Spaulding Roundup: QB/RB Rotation & Thoughts On Balancing Perspective During These Rebuilding Years Of UCLA Football
Let's start with the quarterback story again in today's roundup. Rick Neuheisel wants Richard Brehaut to get meaningful snaps this weekend in Oregon. It looks like he doesn't want to put him in situations when the outcome is already decided. It sounds like he wants to put Brehaut in situations during which there will be opportunities to grab the momentum via offense. From the Daily News (emphasis added):
"Richard Brehaut deserves some meaningful time, not just at the end of ball games, to show what he can do," Neuheisel said. "Earlier, I said I'd hoped, or I'd like to be able to. Now I'm making sure it's going to happen. I'm going ahead and saying it this time." [...]
"Norm and I have discussed it," Neuheisel said. "He's in those meetings with those kids. He believes (Prince) is the best bet for us as it stands currently. I don't disagree. He wasn't sharp Saturday. I wish he were, but he wasn't. I made a switch. But it doesn't mean I can't go back to him and have confidence in him. I want the young quarterbacks to play without fear of a quick hook. But they also have to play and play well.
"We've got two young quarterbacks and we'd like to see them both develop; I just think it's time Richard gets some chances."
Cannot agree more with CRN on this. Look I get that QB is not our only problem. I get that our wide receivers are not making plays. We are not getting senior leadership from certain guys on our offense. Our offensive line is still developing as it was completely rebuilt from the disaster left behind by Karl Dorrell. However, to me it still starts with our quarterback. Forget winning the game at this points. We need our QB to at least manage the game and take advantage of opportunities when the present themselves.
We just haven't gotten that from Prince or Craft. Prince had a great first half against San Diego State. Then he fizzled out in the second half. He didn't throw interceptions against Tennessee but he didn't exactly light the place up. He showed some signs of life against Cal but was beyond awful against Oregon and this past weekend against Arizona. I think he has the tools to emerge as a good QB. However, at the same time I think Richard Brehaut deserves fair shots to prove himself during in game opportunities as well (not just in situations when the games are already decided or UCLA is looking to make desperate come backs).
I really hope CRN and Chow have special packages in place for Brehaut which he can run coming into either second or third quarter that would fit his athletic abilities. Not sure if its going to help the kid if we ask him to take 5 step drops in slow developing plays when the defense is already teeing off him with blitz after blitz . Anyway, it will be interesting to find out how the rotation is going to work this weekend (even though we are not going to get to see it). More after the jump.
Speaking of rotation looks like Ramirez is going to be out of it:Christian Ramirez, who was No. 1 on the depth chart at tailback coming out of training camp, has been told he's no longer in the playing rotation.
Ramirez said he received the news Monday during a meeting with running backs coach Wayne Moses.
"We're just trying to find the right combination," Neuheisel said.
Ramirez started against Arizona because Johnathan Franklin missed a team meeting. But after he fumbled early in the third quarter, Ramirez never played again.
Neuheisel said that on the play Ramirez fumbled he was "dinged up, and may have a concussion."
Hope Christian gets to be 100 percent sometime soon. Frankly, I was really surprised to see Ramirez start this past weekend. It didn't make any sense to me given how productive JetSki has been this season. Moreover, where is Derrick Coleman? The kid is our second leading rusher averaging around 5.5 yards per carry. Where the heck is Milton Knox? Why haven't we seen them in our last couple of games? Our RB rotation has been very befuddling without making any kind of sense. Not just that our running plays have also not shown any kind of imagination in terms of offensive scheming.
Seems like we just keep running the same off tackle plays without taking into account who is at TB. I don't get why we have 5-8, 170lb Damien Thigpen running between the tackle when he comes in. As I mentioned yesterday with Knox, Thigpen and JetSki, it seems like we have the RBs who can get outside and take advantage of their speed. So I don't understand why we are not working up plays that would put them in a position to dart through in open spaces. Meanwhile, on the other side it'd be good to see Coleman in situations when we need to pound the ball and wear out the other team.
Anyway, those are some thoughts that have been going through my head. Honestly I know we are all frustrated and that is natural given a 4 game losing streak. However, like many year I am not close to giving up. Also, I think people here to need to brace for tougher times because I don't expect this weekend to be pleasant either. Plus we have talked about how gruesome the schedule is for next season. Still while we are going to stick with the team and be supportive of our players and coaches, that doesn't preclude us from questioning decisions not making a lot of sense or wonder out loud for explanations.
I get the difficult job of rebuilding CRN and his staff inherited. I mentioned on Sunday that we will not go easy on him in terms forgetting the mild expectations we had set for this season and the reality based expectations for next year. That said we will definitely take into account the improvement he has already made in several aspects of our program. Its clear to me that our OL is getting better and we have better talent among our younger guys. We will be patient and allow our coaches to grow this younger guys while at the same time we are going to wonder about any moves that might seem illogical.
