Ben Ball 09-10 & ML, JA, DG prospects (update: JK out 4-6 weeks)
Bumped. 27 more days to go. GO BRUINS. -N
Rivals.com has been doing a countdown of college basketball teams. Today they got to number 30. And the 30th best team according to them is our very own UCLA Bruins. The projection:
This season, UCLA coaches might say the one word they haven't had much use for over the past few seasons: "rebuilding." Of course, rebuilding for UCLA might mean a third- or fourth-place finish in the Pac-10 and a low NCAA tournament seed, but it's a changing of the guard nonetheless.
This projection is pretty consistent with the national opinion on CBH's upcoming team. Gary Parrish of cbssports has us outside of his top 26. It is really tough to quibble about this since our team is really a complete question mark. We could wind up being a top 10 team or we could be a middle of the pack Pac-10 team.
Rivals predicts a starting lineup of ND, DG, TH, ML, and JA. There was no mention of TH's health, but even if he is healthy I doubt he will start. I think JM will have a breakthrough year since he has slimmed down and will be our starting center allowing DG and ND to slide down to the 4 and 3 respectively. I expect TH, MM, and RN to get action this year since they appear to be the most capable of contributing defensively. If TH and MM can play the 2, they will get a lot more time since we are so thin in the backcourt.
Rivals outlook seems about right to me:
UCLA is in transition, but the Bruins have too much talent and too good a coach to take a steep tumble down the Pac-10 standings; it helps that the league will be down this season. UCLA is one of the few teams in the conference that has its strength up front. That could be a major advantage, provided the guards don't get overwhelmed.
For once, we will have a big lineup with plenty of size on the bench. JA and ML may not be able to apply the same level of full court ball pressure that DC provided, especially since it will be important for them to not get fatigued and in foul trouble given our lack of backcourt depth. Having all that size inside should make it difficult for teams to go inside on us and be forced to beat us by shooting 3s and jumpers.
More info on ML, DG, JA, and TH below the jump.
Draftexpress.com, one of the better NBA draft websites (they had RW projected as a top 10 pick BEFORE his sophomore year), has been doing profiles of the top prospects of each conference. Look who is number one in the Pac-10: our very own ML. So snippets from their in-depth analysis of ML's game.
Offensively
Offensively, Lee is at his best in an up-tempo setting, where his terrific athleticism really allows him to shine. He’s often the first one down the court, looking like an absolute jet with or without the ball, and regularly getting to the basket where he can make some very acrobatic plays. He’s an extremely fluid, explosive player, able to change directions on the fly and looking extremely quick and shifty in everything he does. Guards who can pick apart a defense on their own with a blazing first step are all the rage in today’s NBA, and Lee shows the potential to develop into that and much more down the road.
And more importantly, defensively
Defensively, Lee is an absolute menace, already being a shut-down stopper type, but showing even more potential as he continues to grow into his frame. He possesses superb lateral quickness, being capable of getting right in his matchup’s face and sticking with him for long stretches, while showing great intensity in the process. He gets in the passing lanes on a regular basis, and will even come up with an occasional blocked shot. Lee’s willingness to defend, coupled with the frenetic energy he brings to the floor will surely endear him to NBA decision makers, as he’s capable of guarding multiple positions already and still has room to improve down the road.
I look forward to seeing ML live up to his potential. From everything I have seen from him, I fully expect him to be the next great Ben Ball Warrior, but we need to be patient as it won't be overnight.
Coming in at number 7 is DG. In analyzing the numbers, DG was an efficient beast:
Analyzing his production from last season, Gordon’s production and efficiency proved to be greater than his basic numbers could ever show. On a per-40 minute pace adjusted basis, Gordon averaged 13.4 points and 12.7 rebounds a game last season. Those are solid numbers and it will be interesting to see if he can keep up that production with a bigger role and added minutes this season.
If DG can put those numbers up this year, it will go a long way in making for a succesful season. However, DG does have some areas that he needs to work on.
On the few post up opportunities that Gordon had last season, he showed a limited amount of moves, resorting to a mini jump hook over his left shoulder on almost every occasion. He would also get pushed away from the basket too easily, which was due in large part to his high center of gravity and lack of lower body strength. He must learn how to establish and hold a base, which will make for easier post entries from his guards. He has a decent looking shot and had 17 foot range in high school, thus developing a face up game, which was nonexistent last season, would serve him well. Additionally, gaining more confidence with the outside shot will open up options for Howland to use Gordon in pick and pop situations.
