Anyone notice it? Texas A&M 52, Texas Tech 30?

Don't like doing the transitive properties, but didn't KSU KILL A&M? Shows you how good the PAC 10 is if the worst teams in the PAC are beating the best teams in the Big XII

about 1 month ago ucla13_usc9 10 comments 0 recs |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

don't like transitive properties either

but I totally agree with you about the strength of the Pac 10. We know how good SC and Oregon are. Cal was blowing people away out of conference and struggled in conference. Arizona was given crap over a loss at Iowa, but look how good Iowa turned out to be. And the obvious one…we started 3-0 with the win at UT and are now at 3-4.

Has there ever been a player better than Detlef Schrempf?

by bucknellbruin on Oct 25, 2009 11:51 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs

Yes I noticed it

I have noticed how since Kansas State played UCLA, how one team has gotten better while the other has been spiraling to the bottom.

by Nestor on Oct 25, 2009 12:13 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

Not fair Nestor

Kansas State has not played the same level of competition as UCLA has. Do you really think they would have done as well if they had played Stanford, Oregon, Cal and Arizona in succession?

Also, the offense they are installing there is not nearly as complex as Norm Chow’s. It’s a junk-it-up offense that our own players referred to as “streetball”. Furthermore, I don’t think they’ve had quite the same recruiting incompetence as our previous administratoin.

Have they gotten better? Sure. But I think their ceiling will be limited, and they will not produce a program that attracts as many NFL scouts.

But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.

by tasser10 on Oct 26, 2009 1:01 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs