Bruins Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Sean Keeley's Week 12 College Football Buffet

Norm Chow's Airraid Offense: Inexperience Is The Problem

Bumped. GO BRUINS. - N

Since the generalization posts have come out today, I say we lighten things up and look towards the future a little ignorantly (smiles at Nes)

The goal of the Chowster is to get to the Air-Raid offense that he was so used to using back at BYU and U$C. Commoners, like me before research, say that balance is the best thing in an offense, but when you can replace different parts of schemes (ie intermediate passing game can replace intermediate running game) balance is inevitable. People that live by these schemes include the following

  1. Hal Mumme
  2. Mike Leach
  3. Lavell Edwards
  4. Norm Chow
  5. Bronco Mendenhall
  6. Chris Hatcher
  7. Tony Franklin
  8. Sonny Dykes
  9. Art Briles
  10. Mark Mangino

-via Chris from smartfootball.com

That's a pretty good list of OC's right?

Analysis after the jump

Star-divide

Way back when, Norm Chow devised a sinister plan to shock the College football world.

The offense that he wanted to use would not require insane running backs, tricky motions, or overly athletic quarterbacks. And it wasn't the A-11, or the victory formation.

The offense that he described was originally meant for the split back offense. Of course, the split back is easily converted into the I, split wide Shotgun, Dual Back Shotgun... etc. The first play I found that illustrated it well was this one. 

Screenshot2009-10-25at35921pm_medium

via i224.photobucket.com

(Play credit to Chris from Football Smarts)

Entitled 65 Flood or Y-Sail, it is basically the beginnings for all "Airraid" offenses:

Preplay: Read cover 2- "Where are the corners? Cushion... if yes, then cover 2."

During play: 5 step drop

Before he does anything, he "peeks" at the Z (#1, fade underneath him) to see if some massive breakdown in coverage occurred for the big play.

He then goes to the Y (#2 Tight End, Sail--->[Sail is a corner route, with an over-middle-under policy, or go where the guy/s covering you aren't]) 

Your safety valve is your full back, which has been a primary route this year.

Also, your running back is also able to go across the middle as a safety vale for the safety valve, but it is unlikely that he will be able to escape the pileup.

Coverage Pending: If it is cover 2, the QB has to read the Strong Safety

You can use your Z (#1, fade underneath him) as either a safety valve, or tunnel vision lockdown guy, because it will be one on one, no matter what. Also, he Y receiver can be a tunnel vision candidate because he will be up 1 on 1 with the SS, or wide open.

That play is just amazing, however, it requires your QB to get a bunch of reads in in a matter of milliseconds. Try it to get an idea of the timing required with a traditional 5 step drop. Count to 3. Thats how long the play takes to develop. Anything more than 3 seconds will require a scramble/sack. 

Ok comparison time:

BYU: OL is big, built for Pass protection, Dennis Pitta (TE) is just a beast, shotgun with Harvey Unga blocking for you and then being your check-down is guaranteeing you yards every time. Hall has the arm and vision as a 8th year senior (he's been there for a while and I didn't include the LDS mission)

TTU: OL is huge, built for Pass protection, Y spot is shifted to a rotated Slot spot. Lyle Leong and Co. are amazing receivers who know how to catch the ball. Baron Batch is a good receiving back, haven't seen so much of his pass protection, but you would imagine it was good... I mean he gets enough practice at it. Potts/Sheffield are bred for this play 20 yard darts every time.

UCLA: OL isn't massive, but still big, built for timed release protection, Moya and Paulsen can catch, but aren't as fast as the TE's/Y's mentioned above. CR/JF/DC aren't necessarily big, but can be adequate blockers, DC is the best at blocking, worst at catching, JF's in the middle somewhere and CR is the best receiving back we've got. KP has mechanical problems, but has made good reads, KC and RB are using the lockdown guys incorrectly. In my opinion, KP is the best option for this play because he can make those reads. Mechanics are something you can fix too. BUT RB has the mechanics down, he might have to be spoon-fed the coverages though (ie have Austin shout them out in a code or something), which could work out really well... if the receivers catch the ball

Comparison Conclusions:

BYU & TTU have big, experienced lines with great shuffle-step technique and enough strength to follow through with that technique. Then, they have a designated star RB who can draw in another defender on passing plays because of his dual-threat capabilities, which could ease up coverage downfield. TTU has more than one receiver, on the other hand, that can really draw a safety back, and then he can catch the ball.

For the offense to work, UCLA will have to develop a better sense of pass protection through a downfield threat, or develop a deep threat through pass protection. It's the chicken and the egg right? I don't care which starts which though. But specifically, we're headed in the right direction as XSF is built for the Airraid offense, as is KM. Randall Carroll needs some hands, but he does have the speed for it. ALSO, all of these players from the other teams have been veterans who have earned their playing time towards the latter half of their freshman year. So Nes, being young IS the excuse. This offense requires a lot of practice and development, and asking them to open up the playbook and expect to win 6 games is a stretch with a VERY inexperienced offense, so Chow dampened his playbook wisely, so he's coaching outside of his zone right now, which attributes to non-chowy playcalling.

