UCLA vs. Humboldt St.: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
While far from perfect, UCLA's performance versus Humboldt St. was infinitely better than the one they put on six days ago versus Concordia. It's a good thing too as the Bruins have only five days before the games start to count. With the team almost completely healthy (Tyler Honeycutt was the only Bruin not dressed to play tonight), UCLA can now go ahead full bore and begin to work out the kinks that are all too evident in their play.
The Good
Two New Guards- If anyone was questioning how important Michael Roll and Jerime Andersen are to the Bruins, they aren't anymore. While James Keefe played the role of stabilizer in the last game, Roll took on those duties versus Humboldt St. The senior led the Bruins with 17 points on 50% shooting, but most importantly, he was tenacious on defense and ball mover on offense. Roll threw some fantastic entry passes and was quick to get the ball out of his hands to stretch the Humboldt St. defense with ball movement. Meanwhile, Andersen took over the point and maintained complete control of the offense. He kept the pace of the game where the Bruins wanted it for the most part, applied the ball pressure on defense that is so key to Howland's offense and was deadly getting to the rim upon occasion. Surprisingly, he was even able to play 29 minutes despite being sidelined for much of the past few weeks.
Second Half Defense- After a dreadful defensive effort in the first half, UCLA came out in the second half ready to defend. Andersen increased his ball pressure, while Malcolm Lee did a much better job denying his man the ball. This kept the guards from being able to penetrate and forced the Humboldt St. guards from doing much. While poor outside shooting from Humboldt St. did help out the Bruins, the fact that 12 of the starting guards' 16 shots came from behind the arc says something. The Bruin big men also did a better job of working to keep the Humboldt St. bigs away from the rim and on the defensive boards as the Lumberjacks saw their offensive boards cut nearly in half in the second frame. In total, UCLA held Humboldt St. to just 23% shooting in the second half.
Ball Awareness- It appeared as if the UCLA defense had no idea where the ball was last week, but tonight they were on it from the opening tip. UCLA forced 19 Lumberjack turnovers, thanks to Drew Gordon's six steals and three blocks, both team highs. When the ball was on the block, help was coming from all over and hands were on the ball to knock it free. Players also did a good job of reading eyes and passing lanes to make things difficult on the Lumberlacks, forcing turnovers. The ball pressure up top by the guards and high hands forced a lot of lobbed entry passes, which the UCLA big men recognized and got hands to.
The Bad
Malcolm Lee- The guy who was supposed to be the Bruins' breakout star has struggled to this point, although it is still very early. Lee missed both of his three point attempts and shot just 33% from the field. He did well coming back to the boards to reel in six rebounds and he was five of seven from the free throw line, but he's yet to find his place in the offense. He is a dynamic and athletic player, but he's yet to show the improved jump shot we heard about over the offseason and three turnovers to go with it won't help. He did make a few nice passes, totaling four assists, but he needs to be better if this UCLA team is to thrive. Luckily, there's still plenty of time for him to find his place in the offense and he clearly knows that he's just getting going, as evidenced by the work he put in after the game.
Free Throw Shooting- I guess this is progress because free throw shooting was in the ugly column last week, but it's still not good enough. 22 of 33 from the line is not going to get it done against good teams in close games, especially when UCLA hits the road and has to deal with hostile crowds while toeing the line. This is an athletic team that when clicking offensively, should put pressure on defenses and force teams to foul. That won't mean much though if they can't knock their shots down from the charity stripe.
Nikola Dragovic- Dragovic's mindset was much better in this game than it was last game when he was jacking up a shot anytime he could see the rim. He was a part of the offense in tonight's game, instead of working outside of it, and he moved the ball better so he didn't spend as much time on the ball. That decreased the number of turnovers from Dragovic so overall, he was better today than he was a week ago. The mindset and attitude, especially with the intensity he showed defensively, were a plus. The problem for Dragovic is that he is a shooter first and foremost, but he's not shooting well. Just three for 10 tonight from the field and two of seven from behind the arc, Dragovic got good shots, but couldn't knock them down. Dragovic does have a sweet stroke though so you would have to assume that his shots start falling soon.