Right behind DG at number 8 is JA. JA is probably the most critical player for CBH this season as he is taking over the position of JF and DC and does not have a true backup. For JA, failure really is not an option. First the good:
Looking at Anderson’s game, it’s hard to come to many definitive conclusions based off his limited playing time, often coming when UCLA already had a convincing lead, but a few things can be taken away. Anderson is a steady floor general who runs his team’s offense well, not over-dribbling, moving well without the ball, maintaining good spacing, and distributing the ball among his teammates. He didn’t show much in terms of ability to create off the dribble for others in the lane, however it’s something we’d seen from him in high school and is something to look out for as he grows into his larger role this year.
And the bad that we are well familiar with from the times JA struggled last year.
While Anderson does have good moments with his dribble and can make things happen in the lane, he seems to have a lot of trouble dealing with pressure defense in both the halfcourt and fullcourt, often exposing his dribble to defenders, leading to quite a few steals far away from the basket. Being able to better handle these type of situations will be crucial to his success this season, as it’s something teams will catch onto and abuse if he doesn’t fix it.
Not to be outdone TH was recently picked as one of the sweet 16 freshmen to watch by NBCsports. They lead with an important question:
The big question in Westwood: Which star freshman will Honeycutt resemble -- Kevin Love or Jrue Holiday?
I don't think this is a fair question to TH. He is not a gatorade national player of the year like KL or JH and has none of the hype that those two had. If TH can contribute as much as JH did last year, I think that would be a very productive year for TH and UCLA. Here is a little more of what they have to sa
So Honeycutt, a 6-8 swingman, gets the task of helping to ensure UCLA doesn’t stumble too much after losing four starters from last year’s 26-9 team. Sure, Malcolm Lee, Michael Roll and Nikola Dragovic will be the go-to guys, but don’t discount Honeycutt. He’s a solid shot blocker, rebounder and smart passer.
I think the idea of "helping" is a much better expectation of TH than the superstardom of KL or JH.
I'm going to enjoy watching CRN and football team, but I already have November 4th circled on my calendar for UCLA's first exhibtion game of 2009.
Update: LAT has an injury update. Some good and some bad. First, some bad news for JK.
Keefe dislodged his left shoulder on Tuesday night. He had injured it before, suffering a torn labrum in 2007-08 that forced him to miss 12 games.
After initial X-rays were negative, the senior underwent an MRI and the team expects to receive results later this afternoon.
JA has an injured groin also, but TH appears to be doing well.
Update 2: JK out 4-6 weeks.
The MRI on his injured left shoulder has come back negative. But instability in the joint will keep him in rehabilitation -- and off the court -- for four to six weeks.
That should put him back in action at roughly the same time the Bruins play their season opener against Cal State Fullerton at Pauley Pavilion on Nov. 16.
"We are very relieved that the injury isn't going to be a long-term one," Coach Ben Howland said in a statement. "Everything looks to be intact and we are very happy for him and for the team."
Get well JK.
Go Bruins!
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of BruinsNation's (BN) editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of BN's editors.
3 recs |
28 comments
|
Comments
Great stuff poncho
From what I am hearing TH is looking all right and will be ready for practice camp. Also, it will be interesting to see how JMM is doing in his sophomore year. Perhaps he will come back with a little better footwork and more conditioned to play Ben Ball defense.
by Nestor on Oct 7, 2009 3:40 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
JMM
I say JMM the other day on campus and he looked great. He is never going to look like Kevin Garnett, but his body fat looked way down and looked more like a man than the baby fat freshman that he was last year.
by bruinponcho on Oct 7, 2009 3:57 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good to hear
Now crossing fingers for JK.
by Nestor on Oct 7, 2009 6:51 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks, that's a great
preview/roundup. Really appreciate it.
I suspect we’re being underrated a bit this year.
by paulucla on Oct 7, 2009 3:47 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Here it comes again
Ben Ball season.
Call it rebuilding if you must, it doesn’t dampen my enthusiasm. I had a great time watching the 2005 team that “only” made it to dance. With all the unknowns and young players expected to play big roles, I expect this team to perform similar to that one.
by Tydides on Oct 7, 2009 3:57 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Someone missing here
Great stuff, but I don’t see the initials MR showing up. I know we’re all enamored with the athleticism of ML, but I expect CBH will count on MR quite a lot at the 2 this season as a veteran, calming force on the court, as well as for his ability to feed post players and stretch defenses with his outside shot. On the defensive end, his savvy and toughness ted to make up for a lack of elite foot speed. And hopefully he’s hungry after missing time with that foot injury. I can envision the team developing into a more up-tempo style as the season progresses (especially since it seems that will be the general style of our conference foes who likely will not tend toward half-court slugfests), but at least in the early season I suspect we’ll see a good dose of MR.