Chow out of his zone expanded:

Last year Kevin Craft set the record for the most UCLA passing attempts and threw 20 INT's. I bet that both CRN and CNC had a talk and decided that the offense would need to develop more off the field before the entire Airraid offense could be unleashed. Which is Dorrellian, I know, but smart because he didn't want to go 4-8 again, and he learned his lesson with an inexperienced (and crippled) offense. Now we got some whippersnappers and he is developing off the field right now, and the playbook is slowly starting to open up, but faster than the development is going, so it's a matter of just one measly year before the Airraid starts working correctly, or shows some signs of doing so. I wanted to make sure that Chow wasn't off his rocker, and he isn't... to any degree.

"I have never played with a freshman quarterback before. That's the situation we're in. Most kids get two years before they have to do this job." -Norm Chow (Interview with LA Times' Chris Foster)

Another point is to add upon the "chicken or egg theory" is that opposed to Dorrellian offenses, the Pass should open up the run in this offense, not the other way around (most effective IMO, as the past 11 National Champions have done just that).

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of BruinsNation's (BN) editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of BN's editors.

2 recs  |  Comment 34 comments  |  Add comment |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Another outstanding Post!!!

And, it explains why CRN said “We are going to run or die trying.” We got burned rushing this offense along too quickly last year. So, the adjustment is to not depend on it as much, to run if we can, and to work it along, slowly.

Very good job of explaining it and why we are not where we all want to be.

sjh

by Class of 66 on Oct 25, 2009 4:47 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I was on the way back

From tucson, and I was like…OH! Did some research and waddaya know!

There's no one in the world that wants to beat UCLA more than _______.

by ucla13_usc9 on Oct 25, 2009 4:49 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Consider it

A revelation

There's no one in the world that wants to beat UCLA more than _______.

by ucla13_usc9 on Oct 25, 2009 5:33 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

not being conceited though

There's no one in the world that wants to beat UCLA more than _______.

by ucla13_usc9 on Oct 25, 2009 5:49 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

NIce post

Didn’t see this post when reading the thread. Very good info that never really get explained from other sources.

So you really think we can even come close to implementing this next year? Tough to see with how we look currently.

by Bruin'96 on Oct 25, 2009 8:30 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I think it will actually

Changed my mind. I believe we’ll start inching towards a better offense, but the sophomore year for Taylor Potts was “good” in my eyes so why not

There's no one in the world that wants to beat UCLA more than _______.

by ucla13_usc9 on Oct 25, 2009 9:43 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nah

Too much expansion for not enough talent

There's no one in the world that wants to beat UCLA more than _______.

by ucla13_usc9 on Oct 25, 2009 8:35 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Wow

Instead of trying to visit some football site to learn about football, I’ll just read your posts! I was pretty lost as a UCLA football fan – not knowing a whole lot about the intricacies of the game, but your posts seems to explain why we seem to be so terrible right now. My gut tells me a lot of people on this site are totally overreacting. We are in year 2 of a major rebuilding program. I will reserve judgment about these coaches at year 4. Another post I saw earlier here I think also hit the nail on the head: UCLA football is better in 2009, but so is the entire Pac-10.

Oh UCLA you sweet bitch, you've BRUINed me for anything else.

by bruin8uclap on Oct 26, 2009 12:30 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

smartfootball.com

is a must read

Chris Brown deserves the site traffic.

by mdjohns4 on Oct 26, 2009 12:03 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Great Post!

Very informative post. Your technical knowledge of the game is enlightening and really helps put things into perspective. Incidentally where did you learn this stuff, and are there any good technical books on football that you would recommend? Look forward to your future posts!

by RogerT on Oct 26, 2009 2:17 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I don't know any books

But this is the progression that helped me learn football from when I was just a lil feller:

Backyard Football on the PC (Humungous Entertainment)
Small Attention span at UCLA games
NCAA Football 2001-10 on the Newfangled PS2/3 (EA Sports)
Medium attention span
Pop Warner
High School Football
Where I am now

There's no one in the world that wants to beat UCLA more than _______.

by ucla13_usc9 on Oct 26, 2009 6:15 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh

And Plenty of BN before I started posting/commenting.
I’m still afraid of Nestor though

There's no one in the world that wants to beat UCLA more than _______.

by ucla13_usc9 on Oct 26, 2009 6:18 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

My knowledge of

the basic passing tree would be nothing without NCAA Football!

by inhowlandwetrust on Oct 26, 2009 2:56 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Good post . . . here's the problem.

