Bruins Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: College Football Rankings - BlogPoll Top 25

Clear Signs Of Progress: Rick Neuheisel Has Our Bruins Marching Forward (And Meeting Expectations)

Let's do another quick reset on this Sunday. Rick Neuheisel's UCLA football team is entering the last game of the regular season (the Holy one) with a record of 6-5, riding a 3 game winning streak. Obviously if you look around here and among other hard core UCLA communities you will get a sense of giddiness and optimism we haven't experienced in a long time. However, no one should mistake that with the notion that we think somehow 6 wins are the standards of success in Westwood. Anyone doing that (like the moronic beat reporter from the Trojan Times) is missing the big picture about where UCLA program was when Rick Neuheisel took it over and how long the journey is going to be before we finally get the program to where it belongs (regularly competing for Pac-10 championships).

During the pre-season, consensus emerged re. expectations heading into this year projecting UCLA to win either 6 or 7 regular season games making itself bowl eligible. Getting to that stage after suffering through a 4-8 season (marked by a talent and experience void all over the team) would amount to same accomplishment for Neuehisel, as what Howland did during his second year in Westwood when he got us into the first round of NCAA tournament. Well with just one game left in this season, I think CRN can make a good argument that he has gotten it done. This year Bruins have won every game they were supposed to (which wasn't the case during previous regimes). They came short in games they were underdogs except for the one in Tennessee and if not for a dropped interception (which would probably turn into pick-6) in Corvallis they would probably looking at a pretty solid 7-4 record at this point in CRN's second season in Westwood. In other words, despite what some blowhards in the media tried to tell us earlier this year (writing nonsense like Neuheisel's team "falling apart") the UCLA football program is showing clear signs of progress and taking step towards right direction.

Those signs of progress were pretty evident yesterday on both sides of the ball. I will start with the defense. Chuck Bullough has gotten a lot of critcism this year (and I though it was deserved). However, it was his defense that really set the tone and won the game for us against ASU. I thought it was huge, especially going into the game, knowing how tough the ASU defense was we were looking at our defense to win the game for us. Well they came through in a big way, destroying the Sun Devil's offense (which seems to have found its own QB) with 6 TOs, returning two for TDs, and limiting them to 315 total yards. Price and Ayers were the defensive terror mongers:

Price had four tackles for a loss, including two sacks.

"It's just hard to block him," defensive coordinator Chuck Bullough said. "He's a powerful guy."

Ayers had two tackles for a loss, one of which was a sack. Bullough used him at defensive end at times, as Korey Bosworth was hampered by a sprained ankle.

"Sometimes he gives you that burst off the edge," Bullough said. "You want to put in him in spots like that because he can be successful."

We have already talked a little about how cool it is to see Ayers coming off the edge. The player he reminds me most of is the late great Derrick Thomas. He seems to have found his natural place in our defense. It's not dropping back in coverage but to find a way to get to the quarterback or just hang out in backfield. It's just fun to watch and he has now emerge as the clear front runner to take share the leadership role with Rahim Moore for next year's defense.

As for Brian Price, what else is there to say. I am going to miss the Big Bear next season. He was classic BP. However, the play that will give Chetey Petey something to think about is the one leading to the second TD. Someone needs to review the tape but IIRC in that sequence BP had lined up at the edge bringing pressure from the outside. That was a new wrinkle Bullough through at Arizona State, which caught them flatfooted. Loved it.

The rest of the defense did all right. Seemed like we had our classic slow start at the beginning when Dimitri Nance kept gashing us for chunks of yardage in that first drive. He was just slicing through the front-7 at the beginning before ATV took it to the House. The defense did make some adjustments though and as a result after Nance racked up some solid yardage at the beginning, he didn't do much rest of the game. Both of the ASU TDs seem to come in broken plays when their QB basically made something out of nothing. Heading into next weekend the Bruin defense will obviously take on an offense with surreal talent. However, I think if they can generate the same kind of heat on Heisman Barkley, and contain McKnight around 120-140 yard rushing yards for the day, I think we will have a shot. More after the jump.

