All the wrong moves
Bumped. Still gathering my thoughts. Let me say this: tasser and yours truly started as students UCLA on the same day in the same class. We attended all the games sitting in the student moshpit watching UCLA teams from the 90s. Bruins Nation has always been about holding our athletic programs accountable to maintain the standards set by our tradition. We are not giving up on Neuheisel. I personally will do my best to wait till the end of his 4th season to make my final determination on whether he is the answer. That said anything less than 6 wins in 2009 will not be acceptable here on Bruins Nation. If our team doesn't get to 6 wins this year, we will consider it as first strike against Neuheisel in his career as the UCLA head coach. GO BRUINS. - N
19 games into the Neu era.
What has our football team improved in?
Well...the QBs are throwing fewer interceptions. They're just replacing them with fumbles.
The field goal kicker is having a record season. Because the offense can't score TDs.
The punter is even better than last year. Because the offense can't convert on third downs.
The wide receivers drop even more passes. Nelson Rosario is officially doing a Brian Poli-Dixon impersonation.
The defense is better than last year...it is sad to see their efforts go to waste because our offense just can't score.
The OL is doing a better job, though still inconsistent.
This is a sad, sad state of affairs. I think it is fair to say that overall there has been zero progress made since last year. Zero. What is the point of bringing in all this talent only to have game plans that take the game out of their hands. If our coaches don't trust the players, then don't friggin' recruit them. Freshmen...freshmen are calling out Norm Chow...on friggin' twitter. We are losing games, eminently winnable games, because the coaches just cannot bring themselves to take the training wheels off. That is not what inspires people, and that is not what motivates players.
This season is in a downward death spiral and I am deeply disappointed with the approach taken by the coaches this year. Players make the mistakes, sure, but this game plan has no place on this team anymore. It was okay last year. I don't care how green or inexperienced our players are, if you don't put them in a position to win games and make plays, they simply won't. If something isn't done to get this disgusting taste of losing out of the players' mouths, this team will go the way of Toledo's 2001 team.
I can't bear to watch this team anymore and I don't know whom to blame anymore either. Perhaps my own delusional expectations of having a team out there that actually looks like it knows what it's doing. There is simply nothing to look forward to in each subsequent game. The game plan is the exact same every week and I just sit here dreadfully waiting to see who will screw up first. Last year we were overmatched, so losing was not as painful. This year, we were in the game in all 4 of our losses. This team has not made a play when it mattered the most, except on the goal line stand against Tennessee. That's it. That is pathetic.
I have never, ever seen a team, even the bottom dwellers of the worst conferences, play with such a reduced, lame and boring playbook because "they don't have the personnel". If our coaches make our players play in fear of screwing up, then I'd rather they didn't play at all.
To be fair, we have played four straight games against good, or very good teams. And we were close each time, even against Cal. But it's time for the coaches to help their players lose their big play virginity.
UCLA, tied with Washington State at the bottom of the conference. These are dark days.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of BruinsNation's (BN) editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of BN's editors.
1 recs |
23 comments
| Add comment
|
Comments
After reading the post below mine
I just may be expecting too much from this team. Consider this post a rant, I suppose. I am just amazed at how bad UCLA football has gotten. It is beyond me. The coaches certainly know more than I do, I am just frustrated.
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
by tasser10 on Oct 24, 2009 9:04 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Well...
It was a good rant actually. I agree with you for the most part, but the questions are possible to answer. There are some lights on, though. 5-7 is a pretty reasonable goal, and a success from last year if you ask me.
There's no one in the world that wants to beat UCLA more than _______.
by ucla13_usc9 on Oct 24, 2009 9:08 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Is 5-7 really improvement?
Our non-conference schedule was clearly easier this year. It looked like it would be good for an extra win, and it turned out to be good for two more wins. If we end up 5-7, we’ll have gone 2-7 in Pac-10 play compared to 3-6 last year.
by SuperBruinMan on Oct 24, 2009 9:53 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
+1 Win right?
No but seriously, look at the conference. The competition has improved 10 fold, and we accomplished some great feats along the way. Winning @ Tennessee, @ WSU, vs. ASU. Pathetic right? But it goes from terrible to sucky. All relative though. Even if we win 6, I seriously doubt we’ll get into a bowl.
There's no one in the world that wants to beat UCLA more than _______.
by ucla13_usc9 on Oct 24, 2009 10:02 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
We might have a shot
There are 6 spots for Pac-10 teams, meaning UCLA would probably need 4 non-eligible teams from the Pac-10. Oregon and USC have reached 6, and WSU has no real shot, so UCLA would probably need 3 of the next 6 to fail to reach 6 wins (assuming UCLA beats ASU, UW and WSU to get to 6 wins and loses to OSU):
Cal (1 win needed): @ASU, OSU, UA, @SU, @UW
Stanford (1 win): UO, @USC, Cal, Notre Dame
OSU (1 win): @Cal, UW, @WSU, @UO
UA (1 win): WSU, @Cal, UO, @ASU, @USC
ASU (2 wins): Cal, USC, @UO, UA
UW (3 wins): @OSU, WSU, Cal
It’s hard to see Cal not winning one, and Arizona’s game against WSU should put them over the top. Under the assumption that UCLA loses to OSU, they’re win over WSU would also put them over the top. Stanford only needs one win, but they have a very tough schedule remaining, and I think there’s a chance they don’t win any. ASU has a similarly difficult schedule, and needing an additional win they probably wouldn’t make it. It’s hard to see UW winning all three of those. If UCLA does get to 6 wins, our bowl hopes would probably hinge on Stanford’s games against Cal and Notre Dame.
by SuperBruinMan on Oct 25, 2009 1:19 AM PDT up reply actions 3 recs
rec that guys
Maybe put that in a post because that’s basically our last straw
There's no one in the world that wants to beat UCLA more than _______.
by ucla13_usc9 on Oct 25, 2009 5:46 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
not sure thats totally correct
because bowls do have some say in who they pick, and would you rather pick a ucla team that won 3 of their last 5 games or a UA team that lost 4 in a row?
