all 3 of our losses. We lost because of mistakes for the most part (both by players and coaches), but that’s what happens with a young team. All we needed was to win one of these last 3 games and we’d be sitting pretty. Oregon to me was the winnable game…
Yes, I do think that the coaches are saving a few things for the U$C game, because in a season like this, winning that game has much more of an impact. I could be wrong of course.
We are not going to beat Arizona on Saturday, in fact it will probably be a blowout, though I hope not. I fell for the ecstasy of being 3-0, a bunch of us did, but we need to go back and look at what makes sense for this team, through our usual BN analytical lens. Many teams are just ahead of us at this point…we went through four years of recruiting like we were Northwestern…
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
by tasser10 on Oct 20, 2009 8:18 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
*Checks to see if I ridiculed tasser*
I did not. All reasonable takes. I had us at 3-3 at this point in the season though. Figured we’d win one of the last three and lose at Neyland.
by Tydides on Oct 20, 2009 8:39 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It'd be ok if you did!
I tend to be pessimistic/cautious when it comes to UCLA football.
I had the same but I had Stanford as a toss-up, hence the 2-4…
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
by tasser10 on Oct 21, 2009 9:29 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Overcoming a culture of timidity
After reading the re-post of the article on Terry Donahue (and re-opening the scars of the 80’s and 90’s – watching UCLA “win” games in the first 3 qtrs and then give them away in the 4th qtr) I think that Donahue and Dorrell (the Double -Dees) have a pseudo-gentlemanly1 quality of deference and timidity. It is the anti-thesis of being competitive – and they have imbued their teams with this attitude.
I fear that after almost 3 decades of timid leaders the football program has internalized it. Cheaty Petey once described our program of having ‘no heart’ and I take this to mean no assertiveness or competitiveness. I think that Neu & Chow are fighting this attitude in our program. Some of the things we are seeing are consistent with our team having the mindset of Double-Dees (e.g. sloppiness, stupid penalties, lack of focus, not tackling aggressively, not putting that extra effort to run an exact route or catch a pass, etc). All the scheming, training, adjusting, play calling, etc won’t fix it until the mindset is changed.
If the problem is Double-Deism , the good news is Ricky Neuheisel is just the man for the job – remember his Rose Bowl appearance? He didn’t buy into an attitude of timidity and deference then and he still doesn’t. He is relentlessly positive because he has that self confidence to know that he can get it done. He is recruiting people with that attitude and he can turn our team around. Some key players (Price?) aren’t Double-Deists but the whole team needs to reject it and take on a winner’s attitude. One loser can lose the whole game.
The bad news is changing an entire team’s attitude is going to take more than a few seasons – He’ll need that relentless positivism. It is hard to change a long-standing attitude: they need success to know that they can get it done and that they deserve to win. But they’ll find this hard to achieve as long as they cling to Double-Deism – it is going to take a lot of time and effort (and maybe luck) to break the vicious cycle of mediocrity.
The worst news is, it will be hugely frustrating for the fans to watch our team slowly be converted away from Double-Deism. It is worse than watching a youthful team make youthful mistakes because they improve with experience – the Double-Deists will keep making those mistakes until their attitude changes – and each mistake reinforces the Double-Deism creed.
Well, those are my thoughts.
1 Note this should not be confused with John Wooden’s genuine gentleman nature. He is as good and honorable as they come but he also knows how to compete and how to assert himself. Maybe the Wizard of Westwood has set the bar so high that it’s very hard to find coaches with both the skills to win and the character to represent UCLA.
by JonnyG on Oct 21, 2009 11:04 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 




