Star-divide

Moving over to the offense, I actually was all right with what I saw from our offense yesterday. We knew we were taking on the best defense in the conference and one of the better ones in the nation. ASU's front-7 is really good and they are vicious hitters. Their secondary also played well. This was one of those games we needed Prince to manage the game and he did exactly that. Our offense didn't turn the ball over once, helping UCLA to win the TO margin by 6-0.

Of course the penalties were killers. Probably cost a TD here and there as we racked up 11 penalties for 100 yards. We will have to clean that up especially among our OL. On the other hand, I thought our OL did ok as they gave Kevin Prince time and most importantly, help wear down the ASU defense in second half, by opening up holes for Chane - The Train - Moline. Here is CRN talking about his game script:

"We learned how not to lose a game," UCLA coach Rick Neuheisel said. "We hung in there and protected a lead. That doesn't mean you can afford to not stay aggressive. Penalties kept us from getting a little momentum down the field. But by not turning the ball over and playing sound field-position football, we kept ourselves ahead."

Norm Chow emphasized the point about winning the TO battle to win the game:

"We gave it away last year," UCLA offensive coordinator Norm Chow said. "They gained 120 yards on offense, and we gave it to them. We couldn't do that. You get to the end and you try to win the game. At this point in the season, all you have to (do is) win. However you win, you have to win."

And his field general - Kevin Prince - talked about making it happen with ball control on the field:

"We weren't trying to do anything too big," said Prince, who added 42 yards on the ground. "That's a good way to describe it, a mature performance. It's important to go in there and execute a game-plan. The coaches just wanted to make sure we didn't turn it over. That's the story of the game - five to zero in turnover margin."

Actually it was better than 5 to 0 Kevin (it was 6-0). A huge reason we were able to win that battle was because of dependable and productive carries from Chane. CRN was impressed:

Senior Chane Moline came to UCLA as a tailback and scored five touchdowns as a short-yardage back as a freshman. He has played fullback this season, but Saturday he was back at tailback, grinding out 84 yards in 25 carries.

The move was made after the Bruins had trouble with fumbles in recent weeks.

"We have been using Chane in bits and pieces and decided maybe we should do it on an every-down basis," Coach Rick Neuheisel said. "It was fun to watch us slug it out."

It was definitely fun to see our OL opening holes against a solid DL and Chane just blast through it. I wonder if we are going to see some of the identical packages next weekened (mixed in with doses of Jet Ski and Knox)

In terms of next week, Reggie Carter as always is just a little excited:

"I love being underdogs. I hope they think we can't win at all. Hopefully, we're 50-point underdogs," he said. "Then they'll be surprised if we win."

Prince is glad that we don't have to go through a bye week to wait for the Trojans:

"I'd prefer doing it this way; I hate bye weeks," Prince said. "I feel like it kind of takes you off your rhythm. It's good for getting guys healthy, but we're healthy enough. We needed to come out here and play and continue to get our confidence going."

And I will end with this from CRN:

"As a program, you've got to learn to crawl, then walk," Neuheisel said. "Next week, let's see if we can't run a little bit."

Well we are glad that our team is standing and walking after all the cat calls about it "falling apart" earlier this season coach. It is going to be fun to read about these guys prepare for next Sat. Hopefully our coaches will have our boys locked in and focused for their best game week of practice. I think it will a matter of which guys are the most prepared next Saturday.

I feel confident though that Rick Neuheisel and his staff will do whatever possible to get our boys focused and ready. As mentioned above, given what we have seen this month (and actually the whole season) it's clear our guys are fighting together every game. They have already done their part for showing progress.

GO BRUINS.

0 recs  |  Comment 36 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

* The 25 carries seemed like they...

produced more than 84 yards. That was my impression from Sec 17. It was nice to see a deliberate ball control offense that did both maintain possession of the football and move the chains. Oh, but the penalties. And, before Verner’s pick six, I didn’t like what I was seeing on Defense to that point.

Tom Skalman '84
Las Vegas

by tskal on Nov 22, 2009 10:57 AM PST reply actions  

I liked our running game yesterday

but in next week’s game at $C, we need to get some speedy running backs like Knox and JetSki back into the mix. It was great to see Moline have a great game though, especially on senior day. He actually holds on to the football.

by bruinfan94 on Nov 22, 2009 11:21 AM PST reply actions  

Lingering issues

Bullough hasn’t proven himself yet. He won’t prove himself until we play well against a single good QB and a single good offense, which we haven’t done all year. It’s really much easier to scheme against horrid offenses with no QB threat.

And while the Chane Train worked for us in yesterday’s game, 25 carries for 83 yards is not a productive running game. (After all, we scored only three field goals.) There were a few holes, too, that a faster back could’ve turned into TDs it seemed. I really hope they haven’t given up on Franklin for this year, because I think we’re going to have to roll the dice to have a chance next week.

by bluebland on Nov 22, 2009 11:56 AM PST reply actions  

Hopefully we'll upgrade the DC position next year -

whether Bullough improves himself or we bring in a better DC.

by Seanny Rotten on Nov 22, 2009 5:44 PM PST up reply actions  

Moline was the right guy for ASU

because all we needed to do was not turn the ball over. He was perfect, but let’s not pretend like that will be enough to beat USC.

Formerly ryebreadraz

by Ryan Rosenblatt on Nov 22, 2009 1:39 PM PST reply actions  

well said

The teams that have beaten SUC have very quick, powerful running backs COMBINED with a qb who can run well. Prince has shown he can run, but none of our RBs have stepped up yet to prove they can be that RB who dominates a good defense. I thought Jet Ski was proving he was our guy, but constant fumbles will kill any momentum.
To be honest, I think we need to give Jet Ski the chance next week to be our main guy. If we find ourselves ahead by 10 pts in the 4th and we just need to hold onto the ball to run the clock out, we can use Moline as a full time back. But otherwise, we need to take the risk with Jet Ski to have a chance. IMO, he’s our only RB who has the real ability to gash the SCum defense.

This is going to be my first time going into the Mausoleum, and I’m damn excited! Let’s give ’em hell and bring home the win!

by longbordr52 on Nov 22, 2009 2:01 PM PST up reply actions  

Watch your back

That place is always violent, which is no surprise considering all the assholes in ketchup and mustard you’ll be surrounded with. Who knows how much angrier this losing streak of theirs will make them.

by Tydides on Nov 22, 2009 2:10 PM PST up reply actions  

That place used to be...

the Bruins home too…Alot of great games, great players, great coaches, great teams…it’s part of our Bruin Heritage. We don’t want to ever forget that. Ours is not some upstart program that is “trying to play with the big boys”….We’ve always been with the big boys. Lotsa history there. Don’t forget that…

Tom Skalman '84
Las Vegas

by tskal on Nov 22, 2009 4:40 PM PST up reply actions  

I'll second that about the Coliseum

Let’s not put down the Coliseum just because SC plays there. In its history UCLA has played many more home games in the Coliseum than in the Rose Bowl. It was also the home of the Los Angeles Rams, and it is the only stadium in the world to host the Olympics twice (in 1932 and 1984). The Rose Bowl and the Coliseum are both part of our great athletic heritage in Los Angeles and that heritage is much bigger than just USC football.

by RogerT on Nov 23, 2009 3:45 AM PST up reply actions  

I would not trade my big game memories in the Colosseum for anything

and to tie this to another thread, as students, we used to fill our section even though it was not easy to get there.

tskal hits it on the head. We have a big time football tradition much of which was established in the C.

sjh

by Class of 66 on Nov 23, 2009 6:31 AM PST up reply actions  

The only slight advantage they have

Is being at home, so to speak, and having a better running game. I defy anyone to point to anything that the Enemy has done this season that indicates that they are a far superior team to ours. Beating Cal? Well, we didn’t get beat by Stanford all that bad. Beating tOSU? Well we beat Washington. Who had the better offensive/defensive performance against ASU?

If I was CRN I would be pointing these facts out. We should never be afraid of those losers again, ever.

Troy will fall...again, again, and AGAIN!

by Bruins102NCAA on Nov 22, 2009 2:17 PM PST reply actions  

Price Gone?

Is that official or just speculation?

Didn’t he say he was going to stay through graduation? Has he publicly changed that position?

Don’t forget DC stayed. Some good guys just love college and college sports and are not in a hurry to leave.

sjh

by Class of 66 on Nov 22, 2009 4:12 PM PST reply actions  

I think N just doesn't want people to get their hopes up

BP is a big time pro prospect. It wouldn’t surprise me in the least if he left, despite anything he’s said before about staying.

by Tydides on Nov 22, 2009 4:36 PM PST up reply actions  

FWIW

Kiper doesn’t even list Price in the top-5 draft-eligible DTs for the 2010 draft. That’s not to say he won’t be a high draft pick, but perhaps there is some motivation there to improve is stock somewhat.

I agree with N though, I am pretty pessimistic we ever see Price playing in a Bruin uniform at the Rose Bowl ever again.

formerly godblesstyus95

by Blue Me on Nov 22, 2009 6:10 PM PST up reply actions  

I think

that will change once scouts finish looking at film and looking at the stats. Brian Price leads all defensive tackles in the country in tackles for loss, and leads the PAC-10 in TFL at any position.

by captainqtp on Nov 22, 2009 11:43 PM PST up reply actions  

Kids say lot of things before the season

From what I have heard from folks close the program he is as good as gone. If you don’t believe me now that is fine but don’t be surprised when he goes pro. I’d be happy to eat crow if he comes back but he is gone. And it doesn’t make him a bad guy if he leaves after this season. He is just ready to move on from what I have heard.

by Nestor on Nov 22, 2009 6:28 PM PST up reply actions  

Who are your sources?

Don’t need specific names but how are they insiders?

by Gen2Bruin1987 on Nov 22, 2009 9:03 PM PST up reply actions  

The changes to the NFL's rookie salary structure that apparently will begin with the 2011 Draft . . .

. . . make it financially advantageous for juniors like BP to come out after this season for the 2010 Draft. Or so I have been told.

by orlandobruin on Nov 23, 2009 4:41 AM PST up reply actions  

Boy, I'll say...

…and we’ll have to stop them FROM running…make that frosh QB beat us…IF HE CAN!!!!

Tom Skalman '84
Las Vegas

by tskal on Nov 22, 2009 4:42 PM PST up reply actions  

Spaking of running...totally unrelated

but is anyone watching the Bears/Eagles game?

Kahlil Bell’s first touch as a professional was a 72 yard scamper. Not bad. ;)

by CAJason80 on Nov 22, 2009 6:20 PM PST up reply actions  

Blue and Gold?

It’s not terribly important in the scheme of things, but are we wearing our home unies against U$C?

Bleeding powderkeg blue and gold for 55 years. Go Bruins!

by Digdog on Nov 22, 2009 5:34 PM PST reply actions  

i think so

the NCAA changed the rule after last year’s game and no one has to secede a timeout

by AMM19 on Nov 22, 2009 6:02 PM PST up reply actions  

Unless I missed something

the road team is still assessed an “equipment infraction” and is penalized one timeout before kickoff. CRN and PC agreed that the home team will then call a timeout immediately after kickoff to even it out. I don’t think the rule has changed.

formerly godblesstyus95

by Blue Me on Nov 22, 2009 6:13 PM PST up reply actions  

Pretty sure they did change the rules

You can wear anything, as long as it is approved by the NCAA a certain amount of time in advance.

by SuperBruinMan on Nov 22, 2009 6:57 PM PST up reply actions  

I agree with SBM

and it is official that they will be wearing our home blues

by Sideout11 on Nov 22, 2009 9:09 PM PST up reply actions  

The NCAA changed the rule prior to this season

If both teams agree to it and the conference approves it before the season, teams can wear the same uniforms. UCLA and USC approved it this summer and submitted their application to the Pac-10, which was approved.

Formerly ryebreadraz

by Ryan Rosenblatt on Nov 22, 2009 10:05 PM PST up reply actions  

This team has exceeded my expectations

I honestly didn’t think we would get six wins this year. I hoped for more, but I wouldn’t have been surprised at another 4-8 year. That said, my new expectation is a seven win season. It seems like the O-Line is embracing Coach Kezerian’s philosophy – “Line up and whip the guy across from you.” Let’s do that and wipe the arrogance off of some trOJie faces.

by Fox 71 on Nov 22, 2009 5:35 PM PST reply actions  

CRN still has a lot to prove IMO

I have to say I am disappointed this season with the coaches. I expected better. I hope the team lives up to my prediction after OSU that we would finish 8-5 with a bowl win. That would salvage what should have been a better season.

OFFENSE: Coaching job: B-

The excuses: On offense we were hurt because Prince was out with injuries twice. Our line is very young.

Nevertheless, I think the major mistake with the QBs was the indecision on the backup for Prince. Brehaut supposedly was the #2 and got all the practice reps as the backup, yet over and over again Craft was put in to save the day with no reps during the week. On the other hand, I think the O line has been coached brilliantly. They’re performance has improved dramatically week after week. I still think we don’t run enough in four down territory with this line. What happens if Prince doesn’t get hurt twice? I think it’s worth a game, maybe two, a significant difference.

Still on the offense, I am happy to see we are finally throwing to our wideouts when they are covered one on one. This has really opened up our offense, which despite not scoring a touchdown, moved the ball well against ASU. My major concern is that CRN seems too much like CKD by being so conservative in the red zone and playing for field goals. This has driven me crazy all season. I think if we played for TDs more this season we would have won at least one or two more games, like at Stanford.

CRN and NC have done their best job with Prince. Given the limited time they have had to work with him, he has clearly taken a great leap forward this year. Perhaps he may actually start to live up to NC’s high expectations of him, if not the rest of this year, but in the remaining years he has at UCLA. The receivers have also stepped it up now that Prince is hitting them in stride. Rosario is fantastic when he is good, perplexing when he makes drops on simple balls.

The running backs have been a mystery all season. I’m still surprised that even at this stage of the season we have still not settled on our running back rotation. The latest move to Moline seems good. Why wasn’t it tried much earlier? I don’t think our backs have little talent. In fact, I wish we’d have seen more of Knox and Thigpen, but this group just has not developed well IMO this year.

What really hurts the coach’s grades on offense IMO, and makes it a B-, are the penalties, especially from seniors, that have plagued the offense the whole year. If there’s one thing that reflects coaching and discipline, it’s penalties. CRN has never really gotten a handle on them and I can’t figure out why.

So, the coaching is a mixed bag to me on offense. Really good with Prince but bad with his backups. O line really good. But receivers and running backs a disappointment in their development. Stupid, drive killing penalties all year. If our offense plays well against SUC and the bowl game, I’m more than happy to eat my words and raise the score.

DEFENSE: C+

The excuses: Injuries have plagued key players forcing us to make do with some youngsters.

Remember when this defense was so good it dominated preseason practice? Remember how this defense was supposed to hold the line while our offense developed? Without a doubt this has been the most frustrating side of the ball. Understandably, we are in the PAC 10, a league so tough IMO that if the highly overrated SEC teams played our round robin schedule I think they lose at least two if not three games. I’m serious.

But this defense has suffered from inconsistency all year, especially after the first three games when we got into PAC 10 play and teams really opened up their offenses. The defensive line has had trouble putting pressure on its own. The linebackers have missed assigments way too much. The secondary has just been too soft IMO most of the year. Except for the Cal game, though, I think the defense has performed fairly well overall. They have just broken down at key times.

Part of the problem has been the offense was struggling, but overall I think the problem has been the way too conservative schemes of CB. Recently, however, he has been playing much more aggressively and it has paid off, especially in the ASU game. Yes, we got burned on two blitzes, but we created 6 turnovers. That’s a trade-off I can take.

I think our players on defense are much more talented than they have played, despite the recent improvement. This is probably understandable since it is CB’s first year as a DC, but I really expected better. I think the coaching on defense has been average most of the season, but with the recent aggression I give it an uptick. Again, how we perform against SUC and our bowl game will tell the tale.

Given our 6-5 record I guess these grades are to be expected, but I hoped for a lot more from CRN. I’ve supported his hire from the beginning and expected a big improvement from CKD. Of course, the season is not over, and after we beat SUC I will be ecstatic, of course.

This analysis does not factor in CRN’s tremendous recruiting that bodes so well for the future. As the saying goes, the coaches with the best talent are the real geniuses.

