Ben Ball Roundup: Update On Nelson/Honeycutt, Howland's Thoughts On Bulldogs & Other Notes
So just two more days to go till the Finals weeks come to and end. Bruins will get back to practices tonight to prepare for Saturday's game against Mississippi State Bulldogs. I believe they are heading out to Anaheim on Friday. Hopefully the focus on finals and taking couple of days off from practices will allow freshmen such as RN more time to heal up and TH to get stronger as he works his way back to the rotation. Coach Howland gave updates on the status of his two key freshmen and his impressions on the Bulldogs yesterday.
Howland is optimistic that Nelson will be able to play on Saturday:
Nelson hasn’t missed any practice time because it’s finals week at UCLA and the Bruins didn’t practice on Monday or Tuesday. The Bruins are optimistic that he’ll be able to play Saturday against Mississippi State at the Wooden Classic in Anaheim.
"The main thing is there’s no significant damage to the eye," Howland said. "It could have been a lot of potential for bad things in a situation like that but everything seems pretty good."
Given how tough this kid has proven to be in early going, I will be surprised if he is not available on Saturday. Speaking of being available, Howland is hoping to get more mins for TH on Saturday. TH had a rough start on offense (shooting 1 for 6) in his first regular season game as a Bruin, however, he showed glimpses of his athleticism grabbing 6 boards in just 19 mins. From the LA Times:
Howland chalked up some of the rough play to jitters and said that he would have to use Honeycutt judiciously until the underclassman worked himself back into top shape.
But the Bruins need another body in the rotation, someone to take the load off Michael Roll, Malcolm Lee and Jerime Anderson, so Honeycutt may have to push himself in Anaheim this weekend.
"We're hoping he will be able to get more playing time," Howland said.
TH himself is focusing on getting back into the flow of the game:
"I felt like I did pretty good," he said. "I've just got to get back into the flow of the game."
It's not just TH. The entire team still has a lot of work to do in terms of having a flow and rhythm in offense. More on that and other notes after the jump.
Coach Howland talked about the need for the team to eliminate taking rush/hurried shots:Of the 61 field goals that UCLA attempted in the 73-61 loss to Kansas, Howland counted 14 that were ill-advised. That might explain why the Bruins rank last in the Pac-10 in field-goal percentage.The Bruins have connected on 42.5 percent of their field-goal attempts - that includes a 27.1 clip on 3-point shots - through seven games."We got way too anxious on a number of occasions, even in the first half, and early in the second half were we took bad shots," Howland said. "I think we’re going to have to really understand that we have to be more patient."When we can get Michael Roll and Nikola (Dragovic) and Malcolm (Lee) open for wide-open shots, they’re going to make them. But when they’re rushed and they’re hurried, it’s going to be much the same."
It is going to be interesting to see just how long Howland can remain patient with Dragovic. He had two airballs last game in addition to all the instances when he just seemed to forget the need for boxing out on the defensive side of the court. I am hoping somehow Honeycutt will find his scoring rhythm in the coming weeks. If that happens and Dragovic is still shooting less than 20 percent from behind the arc, I would have to think Howland will have no choice but to reduce his mins during the conference games.
Coach Howland also offered the following thoughts on Bulldogs:
On Mississippi State's offense:
"They have a very good point guard, Dee Bost, he's a smart player. Shoots almost 53 percent from threes thus far. They're a pretty good shooting team. They have another kid (Ravern Johnson), he's long athletic and a starting three-man, really a good athlete."
On Mississippi State's defense:
"They pressure you and try to get after you defensively. They can really get out and get after the ball. They're athletic. They're a very good rebounding team and obviously they block shots with the big guy inside."
It sounds like we can't expect much zone defense from the Bruins this weekend in Anaheim:
"You know what? Old Dominion, who's a really good team this year, tried to zone them and actually it didn't work. They do a lot more zoning that we do. We'll look at it but they're a good shooting team. It's a thing where we'll have to see how we do as the game progresses. At some point, we're going to use it. It's not going to be...I feel like our young guys, like Reeves Nelson and Tyler, they need to learn how to play man-to-man. We have to keep working on getting them better."
Given how good of the shooting team the Bulldogs are it makes sense. I think the key for our guys is going to be putting pressure with our on ball defense and then hustling around the rim to make sure we are not getting out-rebounded. This means our frontcourt (cough*Nikola*cough) can't take time off from boxing out and giving up easy rebounds to Jarvis Varnado.
I think we will have a good shot in winning the game if we can win the turnover margin, hold our own on the rebounding numbers, and play a smart and patient offense. It sounds so easy but has proven to be incredibily difficult with our team in the early going. Hopefully a somewhat healed up Nelson, healthier Honeycutt and a rested team will be difference for our guys on Saturday.
GO BRUINS.
0 recs |
14 comments
|
Comments
Maybe we should wish for the positive
Good snapshot.
But Instead of saying: “It is going to be interesting to see just how long Howland can remain patient with Dragovic”…
Maybe we should be saying: “Let’s hope that Dragovic and Roll get back to shoting percentage they were able to achieve last year.” If so, our offense improves dramatically.