I think some of it does hinge on how well you are playing at the end and television ratings, so its not totally cut and dry.
"when you've seen how big the world is, how can you make due with this?"
by silverlakebruin on Oct 25, 2009 5:47 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
U of A
No doubt. Offensive Football is always better than Defensive in the WWL’s eyes
There's no one in the world that wants to beat UCLA more than _______.
by ucla13_usc9 on Oct 25, 2009 5:53 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Should add
Perhaps our record last year was better than the team was. Two of the wins were due to last second drives, the other two were against the worst Pac-10 teams ever. Maybe our record should have been a lot worse.
by SuperBruinMan on Oct 25, 2009 1:22 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Tennessee was a fluke
I’m gonna get hell for it, we did earn 3 of those wins though
There's no one in the world that wants to beat UCLA more than _______.
by ucla13_usc9 on Oct 25, 2009 11:08 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The truth hurts
but it’s still the truth. Tasser is on the money with this post.
The Mad Bruin
by lostnacfgop on Oct 25, 2009 8:43 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
an important question in evaluating the Neuheisel era
There is general disagreement on BN about a very basic question wrt this year’s team:
Are we better or worst than last year?
My take—we are probably about the same. We won all of our nonconference games, but our recent losses against the rest of the Pac just show that the conference is better this year, through and through.
Still, I’m disappointed about the lack of progress. Remaining at the same level of bad or mediocre is not acceptable, and I’m losing patience.
by 8_clap on Oct 25, 2009 8:53 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Sadly, this team is better than last year's team
Last year, 6 of our 8 losses were by 3 TDs or more. This year, we’re only losing those games by 2 TDs or more. We’re a touchdown better, basically, than the feces we produced on the field last year. At this rate, we’ll be a solid Pac-10 team by 2012.
by BruinsRule on Oct 25, 2009 10:55 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
hahhahahaha
We should all check back a decade from now….
by Bruin'96 on Oct 25, 2009 12:43 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good Analysis
Finally a sane, coherent evaluation of the Bruin football program.
Keep up the good work.
by Trudger on Oct 25, 2009 10:00 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
All I'm saying
after all this ranting, is that the current game plan isn’t working. We’re losing anyway, even if we’re in it for a while. So screw it, let the kids have some fun at least, call some clever plays, a little trickery, to keep them and the fans interested.
The more I read, the more this team plays, the more PISSED OFF I get at Carnesale for hiring Dorrell. What an epic destruction of a program. Imagine if Walker hadn’t joined the team…without his recruiting, we would be worse than Wazzu right now.
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
by tasser10 on Oct 25, 2009 11:53 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
WELL SAID...
i have been a UCLA BRUIN since UCLA beat USC with GARY BEBAN, back in 1965, 20-16..i cheerleaded for UCLA for two football seasons, 1968/69, so i have a history of UCLA FOTTBALL in my blood…i have never seen so predictable a teams offense as i have this year…it’s as if we do not have a game plan other than to loose…the win at TENNESSE made me proud, but other than that it has been a deary team and coaches this year…sad, very sad UCLA has sunk so low…TOLEDO, DORREL and now COACH RN/CHOW…maybe next year????
by bruincheerleader on Oct 25, 2009 3:28 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Any stat experts in the house?
Once again, it looks to me like our QBs flat out hold onto the ball too long.
Which brings me to my stat question—Can someone break out (even if it is just for the last game) the average amount of time per play our QB has the ball in his hands versus the time the Arizona Qb had it in his? I would bet it is about a second or two longer, which in football terms, is forever.
by Free the 16 on Oct 25, 2009 8:56 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
MASSIVE Amount of work
I have yet to see a stat that actually times plays, but Arizona’s offense is a 1-5 second developing offense, and ours is a 3-6, depending on where the pocket is. 1 is sometimes very bad (ie Pick 6 via Dye) and so is 6 (lots of time in coverage, no time left for decisions).
There's no one in the world that wants to beat UCLA more than _______.
by ucla13_usc9 on Oct 25, 2009 10:03 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't understand playing Craft
This season is already toast, why play the established-as-nothing-special senior? Why didn’t he move to Brehaut if he was going to bench Prince??
by BoltDaddy on Oct 25, 2009 9:32 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Craft was the best right?
He put in the QB who he thought had the best shot. Brehaut has yet to prove anything, in 3 chances (unfair I might add), he should still have something to remember him by besides sacks
There's no one in the world that wants to beat UCLA more than _______.
by ucla13_usc9 on Oct 25, 2009 10:04 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 



















