Spaulding Roundup: Ready For Prince's Return & Preparing For The Explosive Ducks
Let's open with Rick Neuheisel setting the table for this game week:
"I love everything about this job. I love the planning. I love the strategy involved. I love the interaction with young people. I love recruiting. I like alumni. I even like emails from disgruntled alumni. I just don't like losing. The key is getting rid of that feeling as quickly as humanly poss. Were on to the next game; it's a great test for us. It's fun to think about playing the No. 13 team in the country in the rose bowl. We had a good game with us a year ago. They got us in the end. But our guys are going to respond in the exact right way. Every time we've asked them too, including being down 24-6 in this last game and battling back with a chance to tie it. I still feel good about our program. We're still relentlessly positive. We've just got to get better on both sides of the ball."
Well I can get on board with that. Look we have reflected a lot since the tough loss against Stanford this past weekend. There is nothing wrong with talking and discussing what we are seeing with our own eyes on the field. However, does that mean we are concerned with where we are headed under CRN? Of course not.
Given his over all body of work, seeing how he and his staff has gone out recruited talent in first two years, reconnected the program with the greater Bruin family, bring a sense of excitement around our practices and our games that never existed before, and having our guys fight in almost every game, there was never any reason to be worried about the program. All we have been doing is thinking things out loud and analyzing our issues in as much detail as possible (from all angles), instead of just going along with one sentence grafs we read in our local papers. In any event, I have no doubt that Neuheisel, Chow, and Bullough are doing their best to game plan every week what they think is the best chance for our guys to come up with W.
Of course it will really help them if they can get back their starting QB this Saturday. According to the Daily News CRN said Prince is scheduled to resume starting QB duties in practice today, which would his first real action since Tennessee:
"We'll give him a chance to get him back in there with the ones," Neuheisel said. "I've listed him at 'or,' because I'm not sure. I'd love to see him be right where he was when he left off. If that's the case, then yeah, Kevin's in there. If there's rustiness, and things worry us, then we'll have to make that decision, too."
If Neuheisel and offensive coordinator Norm Chow don't believe Prince can go, they'll go with redshirt senior quarterback Kevin Craft for the third straight game.
Craft has been efficient in his 1-1 start, completing 35 of 58 passes for 390 yards with one touchdown and one interception. However, most of his passes have been short, high-percentage passes, and the Bruins failed to stretch the field against Stanford.
With Prince and his lively arm, the Bruins are counting on a change when he returns.
"The reasons we chose Kevin Prince in the beginning are still the reasons," Neuheisel said. "He's got a big arm, he can put the ball at all portions of the field. We need to keep working on some of that downfield throwing. He gives us a chance to do that."
Also, according to the LA Times, Prince will have X-rays taken today, which per their report is "expected to be a mere formality." Needless to say if Prince is able to return on Saturday it would be a huge boost not just for the team, I think it will lift the spirts of everyone in Bruin Nation. More after the jump.
CRN also had some very insightful observations to share making it very clear how much faith he has in Norm Chow (emphasis added):
"It's a combination of things. Sometimes protection is not quite holding up long enough to hit the ball downfield. Sometimes it's a pressure that you have to throw the ball hot rather than get the ball down the filed. Sometimes it's a quarterback seeing something else and taking something that isn't as big as a play as you might have had. We need to keep bringing focus to it.
"I feel that we've got the best play-caller in the business in the standpoint of calling his spots. I'm not going to second guess him. You don't have to go back very far to see plays that are very explosive."
And about our downfield passing game (or lack thereof):
"You have to be able to stretch the field both horizontally and vertically. Everybody just wants to see deep balls. Long throws in the air, it's exciting. It's a big play. It's like a play at the plate loves to see it and see what's going to happen to happen with the ball in the air. But you have to have the ability to make them play the entire field before you start seeing the heave and hoes."
