OC Register Writer Blasts Cheatey Petey, Lampoons Barkley As "Boy Blunder"
Meanwhile across town the natives are getting restless. Case in point check out the following piece from the OC Register, which is basically Orange County version of the Daily Trojan. It is absolutely ugly. The article entitled, "USC football: Glory days over if Bates stays," takes Pom Pom behind the woodshed:
[I]t was Carroll who doomed the Trojans’ season even before it started with a series of poor decisions and missteps at quarterback. And it’s Carroll who faces some hard decisions in the offseason if he is to put USC back into a position where it can challenge the Oregon schools and Stanford next season, to say nothing of assuming its annual spot in the national top five.
From the childish way he handed Mark Sanchez’s decision to skip his senior season and enter the NFL draft; to his hiring of Jeremy Bates as quarterbacks coach and then turning over the offense to him; to the bungling of the Aaron Corp start at Washington; to his constant, over-the-top hype of freshman quarterback Matt Barkley to the point where it bordered on delusional, Carroll botched every single major decision regarding the quarterback position.
As the clock wound down on the Trojans’ third loss in their final five games, Barkley was perhaps the most overrated player in the country, and it was largely Carroll’s fault.
Whether he was attempting to boost Barkley’s confidence — or perhaps shore up his own as he sent an unproven freshman quarterback into the season — Carroll’s endless hype of the former Mater Dei star created unrealistic expectations that no freshman, certainly not Barkley, could live up to. Carroll further compounded the foolishness of his endless promotion of Barkley by then placing Barkley’s future, and to a large extent that of the USC program, into the hands of someone just as in over his head as Barkley — Bates.
Barkley needed to be eased into the starter’s job. Instead, Carroll billed him as the next Palmer-Leinart-Sanchez-Elway-Unitas.
Barkley needed a teacher who would smooth his rough edges and elevate his game. Instead, Carroll handed him over to SlingBates.
No wonder we have been reading "rumors" about Bates being in the market for NFL gig (I wonder exactly who are floating the stories? Bates' agents desperate for his client to get him a new gig or Pom Pom's spin machine looking to transition another overhyped OC (following Chow) out of Heritage Hall (ooh look out Bear fans). Oh yeah, and here is the classic tidbit on the "Boy Blunder":
In the second half of the season, the Boy Wonder has become the Boy Blunder. Barkley threw six interceptions and four touchdowns in the last four game for a quarterback efficiency rating of 105.5. Barkley finished the season with 13 interceptions, the most by any Pac-10 quarterback or as many as the conference’s two other touted first-year starters, Stanford freshman Andrew Luck and Arizona sophomore Nick Foles, had combined. Just weeks after the hype started by Carroll actually had some wondering aloud whether Barkley was a legitimate Heisman candidate, the obvious question now is whether he is even the best quarterback on campus.
Woof. Read rest of his thoughts on Boy Blunder over here.
GO BRUINS.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of BruinsNation's (BN) editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of BN's editors.
19 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
God can you say spoiled?
A down year for USC still nets them a bowl and an above 500 season… I’d take above 500 on a breakout season right now!
I don’t see what their problem is with Barkley, I mean they saw Corp play right? They have an attention span? I mean it makes PERFECT sense to start your best QB… I wish WE had Barkley, if they don’t want him, I’ll take him
Back in business
Yeah
Even though I don’t think Barkley has lived up to surreal expectations set for him, I think he did ok. To call him a bust just after one season is crazy.
i hope they oust him
He’s just a short greyhound trip to the Morgan Center… he can grovel for a few minutes
Back in business
Agreed
In terms of off the court antics and overall dedication, Jrue was a total disappointment. I just had to throw that in there, especially after recent posts calling Jrue an “overrated scrub.” I really believe that the kid would have had a monster sophomore year. Oh well, “ifs and buts”
I wouldn't take him!
Character still counts to me. Barkley is where he should be as a freshman quarterback. He’s talented and has some growing pains to get through. However, after seeing him taunt us after “the bomb” by saying to our guys, “Look at the score.” i wouldn’t take him. He claims to be a devout Christian in the mold of Tebow. Where is taunting ever acceptable. His character is flawed. Give me a player with heart ala Cowan and I’ll support him through thick and thin.
its kinda like
if you let a chicken roam, you’ll lose the chicken. ESPN wouldn’t even know the difference between Matt Barkley and Danny Rees if Barkley came to UCLA… a la OSU "Savior of our peaking program"
Back in business
by ucla13_usc9 on Dec 14, 2009 10:04 PM PST up reply actions
Given Corp's performance against Washington
What exactly leads this writer to believe he would have been any better than Barkley?