Is CNC (or the talent) even going to be around to reap the fruits of CNC’s labor? Doesn’t his Tennessee Titans money dry up this season and he has just one more after that? That leaves next season (against a ridiculously tough schedule) to bring it all together.

It appears that the commitment and time it takes to learn this system dictates that UCLA have a longer commitment from CNC, otherwise the Bruins are back at square one.

Also, CNC’s comment that “most kids get two years before they get this job” relates back to my thoughts that CNC may be too entrenched in his ways to get results from the current crop of players he has. The whole square peg round hole argument. Part of this, I believe, is generational. CNC’s generation, in general, is much more patient that generations after that (planning and prepating for the future), including my generation (Gen X) and subsequent generation(s) after that.

Playing devil’s advocate to CNC’s comments, I can name a number of QBs who made significant impacts in their first or second seasons in a program:

Tim Tebow
Colt McCoy
Sam Bradford
Jacory Harris
Nick Foles (didn’t even start the season opener this year)
Andrew Luck
Jake Locker
Ryan Mallett
Tate Forcier
Tyrell Pryor

I could go on. Now, I know that many of these programs do not run a CNC type of offense, but the UCLA kids see what is happening in those programs and wonder why the Bruins cannot have that type of success, leading to Twitters from players about why the coaches do not trust the kids with the keys to the car when things do not work out.

One of the problems with CKD’s west coast offense was that the playbook was so thick that it took the players several years to learn it. Even CNC commented that it was too much to handle. Although the playbook is simplified, the scheme we are running now STILL appears to require time (namely, an experienced QB in the system) to digest its permutations.

I fear that, by the time the Bruins get to that point, CNC might be moving on and some of our young talent, frustrated by what they see happening at other programs using young players, moving on to greener pastures.

I hope that I am wrong.

by orlandobruin on Oct 26, 2009 5:32 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Also wrt to Foles

The coaches weren’t starting him because apparently he was not doing well in practice.

There is also some guy named Cade McNown who apparently did ok as a true freshman. He kept me interested (even when he was making crazy freshman mistakes) through the whole season.

by Nestor on Oct 26, 2009 5:46 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

A good majority of those

Played behind someone. Tebow-Leaf, McCoy-Young, Foles-Tuitama, Mallett-That one guy from michigan… forgot his name (Mallet did transfer if you didn’t know). We have PRINCE-CRAFT…(what???) The rest are scramblers/insane athletes.

The fact that CKD was so bad at attracting talent (Biennemy was the only great recruiter in CKD’s era) left the program entrenched

There's no one in the world that wants to beat UCLA more than _______.

by ucla13_usc9 on Oct 26, 2009 5:55 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Chad Henne

You know… the starting quarterback for the Miami Dolphins

by mdjohns4 on Oct 26, 2009 12:01 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

ya that guy

There's no one in the world that wants to beat UCLA more than _______.

by ucla13_usc9 on Oct 26, 2009 4:23 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hahaha, yeah remember

the speculation that Mallett might come to UCLA??

by inhowlandwetrust on Oct 26, 2009 2:51 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

How's that whole Terrelle Pryor

experiment working out for Bucks fans this year? Ask any of them, and they’ll shake their head. Pryor looked good last year because about 85% of the OSU playbook last year was “Hand the ball off to Beanie Wells” and “Zone Option Run Play”.

This year, with a less experienced backfield, Pryor’s completion percentage has dropped from 60% to 55%, and he’s more than doubled his interception total from last year already.

by CAJason80 on Oct 26, 2009 1:04 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

And

he has a bad attitude.

I have seen him on the sideline a few times getting annoyed at his teammates when they patted his helmet or shoulders after a bad play.

But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.

by tasser10 on Oct 26, 2009 1:50 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Understood.

But would you have UCLA switch places with Ohio State’s program right now?

by orlandobruin on Oct 27, 2009 4:59 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It may take Chow 2 years to groom a QB...

to be succesful, but that true freshman across town doesn’t appear to need 2 years. If that is a tennent of Chow FB, so be it. I can wait. Norms record needs no defending.
OTOH if there is a system that doesn’t require a 2 year waiting peroid, it would seem to me to be superior for obvious reasons.

I enjoy your articles!
Thanks 13/9
GO BRUINS!!!

by GogetemBruins on Oct 26, 2009 8:10 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

That freshman

Also has an O-Line that gives him all day to throw, along with helping to create an effective running game that allows him to throw, plus weapons that will catch the ball when it is thrown.

Our O-line has underclassmen getting significant playing time and it still a work in progress.

If you have time, you can make better decisions.

by freesia39 on Oct 26, 2009 9:08 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

We are Marshall, folks...

