Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Dissecting Nick Diaz's Positive Drug Test

Moving Forward: Bruins Need One More Win (And Focus On Arizona State)

I know lot of us are dying to think about that last regular game of the season (especially after what transpired yesterday) but this is not the time for any of us to look ahead. It looks like we did have a good reason to feel slightly better after that fourth quarter against Oregon State, when we got the sense that it was time to rally around our Bruins. Well something is clearly working right now and it feels good.

Yes, last night's blowout win was only against lowly Washington State. We could have looked lot better than we did against Paul Wulff's demoralized bunch. Yet, I still think there is something little encouraging about that performance because it was one of those games we have seen UCLA football team either choke away or make it unnecessarily hard on themselves to win over the years. We now hope our team can keep it going by locking in on the next opponent which is capable of ruining senior day at the Rose Bowl.

Let's start with something CRN did to get his players in the right mindset to deal with the elements. From the LA Times:

Neuheisel's cold-weather preparation included holding Friday night's team meeting outside in a snow storm.

"I was amazed how many of our guys had never been in snow before," Neuheisel said. "It gave us the right mind-set."

Still, it was cold.

He also made his players get a little taste of snowball fights so that they could "get used to the weather":

UCLA Coach Rick Neuheisel had his players throw snowballs, while his kid threw touchdown passes.

UCLA players hardly seemed uptight heading into today’s game at Washington State. A snowstorm Friday night had a handful of Bruins outside throwing snowballs at each other for a half hour.

The frolicking was the result of Neuheisel’s instructions to go outside and get used to the weather.

Yeah, his son - Jerry Neuheisel - threw a 45-yard touchdown pass on a fourth-and-11 play with 31 seconds left to give Loyola a 41-37 victory over Crespi (which I guess was a good omen for the weekend). Anyway, going back to the game, what I liked about iur guys was how they looked confident. They weren't cocky as team leaders like Reggie Carter struck all the right notes before the game as he was gracious towards a struggling team. Our guys had the look of a locked in football team that knew exactly what was at stake and what they needed to hold on to the momentum Rahim Moore and co grabbed to end the Washington game on our home coming weekend. It is going to be a challenge for us to hold on to that momentum next weekend against a very good defensive team. However, if we can continue to build on the successes of last 9 quarters, this will truly turn out to be a Novermbet to remember.

Star-divide

As noted in the post game thread, Kevin Prince was the head line grabber. He had a great game by all accounts. Yet CRN (as he mentioned during half time) though Prince could have played even better:

"When you're enjoying this kind of success, it's almost like going down the cafeteria line and trying to grab everything," Neuheisel said. "You have to maintain your patience. I thought Kevin tried to make throws down the field instead of taking what they were giving him underneath."

Prince completed 27 of 40 passes, as Neuheisel, said, "I thought he did a nice job getting back to the scheme." Practice-like corrections made possible by the scout-team-like defense Washington State offered.

I thought we saw that in Prince during the second half, especially after the Cougars scored a TD. Prince drove the team down for our own TD drive during when he was methodically looking of his primary and secondary targets. He also did a great job during the two min drill to end the first half when he was finding Moline for little check downs:

Prince hit Moline four times on the ensuing drive for 35 yards, meticulously going through his reads until settling short, and the Bruins chopped their way down the field to set up a 38-yard field goal by junior kicker Kai Forbath.

"All week in practice we knew the check-downs were going to be a big factor in the game," said Moline, who finished with three carries for 25 yards and seven catches for 60 yards. "We check-released, we checked down from linebackers, and especially in that two-minute drive when I got all those catches, Prince was checking down the field and no one was there."

Moline had himself a great game which you can read more about here and here.

However, the fact that Moline was our most productive running back is a cause for concern. Derrick Coleman had a decent game yesterday rushing for 50 yards in 12 carries. Our entire team (thanks largely due to Prince's 68 yard rumble down the sidelines) rushed for 232 yards which is not too bad against a bad Washington State defense. However, Coleman to me appears more as a servicable full back than a feature tailback. He did a better job of falling forward yesterday though which is a positive but I think he will have tougher times against team with average or better defensive speed (like the one we are going to face next weekend at home).

JetSki's fumbling issue is a real problem now. Not sure what else the coaches can do. They have sent every message they possibly can. It's a matter of him playing with focus and concentration on every down. Milton Knox picked up some decent chunk of yardage during garbage time. Yet he looked unsure in the fact of Coguar blitzes and failed to hit the hole with authority on a key 3rd and 1 in third quarters. Thigpen has a lot of promise but he doesn't have the frame to be a every down back. Christian Ramirez is just too brittle and inconsistent to have a discernible impact. So, you can see why getting both Malcolm Jones and Jordon James were big deal for this year's recruiting class. It looks like we have a QB of the future slowly emerging in Chow's offense. We now need a back or two, who can costar with the Prince.

Our OL did a decent job of providing pass protection. However, there were moments of sloppiness that needs to be cleaned up. Darius Savage didn't look totally comfortable at RG stepping for Ryan Taylor. I thought our OL's overall run blocking performance was pretty mediocre against an atrocious defensive line. Also, our OL looked somewhat unprepared for WSU blitzes when it seemed like opposing LBers was getting to Prince untouched. Again, it's something we really have to work on this game week to prepare for a solid Arizona State defense.

Moving on to the other side Akeem and Brian Price were the two big stars in last night's defense. From Jon Gold in the Daily News here are Kyle Bosworth's comments on what BP did to the Cougars' offense:

"BP has always had his name out on the leaderboard, but with Akeem, it's really good to see him kind of shine today," Bosworth said. "Two picks is huge for anybody, and it's good to see him with those two sacks.

"I'm happier for him, but BP did great - I know he'll be in the league one of these days, and this is one of the games that's going to help him do that."

Price racked up three tackles for loss, which makes him Pacific-10 leader with 16.5 for the season. He also has 5 sacks to go along with those stats. There is not much I can add to make him sound more incredible than he already is. I cherish watching this kid play just like I enjoyed recent great Ben Ball warriors such as KL, RW, LRMAM, AA, and DC. I am keeping my fingers crossed that he can add to his legend on a week by week basis (because I won't blame him if he decides to jump provided he gets positive feedback from NFL draft whizes during the off season). 

In addition to Price, Akeem had a great game as he benefited from a new look Bullough through at the Cougs:

For the first time this year, UCLA defensive coordinator Chuck Bullough lined up Ayers on the defensive line in a three-point stance, allowing Ayers to burst off the ball at the point of contact. He said both of his sacks were from the formation.

That is sure to catch the eye of those in the NFL, as well, as hybrid pass-rushers - those who can play both in coverage and on the line of scrimmage - have become in vogue in 3-4 defenses.

"It wasn't anything really new to me," said Ayers, who played his sophomore and junior seasons in high school at defensive end. "I'm used to being in a three-point and getting a pass rush. I definitely can see myself doing something like that - I'm athletic enough to stand up and drop into coverage, but I'm also able to rush the passer."

Hope Akeem can build on this weekend's performance to put together another consistent outing next against Arizona State.

While Akeem and BP had great games, I am getting worried about Reggie Carter's contribution to our defense. Reggie Carter is a great Bruin and solid leader for this football team. He is definitely the emotional heart and soul of our defense. However, the more I have watched him in recent weeks, the more its becoming clear to me that he is not the same Reggie we have seen over the years. It looks like his injury is really bothering him. He doesn't have the same ability to move around from MLB spot and he routined finds himself away from the action. Just look at the game tape from Tennessee and compare it what we saw yesterday. It's not even close.

Apparently Reggie is trying to will himself through these last few games of his Bruin career. The coaches tried to take him out during early in the fourth quarter but he wouldn't come out. So per the LA Times the coaches had to take a time out to get Reggie out of the game:

"That was the first time since I have been at UCLA that we have been ahead by so much that they were taking me out of the game," Carter said. "I told them, 'No, let me stay.' Then coach told me he didn't want me to get hurt. So I apologize, but I just wanted to enjoy the moment."

I think Reggie needs to rest up a bit. I think it could potentialy be worth it to use him as sparingly as possible next weekend against Arizona State and perhaps use Steve Sloan at the MLB spot, who did a servicable job last year when he took over for Christian Taylor. Guess, this is an issue we will have to defer to the coaches who have shown pretty good judgment wrt to injury issues this season (See the cautioun they showed with Aaron Hester).

Our punt return performance continues to be a concern. Terrence Austin had another fumble yesterday, which luckily for us went out bounce. He also had a fumble against Washington State during kick return the previous weekend. Terrence has to clean this up. He is running out of time in his last few games as a Bruin.

On the flip side, Sean Westgate came out with a huge punt block. It's not the first time he has made big plays a special teamer (remember the punt block he had against Tennessee last season at the Rose Bowl). I also liked the intensity Damien Thigpen showed during punt coverage even when we were up by a huge margin late in second half. Damien sprinted down the field during Locke punt and dove to down the ball at 2 yard line even when we were up by a score of 43-7. That kind of little details tells us something about the character of the team under its head coach.

Going back to big picture as good as we feel this Sunday, it is important that we don't get carried away. Tracy Pierson from Bruin Report Online had a solid breakdown of the game, in which he rightfully warns UCLA fans to not get too carried away. However, Tracy ended with the following encouraging notes (not behind a subscription firewall at the time of this post):

UCLA’s 556 total offensive yards were better than Arizona (471), Arizona State (410), and Stanford (481).

In fact, it was better than what USC did in the Coliseum against WSU (403), or even Oregon in Eugene (514).

UCLA’s defense held WSU to 180 yards, compared to the 185 yards WSU gained against Arizona, 206 against Notre Dame, 440 against Cal (what the heck?), 181 against Arizona State, 229 against USC, and 351 against Stanford.

Yeah, WSU was without its starting quarterback when it played UCLA, but Jeff Tuel didn’t even play in some of those other games.

So let’s overlook the actual play on the field and go with that. It’s so much more fun to look at it that way, huh?

Regardless if you’re the type who watched that game and came away satisfied (Blue), or came away thinking there wasn’t much you could take away from it and it didn’t give you great expectations for facing ASU and USC (Crank) – or a little bit of both (most of us) – it was good to see UCLA have an easy, blow-out win for the first time in a while. It clearly kept Prince and Co. in the same productive, offensive rhythm established in the OSU 4th quarter and against Washington last week, which is a good thing. It’s also good that the defense maintained its bottom-line successful M.O. – looking vulnerable but doing enough to put UCLA in a position to win.

In other words, at this late stage of this season the team under CRN's leadership continues to move forward. We now have 5 wins which on paper at least is clear step forward from last season. We now need our boys to take lock in and focus for another game week to get that much talked about 6th win next weekend at the Rose Bowl. That's all we should be thinking and talking about till next Saturday. If we can accomplish the objective of getting our 6th win, we will have our program in a pretty decent spot heading into last regular game of 2009 season. So, let's just all focus on Arizona State just like we have been taking it game by game since Oregon State.

GO BRUINS.

Comment 26 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

As much as I love seeing USC get blasted

Their loss yesterday may have actually hurt our bowl chances.

6 wins will likely not be enough to get us to a bowl
If we win out to get to 7 and a win over SC….it will be likely but not a given

oh the irony

by UCLABruins4Ever on Nov 15, 2009 11:45 AM PST reply actions  

I think our chances are about the same as they were before

The only way for us to climb any higher in the standings is if SUC loses out and we win out, and even then we would be sixth. The most likely scenario to a bowl game remains that we get to 6-6 or 7-5 and go to a non Pac 10 affiliated bowl from another conference not filling their slots. It was never a given that we’d get a second BCS bid, and it probably wasn’t all that likely even before yesterday. In fact, them losing gave us the only opportunity we have to climb into sixth. Had Furd lost, they would have joined Cal with 3 losses. Both of those teams have beaten us this season, so we would have had a best case scenario seventh place finish (since UA beat us too). Now, the scenario I stated at the beginning gives us one of the bowl tie in games. The net result of this is that I see our chances as being slightly better after yesterday due to SUC losing, if only because, to borrow a poker term, it gives us one more “out”.

by Tydides on Nov 15, 2009 12:01 PM PST up reply actions  

I guess I'm mistaken

The tie-break rules only matter for conference champ. The spirit of my original post stands though: we will have a great chance at a bowl if we keep winning. SUC has nothing to do with it.

by Tydides on Nov 15, 2009 12:24 PM PST up reply actions  

No!

You love watching Harbaugh run up the score on them!

There's no one in the world that wants to beat UCLA more than _______.

by ucla13_usc9 on Nov 15, 2009 12:03 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

doesnt matter

it’s a good thing U$C got blasted, and we cannot look at it like something that deter our chances if we finish 6-6. Sure, we’ll be #7 in the Pac-10, but there should be a spot somewhere for us. The way things have gone with the conference from week to week, it’s hard to predict it. Here is how ridiculous the Pac-10 standings look: http://ranjeremysports.blogspot.com/2009/11/whacky-pac-10.html

by maccabita4life on Nov 15, 2009 3:23 PM PST up reply actions  

It wasn't the win yesterday that hurt

We needed to Stanford to lose out starting with the Oregon game if we were going to get an automatic bid with 6 wins. Stanford’s win yesterday makes it all worthwhile.

by SuperBruinMan on Nov 15, 2009 7:12 PM PST up reply actions  

The biggest threat to our bowl chances is us

Our D still looks extremely suspect up the middle. Our running game is in its worst state all year — without a functional Franklin we’re either dropping the ball or playing a very limited Moline/Coleman for most of our carries — and our OL is very questionable with these new injuries. Anybody know if Eddie Williams has any hope of returning? Hope at least Taylor will be ready next week.

Prince’s growth — and more consistency from Rosario — might be enough to make up for all of these questions. I don’t know, but our next game is an absolute MUST for this program, and especially this defense.

by bluebland on Nov 15, 2009 12:15 PM PST reply actions  

UCLA > sc

It’d be great to see UCLA win their final 2 games and bowl game and sc loses all of theirs. What would Plaschke, Simers, Maya, et al. have to say about the closing the gap ad then?

by UCLA4Life on Nov 15, 2009 12:52 PM PST reply actions  

Humanitarian Bowl

If Boise State is unavailable (likely, considering they’ll be playing in either late December or early January for their bowl this year), the Humanitarian Bowl matches a WAC team against an at-large team, preferably from the Mountain West, but there are exceptions (Maryland played Nevada last year in it, for example). I remember a random ESPN bowl projection from earlier in the year that had us playing Idaho in it, which I wouldn’t mind in the least.

by FLAT on Nov 15, 2009 2:09 PM PST reply actions  

I wouldn't mind either

Since I live around 3 minutes away from Bronco Stadium, I would love to see this happen.

by Insomnia333 on Nov 15, 2009 3:18 PM PST up reply actions  

"[I]t is important that we don't get carried away"

The above quotation is from Nestor’s post and it bears emphasis. If am repeating another post, forgive me, but of the 5 teams we have beaten, only 1 has a winning record, Kansas State, and one of their wins was over dreaded Tennesse Tech Tech (and yes 2 our wins are against the Washington schools with a total of 4 wins between them) Tennessee which is in our situation, a rebuilding slog, is even at 5-5. These numbers do not lie. We have not beaten a team that is playing solid Division One football.

by peggysue69 on Nov 15, 2009 2:43 PM PST reply actions  

I hear what you're saying

But I think there are two important things to keep in mind:

1. There’s VERY little difference between a W and an L, a lot of the time. If a couple of things bounce our way against Stanford, Oregon, and (especially) Oregon State, we’re 8-2 and planning our Rose Bowl trip. So even though our wins have come against two average teams, two bad teams, and one terrible team, it’s not like we’ve been barely winning those games and then getting crushed by the “big boys.”

2. We’ve had three “seasons” within this season: the 3-0 start against poor/average teams, then from the start of the Stanford game through the third quarter of the Oregon State game, and then from the fourth quarter of the Oregon State game through now. We’ve been a TOTALLY different team in all three of those different “seasons,” and it’s important to point out that, in our latest “season,” we’re playing VERY well (though, okay, far from perfect), as our QB and defense are living up to their potential and things are just going our way, with the exception of ATV’s dropped pick-six (and that seems like forever ago). So again, this last sentence will sum up the point: Our losses against Cal and Arizona and Stanford (among others) don’t really mean much right now because we’re a completely different, and better, team.

I mean, COULD we lose to Arizona State? Yeah, especially if we suffer from the Dorrellian disease known as “Look Ahead Syndrome” and the guys come out flat and unfocused. But from what I’ve seen lately, that’s just not going to happen. I’d compare us to a baseball team that plays poor/averagely for the first four months, then gets a big trade deadline prize (in our case, we traded Injured/Ineffective KP for Bringing Back Memories of #18 KP) and then starts winning five games a week. And I think that’s why everyone’s so giddy right now.

by FLAT on Nov 15, 2009 3:53 PM PST up reply actions  

Agree in Part

We were in those games we lost during your “second season” and could have won each. We never stopped trying. We were probably short a bit of talent and could not make the key plays that would have turned or won the games.

The teams we lost to look pretty strong now.

We are a “better team” than our record and are where we should be now.

We have not lost a game we “should have won” and did win a game we “should have lost” (Tenn on the road.)

I think we are on schedule in our rebuilding process.

sjh

by Class of 66 on Nov 15, 2009 6:08 PM PST up reply actions  

Last thought from Peggy Sue

I pushed the wrong button and did not finish my thought such as it was .

We should not get carried away but as Nestor points indirectly we are on the ascendency and we all know in our brains and hearts that a corrupt diploma mill on Figueroa is on the decline. We need to make sure the Rose Bowl on Saturday is truly Blue.

Go Bruins!

by peggysue69 on Nov 15, 2009 2:50 PM PST reply actions  

I think you guys will enjoy watching this "behind the scene" clip after our victory at WSU

Post Game Speech by Coach Neuheisel at WSU Locker Room
http://www.facebook.com/video/video.php?v=1293111207504&ref=nf

posted by Angus McClure
Director of On-Campus Recruiting

-seems like our public relation staff are catching up on recruiting tactics for the 21st century

by Gutza on Nov 15, 2009 5:16 PM PST reply actions  

Concur

I am unaware of any sports “journalist” in the area that is a Bruin Homer

by sam_in_hb on Nov 15, 2009 8:59 PM PST reply actions  

For what its worth

Stanford beat $c 55-21 @ $c
Stanford beat us 24-16 @ Stanford
We fared better in more adverse conditions

$c beat WSU 27-6 @ $c
We beat WSU 43-7 @ WSU
We fared better in more adverse conditions

Oregon beat $c 47-20 @ Oregon
Oregon beat us 24-10 @ UCLA
We fared better, but the conditions make it hard to compare since Oregon was without Masoli, but were it not for the first few minutes of the third quarter and a TD for us on that 4th and goal, very different game.

Washington beat $c 16-13 @ Washington
We beat Washington 24-23 @ UCLA
We fared better, though not in the same conditions

The only team $c clearly did better against was Cal. The OSU game for both teams could have gone either way.

Bottom line, I think we can take something away from beating WSU like we did. Only Oregon and Arizona beat them worse, and that was with WSU playing at Oregon and Arizona. We can take confidence from this game, and should. Here is to a huge Senior Day for us against ASU!

by sponkey21 on Nov 15, 2009 10:18 PM PST reply actions  

all those score are not going to matter on Nov 28 when both teams meet.

by Dodgermanramon on Nov 15, 2009 11:04 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

I agree

They won’t matter on the field.

The point was not that will will obviously win based on the data presented. The point is we have no reason not to expect a very competitive game. There is no reason not to believe we CAN (notice I didn’t say are guaranteed to) win the game. There is no reason to diminish the significance of the win in Pullman just because it was WSU. We beat them worse than most did this year, and that is worth something.

by sponkey21 on Nov 16, 2009 1:04 AM PST up reply actions  

and what is it worth beside a victory and a conference victory?

by Dodgermanramon on Nov 16, 2009 1:21 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

It is worth taking some confidence from

and it is not worth discounting. Look at how many people have said, “yeah, but it was WSU.” I am saying so what. Just because it was WSU does not mean it is worthLESS. Thus is worth something. Are you dense or just upset and desperate to find a flaw in my logic?

by sponkey21 on Nov 16, 2009 4:45 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah Jerry!

My Loyola Cubs needed that win. Okay, back to the regular convo.

by BlackandOldGold on Nov 16, 2009 1:34 AM PST reply actions  

What year did you graduate

I am class of ‘07. Oh how Loyola football has fallen since Grady’s retirement. I’m glad to hear Kearin resigned.

"Beating USC isn't a matter of life and death, it's more important than that" -Red Sanders-

by PrincetonBruin on Nov 19, 2009 3:29 AM PST up reply actions  

Locking In On ASU

Can’t say much more than that.

Los Angeles Rams and the UCLA Bruins!!!!!

by Minnesota Bruinfan on Nov 16, 2009 4:33 AM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bruins Nation, an unofficial daily online scrap book covering the greatest collegiate athletic program in the nation. Established June 16, 2005. GO BRUINS.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
UCLA Vital Signs and the Chianti Cancer
Screen_shot_2011-07-27_at_9
UCLA Hockey Team Suspended Before Final Crosstown Cup Game vs. USC, Appeal Tomorrow
Small
MUST WATCH VIDEO: Rick Neuheisel & Jim Mora Talk UCLA Recruiting on CBSSports
Bruinut_helmetlogo-1d_small
Teachable Moments, Part 2
13-9_small
Tourney Results: Comparing UCLA to Elite Programs

Recent FanPosts

Licenseplate_small
UNC - Duke versus UCLA - Stanford. It's No Contest.
Ucla_trumpets_small
Photos from UCLA vs. Stanford
Small
Verne Harris, Glen Mayberry & Michael Greenstein-Atrocious
Small
Video: Santa Monica College OL Alexandru Ceachir talks about why he chose UCLA
Bruinsnation_small
Our Apologies for Recent Technical Issues on BN
Licenseplate_small
SI.com Gives Mora an A for Recruiting Class
Small
UCLA 2012 Football schedule - Predictions
Ucla__1__small
Can UCLA Find a Leader Like Univ. of Florida President J. Bernard Machen?
Small
7 Tips for Success From Superbowl Champion Coach
Uclabear1_small
UCLA’s Pathetic 11-12 Season: Hoops Expectations for Remaining Games

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Uclabear1_small Nestor

Arron_afflalo1_small Tydides

Brad_pitt_as_achilles_small Achilles

377011_2642084725867_1068030137_32302525_1166539782_n_small Ryan Rosenblatt

Telemachus_small Telemachus

Licenseplate_small gbruin

2761_small tasser10

Blue_bellerophon_small Bellerophon

Img_0052_2_small Patroclus

Small DCBruins

Of Counsels

094_small Ajax

Menelaus2_small Menelaus

Small Meriones

Small Odysseus

Associates

Eee_small freesia39

Uclabruins_small AHMB