No true freshman QB – not Matt Stafford, not Chad Henne, not Chris Leak, not Erik Ainge – over the past five years has finished with fewer than 3 losses at the end of the season. This is what you get when you a start a true freshman at quarterback. Yeah, he’s not the second coming this year, but no true freshman quarterback ever is.
SC’s real problem is their lack of receiver depth, and a porous defense. No one respected the pass agianst USC this year because their only decent receiver is Damien Williams. None of the other SC receivers have developed – Hazelton and Ausberry are two of the bigger receiver busts I can think of in recent memory. And keep in mind – Williams was a transfer. If anything, I think USC has a talent evaluation problem at this point.
A lot of their recruiting rankings over the past 3-4 years have been based on “We should give this kid 5 stars because USC is recruiting them, he must be good!”, and I think a lot of the deep talent evaluation has just fallen by the wayside. You look at the teams they fielded in 2004-2005, and then compare that to the depth on their team this year – just not the same.
Look at the list of their 2003 recruits: John David Booty, Lawrence Jackson, Steve Smith, Reggie Bush, LenDale White, Sedrick Ellis, Sam Baker, Fili Moala….
Now, compare to 2006, which you can use as a reference for the depth that should have been there this year: Vidal Hazelton (Bust), David Ausberry (Bust), Emmanuel Moody (Bust/Transferred), Allen Bradford, Antwine Perez (Bust/Transferred), Jemere Holland (Bust/Transferred), Shareece Wright (Bust), Stafon Johnson (Difficult to Place Now), and so on. About the only two or three servicable guys I can really look to on that list that have ‘panned out’ (and even portions of that is arguable) is Taylor Mays (he looked great until this year), Stafon Johnson, and Stanley Havili, who’s a freakin’ fullback.
So I think a lot of this can be traced back to just some poor recruiting decisions. Basically that entire 2006 recruiting class didn’t really pan out for USC, and that really hurt them this year.
And if you look at 2007 now, there’s already warning signs there’s further trouble ahead. Ronald Johnson, Marc Tyler and Corp you probably can already label as busts. Basically, I think a lot of the “OMG! USC just snagged all these 5 star-recruits!!!” was due to the fact that recruiting services started inflating USC targets’ star rankings because they were being recruited by USC. That’s starting to show on the field.
I don't get it
It’s U$C. Shouldn’t they be good just ‘cause? They should be in the top 5 no matter what, right? They have an annual spot reserved for them there, don’t they? I’m very confused. All this recruiting talk makes no sense to me. I thought Taylor Mays was robbed of the Heisman…
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
No kidding re: Corp and Washington
Washington’s pass defense is absolutely horrible. I mean, Kevin Craft was 10-15 against them. They’re a joke. And Corp looked awful against them. There’s no way they would’ve been bowl eligible with Corp playing.
Reading those commends
On the OC Register site is hi-lar-ious.
Someone was seriously arguing that Marc Tyler is better than both LaMichael James and LeGarrette Blount.
Attention USC fan: results on the field are what count, not recruiting rankings. Tyler hasn’t played a down of meaningful college football in two years.
what's the deal with mustain?
I still don’t get why he was good enough to win 8 games as freshman in the SEC but can’t smell the field at SC?
The other question is why in the world was Bradford not rushing the ball 30 times a game? You have a freshman quarterback, a great offensive line, and a huge powerful running back, and you barely use him.. Very strange…
"when you've seen how big the world is, how can you make due with this?"
by silverlakebruin on Dec 15, 2009 10:02 PM PST up reply actions
Mustain's decision to transfer to just$c has to be one of the classic blunders of all time.
Ranks right up there with Orenthal saying to his cronies, “I’ll just go up there and wave a guy around and we’ll get my stuff, then we’ll go get a beer.”
Not using Bradford
Always struck me as just immensely odd. Caroll’s fascination with Joe McKnight is one of the strangest things about their running back rotation. They could just play 3 yards and a cloud of dust with the OL and Bradford and be just fine.
I think Pete keeps expecting McKnight to turn in to Reggie Bush at any minute. Well, it’s been three years, and he’s still not Reggie Bush. Probably not going to happen.
The primary challenge with both Mustain and Corp is that they’re not ‘pro-style’ quarterbacks. USC started chasing star rankings instead of players that fit their ‘system’. That system demands a pro-style quarterback.
Bates has telepathic skills
Petey said he heard “The TD” playcall over the headset and thought,“great freaking call”. But he wasn’t wearing a headset at the time. Bates must’ve had telepathic skills.

by 




