Most of the time new coaches take over a D-1 program there’s something working right. It was as if our offensive squad had been wiped out by a plane crash. We’re not only rebuilding the QB & OL, we’re retraining WR’s and even RB’s

by JonnyG on Oct 26, 2009 9:55 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The key to any complicated passing passing set up

is ability of the qb to read the defense. If one has learned in HS how to do that, it can be picked up pretty quickly (see Barkly at $c), if one has not really (which is most HS qb’s) it takes some time.

Alternately, if everyone else is also learning a new way of playing offense, rather than tweaks to a system they’ve been learning for a couple years (as players)….it lengthens that time.

Go Bears Go

by Rocksanddirt on Oct 26, 2009 8:25 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Hahah

You’re funny

There's no one in the world that wants to beat UCLA more than _______.

by ucla13_usc9 on Oct 26, 2009 10:11 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

Are you the guy

who “cheerleaded” for the Bruins? I think they don’t need you anymore.

But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.

by tasser10 on Oct 26, 2009 12:35 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

At this moment.

Currently our quarterbacks have bigger issues than just understanding the offense. Basic fundamentals need some work. How many bad balls have we seen thrown in the last few weeks?

What are the odds more people on the team can step up and act like they belong in a Div-I university?

by Bruin'96 on Oct 26, 2009 11:03 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Airraid

The Airraid is more than the passing concepts, it’s a style of play, a way of practicing – they are like an option equivalent that passes the ball, they only run a small handful of plays but they rep the hell out of them and practice them in several different looks – Mike Leach is a multi-formation guy, but he teaches his WRs to get maximum reps no matter where they stand on the field (I think that I did read somewhere that he even goes as far as to not even flip WRs – because it would cut down their reps in half in practice). No Airraid team would drop as many passes as we have this season. I wouldn’t consider Chow’s offense an Airraid at all – yes, the Airraid system is built on top of what Chow used at his previous coaching stops, in terms of organizing plays as concepts and using tags and formations to become multiple out of series-based offense, but that isn’t unique to Chow or the Airraid and other than that I would not put them in the same boat.

As far as complexity, I don’t think that what he does is more or less complicated than most other teams. From what I have seen over the past few weeks UCLA has not run anything that you would not see from many high school teams.

When I have the time I would like to go through and put together some cutups of some of the passing concepts that Chow has been using lately. Off the top of my head, I’ve seen a lot of smash, all curl, “NCAA route” (as in, everyone in the NCAA runs it), and a few more that are all pretty universal among all levels of football. As far as QBs go, a lot of the reads on these short-game concepts are very simple – just reading a flat defender and throwing to one of two guys. I am not worried about scheme being too complex at all for our guys – I’m sure spending time with Vince Young in Tennessee got Chow prepared for working with a QB that struggled to understand his offense.

by jtthirtyfour on Oct 26, 2009 10:21 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Funny you mention VY

Our offense has been reminding me of the Titans offense with VY and Chow. Basically a super simplified offense which relied heavily on the run to take the decision making out of the QB’s hands.

by makenji on Oct 27, 2009 2:20 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Didn't Prince

miss his whole senior year due to a knee injury? So this year is his first game action in 2 years.

by drebruin on Oct 26, 2009 11:40 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs


User Tools

Welcome to Bruins Nation, an unofficial daily online scrap book covering the greatest collegiate athletic program in the nation. GO BRUINS.
Start posting about the Bruins »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Morrell_small
Wildcat and the UCLA Running Game
Ucla_small
Everyone needs to calm down about Ben Ball
Trojanssuck_small
An Angel in the Defensive Backfield
Small
UCLA at Washington State: A memory
13-9_ucla_baby____036_small
Videos from Washington/UCLA Football Game!

Recent FanPosts

Small
My two game season starts tonight
Small
Have You Been Watching Darren?
2603_1028618641249_1398823305_30086007_6195771_n_small
Trying to Keep the Mojo Going
Bruinsnation_small
Ben Ball Roundup: Gameday Notes
Brad_pitt_as_achilles_small
SI Poll: They Like Us, They Really Like Us ... sort of ...
Bruinsnation_small
Colorado Interviewing Karl Dorrell To Be Their Next Head Coach?
Images_small
Bruins Find Bats As Blue-Gold World Series Game 2 Goes To The Blues
Small
"Carroll and Kiffin and Sark"
Bruinsnation_small
A Note Re. Evoking CHP (Con Artist/Sleazebag) To Criticize Howland

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS


Managers

094_small Ajax

Bruinsnation_small Nestor

Menelaus2_small Menelaus

Arron_afflalo1_small Tydides

Brad_pitt_as_achilles_small Achilles

Small Meriones

Telemachus_small Telemachus

Small Odysseus

Blue_bellerophon_small Bellerophon

Authors

Images_small Ryan Rosenblatt

Official Partner of CBS Sports