Guess that's part of the drama that is college sports. We are all part of it and I actually think it's fun in some ways to talk all of our issues out in such detail. Speaking of which, I think you guys should take up on the offer from ryebreadaz and ucla13_usc9 to join them in this week's podcast. Specifically those of you who might not agree with their takes from recent weeks (cough***QB decison***cough) might want to call in and make your case on why you disagree with them. :-) As mentioned above, it's all part of the fun and the balancing act that will take place here on BN during these tough rebuilding years of UCLA football.
GO BRUINS.
0 recs |
22 comments
| Add comment
|
Comments
QB situation
Obviously, if I am interpreting this correctly, we are now back to an open audition for the starting QB job. There is no other way I can intepret this.
Alright, fine.
The best thing we can hope for is that one of these gentlemen steps up and thoroughly outplays the other, and wins the job outright. Then I believe we stick with that guy, through the ups and downs, through the wins and losses, and let him learn and develop without stunting their growth with back and forth platooning. And preferably, we get to that point within the next couple of weeks.
With both of these guys being freshmen, we have to find out who is going to be leading this program for the next 3 or 4 years, and we need to find out now. I cannot envision a prolonged, unsettled, 2 QB situation ending anyway but badly for both of these young men, and our program.
Prince or Brehaut. May the best man win.
by godblesstyus95 on Oct 27, 2009 7:03 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
More tough times?
Yeah, I agree that I don’t see many wins the rest of this season…and before the season began I felt I would be thrilled with 6-6 and MAYBE a bowl appearance.
It’s not that we are losing. It’s HOW we are losing. It’s continually dropping easily catchable passes, committing dumb penalties, missing tackles, not being able to score touchdowns with any consistency once inside the 20, making poor decisions at quarterback and appearing to play “not to lose” even when we are trailing.
Arizona on paper is a better team right now, but they GAVE us 5 turnovers and we did nothing with it. If you get 5 turnovers, you should win even with a talent disparity…at the very least you should be competitive. But we looked like an absolute trainwreck.
I expect that we should lose (on paper) on Saturday. But I also expect that we go up there and compete and give ourselves a CHANCE to win. I’m not being unreasonable in asking that we at least look like a competitve Pac 10 program at this stage of CRN’s tenure even if we don’t win consistently. The past several weeks we have looked more like a bottom-tier WAC team…that is what is troubling to me.
by bruinecon91 on Oct 27, 2009 7:29 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
nobody
GAVE the Defense anything. they created turnovers and/or took advantage of Arizona mistakes. I’m not going to argue that they had a perfect game because it’s obvious they didn’t but let’s not say that Arizona GAVE UCLA anything on saturday. If anything a couple of the touchdowns the Defense gave up were because of the two turnovers our O had.
by King J77 on Oct 27, 2009 9:27 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I know I'm going to be dragged out of BN, tarred and feathered for this, but . . .
It seems Craft has been no worse than either of the other two this year. The biggest complaint against Craft this year is that we only seem to throw to the edges when he is in. Yet, many have questioned why we don’t play to what he is good at, which is throwing while rolling out of the pocket, or playing in a constant 2 minute drill.
Purely on face value, if we were to evaluate some 3rd party football program from afar, I think it would be safe to assume that last year’s starter would be the guy to stick with this year, while the two freshman QBs battled for the 2nd spot awaiting their turn when the incumbent burns up his eligibility.
I’m not saying Craft is the better QB. But had I known this year was going to be this bad, it would seem prudent to continue mentoring the younger QBs while the OL continues to jell together and we figure out our run game.
(And, now I’m going to get out of town before the mob wakes up)
A coach is someone who can give correction without causing resentment. John Wooden
by MexiBruin on Oct 27, 2009 7:46 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Craft's ceiling is not real high
and I don’ t think I have to elaborate any further on that.
For the long term (next 3 years) growth and potential for this program, I would go with one of these freshmen and stick with them.
We are a lower-tier bowl team at best this year. For where this program needs to be, we need to develop one of these young men. IMO Craft should not see the field in a Bruin uniform again barring extreme unforeseen circumstances.
by godblesstyus95 on Oct 27, 2009 8:14 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
while I don't agree, you bring up a good point
I think your point actually underscores an issue that faces this year’s team. From the start, we should have decided to either play it safe and try to win games, or take the risk with the young players to get them experience and hope for some wins. The problem is that it seems like we’re doing neither. If we’re using Craft because he gives the best chance to manage the game and win now, that’s fine…but stick with it and red shirt Brehaut. On the other hand, if we’re taking a chance and looking to build experience then Brehaut should have been in when Prince went down. in hind sight, personally, I look back with regret at all pt Brehaut could have had (good or bad) over the past few weeks.
by bruin_nerd on Oct 27, 2009 8:52 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions 1 recs
I like Craft also but...
When he is on as you mentioned in the two minute drill, its great. If we did that the whole game not sure our players can handle that level the entire game.
