Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Animated GIFs Of January

Challenges For The Caretaker Of Westwood: Will Howland Adapt & Adjust?

I am an eternal optimist when it comes to talking about Coach Howland's basketball program in Westwood. For good reasons he is loved around this community and has earned the moniker "the Caretaker of Westwood" as the heir apparent of the greatest Coach ever to lead any American sports team. That said it doesn't mean we cannot be honest about about concerns and questions when they arise about his program on and off court. Right now there are few of them and we have legitimate reasons to wonder about where Howland is taking the UCLA basketball program both in the short and long term. We wonder that because right now we think UCLA basketball is in a very precarious position and how Howland react, adjust and navigate through it in the coming weeks will have ramifications for our program in next few years.

I don't really want to go over the details of last night's game too much. The scoreboard tells the story and frankly the blowout was even worse. I want to focus on few of the big issues that I think will determine what kind of season we end up having in Westwood. BTW after last night we need lower our expectation even more. Forget about making the Big Dance. Right now I am not sure whether we can qualify for the NIT with a winning record at the end of this season. Chew on that for a minute. We are that bad (and it is not going to feel any better tonight after we get done being handled by Butler). So what's our deal (as Jim Harbaugh said last time he left the Mosoluem). Come with me after the flip.

Star-divide

First, the obvious problem starts at our pg. The PG position at PointGuarU is a clusterf**k. It's a mess. I don't want to reach a conclusion on JA. I still think he has a shot of emerging as a credible Pac-10 pg by the time he is done in Westwood. I think it is unfair to make long term conclusion about his game given the fact that he has bee dealing with injuries this season and just doesn't have enough experience as the starting pg of this program. That said, right now he is not a Pac-10 level pg. He certainly wouldn't start for a good team and he is playing for a very bad one right now.

How did we get into this situation? Well the blame lies with Coach Howland, his staff and the primadonna we all know as Jrue Holiday. Obviously Holiday was supposed to be our starting pg this year, but apparently (from what we have heard) he couldn't handle Howland's tough coaching style in Westwood, so he bailed early. Well that is fine. That leads me ask two questions: 1) why didn't Coach Howland have a contingency plan when he knew the brat was going to leave at the end of the season (especially when recruits such as Donte Medder might have been open to coming to Westwood) and 2) why didn't Howland bench Holiday's primadonna a$$ more last season and give more time in favor of someone like ML (who during the second half brought lot more defensive energy and urgency in the game, See i.e. games against ASU and WSU)?

The second question, leads me to my second issue with out team: minute allocation. We find a number of our young players such as JA and ML so inexperience because Howland was too stubborn not to give them enough mins last year. He did the same with RW in his freshman season as well. His stubbornness worked out fine earlier in Westwood because he had enough experience (NBA level at that) on his roster but not this time around.  We are seeing that issue again playing out with the minutes given to Nikola Dragovic (and JK).

Nikola Dragovic ate up 22 worthless mintues last night in Anaheim. When he came into the game the score I believe was tied up at 7-7. As soon as he came in his total lack of defensive instincts and intensity, change the complexion of the entire game. The Pilots went on a 9-2 run with him on the court and never looked back. Before Dragovic came in we were not doing too well offensively, but at least we were showing a defensive pulse. We lost all of it after he stepped on the court. The issue is when Dragovic comes on the court, the team loses its classic Howland identity. Ben Ball is predicated upon tough inside-the jersey defense, rebounding, and a solid fundamentals on offense that depends on selective high percentage shots. Well Dragovic doesn't help with any of that (and I don't care much for padded rebounding stats accumulated due to clankers on the offensive end).

Dragovic has no idea how to hedge. He can't really box out. He never finds himself in the right position and he usually sees eithe his man blowing right by him or leaving him wide open. He seeminly has defensive brain cramps in ever possession showing no clue on how to play team-defense. It is a pathetic site to watch him play "Ben Ball". I have no idea why Howland is so obssessed with giving him so many minutes and sitting down players like BL and RN. He didn't do it in his second year when he had no problem sitting down certain Lavin (btw how comical was it it listen to him talk about an "anemic offense" last night?) recruited players so that he could go with AA, JF, JS and LMR. I don't understand why he can't do the same this year. Last night Dragovic shouldn't have been alllowed back on the court after his intial mins. I also though BL played with much more passion and intensity than JK who showed zero signs of urgency and senior leadership on the court.

Third, I am not seeing any signs of Howland holding his young team accountable. Last night was the second game in a row when DG chucked a 3 pointer with lots of time left on the clock? I mean WTF is up with that? DG shooting 3 pointers? I don't understand why Howland didn't bench him immediately after pulling moronic stunts like that. It wasn't just DG who was pulling idiotic and poorly coached "stunts" on the court. Perhaps Howland could have sent a statement if he stated ML at the 1 during second half to send a message to JA.

As for Howland's style of offense, I am not sure he needs to make wholesale changes. The numbers from last few years back him up interms of effectiveness of his offense. However, during last few years he also had college superstars such as JF, RW and DC running it. He doesn't have anyone close to their calliber in his backcourt right now. So he does need to make adjustments, which might entail loosening up the reigns or shifting around his personnel, going with talent and potential over "experience," to make sure he gets the most athletic combination (i.e. more mins for MM) on the court. Right now I rather have Howland struggle with an athletic team that he teaches through taking its lump on the court, than an experienced core, which hasn't proven itself after 3-4 years in Westwood. In other words, Howland needs to do IMHO what he did in his second year in Westwood: go with the youth movement.

This is an interesting moment for Howland. If you think about it he is the ultimate builder/rebuilder of programs. He has done it at three different schools. However, he has never been in a situation where he had to maintain and build on success. This is a first for him. It will mean he will need to make adjustments and some changes to continue the incredible success he has blessed us with in Westwood. It is clear the opponents (and the currrent landscape of basketball with the way draft works) have adjusted to him. It will be up to Howland to make some moves to counter so that he can continue the incredible job of caretaking he has done so far in Westwood.

We will have our game thread up late tonight when we take on Butler.  We are all rooting for him.

GO BRUINS.

Comment 78 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Agreed, having no contingency plan is killing us

Considering that Jrue was a highly rated prospect, the odds of him remaining at UCLA were slim. With that in mind, we should of had a point guard in the following years recruiting class. Especially considering that we had one scholarship available. I do not understand Howland’s logic.

by misfit15 on Nov 27, 2009 7:55 AM PST reply actions  

I think that your second to the last paragraph is key

I mean to be honest… what would have really happened to RW had DC not gotten injured at the beginning of that season. RW whats able to showcase his athleticism and what he could do when the ball is in his hands. Same thing happened when he allowed JF, AA, and JS to play some real minutes their freshman season. I think he needs to utilize the guys he’s recruited since he doesn’t really have the luxury of 1st round NBA talent right now (i.e. JK, MR, ND). Like you said he should give minutes to MM, BL, RN, and I sure hope that when TH is back from injury he gets some major minutes. That is our future. Not ND, MR, and JK. While I senior leadership is needed, I think we need to realize that 2 of those seniors (JK and MR) weren’t even starters last year, except ND. So like you said we might as well go with talent and potential over experience.

by bruinucla on Nov 27, 2009 7:55 AM PST reply actions  

MR still gets it and his mins are useful

JK also can play semblance of defense so he warrants some mins. Dragovic shouldn’t be in the game unless it’s garbage time.

by Nestor on Nov 27, 2009 7:58 AM PST up reply actions  

I agree

MR has proven himself to be far more than just a roll player, unlike the other two.
Pun not intended. :)

by bornagainbruin on Nov 27, 2009 8:38 AM PST up reply actions  

role, not roll

I guess I got inside my own head.

by bornagainbruin on Nov 27, 2009 8:42 AM PST up reply actions  

No PG

your point about the pointguard situation is really the biggest reason for this teams failure.
Its true that we have a young team and low on experience, but that was also the situation when JF, AA, JS,… first stepped on the court. We have to accept the fact that last year’s recruits are simply not as good as they were expected to be. Maybe I am giving up too early but I just don’t see JA being the type of player that UCLA can help build a top 5 UCLA program. Even if all the other players develop as expected, without a great point guard, this team is not going anywhere.

by cyberdbk on Nov 27, 2009 7:59 AM PST reply actions  

Lack of solid pointguard play, just makes everyone in the team not reach their true potential.

by cyberdbk on Nov 27, 2009 8:03 AM PST up reply actions  

Short term: Pain

Long term: We’ll see

I’m behind Howland and I believe in his system, but a 27 point loss to a mid major team in your own backyard better be an aberration.

Adapt and adjust Howland. We are watching.

formerly godblesstyus95

by Blue Me on Nov 27, 2009 8:07 AM PST reply actions  

From roll players to brick layers

I have been a dedicated fan of the Bruins since listening to radio broadcasts prior to John Wooden’s era. Last night made me sick. Rather than nitpick particular players on the current team, it is much more important to take a broader view and address a bigger issue.
For example, why does Portland St. have better players than legendary UCLA? And why do 50 schools have better players than UCLA? My answer is because Ben Howland is a coach that earned his stripes with defensive basketball. Somehow he attracted some great players like DC and KL and RW but the multitude of great players, players with Jr. Kobe skills opt for venues that let them flourish as offensive stars. Most of that type of player don’t want to go to a defensive program. UCLA attracted Kareem, Walton, Goodrich, and many many more of the very top players in the US. We as alumni and fans should expect nothing less.

by guruofbruins on Nov 27, 2009 8:10 AM PST reply actions  

The problem is

we are currently under-manned and over-scheduled. No immediate solution suggests itself, but we do absolutely have to go with the youngsters. Might as well get to it, without further delay. The Portland thing needs a little perspective. The “experts” are mentioning them in the same breath with Gonzaga, so they do have some status. I just hope we can reach the PAC-10 part of our schedule without having given up hope. That applies to the team and the fans as well. I am trying to learn how to breathe normally when under great stress, myself.

by ReineSeite on Nov 27, 2009 8:14 AM PST reply actions  

I disagree about the offense

I will be curious to see the level of guard talent we can recruit going forward with Howland’s slow paced offense.

"when you've seen how big the world is, how can you make due with this?"

by silverlakebruin on Nov 27, 2009 8:24 AM PST reply actions  

time for some perspective.

Yes we lost and lost bad. But, last night when I tuned in, the moment ESPN put up the graphics showing all of Portland’s players were seniors, and ours were all sophomores and freshman, I knew we were done for. They played like a tournament tested team, we looked like a bunch of underclassmen still getting used to each other and our coach’s system.

Now, the sheer number of 3s and NBA 3s for that matter were as painful as a gut punch. Now, very few college teams are going to defend that far out on the perimeter, but the fact that Howland did not adjust once it was apparent they were going to make those consistently, that is concerning.

I still think we have a lot of season left, and still believe we are a tournament team. But, I think the game last night showed, the grading curve is very steep.

The best thing you can do for your children is to love their mother. John Wooden

by MexiBruin on Nov 27, 2009 8:28 AM PST reply actions  

We are not a "tournament" team

Let’s get over that delusion the same way people actually thought KL and Holiday were coming back for another season.

by Nestor on Nov 27, 2009 8:30 AM PST up reply actions  

Respectful disagreement
the same way people actually thought KL and Holiday were coming back for another season.

I have criticized CBH for recruiting one-and-dones. I lose that battle.

But, when I criticized him for not having a contingency plan for when JH left, I was criticized in return by those who said JH was not “supposed to leave” and that he, in essence, screwed us. Nestor, my friend, I think you were one of those people.

Are you agreeing with me, now? If “people” should have known JH was not coming back, shouldn’t Howland have known — and done something about it?

PS: I am usually optimistic but I agree with you that we are not, and will not be, a tournament team. We will be lucky to go .500. That’s probably the price we pay for recent success and I can live with it. But, I do hope we play very young all year. We really don’t owe the seniors anything. They have to earn their time. MR will. Maybe JK will get some time. ND has looked bad all year, except for one game. I was one of the strongest believers that he should have a chance to compete for time — but he is losing that competition and should not be playing as much as he is until he starts playing better D.

sjh

by Class of 66 on Nov 27, 2009 9:56 AM PST up reply actions  

CBH's tough coaching style

As I understand it, most of the one and dones are a product of CBH’s coaching style. Players these days are primadona’s and only really special players, such as DC, are willing to put up with it.

The thing that concerns me is how it effects recruiting. Recruits’ parents talk often and it is a very close community. This is only HEARSAY, but I’ve heard that recruits are hesitant to commit to CBH’s coaching style and system. Maybe this is why he’s having a tougher time with next year’s class (with the exception of the Smith, but remember Bobo was a 5 star center too).

Either way, be prepared for a frustrating season. Even more frustrating will be watching UW and Cal’s guards running circles around our back court. I hate those guys.

by hongerelli on Nov 27, 2009 10:27 AM PST up reply actions  

We have three seniors on this squad who get a lot of minutes

Roll, Dragovic, and Keefe.

The real question in my mind is how is Portland able to have better athletes in their senior class than we do… Sure, top level talent leaves early, but there is clearly a problem with talent evaluation.

Roll is a fine role player, not a starter. Keefe and Drago are either one or zero dimensional players…

"when you've seen how big the world is, how can you make due with this?"

by silverlakebruin on Nov 27, 2009 8:32 AM PST up reply actions  

I think Roll is a starter

Role players can be starters – some starters have to be role players, in fact. He just needs other guys around him, and the only two guys who ever look like playmakers on that court are ML and DG

Has there ever been a player better than Detlef Schrempf?

by bucknellbruin on Nov 27, 2009 8:37 AM PST up reply actions  

I think in a top 10 program

someone of roll’s talent is not a starter. If we don’t have a better player than him to start, we have done something wrong.

Nothing against Roll, I think he plays well for his talent level, but you don’t want him playing 30+ minutes a game.

"when you've seen how big the world is, how can you make due with this?"

by silverlakebruin on Nov 27, 2009 8:39 AM PST up reply actions  

but it all depends on the team

personally, i think having a guy drifting around the outside firing up 3’s at a 50% clip is a huge part of a team. Look at Lee Humphries (from Florida). There’s no way he was more talented then Roll, but he started on 2 national title teams. If a team has the guys we should have – that is to say, athletes, a penetrating point guard, a presence on the block – then Roll is a very valuable player.

Has there ever been a player better than Detlef Schrempf?

by bucknellbruin on Nov 27, 2009 8:41 AM PST up reply actions  

Sure, if you have super freaks at the other four positions like

Florida did, you can afford to have a guy who is basically a spot up shooter who can’t create his own shots, but that’s a pretty rare accomplishment in college basketball.

"when you've seen how big the world is, how can you make due with this?"

by silverlakebruin on Nov 27, 2009 8:57 AM PST up reply actions  

assessment

I would figure out who my best 5 players for the future and start them. The guys who show the most flashes of basketball ability regardless of position and who are playing the least fearful. Right now we have 4 basketball players not afraid in my opinion that can do the job.. DG, ML, MR, and RN. I hope Honeycutt is the 5th. If we can get 5 decent ballplayers working by the end of the season then I believe other guys on the team are more than capable to fill in for some minutes while they get their game together. Personally I wish JA showed more flashes of brilliance I will call them then he has. His number is quite low for me. He probably got more minutes then either DC and RW his freshman year, but when they came in you could tell they were ballplayers.

Interestingly I think JK shows random flashes of ability. Much in the same way AA did for 3 years, although with much less athleticism. A light fortunately went off for AA just as I was about to give up on him and he was terrific last year. I think Keefe plays afraid in a game. It would not surprise me if he hit everything in practice and looked solid all the time when it did not count, but the glare on the court seems to bright for him. If he can’t shake that fear loose he is at best a bench contributor for this team.

Conversely I also believe there are gamers who play better in games. I remember hearing how bad at practice Jaron Rush was back in the day. The only thing I saw from him was a complete demon on the court when he played. Hopefully we have a player like that wilting away now to help out. Time will tell, but I honestly believe the cupboard is not bare. The under performers like ND, JA, and JK would be fine off the bench if we can get our 5 good, fearless players to start and play cohesively and act like this game of basketball is fun.

by Penny2i on Nov 27, 2009 8:35 AM PST reply actions  

We need an identity

If you look around the country right now, the top teams are either veteran-dominated squads (like Kansas) or very, very athletic (like Kentucky). We are neither this year. We HAVE to start getting our athletic young guys involved – MM and TH (when he returns) especially. I’d love to see a lineup of ML, MR, MM, RN and DG out there getting some minutes together. At least that’s a lineup that has the athleticism (minus MR, but I think he’s an underrated defender) and the energy to make up for our lack of experience (and, you could argue, talent).

The defense of this team isn’t Ben Ball quality, but a lot of that blame rests in the fact that we don’t have the athletes. And as Ryan has been saying, this is also where CBH needs to swallow his pride and either play a zone or play his young guys. Keefe and ND just can’t play Ben Ball defense.

One final thing about recruiting – it seems as though Howland has been looking for less one and dones lately. While I think that’s admirable and good for the program it’s going to cause seasons like this one. We have no NBA ready talent on this team, and since it’s all young talent – and not polished – we’re bound to struggle.

So while I’m not chalking this up to a lost season yet, I fully accept the fact that season like this happen when recruiting classes are all 3-4 year guys. Give ML, MM, TH, DG and co. another year, then give them that 1-and-done in Josh Smith, I think we’ll be looking at a big time resurgence in Westwood next season. For now, I’m just looking to see if Howland can/will adapt and adjust this year, so that we can do the absolute best with what we have.

The game against Butler will show me a lot. They’re a similar team to Portland – veteran, tough, and smart. They can shoot from the outside. I am really interested to see what adjustments CBH makes tonight.

GO BRUINS

Has there ever been a player better than Detlef Schrempf?

by bucknellbruin on Nov 27, 2009 8:36 AM PST reply actions  

Coach Howland hasn't been looking for fewer one and dones. He just didn't land them.

He recruited Abdul Gaddy. He recruited Harrison Barnes. He landed Josh Smith, who may be 1 and done.

Right now, he has a team full of complementary players. Keefe, Roll, Reeves…even Dragovic- all of these guys are well suited to be supporting pieces of a competitive roster. Right now, they’re being asked to be impact players, and that quite obviously, is beyond their abilities.

by insomniacslounge on Nov 27, 2009 12:19 PM PST up reply actions  

yeah, i guess you're right

the problem isn’t that he hasn’t recruited them; he just hasn’t gotten them. But we both have the same idea of the problem – our starters are not playmakers. They’re role players.

Has there ever been a player better than Detlef Schrempf?

by bucknellbruin on Nov 27, 2009 12:27 PM PST up reply actions  

Completely agreed about playing Ben Ball defense.

JK and ND have reached (at least close to) their full potential playing defense. One thing that the guys over At The Hive (the New Orleans Hornets SBN blog) said that struck me is that DC playing defense looks like an NBA veteran playing defense. Yes, DC has crazy speed, but he also developed the ability to use that speed under CBH. Both JK and ND neither have the ability nor the dedication to play solid Ben Ball D. At least with our young guys, even if they’re not very good on D now, they have upside and the potential to get good.

by Centric on Nov 27, 2009 2:07 PM PST up reply actions  

Good post, Nestor

I had a friend over that went to Portland, and I kindly asked him to take a hike at halftime.

There are a number of problems with this squad at this point in time. The biggest problem, in my opinion, is that Howland runs a complex defensive scheme and a vanilla offensive scheme, which neither work with a young, inexperienced squad.

Defensively, shortcomings can be covered up with intensity and effort. The team lacked both last night, as they have for most of the season. I’ll be the first to stand up for Dragovic when it comes to personal attacks, but in no way can I defend his lack of intensity and lack of leadership. At least he played hard against Fullerton. He embarrassed himself last night. We simply look like a better team when he is not on the floor, and this cannot be unnoticed by the staff. He is a senior “leader”, and I do think that his lack of effort spread to the rest of the team last night. A leader cannot take games, or even possessions, off.

Offensively, our team is in trouble. Howland’s offensive system thus far has been “get the ball to the best player towards the end of the shot clock and let him make a play.” It worked great with JF, AA, RW, KL and DC. They aren’t on the team anymore.

This team needs a system to score. We don’t have any playmakers on the team. Not that we don’t have potential playmakers-I think Moser, Lee, and Gordon all have the physical ability to become one- but we don’t have any developed playmaking ability. Gordon is not much better than last year, which is understandable given his injury. Lee’s improved shot has yet to be found, and he seems like the same player as last year. In my opinion, Moser is the most intriguing player on the team, and the most likely to develop into a game changing player. He needs to be on the court as much as possible before conference play starts.

At this point, the team simply isn’t ready to compete. Howland didn’t play the young players enough. Injuries stalled development. The schedule is brutal. That said, there can be no excuses. Every team has struggles, but this early season has been disgraceful. Howland needs to make offensive adjustments. Period. The fact that 3 seniors graduated and a frosh left early do not hold water. The seniors were scheduled to leave, and the frosh was considered the number one recruit in the country, and should have been recruited with a contingency plan in mind. Instead of recruiting another guard or accepting a transfer, Coach Howland gave the extra scholarship to a walk-on.

I think this year’s team will grow into a decent squad by season’s end. There will be a lot of growth during the nonconference schedule- it scares me to think what the scores against Butler and Kansas might be… But hopefully we can turn it around and make a decent showing during conference play. This might be a year to simply out-physical other teams and play knock-down, drag out basketball.

I can’t wait for saturday.

by AllHailMightyBruins on Nov 27, 2009 8:51 AM PST reply actions  

Seems a bit harsh..

“I had a friend over that went to Portland, and I kindly asked him to take a hike at halftime.”

I dunno the circumstances, but I assume that he was obnoxious and was rubbing it in. Otherwise, why ask him to leave?

We might just have to suck it up this season and take the long view. Back in ‘80, it was the famous “Bruins in Ruins” skein in November and December and the team settled down to eventually go to the NCAA final game. Probably no way this year’s team will do that — or that we have any right to expect they do — but the great joy of the ’80 season was that games were exciting because UCLA was playing to win rather than avoiding a loss.

Howland’s too good a coach and loves this program too much to turn into another Lavin overnight.

On the bright side of things, folks like Oregon, USC, and Washington might think that this is their year and might get surprised. Wins like that are especially sweet.

God, it's great to be a Bruin!

by WHP '68 on Nov 27, 2009 9:40 AM PST up reply actions  

Haha.

I was being a bit dramatic. He actually took a cue from my girlfriend when she went to bed, but I was so close to kicking him out. I altered the story to express my frustration.

by AllHailMightyBruins on Nov 27, 2009 9:57 AM PST up reply actions  

Not too late

Now we can see how weak our previous 3 opponents were.
The reality is that the Keefe and Dragovic are a bust. These guys have not earned the right to start. They have been here forever and bring almost nothing to the game. This is not a “union” where you are rewarded for years on the job. It is time to pull the plug on these lightweights and rebuild for 2010-2011. It is time to come out of denial, this team is going nowhere. And don’t expect any of the Seniors to lead this team.They are not leaders. Neither JK or ND would start on a competitive team. Mike Roll at least has learned the system and puts forth an effort. His passes are usually well placed, while he is not the best defender you can’t question his effort and he rarely gets beaten because he is taking a nap on the court like ND. ML has to become the PG with JA coming off the bench and growing. ML is the only guy who is able to create in the lane and break the zone down. RN should get every minute that ND is sucking out of the game. BL should get at least half of JK’s minutes and probably be starting with JK coming off the bench. Remember we are not going anywhere with ND, JK starting and they will be done in March. Let’s move on and get these young athletes some experience or we will be in the same boat com next fall. My starting linup for Butler would be ML, MR, DG, BL, RN. You think they would lose by more than 30? Bring Moser,
Anderson, Hamid, Keefe, Morgan and Drago off the bench to rest the starters.
I am going to really have to force myself to watch tonight, Last night was like a flashback to Lav’s last year. I think CBH will do what is right. He is just a little more patient and mature than I am. Go Young Bruins.

by JRWfan on Nov 27, 2009 8:56 AM PST reply actions  

Everyone just take a chill pill

Howland will keep our team in good shape. I can’t believe how many “Bruins” are acting as if they know more about basketball then CBH. I am pretty certain he knows what he is doing Better than all of us combined. Still better than the Lavin years methinks.

by burculian on Nov 27, 2009 8:59 AM PST via mobile reply actions  

We Have Our POV

We see the final results. We scrutanize the results because ultimately our fan dollar supports the program. We have a different perspective and our voices should be acknowlegded as Ben did after the Fullerton loss when we could all see RN needed more minutes. UCLA teaches across all curriculum that multiple POV’s are a necessity.

We passionately want what is best for the program both right now and in the future. Sometimes more so than the coach has the ability to do. We need to have our criticisms heard so that the parents of Keefe and others will understand when Coach Howland benches their son.

Check out my article about the Dodger Dugout Club.

by alcor805 on Nov 27, 2009 10:56 AM PST up reply actions  

I think Howland places a high value on loyalty...

And rewards his seniors with PT because they have remained committed to him the longest. But I agree, ND needs to go, if not for his off-court run-ins with the law, than for his poor play on the court. Let’s get the best players more minutes. And play some offense without looking completely lost. The way we were getting destroyed by the zone D yesterday made me grow a few white hairs…

by bruinbunz on Nov 27, 2009 9:32 AM PST reply actions  

Where else could these seniors go?

I doubt any program would want them…and there’s no way they could be drafted into ‘the show’. That’s not loyalty in my opinion, that’s being stuck in the program that recruited them.

Glad to see more people on the board agreeing that the young bucks need more playing time.

33 Wins. Yeah, I said it.

by JETisKing on Nov 28, 2009 10:24 PM PST up reply actions  

Why not give some minutes to Bobo?

I don’t care how bad he looks in practice, a big body in the paint might have kept out some of those drives last night. He could be barely mobile and be better than what we showed. And I agree this should be the year for a youth movement. Let the freshmen and sophomores grow, let Roll shoot threes, and let’s stand behind them the same way we stcuk with our football team in October. Oh, and let N no D play only at garbage time.

by Herodotus on Nov 27, 2009 10:23 AM PST reply actions  

Because he cant play

JMM did get some time in the closing minutes yesterday. He forced a couple shots, looked lost, and had no chance on defense. So regardless of how he looked in practice, he looked terrible in the limited time he has gotten this season.

by bruinponcho on Nov 27, 2009 10:59 AM PST up reply actions  

sounds like the players CBH is starting and keeping in all game

"when you've seen how big the world is, how can you make due with this?"

by silverlakebruin on Nov 27, 2009 11:30 AM PST up reply actions  

sounds like you should find another roster then

This year’s team is what it is. Three role player seniors, no juniors, sophomores struggling to find their identities, and freshman who will make a good hustle play one minute then get burned by less talented players the next minute. If you are unhappy with that roster and are just going to whine about it, go find another team because there are no free agents or trades in college basketball.

by bruinponcho on Nov 27, 2009 11:47 AM PST up reply actions  

We've got one ace in the hole

Our top Freshman recruit is still coming. Hopefully Honeycutt is durable and ready to play 25 minutes a game.

Check out my article about the Dodger Dugout Club.

by alcor805 on Nov 27, 2009 11:50 AM PST up reply actions  

Not going to hold my breath

I hope TH is the stud that we need, but I’m not going to put the added pressure of carrying a team on the back of a injury plagued freshman as that isn’t really fair to him. The thing I am looking forward to with TH coming back is the hopeful lineup change that would result pushing ML to point and MR to shooting guard and JA to the bench.

by bruinponcho on Nov 27, 2009 12:56 PM PST up reply actions  

I'll take your advise on what team to support

For exactly what it is worth.

My point is I find it comical to see certain players with a 10 second leash like moser or no leash like bobo while others get unlimited opportunity even though they aren’t performing.

"when you've seen how big the world is, how can you make due with this?"

by silverlakebruin on Nov 27, 2009 8:39 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

LOL. slb, good one.

I don’t think it would hurt to play Bobo at this point. In college, most of the time all big men have to do is play ‘big’ and keep their arms out and up when opponents try to shoot over them.

Personally, I don’t think Bobo has had enough playing time to even look like he’s lost or in a groove or whatever. Strange assessment on a guy who plays garbage minutes.

33 Wins. Yeah, I said it.

by JETisKing on Nov 28, 2009 10:27 PM PST up reply actions  

Seems pretty obvious but....

When you have to depend on three guys from the hoops hotbed that is the OC (Roll – Laguna, Keefe – Santa Margarita, Anderson – Anaheim Hills), you’re in big trouble.

How we ended up recruiting from that area when about the only great program might be Mater Dei (and those players went to Duke I believe over the past few years) is beyond me.

Maybe I’m wrong, but the last decent UCLA Hoops player from the OC was Kevin Walker (Brea-Olinda), and he was a 6-11 three-point shooting one-trick pony. Did that date you as much as me?

It’s going to be a very long year.

by bruin4life1993 on Nov 27, 2009 10:29 AM PST reply actions  

Walker had no upside

He was better as a Freshman than he was as a Soph, Jr or Sr. He was a lesser version of Roll.

Check out my article about the Dodger Dugout Club.

by alcor805 on Nov 27, 2009 10:47 AM PST up reply actions  

Bruinsnation is finally with me

I took some heat for criticizing Keefe last week during and after the Bakersfield game. As much as some people may defend his skills, he is a stiff. He plays very small for 6’8", can’t play above the rim, has no go to move, and makes bad decisions on offense. If you’re wow-ed by setting picks, sure Keefe does one thing right on that end of the floor. He is not a leader, he is not vocal, he is not a scorer and will never be an NBA player.

Meanwhile he’s taking minutes away from Reeves Nelson and Brandon Lane. RN and BL have a brighter future and that will be obvious when they get extended minutes.

Nic Dragovich is not a basketball player. He grew up playing the Euro ‘Chuck ’n Run’ style; which appears to be the complete opposite of Ben Ball. To pile onto Nestor’s +/- estimate for him. I know for sure he was -15 in his first 5 minutes alone. He was Portland’s MVP last night, igniting a 7-0 run from 7-7 to 7-14 and an 8-0 run from 15-20 to 15-28.
Some people who didn’t see the game might be wondering ‘How can one guy be responsible for all that?’. Well Nic’s first lowlight was a guy hitting a 3 pointer in his face. The next possession they drove right around him. Later in the game a 6’8" frail white guy drove right around him and had the thunderous dunk of the night. To add insult to injury the guy started laughing in Drago’s face and ND had no reaction. He continued laughing the rest of the game from the bench. His name was Sikma; you won’t have to look to hard to find that highlight.

Dragovich is basketball cancer. He takes incredibly bad fundamentals and mixes them with bad shot selection and produces the most inefficient results possible. He makes everyone else on the court look worse. It would be fortunate if the Bruins could somehow part ways with him as soon as possible.

Check out my article about the Dodger Dugout Club.

by alcor805 on Nov 27, 2009 10:45 AM PST reply actions  

One more

When we went with our big to big double team, we were doing a decent job staying in the passing lane on the strong side with one notable exception: Dragovic, who wasn’t watching his assignment and got caught about 6 feet out of position as they passed the ball back out to his man and we gave up a 3.

by Tydides on Nov 27, 2009 11:01 AM PST up reply actions  

I'm not with you

especially when you call a Bruin brother a “stiff” and another “basketball cancer”.

Analysis and criticism are fine. Name calling is not.

sjh

by Class of 66 on Nov 27, 2009 11:06 AM PST up reply actions  

Nestor - A Ruling Please

I’m not making fun of them. I’m trying to summarize a lot of criticism into basketball terms. Trust me; it’s not fun trying to find new words to define our team’s shortcomings.

I was ND’s biggest supporter when he finally debuted a couple years back against Oregon St during an 81 to 37 blow out. Little did I know that playing him was the first step in the wrong direction for our 09-10 season.

Check out my article about the Dodger Dugout Club.

by alcor805 on Nov 27, 2009 11:41 AM PST up reply actions  

I think

We have to do our best to not attack our guys alcor. I think it is ok to criticize a player’s game as “stiff” (I have heard people use that term) but calling anyone “cancer” is bit too much. I understand saying things in the heat of a game thread to a certain extent but all of us are here are capable offering solid observations. Let’s do everything we can to stick with that even when we disagree.

And yeah, I myself have let emotion to get better of me at times and I am trying very hard to make sure I don’t take out my frustrations by attacking our own players (even though I think a player is offering nothing to our team while he is on the court).

by Nestor on Nov 27, 2009 4:03 PM PST up reply actions  

I think "cancer" would be fair...

…if used properly. Not on a personal level, but in basketball terms.

For example:

ND’s game is so terrible, it’s a cancer on the rest of our squad. His poor decision-making, terrible shots, and horrid defense force the rest of the team to fight like hell to stay afloat. He does more damage than anything, so in that sense, ND’s game is a cancer on the whole body that is our squad.

Is he himself a cancer? I don’t think so. But his game on the floor is so God-awful, it’s like a tumor, destroying everything in its wake and making it impossible to have a fighting chance.

by Bellerophon on Nov 27, 2009 10:14 PM PST up reply actions  

Inexperienced team facing a tough schedule

I’m going to wait until the end of this tournament to make any judgments about the state of the program. However, everyone needs to realize that this is probably CBH’s toughest pre-season schedule (remember how people always complain about he cupcakes we have played in the past). He is going against this schedule with his least experienced team.

As soon as I saw the starting lineups and saw that Portland had 4 seniors and 1 junior, I knew we were in trouble. That Portland team has already peaked and is playing as good today as they will all year. Meanwhile, we have a team where literally no one has playing experience (save ND who looked like he didn’t really want to be out there last night).

I have maintained since the first exhibition that ML and MR should be the starting backcourt and JA continues to (unfortunately) prove me right. The biggest problem however is that this team’s inexperience (and CBH’s offensive scheme) has made for a very very very tentative team that is scared to shoot the ball. This, combined with the lack of a competitive drive has led to some dissapointing results.

I will be very interested to see how the next two games turn out. I’m not expecting wins, but if CBH continues with his square peg round hole routine, I will be very dissapointed.

by bruinponcho on Nov 27, 2009 10:57 AM PST reply actions  

Howland: Light years ahead of Lavin; Light years behind Wooden

If I’m the UCLA Head Basketball Coach, here’s what I do IMMEDIATELY…

1. Change styles starting next game to showcase for unsigned HOT Prep Seniors
2. All Hands On Deck! I’ve got NO STUDS, so all 10 -12 gotta play. How?
3. Balls out, Hard core, Get Spent Full Court Pressing from the opening jumpball.
4. My offense is generated off steals, turnovers. No setting up. Go To The Rack or shoot in the paint – OFF GLASS. A complete hurry up offense. If I’m gonna get beat, I’m scoring 100 in the process. I gotta show the nations ATHLETES that WE BALL at UCLA.
5. If I’m getting beat to bad, too often on the full court press – go immediately to PACK IT IN ZONE! They’re gonna beat my azz with outside shooting. Sure, sometimes people get hot streaks… but it’s rare – and NEVER sustains for BOTH HALFS!
6. I sit down any Bruin Player who celebrates with anything beyond a point of the finger to the guy who gave him an assist for the alley-oop dunk or easy fast break bucket. Who ever scores hustles his azz back in defensive position or sits da f down!
7. DEFENSE is more of an attitude and mindset. Everybody who got a FULL RIDE SCHOLIE to play Mens BB at UCLA has at least SOME athleticism. Therefore, guys on the floor – at least for the balance of THIS season, needs to understand I expect them to get SPENT playing defense, because a sub is comming in (fresh legs) whether they still got gas in the tank or not.
8. OK, guys who MAKE PLAYS (steals, picks, blocks, take charges… maybe THEY get more minutes.
9. I WILL be competitive in every game!
10. I WILL bring SACREDNESS – not scarediness – back to Pauley Pavillion!
We don’t get blown out at Pauley, even if we have to start fights and get T’s. It’s NOT happenin at Pauley! Pac-10 Officials, NCAA Officials be damned. Pauley is Sacred!
We Are UCLA. We ARE NCAA Mens Basketball. Period.

by Bruins78 on Nov 27, 2009 11:07 AM PST reply actions  

And all of those things sound so easy to do too!