GO BRUINS! BEAT SUC!

by uclahy on Nov 23, 2009 12:23 AM PST reply actions  

Pretty sure NC does the playcalling

If you don’t like the redzone plays, he’s probably the one you need to look at. The penalties; that’s on the entire coaching staff and of course the buck stops with CRN. Nevertheless if any team was going to incur penalties, especially on offense, it’d be this one.

I will say though that if you expected 8 wins rather than hoped for it even after taking an honest assessment of our team as well as our opposition and not just saying we should get there because we’re UCLA, then I don’t think it’s CRN that has the problem…

by Tydides on Nov 23, 2009 12:54 AM PST up reply actions  

You're probably right on my expectations.

They were subjectively too high, especially after we opened 3-0, and pretty much manhandled Tennessee most of the game. Nevertheless, I think my analysis is balanced. I support CRN completely. His effort, charisma and experience were the reason I supported his hire. And I still support him and NC and CB as the main coaches. No question IMO that they have the program headed much higher in the near future.

I think with sports teams a lot has to do with rhythm, chemistry and confidence. These intangibles are the residue of hard work, but once they click teams play dramatically better, geometrically better. I understand it’s a process, not a formula or a quick fix. I thknk we’re very close to jelling. I’m counting on this big time against SUC.

Thanks for your response. I appreciate the comments.

GO BRUINS! BEAT SUC!

by uclahy on Nov 23, 2009 2:21 PM PST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bruins Nation, an unofficial daily online scrap book covering the greatest collegiate athletic program in the nation. GO BRUINS.
Start posting about the Bruins »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Dsc00716_small
First Road Trip Of The Year: Open Thread For Bruins In Manhattan
Blue_bellerophon_small
Arrogant WWL "Journalist" Ted Miller Takes Shot at Well-Informed Fan

Recent FanPosts

Small
Matt Barnes arrested
Small
Almost a "Rudy" story at UCLA
Small
Owamagbe Odighizuwa
E014780120090330144414_small
2010-2011 Women's Volleyball Off to a Great Start
Small
Yahoo Sports reports that bu$h to be stripped of Heisman
13-9_ucla_baby____036_small
Photos and Videos from our Trip to Manhattan
Small
Honorary Captain for Stanford game...and me
13-9_ucla_baby____036_small
Reminder: "Rick Neuheisel: UCLA Football Weekly" Tonight
Uclabear1_small
Chris Foster - LAT's "UCLA Beat Reporter" - Tweets Out Of The Closet
080513__0038_1_small
Random Thoughts On The KSU Game

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS

SBNation.com Recent Stories

LANDOVER MD - SEPTEMBER 06:  Safety #23 Jeron Johnson of and cornerback #21 Jamar Taylor of the Boise State Broncos celebrate defeating the Virginia Tech Hokies 33-30 at FedExField on September 6 2010 in Landover Maryland.  (Photo by Geoff Burke/Getty Images)

College Football BlogPoll Top 25 Week 2: Boise State Inches Closer

Georgia wide receiver A.J. Green talks to the media during the Southeastern Conference football media days on Thursday, July 22, 2010, in Hoover, Ala. (AP Photo/ Butch Dill) +4 updates

Georgia WR A.J. Green Suspended For Four Games

Boise State quarterback Kellen Moore (11) celebrates with fans and teammates including Boise State defensive end Ryan Winterswyk (98) after winning their NCAA college football game against Virginia Tech 33-30, Monday, Sept. 6, 2010, at FedEx Field in Landover, MD.  (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)

2010 Heisman Trophy Threat Level Watch: Kellen Moore Starts At The Top

More from SBNation.com >


Managers

094_small Ajax

Uclabear1_small Nestor

Menelaus2_small Menelaus

Arron_afflalo1_small Tydides

Brad_pitt_as_achilles_small Achilles

Small Meriones

Telemachus_small Telemachus

Small Odysseus

Blue_bellerophon_small Bellerophon

Img_0052_2_small Patroclus

Editors

Images_small Ryan Rosenblatt

Licenseplate_small gbruin

Rowing_picture_small tasser10

Small DCBruins