The Ugly
Rotations- Especially in the first half, UCLA's rotations were absolutely horrific. I would not want to be a player watching film of the defense's rotations with Howland. Too often, the Lumberjacks were able to turn a simple screen into an easy basket as the hedge forced a rotation that UCLA just did not execute. This was especially true of the screens the Humboldt St. big men were setting for cutting guards at the elbow, only to roll to the basket and get a pass from the wing for an easy bucket. The rotations were getting better as the game went on, but they were still late. The good thing for UCLA is that quick and efficient rotations are something that only comes with experience and practice so it is reasonable to assume they get better in the coming weeks.
Rebounding- Does anybody except for Gordon rebound? It sure didn't seem so tonight. Gordon brought in ten boards and Lee did well to bring in six, but nobody else got more than three. As a team, UCLA was outrebounded 46-38 despite Humboldt St. missing seven more shots than the Bruins. The Lumberjacks had 14 offensive rebounds on the game, eight of which were grabbed by the Humboldt St. center Brian Morris. While Gordon did have 10 rebounds of his own, he did not do well enough boxing out Morris and the eight offensive boards are an example of that. Howland's teams have been built on great defense, but great defense doesn't mean much if you allow offensive rebounds. It is understandable that UCLA struggle to find an offensive rhythm or communicate efficiently early in the season as they gain experience and learn to work together, but they should be able to rebound and tonight they didn't.
0 recs |
20 comments
|
Comments
Good to know. Thanks for the recap, Ryan.
I didn’t see the game. As long as there’s improvement in every game I have no doubt we’ll be contending in every game against quality teams.
Good to see Commissioner Gordon attack the boards. He’s a stud and I think he’s one of the key players to this squad. Loads of talent that hasn’t even been tapped yet.
I hope Coach Howland gives Malcolm Lee the room and creative freedom to operate and attack the rim. If his shots aren’t falling I’m hoping he’s got the green light to drive to the basket or at least slash towards the rim for high percentage layups.
I hope some of our newer players step up in the long range shooting department to eventually fill the shoes of Michael Roll and Dragovich.
I’m James Keefe contributes a lot more to the offense. He’s shown flashes in tournament games so we know he has some tools to affect games in a positive way.
Can’t wait till the Fullerton game. Go Bruins.
33 Wins. Yeah, I said it.
Thanks for the thorough report Ryan
Roll seems to be the only player who is showing tempo and poise. His shot selection is not forced and when he is open he is deadly. Agree that his entry passes are a welcome addition over last weeks display.
As a team we seem to miss alot of chip shots. I know the easy excuse is it is early in the season, and I hope that is accurate. However, most NCAA players are playing year round and rust should not be an excuse for missing the 3 footers. Hopefully this improve as players get more fundamentally sound.
Defense is our hallmark. As pointed out the rotations need to improve. I am sure CBH will be working double time on this in practice. ND especially needs to show some Sr. leadership in this department.
Good Report
I know we will be improving; however, if we play like this against our conference teams, we will lose 90% of the games. Humdbolt State is not a good team and we were out-rebounded by a margin of almost 2 to 1, that is a disaster. Each rebound could worth as much as 2 points. We were not boxing out the oponents and follow our own shots after putting up, especially against Morris. We need to practice free throw shooting a lot. Shooting below 70% can cause us a lot of games, not to mention momentum and moral. We normally had good rebounding guards, but I don’t find them on this team. Hope I am wrong.
Lee did well on the boards
I don’t know how you can say otherwise. The problem is that he’s the only person I would say had a good rebounding game. It needs to be a better team effort when shots are missed.
Formerly ryebreadraz
by Ryan Rosenblatt on Nov 11, 2009 10:00 AM PST up reply actions
I was mostly responding to the guy above saying we didn't have good rebounding guards
When we had one that grabbed 6 last night. I agree that overall our rebounding effort was lacking.
Oh I know where you were coming from
I just wanted to comment on the overall rebounding. Sorry, I should have clarified that.
Formerly ryebreadraz
by Ryan Rosenblatt on Nov 11, 2009 10:41 AM PST up reply actions
I also prognosticate
That we will lose 100% of the games where we score fewer points than our opponent.
Malcolm Lee practicing shooting at 10:40pm in Pauley?
This kid GETS IT.
I’ve got no doubt that he’ll find his rhythm by the night of the season opener.
The ride may be rough this season, Bruins, but it’ll be like taking your very first car out on its first big road trip. Maybe bumpy, maybe confusing at times — but well worth the ride.
M
"In this program your passion bucket must be full to play SC." -- CRN, to Dan Patrick, 1/2008
DG too focused on highlights/stats as opposed to fundamentals
All game long, but especially in the first half, I was very frustrated with DG. Instead of playing good positional defense as soon as the ball crosses halfcourt and keeping his opponent away from the basket, he played very weakly and let the opposing center setup right next to the basket. This led to DG getting abused downlow. If DG didn’t block the shot or have a successful gamble and get a steal, it was 2 points every time.
As for the rebounding issue, DG should lead the team in rebounds since his man was right next to the basket all game and he played the most minutes of the bigs. I think JK did a good job rebounding in the surprisingly limited amount of time he was given. Humboldt’s scheme also made rebounding more of a one-on-one center matchup since they usually only had one player in the post and the rest out on the arc. Thus, JK or ND were pulled away from the basket and it was up to DG to use fundamentals and boxing out to get rebounds instead of just trying to outjump people like he tries to. I think it speaks volumes that Humboldt’s center had 16 rebounds, 8 of which were offensive.
As for ND, I guess I’m in the minority who isn’t concerned about him. His shots have all been within the offense and in rhythm, eventually they will start falling. He had a few really good passes that setup easy baskets which is something that he has been limited at in the past.
I didn't think DG's defense was too bad
His biggest issues were in rotations and that’s where I saw their center getting his open shots under the basket. The opposing center had 19 points, but I’d guess that 12 of those came on putbacks so I’m not overly concerned about him there. The big problem is the rebounding and putbacks. He needs to start bodying up and making sure he secures rebounds. I would have had DG in the good column if it weren’t for the awful boxing out and rebounding numbers. That alone was more than enough to take him out of the good.
I’m not really concerned about ND either. Last game, I think he took some poor shots and was trying too hard to be the senior leader, but last night, his mindset was perfect. He was working within the offense as you said and moved the ball when the situation dictated so. His game was bad because as a shooter, you need to knock down shots, but they’ll start to go down for him soon enough so I’m not overly concerned.
Formerly ryebreadraz
by Ryan Rosenblatt on Nov 11, 2009 9:58 AM PST up reply actions
DG's biggest problem is jumping on EVERY fake
Even against guys 8 inches shorter, like Concordia. He wasn’t quite as bad yesterday, but still way too jumpy. (Once a guy didn’t even really fake, but only kind of half-faked, and he still jumped to the skies.
His dunking reminds me of Lavin-era Ryan Hollins
An avg. at least one missed dunk per game.
Morris was a bit of a beast
The 16 rebounds and Morris’ points perhaps came too easily in the first half, but he was a good, strong player. He was athletic and moved fairly well for such a big guy. Gordon had good energy and effort, but Morris had an inch or two and 20 pounds on him, and he wasn’t a stiff. Surprisingly challenging opponent.
by citizen zhiv on Nov 11, 2009 1:12 PM PST up reply actions
Low Post Play
The rebounding and defense down low is discouraging. Our bigs were giving up easy baskets to a Div. 2 center who just banged is way to the hoop. What are these Bruins going to do against Pac 10 centers? The guards STILL get beat of the dribble. I’m looking at maybe a 500 record this year. This team will grow, but maybe too late for 2010. Looking foward to watching them improve.
by LouisianaBruins on Nov 11, 2009 7:30 PM PST reply actions
A bit pessimistic
I think we’ll be better than a .500 record. Slow start, perhaps, but the team should finish well, as it usually does with CBH.
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
PAC-10 Blog
Hey Bruins’ fans… last year I was working on an Arizona Wildcats blog (sportscapsule.wordpress.com), but this year I decided to go in a broader direction.
My hope is to cover all PAC-10 teams, and to achieve this goal I want to have one or two writers for each school to post once or twice a week.
If you’re interested, send me a message at thepac10.wordpress.com.

by 



