Let’s start up the campaign for 78 to replace CBH! I especially like the classy part about starting fights and getting T’s at Pauley whenever we’re losing. That’d make me proud to be a Bruin.

/S

by Tydides on Nov 27, 2009 11:26 AM PST up reply actions  

Oh, did I say fights... Sorry...

I meant FOULS. Hard ones. I’ve got, like what, 50 to give. Smile.

Full Court Pressing or Falling back to a zone isn’t hard.
Kids have been doing that since elementary school basketball.

Almost ALL basketball players LOVE to run the open court.
I have no idea what’s so hard about that.
Heck, this style of play is what we ran at the freakin DORMS, and IM basketball
(before they put those HOTELS up there in the middle of Sproul Hall basketball court).

The only HARD PART is change.

I guess change is hard.

(Umm, sometimes there is nothing like a bloody nose shake things up.
I admit it… I’m a MAN. Nuttin sissy about me. OMG he said SISSY.)

by Bruins78 on Nov 27, 2009 12:27 PM PST up reply actions  

Yikes
We don’t get blown out at Pauley, even if we have to start fights and get T’s. It’s NOT happenin at Pauley! Pac-10 Officials, NCAA Officials be damned. Pauley is Sacred!

I think I’d take the blowout over complete embarrassment to the University. If this happened and it was discovered that Howland had encouraged, it would pretty much be the end of his tenure.

by SuperBruinMan on Nov 27, 2009 5:20 PM PST up reply actions  

MENS BASKETBALL: MAYBE LEARNING TO SHOOT WOULD HELP

Blaming CBH and staff for the Bruin woes is in some instances unfair. They cannot shoot for them. As of today they are shooting FG% 423 #PT% 262 FT%567. This will win few games at any level. A free throw record like ours is horrible but many mens teams have same problem but not all. We will improve over the course of the season but there are no easy games for us. Go Bruins!! Better days are comming we hope

by john4justice on Nov 27, 2009 11:40 AM PST reply actions  

If any changes to the rotation are going to be made, I think it will be a long time before it happens

If ever there was a time to bench some players and give lesser used guys some minutes, down by 30 to a WCC team was it. However, Coach Howland pretty much stuck with his regular substitution pattern throughout the game. To me, that’s an indicator that he wants his Anderson-Lee-Roll-Gordon-Keefe/Dragovic lineup to get as much time together on the floor as possible.

The other thing to consider with the rotation is that it’s quite likely that at the moment, Lane, Moser, and Reeves just don’t understand where they’re supposed to be on the floor yet in various situations. Coach Howland believes those assignments are to be learned in practice, not in the midst of a game. It will probably be a few more weeks before they are entrusted with more minutes. I’d expect there to be a similar lag time once Tyler Honeycutt gets healthy.

Obviously these are frustrating times. 2-2 with losses to Fullerton and Portland is tough to swallow. I’m not trying to sugarcoat that. But we knew it was going to take time for this team to get better. There’s no dynamic superstar on this roster like we’ve been accustomed to over the last 4 yrs. So we have to wait for this team to gel together, to get comfortable on the floor, for the young players to not be thinking so much on the court, and for their motion to be more natural. Hopefully, that will lead to better ball movement, better help defense, better team rebounding, and for the love of god, some better shooting from the perimeter.

This is a team full of grinders. As fans, we’re going to have to grind out the season as well.

by insomniacslounge on Nov 27, 2009 12:09 PM PST reply actions  

I've said this in private

And after the exhibition games, I said that this team won’t resemble a Ben Ball team until conference play at the earliest, and I’m sticking by that. People that can’t stomach losses and some ugly play should get off the bus now because there’s still at least a solid month and a half of this ahead IMO.

by Tydides on Nov 27, 2009 12:19 PM PST up reply actions  

+1

This is a period of both talent evaluation and chemistry building.

Add to that the need for some to heal and others to learn the system, we won’t have a real rotation for a while.

sjh

by Class of 66 on Nov 27, 2009 1:07 PM PST up reply actions  

+1

Anyone who thinks every loss is the end of the world is not going to be very happy the next couple of months. I hate every loss, but I understand that you have to walk before you can run, and you fall down a lot trying to learn to walk.

by bruinponcho on Nov 27, 2009 1:10 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm going to wait on my piece

I was going to write a more detailed piece on the lack of adjustments and flexibility by CBH, but I’ll wait until after the weekend to do it. The one thing I do want to emphasize is that when I say flexibility, I don’t mean blow it up and start over and when I bring up Coach Wooden, I don’t mean he started from scratch each year. It’s a matter of emphasizing certain things and being able to play a few different styles depending on your personnel.

Formerly ryebreadraz

by Ryan Rosenblatt on Nov 27, 2009 12:13 PM PST reply actions  

Totally Agree Nestor.

I agree with your thoughts, suggestions, and the tone of your post. It captures where I am exactly. There really is very little to add. I would just say two things.

(1) It is not personal with Keefe and Drago. They’ve had their great moments (Keefe in the Sweet 16 two years ago ranks high on my list of step-up performances), but they add very little to this team this year. Sometimes you “hit” on a scholarship offer, and sometimes you “miss.” We missed on those two. It happens. As I’ve said before, no reason to try to ride their experience to a NIT bid (if that). Better to phase them out, and then reward them for being team players.

(2) Howland, to his credit, has always based his success on having “really good players.” After three final fours, he never said, “I’m a great coach”. No, it was always, “UCLA has really good players.” Good freshman stepped up, good sophomores stepped up, and juniors and seniors were solid, even while talent left every year.

Well, while our freshman and sophomore classes have been highly rated, you have to wonder whether UCLA has “really good players” right now.

I think our squad is probably trying as hard as it can, and some (if not all) of the players will get better. Nevertheless, there is no question that the sophomore class is STRUGGLING. Yes, they are young. Yes, they lost Holiday. But in this day and age, top-flight freshman should be expected to at least contribute immediately (maybe not start, but make contributions), and sophomores should be ready to start/ play significant minutes at a UCLA caliber level. That is just how the game is now. Our sophomores, however, are not “ready.” Lee and Gordon will be very good, you can count on it. But even they are not ready to lead from a talent perspective at this time. Anderson and Bobo—they have big issues.

Our freshman too seem outmanned. We can kid ourselves about Fullerton and Portland being “really good” teams. They might actually be tournament teams, 8 or 9 seeds probably (at best). But those teams aren’t “really good.” So in my opinion, if the last two recruiting classes were as good as advertised, we wouldn’t lose to such teams (certainly not by 30 points). But we are losing. As sad as it sounds, I take that as an indication that we don’t have “really good” players right now.

Credit to Abdul-Hamid for everything he has done in his career behind the scenes. However, every time he takes the floor it is the most stark admission of our talent level.