Anyway, he’s had plenty of chances this year and last. Not sure if the system, or what. He repeats the same mistakes over and over again. He didn’t execute a few basic plays on Sat. In the long run, the young guys need to play. Maybe one of the other two will wake up a bit and start leading this team again.
by Bruin'96 on Oct 27, 2009 9:38 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Where is Knox & Coleman???
I completley agree with you nestor on the RB rotaion, I am very curious to why Knox & Coleman arent getting their share of carries. I have watched Milton since he was in high school and let me tell you this kid is a stud. In the little chances that he has had on the field, he has showm glimpses of brilliance. Personally I think he should be up at the top of the depth chart. However I still have faith in CRN and CNC to put all the pieces together, only time will tell.
by bruins13 on Oct 27, 2009 9:54 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Overcoming the Legacy
We really did start from the bottom last year. There was very little to build on. I think that while commentator Washington’s comments last week on FSN sounded patronizing; they were valid. One area fails it stresses the others. And we do not have strengths in many areas right now except for some individual players to privide any foregivness for mistakes. So the effects of even the smallest mistakes are compounded. But we do have talent. And I, for one, consider this season as CRN’s first season. Last seson was just a damage control exercise. This year’s team is CRN’s team. And how he reacts to the situation we are in right now does count.
All of the comments on this post, taken together, have been absolutly great as far as issue indentification. And I have learned a lot about football just reading them. Now to wiegh in on the situation I tend to agree with the comments that suggest we put the emphasis on building this team for the future and let this season rise or fall as it may.eg. let all of the young guys play and start developing them for the sake of developing them. And if someone says that one cannot recruit without a winning season and a bowl game I say, that win or lose, what potential prep player is going to argue with the chance to play as opposed to being a star on the bench.
by northbaybruin on Oct 27, 2009 10:47 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Knox-yes Coleman=NOOO
Coleman is terrible rushing off-tackle as he stops dead at the first touch.
JetSky (and oposing RBs) on first touch explode out the the touch going down only when completely wrapped up.
Just re-watch 1st and 2nd downs at the Oregon goal-line stop.
Coleman on BOTH carries was stopped by Minimal contact
I suspect that Coleman has a lower back issue that keeps him from taking a strong step out of tackles and taking advantage of his size.
Also, there may be a talent issue; production is more than speed and strength – watch JetSky get 3 yards after it looks like he’s stopped – he has TALENT along with physical skill
by TillamookBruin on Oct 27, 2009 10:53 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
OT: Random fact of the day.
Only 3 DI teams have not played a DII team ever – Notre Dame, USC and UCLA. (Washngton is technically on this list until next year.)
Go Bruins!
by Harsha on Oct 27, 2009 1:26 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I hope UCLA never does!
And it’s time to not allow teams to count those games. They are exhibitions.
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
by tasser10 on Oct 27, 2009 2:39 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
It's quite probable
UCLA and SC won’t given the Pac 10 round robin leaving 3 non conference “preseason” games. The newly added 12th game to
many conferences has forced their hand into playing FCS pushovers. However, plenty of teams (cough SEC cough cough) have been doing this prior to the extra game due to their conference being like the NFL (ha!) in the eyes of the Confederates.
by mdjohns4 on Oct 27, 2009 3:23 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
All those teams had an extra game. They could have played each other. Instead, they called the FCS ADs instead of other FBS ADs.
Anyhow, this was not to knock other teams, but be a source of pride for us. It’s been a rough going for a while, and just hope we all can take a moment to say even at our worst hours we haven’t scheduled a FCS team to pad our schedule. (Michigan recently proved they aren’t necessarily pushovers, but still.)
Go Bruins!
by Harsha on Oct 27, 2009 3:42 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Two Points
1) http://www.ncaa.org/wps/ncaa?key=/ncaa/NCAA/Media+and+Events/Press+Room/News+Release+Archive/2005/Legislation/Board+of+Directors+Adopts+12th+Game+for+Division+I+A
This is the press release after the decision to add a 12th game. The important part is around the halfway point that allows FBS teams to count games against FCS teams toward bowl eligibility. It’s almost as if the NCAA was encouraging FBS teams to play FCS opponents based on the paydays as a result of being bowl-eligible and subsequently making it to a bowl. FCS teams are still pushovers and the Michigan-App State game is obviously an aberration.
2) I was born and raised a Michigan Man, had the privilege of attending UCLA (mostly as a result of getting in combined with a desire to go someplace other than where my family had gone for 3 generations) and hate the fact that the App State game is discussed so freely without referring to it simply as “The Horror.” Please never speak of it again. I beg you.
by mdjohns4 on Oct 27, 2009 6:12 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
1) Right that the NCAA was practically “encouraging” it. I will give you that. Where’s the self-respect though?
2) Consider “The Horror” never referred to again. (At least out of my mouth).
Go Bruins!
by Harsha on Oct 27, 2009 9:16 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Especially USC
since with the Notre Dame game every year they only have to schedule two additional games.
by SuperBruinMan on Oct 27, 2009 6:42 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 



















