it came out from my fanshot about the trojan times' certain writer's take of the timeout ordeal...
a few BNers have already called in the Times and told them they are canceling because of the crap writer's biased reporting.
I have to say, SUC gets a big publicity shot from the Times and it certainly helps recruiting when you decide to cover up all their negatives and continue to highlight the positives...think about our future recruits...young kids who are barely seniors in high school...
they pick up the Times and just realized how classless the BRUINS were...would you stick around and commit to a program that your local newspaper continues to bash and belittle? It's your football career here we're talking about.
The Times continues to be biased. We are still waiting for them to cover the SUC violations and antics off the field. If they do, it's always how petty the NCAA is...when it's the BRUINS, they go all out and run us to the ground.
It has to stop. The Times are struggling for subscriptions. They are near bankrupt. If we continue to cancel and write in specifically of their biased sports reporting...it will make a dent.
I know, it's nice to get the paper on your front door, but it's only a short walk to the next kiosk or read it online...can you do this for our BRUINS?