It’s too early to say the Sophomore class is a bust, and obviously the same goes with the freshman. But in my opinion it’s not too early to wonder how good they really are, at least with the sophomore class. It should not take 3-4 years to develop a highly ranked class in my opinion, and over the last 4 years we know that Howland won’t hesitate to play really good freshman and sophomores if they have it in them.

by rfirpo on Nov 27, 2009 12:26 PM PST reply actions  

I mentioned in the thread last night

that, for many of the kids who went on to be stars, the biggest step was taken between the freshman and sophomore years.

First, they got bigger and stronger. With this group, only Bobo seems to have improved his body.

Second, they knew our system, particularly on D. I don’t see great D being played by anyone, including the seniors; the best is probably MR — but it is not at the level we need to be what we have been. The sophomores aren’t hedging well.

We are being beaten on the boards in almost every game — especially on O rebounds. Part of that has to do with point 1, we are not bigger and stronger.

None of the soph’s had much playing time last year so maybe their emergence will take a bit longer. And, JA was hurt and didn’t get the benefit of the early practices.

ML has surprised me most. We heard so much about how he “blew up” this summer — how he was a dead eye shooter. He needs to chill a bit and get to a point where he can show us his new skill set.

Maybe, we’ve been spoiled by individual improvements because there have never been so many sophomores playing at once.

It’s easy to be much better than your freshman year when you are playing with DC, LRMM, LMR, AA, or JS. They made all young kids look good.

sjh

by Class of 66 on Nov 27, 2009 1:15 PM PST up reply actions  

Interesting posts and very reasonable,

except for that one guy who can see a CBH team going into a wild, full-court scramble mode. I am in full accord with the youth movement theme, but beyond that, I don’t think we can expect much in the way of “adjustments,” because you don’t see much of that in CBH’s style. Play a zone? I would be shocked, not surprised. Shoot early in the clock? Oh, sure. Turn up the D? Now you’re talking. But I am most worried about Insomniac’s thought that the rotation is already fixed, or close to it. If that happens, a lot of youngsters might as well bring their knitting, because they’ll never get off the bench. I know Insomniac did’nt exactly say that, but Howland watchers understand the possibility. I agree with the notion that the Butler game may reveal something, so I’ll be watching with great interest. By the way, not to be annoying or to disagree for the sake of disagreeing, but I think BN is underappreciating JK. It looks to me like the man is actually trying to win.

by ReineSeite on Nov 27, 2009 1:29 PM PST reply actions  

At least for me, the criticism of Keefe

is not that he isn’t trying. It’s that he does not have the talent and the upside that both RN and others do. He shouldn’t be getting that much playing time.

by Centric on Nov 27, 2009 1:34 PM PST up reply actions  

What you might call WILD full court scrambles...

Old school, WOODEN ERA clinicians called 5 or 10 minutes of Hell!

There’s nothing WILD about creating CHAOS and PANIC on the opponets side of the court.
Make opposing guards dump off to guys not use to handling the ball.
Make opposing guards dribble into corners.
Every team usually has one or two at the most super dribblers.
Get the ball outta THAT GUYS hands, and make them pass to a dufus big.

I’m sorry that guys can’t read through the lines today.
FULL COURT use to be a euphamism (sp) for creating chaos for the other guys.
My main point is that because we have no superstars, we MUST, out of necessity,
play as a complete unit. Hence, every man on deck, sweats off, sitting at the edge of their court side seats, ready to be bounced in at a moments notice.

Our current players are gonna get their azzes kicked trying to play a tightly structured game.
We have ZERO go-to guys.
We have ZERO leaders who will step up.
What I’ve outlined is SURVIVAL tactic to assure being competitive in the Pac-10, and get my 18 or so wins to make it to the UCLA Invitational. Yes, that’s MY attitude about the Tournament.

A so-called down year for UCLA Basketball should be in the lower half of the Top 20. But NEVER, under any circumstances UNRANKED.

C’mon, Bruins. Don’t shrink from our place in College Basketball.
It’s RIGHT, PROPER, and good for Mens Baskeball that UCLA is always among the best.
We’ve won too many Championships NOT have that attitude.
It truly offends me to even speak about OUR Basketball program as anything less.
Bottomline, be FLEXIBLE and whatever it takes to get to the Dance.
No SYSTEM trumps us going to the Dance.
Ask John Wooden how he feels about flexiblity.
That’s my take.

by Bruins78 on Nov 27, 2009 2:21 PM PST up reply actions  

Boy Have the Tunes Changed

Just got back from my T-giving jaunt (yes, I did get to watch the game and almost lost a pound or so of turkey in the process) and have been reading the article and comments following. There’s nothing I wouldn’t agree with (cept of course for many of the solutions proposed). This team is both a work in process and a sorry excuse for a UCLA team. It is way to early to judge the frosh class but certainly we better let these ‘talented’ recruits get the playing time they need (and expected when they signed on to come to UCLA). As for the sophs: way over rated and its not too early to say that. Just look around the country to find tons of players with more talent. It says volumes about how the high school players are rated and by whom. Finally the Srs: I can only speculate that they are just tired, demoralized and have no incentive. Beyond that, all three are just ordinary talents. I love MR though and see him as a great sixth man when he’s hot. I especially second the comment that CBH’s style of play and his “tough” practices and demeanor are not conducive to recruiting the biggest and the baddest nowadays. I worry (more than that, I’m convinced) that really top notch hs stars are watching this year’s team and will be saying no no to CBH’s offers, Josh Smith and Tyler Lamb notwithstanding (and don’t take their ultimate enrollment for granted). I hope that everyone is in this as much for the love of the game as they are for winning, cause there might be very little of the latter this year (and into the future). I don’t think CBH has done anything in his years at UCLA to warrant the adulation he’s received. Blasphemy! Blasphemy! He’s been fortunate to have like six NBA players on his teams and we all know that without superstars there are very few great coaches, including CJW (who is a great man, molder of fine individuals, instiller of values etc. etc., but was not a winner until Gail and Walt put him on the map and then Big Lew came out here followed by god knows knows how many more future HOF players.) Again, Blasphemy, Blasphemy! I would be worried about being banned were it not for the fact that it seems Nestor & Co. have come around to seeing (and admitting) some of the same things vis a vis this team and the Coach that others were pointing out prior to the Portland debacle. I don’t so much mind not getting to the Final Four. Not making the big dance at all, however, is not going to endear CBH (despite his three FF trips) to me and lots of other influential alumni (not to say I am influential). Prediction: if this season is as dismal as it portends to be, and next year is not a BIG IMPROVEMENT (all caps, not just a big improvement — like in a .500 record and third in Pac10 type of thing then the reign of CBH will come to the same end as has so many successors to Wooden. And my final note (of even more blasphemy and heresy): the Lavin years and therefore the Lavin coaching were not nearly as bad as you (many on this site, particularly N) would have us believe. I’m not going to look up the details, but my recollection is around a 65% winning overall record with playoff berths almost every year and a not too shameful recruiting record to boot. One might even argue (I am) that his style was more attractive to today’s hs hotshots than is CBH’s. So someone please, explain it to me. Why the hate Lavin trip? It must be that there were intangibles that I’m not aware of.

by classof67 on Nov 27, 2009 2:39 PM PST reply actions  

Lavin's style: "Here's the ball. Do whatever you want"

Yeah, I guess that would be more attractive to some ‘hotshot HS players’. Others- Baron Davis included- would have liked to have had someone on the sidelines that could do some coaching from time to time.

by insomniacslounge on Nov 27, 2009 3:11 PM PST up reply actions  

"Not too shameful recruiting record"

Who cares about that? Without that recruiting record, which btw completely fell apart his last few years, he wouldn’t have accomplished anything at all. Year after year he took one of the most talented teams in the country to regular season mediocrity before “salvaging” the season with a pair of wins the first weekend of the NCAA tournament. It’s simply incredible that you could say that Lavin was “not [that] bad” while also entertaining the notion that Howland’s job may not be safe.