Most predictions I’ve seen show us as finishing ~3-4th in conference, and the team is certainly young, but despite the “rebuilding” label I wouldn’t be terribly surprised if CBH molds this team into a unit that plays up to their abilities, a balanced team capable of competing for a conference championship.
by haywood nighttrain on Oct 7, 2009 4:59 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
No need to be surprised in the first place
A team predicted to finish 3rd or 4th in conference despite having a rebuilding year seems to be one that would be competing for a conference championship.
Now if we won, that would be somewhat surprising. Competing for the Pac? I’d be surprised at anything less.
by mdjohns4 on Oct 7, 2009 8:29 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
MR will be huge this year
You are right that MR isn’t getting any preseason attention, but he will be critical this year. With essentially a 3 guard rotation, MR is going to have to shoot lights out when he is in with JA and help handle the ball and make entry passes when he is in with ML.
by bruinponcho on Oct 7, 2009 8:54 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
With the bigs we have this year . . .
. . . I hope MR fills the same kind of role (no pun intended) that Lee Humphrey filled for Florida in their championship years. When teams collapse on JM and DG, and (presumably) are already guarding NG at the 3 point line, MR should be wide open on the other side of the arc for 3.
I had hoped we would use him in this fashion when we had KL, but that was the season when MR was hurt.
by orlandobruin on Oct 8, 2009 4:53 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Who is zooming who?
Up-tempo? While I would love to see it and I know many of the players would love to play up-tempo, I have 2 compelling reasons to believe we will not go uptempo:
1) CBH (and yes I used the initials becauseof the continuity)
2) The key advantage we will have is big bodies in the front line. We will play a methodical, half-court offense with a goal of working it into the bigs.
Go Bruins!
by Bruin Dad and Grad on Oct 8, 2009 2:47 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think "rebuilding" is in Coach Howland's vocabulary
Just as there is no crying in baseball, there is no rebuilding in Pauley Pavilion. We will be ready. When the first game comes along, the new guys will be veterans of the toughest boot camp this side of Parris Island. They will be ready. I trust Coach Howland implicitly in that department (and most others, too.)
by Fox 71 on Oct 7, 2009 6:22 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Spelling out names
To the Author: I know you think you’re cool by just using initials, showing how “in” you are with the Bruins, but it’s really annoying to your readers. Show some consideration and try spelling out the names (or at least a name); it makes it a lot easier for those of us who aren’t as “cool” as you.
by Biglar on Oct 8, 2009 8:13 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
FAIL
This is not an article. This is a post written for the community. And all the people who have been here regularly know exactly what the initials stand for. Stick around and you’ll learn, or just go look at the lineup and I’m sure you can figure it out.
You joined BN today to complain. That is what makes you not “cool”.
Grade: FAIL
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
by tasser10 on Oct 8, 2009 8:15 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Read BN everyday
And the first significant post of the year on BB makes the initials, especially of the recruits that have NEVER played at UCLA, less effective in communications.
You guys can be rude but it does not take away the point that even in blogs, communication is the purpose.
by Bruin Dad and Grad on Oct 8, 2009 2:43 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
LOL
You registered on BN to make that contribution. If you are not going to offer up anything substantive to this community and offer that kind of pathetic potshots, then stay out and hang out somewhere else.
You are not paying anyone here to spoon feed your UCLA fix. If you want posts written just the way you like it, find a site, pay for it and then demand it. Don’t do it here and if you insult one of our members one more time, you will not get a chance to post again.
by Nestor on Oct 8, 2009 8:17 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
UCLA Roster for dummies
Here is a link to the UCLA roster. There are 18 players including walk-ons. If you are confused in the future, just click over and look at the first letter of the first name and then the first letter of the last name and put them together.
by bruinponcho on Oct 8, 2009 9:43 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Have a heart
I have a hard time attaching names to faces, spelling isn’t my strongest point either. I even know a woman with face blindness.
I’ll admit that I read TH and wondered: who the hell is that?
I did it more than once and still I haven’t remembered Tyler Honeycutt 100%.
It wouldn’t hurt to actually spell out the name every once in a while because some of these posts do look like alphabet soup.
by layout on Oct 8, 2009 10:21 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nothing to do with "cool"
I am the antithesis of "cool" but even I can figure out whose initials are being used in this shorthand way. Besides, it’s been done here for years and everyone else seems to have no trouble getting it.
by bru79 on Oct 8, 2009 10:33 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't know about you guys
But now that I know poncho has mastered the initials for all of our basketball players, I think he’s the coolest kid in school.