Neither is a stellar defender and we need them to improve. But I would rather see them blossom than have to have CBH realize one or both wont
by Bruin Dad and Grad on Dec 9, 2009 9:32 AM PST reply actions
Regarding Roll & Dragovich
Playing hard as he does, Roll just lacks the skills nor caliber to be the floor leader. This is not to put him down, really. He plays well only when the entire team does, not the other way round. We like him, but in a retooling season that we are in currently, to put the burden on him to lead the team is simply asking too much of this fine young man.
Dragovich shoots with uncanny accuracy one moment and seems lost the next . It is a pattern these last three years. In the past, when we had players capable of carrying the team, his erratic, inconsistent performance hurt little. But right now, with the entire team struggling to find identity, let alone rhythm & what not, I really don’t want Howland to take any more chance on him. He must be a pretty good foreign student to gain admittance intio UCLA. His potentials must have also impressed Howland & company enough to offer him scholarship ( sight unseen so I heard ). Warts and all, this is also a fine young man despite some legal hassles off the court. I give him a pass when Howland & UCLA does. But at this critical juncture, right before regular conference games begin, we really cannot afford to count on him to, all of a sudden, blossom and be the kind of player the team desperately needs.
I hope you, Bruin dad & grad, won’t take umbrage at our honest, yet realistic assessments of these two Bruin basketball players.
Well, the only issue there is that defense is one component of the game where effort plays a huge, huge role – and last game we saw far too often Dragovic fail to make the effort – whether it’s will or focus l’m not sure, but even if Dragovic is hitting his D often negates his contribution on O…and when he’s not hitting on O…
Honeycutt seemed to move pretty well last game and l’m anxious to see how he progresses throughout the season. l have a feeling he will be our starting 3 sooner than later.
You know what, s.riley
Honeycutt reminds me of Darren Daye. But I know he will be a better version than Daye.
I'd play Keefe over Drago
The only reason to play Drago over Keefe is better shooting…and that ain’t happening. Keefe rebounds better, plays better defense and just brings better energy. I wish Keefe had some inside moves instead of just being a mediocre shooter but he is what he.
Right now Keefe’s shooting is same or better than Drago so since he brings better D, rebounding and energy why not give Keefe Drago’s minutes?
by RealisticBruinFan on Dec 9, 2009 1:58 PM PST reply actions
Totally agree
ND just cant find his shot, and JK actually has a pretty nice mid-jumper. CBH should start JK and bring in ND off the bench, if he hits he stays in and if he doesnt take him out. Too much of a liability on defense and rebounding.
Stats re Drago and JK
Drago has played in 5 games for a total of 145 minutes; Keefe has played in 7 games for a total of 145 minutes. Drago is 14/49 in FG (.286%), 7/31 in 3 point shots(.226%) and 10/15 in FT shooting (.667%) for a total of 45 points, an average of 9 ppg. Keefe is 10/23 in FG(.435%), 0/3 in 3 point shots(.000%) and 1/5 in FT shooting(.200%) for a total of 21 points, an average of 3 points per game. Drago has 6 offensive rebounds and 29 defensive rebounds for a total of 35; Keefe has 11 offensive rebounds and 19 defensive rebounds for a ; his total of 35 compares favorably with the much-praisedtotal of 30. Drago has 11 turnovers, 3 blocks and 3 steals; Keefe has 11 turnovers, 5 blocks and 4 steals. Drago was high point man(14) against Butler and high rebounder against Cal State Fullerton(14) and Butler(6). Keefe was high in rebounds(6) against Portland. ND has 5 assists in 5 games; Keefe has 9 assists in 7 games. Of course, stats are never the whole story, but Drago is not a bad rebounder; his 35 rebounds in 5 games and 145 minutes compare reasonably well with RN’s 37 in 7 games and 112 minutes, though RN’s rebounds are more evenly distributed between offensive and defensive (19/18) and RN, as we have all seen, is far more aggressive and energetic. Still, a rebound is a rebound and a point is a point. What I am getting at is that both JK and ND are significant members of this year’s team who are actually doing some good things when they are in the game. IMHO, it is not reasonable to de-value them so completely, as some posters seem willing to do. Or maybe I have misunderstood?
As we have noted
Dragovic’s rebounding numbers are somewhat inflated (and kind of worthless) given lot of those rebounds are result of him clanking bad shots. Not impressed with his rebounding ability much.
29 of ND's 35 Rebounds Are At The Defensive End
although it is entirely possible that he clanked some of his shots so badly that they rebounded off our backboard, all the way to the other team’s backboard, where he then grabbed the rebound.
I’m not arguing that ND should start — but he has been one of our leading rebounders.
However, RN, in far fewer minutes, is almost tied with him — though IIRC, RN’s tend to be O rebounds.
If we were talking about replacing ND with RN, there’d not be much of a debate.
sjh
Def.
I think we are mostly on the same page. I am not saying that we need to give ND to single digit mins. I think we should give him around 15-20 as of right now but not more than that. Still haven’t made up my mind on our entire rotation yet because have seen only 3 games so far.
oops. Messed up in the middle;
don’t remember what I was trying to say. Sorry.

by 





