Josh Smith and Tyler Lamb notwithstanding (and don’t take their ultimate enrollment for granted)

Oh, really?

by SuperBruinMan on Nov 27, 2009 5:50 PM PST up reply actions  

I agree with most of your post but...

paragraph breaks are a good thing. :P

33 Wins. Yeah, I said it.

by JETisKing on Nov 28, 2009 10:38 PM PST up reply actions  

Sit Dragovic for the rest of the year

I think Nestor said it perfectly in that Dragovic wasted 22 minutes. In fact, over the course of his time here, he’s a complete waste if he plays any more than 10 meaningful minutes in any game.
It has nothing to do with his off-court antics, and not even his ability (IMO). His problem is that he has no interest in playing as part of the team, and it shows. The most obvious example this year (so far) is a couple of games ago when he was on a break away and made no effort to catch the ball for an easy layup, instead letting it go slightly over his head and out of bounds. He turned around, shrugged his shoulders, and continued to play NO defense.
Without a lockdown defender this year, our team needs to rely on solid team-oriented defense. They were showing a little promise of improvement during the two games where Dragovic was suspended because they began to grow together. When Dragovic comes in and is clearly the weakest link, he disrupts the entire team defense.
Furthermore, Dragovic has proven that he only wants to throw up 15 3-pointers with the possibility of making 2-5 of them. It’s really disheartening.
The one role that Dragovic has done well is by coming off the bench when none of our shooters are hot, giving us the possibility of making a couple 3s right away and getting us back into rhythm. In that sense, he’s like an oversized Vujacic (for the Lakers). We can’t have him start, and it also helps explain some of the weaknesses of last year.

I don’t mean to be so critical of the guy, but he is clearly not a Ben Howland player. I really hope he gets cleared of all charges, since he is still a Bruin, but I just can’t stand watching him in there 20+ minutes per game. He’s obviously far from the only problem with this team, but as a Senior, he has no future role in this team and he’s only keeping UCLA’s extraordinarily young and inexperienced roster from gaining experience. I see Roll as a potential Bozeman-type player who can keep our team focused emotionally with his experience. But not Dragovic. Imagine what could happen if we give RN or BL 15-20 min per game and they develop something of an offensive game. Combine them with DG and we’re talking about an interior force to reckon with.

by longbordr52 on Nov 27, 2009 3:22 PM PST reply actions  

Agree, the problem starts at PG
1) why didn’t Coach Howland have a contingency plan when he knew the brat was going to leave at the end of the season (especially when recruits such as Donte Medder might have been open to coming to Westwood)

It seems like he didn’t think any of the lower rated options were good enough and thought it would be better to wait a year. He was lucky Westbrook was still available when Farmar left, and obviously there isn’t always going to be someone like that waiting. Hopefully we can get someone like McCallum to make up for it.

Ironically, IIRC the PG situation hurt us in recruiting for this year. UCLA recruited both Michael Snaer and Abdul Gaddy, but both were put off by the possibility of competing with 3 highly rated PG’s from the previous year. There was also some bad luck. IIRC Avery Bradley, Jordan Hamilton, Renardo Sidney, and Lance Stephenson were all somewhat interested (and would have been helpful) but were not viable options because of academics or other issues.

by SuperBruinMan on Nov 27, 2009 6:18 PM PST reply actions  

Adding insult to injury

Florida is about to knock off #2 MIchigan State…and they look damn talented, athletic, and underrated (much like 2006)

by TheTJCummingsEra on Nov 27, 2009 6:59 PM PST reply actions  

quick point about the draft and then some

i’ve seen some posts about how our loss of players early to the nba draft over the last few yrs shouldn’t be an excuse, i for one beg to differ. people mentioned unc and kansas as schools that seem to bounce back every year, but look hansborough was a four yr player and lawson also came back when he couldve entered the draft in 08 – what would unc have been if they had left early?
kansas was loaded with upperclassmen last year.
duke finds a way to keep guys and when they hit their dry patch was when rat face lost the touch in keeping his studs at dookie.
in the last few yrs we have lost some serious studs way early. cbh is bringing in the good ballers they’re just leaving, maybe he’s doing too good a job? to dismiss that is unfair.
i know it’s tough right now and there’s a ton of stuff going against our bballers right now. last night was gag-worthy. cbh’s player rotation is frustrating and our continued inability to handle a zone makes me pull my hair out. but i pray you bruin brothers and sisters- a little patience, some more faith, and a smidge of understanding =)

Across The Face

by rb bruin on Nov 27, 2009 10:19 PM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bruins Nation, an unofficial daily online scrap book covering the greatest collegiate athletic program in the nation. Established June 16, 2005. GO BRUINS.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
UCLA Vital Signs and the Chianti Cancer
Screen_shot_2011-07-27_at_9
UCLA Hockey Team Suspended Before Final Crosstown Cup Game vs. USC, Appeal Tomorrow
Small
MUST WATCH VIDEO: Rick Neuheisel & Jim Mora Talk UCLA Recruiting on CBSSports
Bruinut_helmetlogo-1d_small
Teachable Moments, Part 2
13-9_small
Tourney Results: Comparing UCLA to Elite Programs

Recent FanPosts

Licenseplate_small
UNC - Duke versus UCLA - Stanford. It's No Contest.
Ucla_trumpets_small
Photos from UCLA vs. Stanford
Small
Verne Harris, Glen Mayberry & Michael Greenstein-Atrocious
Small
Video: Santa Monica College OL Alexandru Ceachir talks about why he chose UCLA
Bruinsnation_small
Our Apologies for Recent Technical Issues on BN
Licenseplate_small
SI.com Gives Mora an A for Recruiting Class
Small
UCLA 2012 Football schedule - Predictions
Ucla__1__small
Can UCLA Find a Leader Like Univ. of Florida President J. Bernard Machen?
Small
7 Tips for Success From Superbowl Champion Coach
Uclabear1_small
UCLA’s Pathetic 11-12 Season: Hoops Expectations for Remaining Games

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Uclabear1_small Nestor

Arron_afflalo1_small Tydides

Brad_pitt_as_achilles_small Achilles

377011_2642084725867_1068030137_32302525_1166539782_n_small Ryan Rosenblatt

Telemachus_small Telemachus

Licenseplate_small gbruin

2761_small tasser10

Blue_bellerophon_small Bellerophon

Img_0052_2_small Patroclus

Small DCBruins

Of Counsels

094_small Ajax

Menelaus2_small Menelaus

Small Meriones

Small Odysseus

Associates

Eee_small freesia39

Uclabruins_small AHMB