I am assuming on this note the coaches are also going to be working with our wide receivers focusing on execution this week. While we have all talked about Craft's limitations, we need to think just as much about how our WRs let our passing game down this past weekend in Palo Alto. I sure hope Austin and Embree are practicing with a sense of urgency, we didn't see from them during this past weekend. If not, I'd like to see more of Rosario and Presley in the game, along with the speed component of Carroll and Thigpen out in the open field.
Our WRs and QB (whoever it is) will have their work cut against a Duck squad which has a pretty decent pass defense (ranked second in the Pac-10 holding opponents to 167.4 yards a game). Speaking of the Ducks, here are the game notes from the official site (unfortunately it looks like we are stuck with David Norrie again):
GAME 5 -- UCLA (3-1, 0-1) will welcome No. 13 AP/17 ESPN-USA Today Oregon (4-1, 2-0) to the Rose Bowl on Saturday to begin its Pac-10 Conference home schedule. Kickoff is slated for 12:30 p.m. on ABC with Terry Gannon and David Norrie calling the action. The UCLA /ISP Sports Radio Network (KLAC 570 AM, the Los Angeles flagship station) will broadcast the contest with Chris Roberts, Matt Stevens and Wayne Cook mikeside. That radio feed will also be carried live on Sirius XM Satellite Radio (Channel 121 on Sirius, 103 on XM). In addition, ISP produces a Spanish-language broadcast of all UCLA home games which can be heard on the Bruins website at uclabruins.com with Armando Aguayo and Mario Amaya.
SERIES WITH OREGON -- UCLA owns a 39-23 advatage in the series with Oregon which dates back to 1928. The Bruins lead the series 22-12 in games played in Los Angeles and the teams have split the 12 games contested in the Rose Bowl. The teams have also split the last four meetings, with each winning on its home field. Oregon captured last season's battle in Eugene by a score of 31-24. UCLA shut out Oregon 16-0 in the 2007 meeting in Pasadena. Coach Neuheisel is 4-2 overall, 0-1 while head coach at UCLA, against the Ducks.
Last season, the Ducks handed the Bruins a 31-24 setback in their first Pac-10 road contest of the season. Oregon scored first and tacked on seven more points to close out the first half up 14-0. UCLA began the third quarter with a touchdown drive, capped off by then-freshman running back Derrick Coleman's first career score. Oregon answered back and took a 21-7 lead with 6:11 remaining in the quarter. Kahlil Bell's two-yard run pulled the Bruins back to within 21-14 at the close of the third quarter. After the teams traded field goals, the Ducks led 24-17 wth just under three minutes to play. A 69-yard scoring run pushed the home team into a 31-17 lead with 2:22 to play. Quarterback Kevin Craft found tight end Jeff Miller on a short scoring pass with just under a minute remaining to close out the scoring. Oregon totaled 323 yards on the ground in the game, 170 coming from quarterback Jeremiah Masoli. The Ducks had just 42 passing yards. Craft was good for 288 yards passing, a career-best total, while connecting on 27 of 43 attempts, with one interception, one touchdown. The Bruins totaled 63 yards on the ground.
You can read rest of the notes here.
Needless to say the Ducks have come a long way and have made a remarkable turnaround since their dreadful opening night in Boise when they were throttled for 152 total offensive yards. Their offense has gone through a surreal transformation since then putting up 94 points and averaging over 500 yards in their last two games.
Masoli might be dinged up but he has playing with total confidence and their running back combo of LaMichael James (429 yards in 72 carries) and Remene Alston Jr (304 yards in 18 carries) seem to be clicking on all cylinders. The speed of these Ducks will present an immense challenge for a UCLA defense which frankly has had a lot of issue with handling speed in spread type of offense in recent years.
While we are all anxious about Prince's return, this will be a huge game for Chuck Bullough and our Bruin defense who left Palo Alto with lot more to prove rest of this season. I think CRN set the table with the right words and message yesterday. Let's hope his coaches and players respond in kind this week.
GO BRUINS.
32 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I thought that was funny...
CRN LOVES recruiting, planning, coaching, interaction with the players…but only likes alumni.
Here's hoping
KP can return on Saturday. I can imagine he’s probably just desperate to play. I still have a real hard time seeing him ready for this game, though – and it’s probably the game where we’ll need him the most.
Our game against Cal is apt to be a grind-it-out sort of game. We’ll need some offensively consistency and ball-control to have much of a chance against Oregon.
Bruins Need Prince Back
Not so much because he’s better than Craft, but because the coaching staff has more confidence in him. With Prince at the helm, I think the players and coaches will believe they have a better chance to win. This will lead to hopefully to more production on offense and more inspired play from the whole team.
richramus
But also, because he's better than Craft
I find it ridiculous that people are using the number’s from Prince’s first game in over two years and his second road game against the one of the SEC’s best defenses to imply that he’s about equal to Craft.
The Odds are You're Right
But I don’t think it rises to the level of ridicule to want to see Prince actually prove it on the field. Furthermore, this week’s game will likely leave the issue unresolved. The one constant with Oregon this year has been its defense – probably on a par with Tennessee’s – so I wouldn’t expect big numbers against them.
I don't fear the Ducks
But I fear we might make them look good. This should present a real tough test not only for the players and coaches but the fanbase as well. (Us) If KP had never gotten hurt, those 4 suspended, and etc. this would still be a tough game and one I would have to mark as most likely a loss in the old guesstimate calendar.
Unfortunately, KP did get hurt. It seems there is still a lingering animosity for some of those that were suspended. And, Rahim Moore is hurt. It doesn’t look pretty. But, we are at home, and coming off an embarrassing loss. Here’s to hoping the players come out with some fire (and discipline) in their bellies and do everything they can to prove them (us?) wrong.
Go Bruins! Get them Ducks!
A coach is someone who can give correction without causing resentment. John Wooden
Hope KP's Ready As Well
You just never know for sure with these things, though. That’s why KC and RH have to be ready to go just in case.
Los Angeles Rams and the UCLA Bruins!!!!!
by Minnesota Bruinfan on Oct 6, 2009 10:28 AM PDT reply actions
Well, those alums
are a mixed bag, so maybe “like” is still a strong positive. As for the game, I too wonder if Prince can be fully up to speed, but that’s just another case where the coaches will decide. Certainly KP has the arm, and the QB presence, to bring the Bruin offense up a notch. Oregon’s record is somewhat impressive, though close wins against Purdue and Utah would suggest they are not unbeatable for a good team that is playing well (specifcally, us). Those big wins against the (formerly) Golden Bears and hapless Wazzu can be discounted. Still, the Ducks have plenty of weapons, lots of speed, good size, etc. I’m glad we have them at home. No doubt they will be favored. I have no problem accepting that, but this is an opportunity, isn’t it? We still haven’t put it all together. Maybe this time we will.
I hope
they assign somebody to make sure he’s wearing his freakin mouth guard from now on.
Also, for all the focus
on the quarterback play and the inability to get the ball downfield, I think it’s important to note that the wide receivers did Craft no favors on Saturday. I think it might be time to start giving some of the younger burners (particularly Carroll) more opportunities in the slot.
Embree and Austin aren’t getting the type of push off the line of scrimmage, and Embree is still making some rather basic mistakes when running routes in the red zone.
Rosario is great as a possession, move-the-chains kind of slot receiver, but he doesn’t have the burner, post route-running abilities you often look for someone who lines up in the slot. Carroll obviously will know less of the playbook, but his ability to run a 20 yard post in the slot and come free off man coverage is much greater than Rosario’s.
Also, can you imagine Thigpen lining out wide? That would be awesome. I hope the coaches seriously consider utilizing him in some bubble-screen formations. With his speed outside, he could be immensely dangerous.
I'd really like to see Carroll in the slot
His reputation precedes him, and if Prince is under center, defenses will be forced to respect him if he runs a deep route even if we don’t throw to him. He could really unclog the mid range game for us with his presence. Imagine the damage our TEs could do with a little space.
Problem is
I think the coaches like Rosario’s ability to catch the ball (ie, that insane one-handed grab against K-State).
If it were up to me (ha! ha!) I’d run Rosario out wide in Austin’s spot, sub in/out Austin and Embree on the other side, and line Carroll up in the slot.
As is though, they’re subbing Rosario only infrequently with Carroll and every time they do that, they mine as well just announce, “Hello, we plan on trying to run a speed route now.”
I’d love to see this formation a few times a game as well (not gonna’ happen, but I can dream):
SE Rosario
FL Thigpen
Carroll (3rd WR)
Pressley (4th WR)
We’re not running 4 WR sets any time soon with our green OL, though. But it sure would be fun.
Green?
No sacks… basically earned, on the past few games
There's no one in the world that wants to beat UCLA more than _______.
True, but
We’ve been running a lot of FB and TE sets to help with blocking. I don’t think the coaches are quite yet comfortable with running sets that completely abandon utilizing either a FB or a TE for blocking, which the above formation would necessitate.
Agreed
Horrible route-running is probably the most overlooked element of our program since Toledo left, and we’re still not over it.
BTW, David Norrie sounded like he was watching his first UCLA game ever last week. Ryan Moya one of our best TE’s ever? Terrence Austin one of our best returners ever? WTF was he talking about? Not to take away anything from those guys, but it’s insulting to a program to make such moronic statements glorifying whoever’s on the field in your broadcast over an entire tradition.
I find that really ironic
Considering that KD was a WR himself, and as CRN will tell you, was known for his precise route running. That’s one department that I figured wouldn’t fall off under KD.
Here's what amazes me --
All this talk about QB’s and WR’s.
Am I alone in the wilderness calling out in fear that our D will not show up for a full 4 quarters, that it will, as it has consistently for the past few years, get run all over in the first half? And, then play a solid 3rd Q and stellar 4th. That it will put us in a position where we have to play from behind?
Sorry, but I wasn’t a great DW fan — loved his energy but not his D. So, we bring in Coach Bullough whose mission is to not make many changes to Walker’s D, lest we confuse the players with a new system. I wanted Rocky Long. Didn’t get him. That’s fine. But, we are getting less from the most talented players we have — the guys who play D — than we should be.
We need improvements on both sides of the ball and the continuous focus on the QB and WR positions turns a blind eye on the failures on the D side of the ball — especially in our tackling and discipline.
My biggest worry is not that our O will fail. My biggest worry is that our D will.
sjh
Here's my take on it
24 points isn’t a lot of points, especially in the Pac 10. That’s what we held Stanford to, despite any deficiencies we have in that unit, real or perceived. 16 points is even less, and while I can see us winning games that we hold opponents to 24 in, I can’t see us winning games where we only score 16.
The Reality Is
We have a D that can play better and should not be giving up the ground we have been giving up in the first quarter (and perhaps all quarters until we lock down in the late 3rd and the entire 4th).
Although one can say that 24 points isn’t that much, can one say that this D is playing to its full potential? The truth is that it has the talent to be better, especially against the teams we’ve played.
We should hold this D to its full potential and that potential is one that should not be missing tackles, sleepwalking through full quarters, and giving up stupid penalties.
Our D talent has to make up for our deficiencies on O — we’ve known that all year.
In fact, I think the O has played more to its full potential than the D. Especially the O line which is exceeding expectations. And, this debate over Craft is, in my eyes, BS. He has given 100%; he is playing the best he can play. It may not be good enough, but no one can criticize his effort.
I don’t think we can say the same thing about the D.
People are criticizing CNC for his play calling — but there’s no criticism of Bullough for the lack of intensity and discipline of his D — or some of the questionable D calls he made.
For us to win, we have to be a stronger D team. Probably 60% of our talent is on the D side. It has to play to its full potential for us to win 6 games and be bowl eligible. It isn’t.