No seriously, you’ve never heard of shorthand? You don’t think that by basketball season, writing post after post and comment after comment with the full names wouldn’t get repetitive? What do you think saves more time: You learning our frickin roster, or having every person on this site write out full names in all of their comments and posts for your convenience? You know what the answer is? Doesn’t frickin matter. The initials are here to stay.
by Tydides on Oct 8, 2009 10:45 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
And, Once You've learned them
we create derivatives of the original theme like AA2 who morphed into PAA.
I can understand that when one is new here it is a bit frustrating to get the initials but it’s pretty easy to catch on.
Initials play an important role here like SPTR’S — unfortunately, you’ll learn, and fully understand this term way too soon and it will be used for way too long.
As Ty points out, no one means to be exclusionary. It really is a matter of saving typing strokes.
sjh
by Class of 66 on Oct 8, 2009 11:02 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I add my voice to the minority view on initials
I used CTS and CHP for reasons which were compelling to me – I could not bring myself to use the word “coach” with either of the guys referenced in those terms, and ultimately I could not even bring myself to use their names. I therefore used Coach Toledo’s Successor and Coach Howland’s Predecessor, and those were just too long to type. I don’t think I use any other acronyms (except ncaa (all uncapitalized) and just$c*).
I believe communication is made easier and more accurate by using proper English grammar and syntax, things we all learned at UCLA. I doubt if anyone generates a significant savings of time by using players’ initials. I find it distracting. My professional writing has generally been in an adversary context, and it was important that the audience not be distracted from my main point. Only absolutely dead certain shorthand was acceptable in that context (e.g., i.e, being a couple of examples, or RFAs if the subject of the discussion were Requests for Admission.)
The BN is not a legal publication, and every post is not necessarily made to try to convince the reader to change his or her thinking to be more aligned with that of the writer. But many posts are made in an effort to convince the readers in general to adopt the writer’s point of view. (I try diligently to convince my BN brothers and sisters to improve their collective quality of life by turning the sound down while watching sports on TV, for example.) I want there to be no distractions to the reader when I try to convince or to inform. The wholesale use of initials is simply distracting to me, and I tend to skip over posts of that nature. I also mentally abandon post’s whic’h misus’e apostrophe’s or havve lotts of typpos.
I don’t know who Biglar is, but I sympathize with him or her. I recognize that saving keystrokes will add several months of leisure to one’s life in the fullness of time, but I don’t think the exchange of information is enhanced by using a code that only one side can be sure about.
I am sure I remain in the minority on this issue. Being a geezer puts me in the minority on most subjects anyway. But et tu, sjh?
by Fox 71 on Oct 10, 2009 3:22 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Here's an example of something distracting the reader
I’m confident that this guy is serious. This was a comment made in a blog about a guy who stole some Phillie World Series rings but got caught. The thief was anything but brilliant, and the theft was anything but well thought out. This person had but one comment: “that my friend’s is what you call a dumb ass!!”
Maybe this commenter is a really educated guy who just had a bad day. Maybe he’s just a poor, uneducated guy who assumes that an apostrophe belongs before any “s.” No matter what the reason for his error, his grammatical error was catastrophic in context. Instead of agreeing that the thief is a “dumb ass,” all I could think of was the irony that this particular writer, who made this particular mistake, would call anyone in the world a “dumb ass.” Or maybe I should make that a “dumb as’s.”
by Fox 71 on Oct 10, 2009 6:19 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think we should all get on your case if you use CHP and CTS from now on
I find it distracting :-)
But since I’m feeling punchy, I wanted to do a comparison of the initials you use to save time and the ones that are commonly seen around here. Here are the keystroke savings for the following:
CHP = 89%
CTS = 88%
JA = 87%
TH = 87%
PAA = 86%
CRN = 85%
CBH = 81%
SPTR = 79%
JMM = 79%
So I guess you do have a point if we set the initials bar at anything that saves the user over 87.5% of his/her keystrokes. While I mean for this comparison to be in jest, I do want to point out that I recognize that any time I’ve saved over the years by abbreviating names has probably been blown on this one post alone.
by Tydides on Oct 10, 2009 9:02 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hey, so I had a problem with it at first, too. But keep reading, and you’ll catch on. It’s not so bad after a while. And all the time spent not spelling “Nikola Dragovic” is more time the contributers are spending on content.
Go Bruins!
by Harsha on Oct 8, 2009 2:54 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I feel bad for JK
It seems he just can’t get a break. best wishes for a quick recovery.
by BruinFan96 on Oct 8, 2009 11:49 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 






