Again, don’t get me wrong — I love our team and our coaches. I am not really critical of them. I’m just surprised that the D is coated in Teflon by those who feel a need to question our coaching and our players on O.
If you want to be critical, I think you have to be objectively critical on both sides of the ball.
sjh
66
I think I have been fairly even handed in my reflections on both sides of the ball. Note how my post ended this am. Note how I called out the D in my Sunday am post and note how I even called out Reggie Carter for talking too much extensively in one of the comment section today.
Kevin Craft is a great kid. I am not questioning his heart. However, I can certainly observe that his athletic potential is limited and it shackles our offense.
We really don't disagree
and these messages were not directed at you.
But, if you read the recent threads, almost all of the discussion is on the O side of the ball.
I’m just very surprised there are far fewer comments on the D which was originally hyped as being one of the best in the country.
As to Kevin Craft, I, too, wish that he could throw the long ball and stretch the field. He can’t. But, at least he is doing everything he can as well as he can. I’d like to be able to say the same thing about all of our D players.
sjh
Yeah I think we all generally agree on this
Lot of the frustration is understandable. It happens I guess. :-) It’s part of the football season when people get so hyped up after a 3-0 record that they lose perspective.
You are absolutely right about our defense. I was never really sold on Walker even though I think the defense made some improvements under him, I think it can be lot better. The jury is definitely out on Bullough and how he handles this weekend should provide some more information on him and our defense. They have lot to prove.
I Can't Be That Critical of Bullough
It appears he was told that he could not deviate much from DW’s schemes — because we were not ready for a completely new approach to playing D. I think we knew that he had no O schemes under CTS and could not change everything at once — so we left a D that was solid, if not great, in place and tried to totally revamp the O.
As we get more talent and raise our game, I bet that either Bullough will be given more freedom or will be replaced with someone who is as innovative on D as CND is on O.
sjh
Yes, but...
What justifies the hype on D? Why do we expect them to be so damn perfect? They’re thin and young in the secondary, thin at linebacker, very thin on the D-line. The D-line has so far been exceeding expectations. The secondary has been injured. In football, a single defensive weakness can be exploited. That’s why, as I’ve said before, offensive proficiency is more important.
I want our defense to be great. Careless D in general is the hallmark of careless, insufficient coaching, and we should never be satisfied with lackluster D. BUT…the fact is that scoring 16 points will never be enough to win at a high level, whereas allowing 24 is good enough to win. That’s why the obsession is with offense.
Put it another way. If we had Cade and Farmer on this team, we’d be a championship contender. If, instead, we had two great defensive players and Kevin Craft, we’d be aiming for .500 at best.
We are not so loaded with defensive talent that we can shut down good offensive teams and win with a field-goal offense. It’s a fantasy to think we have a great defense, and it’s not reasonable to expect them to “dominate” all four quarters. Name one defense that does and isn’t USC, Alabama, or Florida.
We do have depth issues on front 7
As we discussed in detail during pre season. However, I think we have enough talent on our defense to be a very good one and not a D that should have gotten man handled and making the kind of silly mistakes it paid dearly for in the first three quarters against Stanford.
No excuse for personal fouls
And in no way was I satisfied with the D. But even with all the apparent manhandling, they were one idiotic personal foul away from allowing 18 points. On the road, that should be enough for a W.
Now the personal fouls really have to stop. It’s one think to get a penalty as part of the game, but the excessive stuff is inexcusable. Cost us 7 points against SDSU, 7 against Tenn (imagine how we would’ve dominated with an extra 7 in that game), and at least 7 against Stan.
"Explosive Ducks"
Made me wonder how long it will be before Nike figures out how to add fireworks to their unis.
Crissman
Can anyone tell me what happened to Crissman? Maybe I missed it but he fell off the grid somewhere along the way.

by 

























